Author: admin

 
Learning outcomes tested in this assignment On successful completion of this unit students will be able to:

1. Understand the abnormal disease processes responsible for the development of immunological diseases, their diagnosis and treatment.
2. Understand the abnormal disease processes responsible for the development of several haematological conditions, their diagnosis and treatment, in addition to knowledge of blood groups systems (groups other than ABO and Rh), and use of blood products.
3. Understand the principles and problems of transfusion and transplantation
4. Understand the principles of a variety of analytical assays used in the fields of Immunology, Haematology and Transfusion/Transplantation
5. Develop skills to interpret and handle data from diagnostic techniques which are used to facilitate patient diagnosis.

Assignment task instructions Prepare a case study in the format of a poster on lymphoma.
The marking criteria for the student’s report are as follows:
-fulfilment of the requirements of the assignment task (including adherence to any word page length specified);
-evidence of reading around the subject at the appropriate level, (predominantly papers), with correct and complete citation and referencing of sources using Harvard Referencing;
-demonstrating appropriate relevance and understanding of recent research pertaining to chosen report and ability to convey information in a succinct manner;
-evidence of critical thinking and evaluation of sources of information; delivery of a clear, well-structured, visually appealing poster;
-standard and style of written English, grammar, spelling, punctuation and use of appropriate scientific terminology.
Format and structure of the submission Maximum word limit is 600 words excluding the reference list, figure and table captions. The poster should be produced digitally for e.g. using PowerPoint or other similar software. Students are advised to use sub-headings to structure their poster. All sources of information and images should be cited using the Harvard Referencing format or Vancouver format

 
QUESTION 1

Tina and Martin are both employed in the personnel department of Financial Services Ltd as personnel assistants. They both started working for the company at the same time but after five years Martin is paid more than Tina even though they work for the same number of hours. Also Martin receives more days holiday per year than Tina. Tina is arguing that she should receive the same pay and holiday as Martin.

Susan is employed in the secretarial department. She has discovered that her pay (and that of other secretarial staff) is about half of that received by staff in the marketing department, all of whose members are male. She has complained that this difference in pay amounts to sex discrimination and that she should be paid the same salary as the marketing staff.

Rachel works part-time in the personnel department. Most of the staff employed part-time in the department are female. Rachel has complained that part-time staff are excluded from the company’s sick pay and occupational pension schemes. She complained about this but was told that it was too costly and therefore not financially viable to include part time staff in the schemes. Rachel is arguing that this exclusion amounts to sex discrimination.

Rita and Tom both applied for a job in the sales department. They were both equally qualified and experienced but the job was offered to Tom. Rita was told “the sales job requires long hours and a lot of stamina, we do not think it is a job for a woman”.
Rita is arguing that she has been a victim of sex discrimination.

Advise Tina, Susan, Rachel and Rita on the basis whereby EU law on sex discrimination (Art 157 TFEU) can be argued to the above events and critically assess whether each could be successful in actions against the company for sex discrimination

QUESTION 2

Pueblo is a Spanish farmer of sheep and dairy cattle. There was an outbreak of sheep rot in some EU member states, although Pueblo’s farm was not affected. As a result of this disease, trade in live sheep was restricted in the EU although an all clear was recently announced. When Pueblo attempted to import some live sheep into France the French authorities required him to pay for a health inspection.

Pueblo exported milk to the UK. At the port of arrival he was required to pay a fee for storage and checking. He then paid a further amount for onward transportation.

Pueblo’s farm also produces different types of cheese. He imports some high quality cheese to Germany. The German authorities levy a 20% tax rate on Pueblo’s cheeses compared to a 10% tax on equivalent German cheeses. The authorities argue that this is justified as German cheeses are produced by environmentally friendly methods.

Pueblo discovered that alternatives to cheese (such as cold meat and food spreads) have only a 5% tax levied on them in Germany. Pueblