Health Research and Designs

Research and Designs

Review the article by Adams, Halligan, Watson, Ryan, Penn, Adamson, & White (2012). In your paper:
•Identify the hypothesis and/or research question(s) of the study.
•Explain the study design.
•Summarize the difference between qualitative and quantitative data/research. Indicate which variables/data in the study were qualitative and which were quantitative.
•Examine whether the data collected for this research provided a solid answer to the research question or supported the hypothesis.

The assignment must be three to four pages in length, excluding the title and reference pages, and formatted according to APA guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Use at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the workbook article, to support your discussion. The scholarly sources should be from a peer-reviewed journal found in the Ashford University Library.

The Health Research and Designs paper
•Must be written in your own words and may not include quotations. Papers including quotes will not be accepted. All content from outside sources must be paraphrased and cited appropriately.
•Must be three to four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
•Must include a separate title page with the following:
◦Title of paper
◦Student’s name
◦Course name and number
◦Instructor’s name
◦Date submitted

•Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.

•Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

behavioral health science

you should write between 700 and 750 words for each question.

2- your answers must be based on the articles and lectures.

5- use simple parenthetical citations in your essay. Do not use long quotations. Quotations over the equivalent of two lines will result in a reduced grade.

6- you must have a clear thesis statement that responds to the prompt and answers the question. Your argument must be logical, clear, coherent and evidence-based. You must use detailed, concrete, and specific examples from the articles and lectures for your evidence. You must list the articles and lectures used as evidence at the end of each question, for example: Talley lecture, Social Ecological Framework or Kreuter et al., “The impact of implementing selected CBPR strategies to address disparities in Atlanta.” This will not be part of the word count for the essay.

QUESTION 1

The social ecological framework was presented in class as providing many possible avenues for research and program implementation. Using the required readings and lectures, write about the pros and cons of a social ecological framework for understanding health behaviors and designing health promotion programs. Your analysis should lead to a conclusion about the framework.

Gifted Education: Affective Development

Part 1
The case study simulates a teacher’s experience of working with diverse gifted students in a regular classroom. It is written as a sequence of events and information over a period of time to simulate the way a teacher is acquainted with their class and gradually finds out about their students over time and with thoughtful purpose.
You, as the teacher Mrs Lipman, in collaboration with your topic colleagues, will consider the questions arising in the case notes and discuss your responses. This will document your ideas about the students and the teacher’s response. There are opportunities here for you to read the literature about the issues raised to help inform your ideas and responses.

PART 2
Readings review & critical reflection (approximately 1500 words)
There will be a discussion thread on for each student. (willSign up to research one student) and use the thread for that student to discuss, share research findings and critically reflect on the behaviours, needs and provisions for this student.
There are 3 aspects to this assignment
• Discussing your student, their needs and possible provisions with your collaborators in a Internet discussion forum. There will be a sign-up sheet on Internet for you to select one of the 8 gifted students in the case study for further investigation. You and a partner will take on the role of Mrs Lipman, and discuss on Internet that student’s characteristics, behaviours and consider their learning needs.
• Completing a review of 2 readings that explore the theories and implications for teaching that relate to your student’s specific needs. Use the 3 column critical reflection format and post this on Internet Each person who is researching a particular student will read 2 (different) papers that help to inform knowledge about the issue, student needs and appropriate provisions. The review will be posted to the discussion forum for their student (approximately 500 words, NGP).
• Writing an individual critical reflection to submit on internet (approx. 1000 words) Using all the information from the case notes, the discussions, and the literature review, critically reflect on what you have learned. Your critical reflection will address the following questions:
* What is this student’s affective issue of most concern and how is it defined or explained in the literature and evidenced in the case study?
* Why might this student experience difficulties at school and in general?
* How might you (as Mrs Lipman) address this student’s needs within the regular classroom?
In conclusion, you may wish to reflect on what this PBL assignment has taught you about yourself, your beliefs and your approach to teaching.

Explanation of the 3 column approach to reviewing the readings:
Eliciting important ideas and impressions from reading the literature involves more than simply summarising what was written (particularly at Postgraduate level). Much of our knowledge is acquired through reading, so it is important to get the most out of the readings as possible by focusing on a range of different questions.
By writing these ideas in this way,
– you are more likely to learn and remember the content of what you have read
– you will build a useful ‘library’ of reference notes that you may well come back to in other contexts
– your reactions to what you are reading are captured in the moment
– the process will provide useful insights when it comes to writing your assignments
You may need to read the article a few times – once for meaning and general impressions and secondly for deeper interpretation of ideas, meaning, perspective…

An Evaluation of Training as a Strategy for Human Capital Development for increasing Productivity of the power sector in kenya: A Case of Power Holding Company

INTRUCTIONS FOR WRITING THE LITERATURE REVIEW
Present and analyse in a critical manner, in a way that the literature will be relevant to the research topic and to act as the basis for a fuller understanding of the context in which you are conducting the research on. Remember critical does not mean looking at the negatives but forming an evaluation.
Show the key variables, trends and ‘actors’ that are in the environment of the study, i.e. Training, Human Capital Development, Organizational Productivity, show the important issues that needs to be investigated.
The literature review is presented in the form of a précis, a classification, a comparison and a critical analysis of that material which is germane to a full understanding of your research study. Such published material may be drawn from all, or a combination of, textbooks, journal articles, conference papers, reports, case studies, the Internet, magazine features or newspaper articles. It should be remembered, however, that the most important source of academic literature are journal articles and you should ensure that you are familiar with the most recent publications in journals relevant to your subject area. Importance of presenting a rounded debate: all the relevant arguments and the counterarguments
1 The introduction of the Literature review might include:
• A definition or description of topic in general terms, or of the issues you propose to investigate – this will give the reader a context in which the literature may be viewed.
• The key trends in this sector of the literature, the main theories and areas of disagreement, and possibly, gaps in the literature.
• An explanation of why you are conducting this literature review and the standpoint you will be adopting when conducting your critical analysis.
• The manner in which the review will be presented. • An explanation as to why, if appropriate, some literature has not been included in the study.
2 The Main Body of the Literature Review
3 This might include:
• Begin with a discussion of the main theories or models, which are appropriate to the study.
• Group together appropriate themes or trends and discuss them in detail.
• Begin in general terms and then narrow down to specific details, this applies to the entire literature review and to individual sections.
• Try to explain and, if possible, to resolve conflicts in what you report.
• Cover all the topics which are relevant to the dissertation.
• Be comprehensive enough to act as a suitably firm foundation, such that it will support the research in the remainder of the dissertation.
• Be up to date – always try to employ the most contemporary journal articles or sources. The Conclusion of the Literature Review At the end of the Literature Review, in this conclusion, you should make explicit what exactly the research objectives of the research are, so that the reader is in no doubt as to what you are about to investigate. In order to do this, you should:
• Summarise the major points that the literature review has uncovered.
• Point out the gap(s) in the literature, if there are any, and use these to emphasise the justification for carrying out the current research project.
• Remember that your literature review should lead and justify the research objectives and questions of your dissertion

Scope of Practice

Read the scope of practice for your chosen leadership role. Please choose one scope of practice competency (or one essential for Clinical Nurse Leaders) that was a surprise or new to you and share how you might develop competency in this area. Why is important to know your scope of practice and the scope of practice for those that you will lead?

PUBLIC HEALTH LEADERSHIP and ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE at the FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL levels.

Describe and explain the variation in PUBLIC HEALTH LEADERSHIP and ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE at the FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL levels. Compare and contrast the roles and responsibilities of the chief executive or key leader for EACH level. Use the literature to justify your position and/or to provide examples.
CREATE AN INTRODUCTION WITH A STRONG THESIS STATEMENT. DO NOT WRITE A CONCLUSION.
References need to be a peer-reviewed academic journal or books.

Research and MSN Roles Worksheet

roles of MSN in relationship to research and evidence-based practice

Role of the MSN
1. Research
2. Evidence-Based Practice

Clinical Nurse Leader (CNL)
1. Research
2. Evidence-Based Practice

Staff Nurse (MSN)
1. Research
2. Evidence-Based Practice
Nurse Practitioner (NP)
1. Research
2.Evidence-Based Practice
Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS)
1. Research
2.Evidence-Based Practice
Please use 65 word count for each Research response and Evidence based practice response

Valid & Relevant Internet Resources

& Relevant Internet Resources

Identify / locate 5 Internet websites that provide tools/information/resources relevant to your logic model and outcomes measurement plan that you are developing for your final project.

Example: The resource might support the “theory of change” or provide indicators for outcome measures.

You must determine that the resources are validity/reliability/quality Internet resources/websites. You may have to access an Internet resource to determine appropriate criteria for assessing the validity of Internet resources, which you can also site.

Develop a table which a) identifies the Internet/website resource with a short description, b) usefulness of the sites for developing/supporting the logic model / outcomes measurement plan, and c) your assessment that sites are valid / relevant, based on the criteria you researched.
TABLE:
a) Internet Link / Description

b) Relevance to Logic Model

c) Criteria for Validity / Relevance
Goals and Objectives:
To ensure that the older adults access supportive and healthcare services necessary for their health and wellbeing
To make certain that the older are included in community activities
To enhance accessibility to basic needs for the older adults
To ensure the safety of the older adults

“When is a child at harm?”

critically analyzing the topic above, please draw from an epidemiological risk perspective, as well as from a least one other risk perspective to support your argument (i.e. consumer, social constructionist, or human rights perspective). Consider the role of social work in assessing risk in this area. You may focus on the issue broadly as the statement or question is currently written, or you may consider analysing a more specific experience within the topic (you might prefer to consider this in relation to a specific type of harm to children i.e. physical harm or neglect).
Assessment criteria: This essay will be marked according to your ability to:
• demonstrate your knowledge of the particular practice issue (child maltreatment ) from an epidemiological perspective
• demonstrate your knowledge of the particular practice issue from at least one other perspective (consumer, social constructionist, human rights)
• demonstrate your understanding of assessing risk in social work practice in relation to this issue
• explicitly use the relevant chapter from the core text in addition to other relevant literature to support your arguments. • express your ideas in a coherent and scholarly manner
• use relevant references appropriately (APA 6 th).

Legal issues

work Pages from text book listed below
As e-commerce continues to grow in the United States and abroad, new consumer protection laws are needed. Use the Internet to research recent developments in consumer protection for transactions through cyberspace. (Kubasek et al., 2013, p. 754-5). Consider cyberspace consumer protections that may affect the business in which you work, in which you would like to work, or from a situation you have experienced. Think of this issue from the perspective of a business working with customers; consider how protecting customers may cost your business profits, or, how it might make your business profits by “differentiating” your business from others like it. Then, consider this from the perspective of a legislator or regulator, trying to protect customers from this situation. (Some ideas: identity theft, credit card interest rates, airline baggage fees, etc.). Be creative.
Make a recommendation for a government regulation, or law that you would like to see enacted. Think of the consequences (good and bad) of the proposed regulation or law that you have suggested to businesses, and to consumers. Consider any unintended consequences that might occur. Your paper should have the following sections:
1. Regulation or law proposal. Be very specific in the wording. (Your own idea and words). (20 points).
a. What problem did you find in your research online that your regulation plans to address? Include a citation to the article(s) that describes the problem. (10 points)
b. What consequences might your proposed regulation/law have on affected businesses? Describe one good and one bad consequence. (10 points)
c. What consequences might your proposed regulation/law have on protected consumers? Describe one good and one bad consequence. (10 points)
d. Consider unintended consequences. What might one be? Describe it. (5 points).
2. References
o Include a reference(s) from the problem(s) you found in your online research. (5 points)
o APA formatting required. (5 points)
Check Investors a “debt collector,” collecting “debts,” within the meaning of the FDCPA? If so, did its methods violate the FDCPA? What might Check Investors use to argue in its defense? Discuss. Explain.
7. CrossCheck, Inc., provides check authorization services to retail merchants. When a customer presents a check, the merchant contacts CrossCheck, which estimates the probability that the check will clear the bank. If the check is within an acceptable statistical range, CrossCheck notifies the merchant. If the check is dishonored, the merchant sends it to CrossCheck, which pays it. CrossCheck then attempts to redeposit the check. If this fails, CrossCheck takes further steps to collect the amount. William Winterstein took his truck to C&P Auto Service Center, Inc., for a tune-up and paid for the service with a check. C&P contacted CrossCheck and, on its recommendation, accepted the check. When the check was dishonored, C&P mailed it to CrossCheck, which reimbursed C&P and sent a letter to Winterstein, requesting payment. Winterstein filed a suit in a federal district court against CrossCheck, asserting that the letter violated the FDCPA. CrossCheck filed a motion for summary judgment. Who won? Explain.
8. 25-16
.
For these reasons, the FTC must step in to protect our children from these money-hungry marketers. To fail to do so is to jeopardize America’s future: its children.
• 1. What primary ethical norm is downplayed by this argument?
• 2. In this argument, what is the relevant rule of law to which the author refers?
• 3. What reasons does the author give for tighter control of advertising aimed at children?
• 4. Please state opposing arguments to those set out by the author in this essay.
ASSIGNMENT ON THE INTERNET
As e-commerce continues to grow in the United States and abroad, new consumer protection laws are needed. Now that you know something about current consumer protection laws in the United States, use the Internet to research recent developments in consumer protection for transactions through cybers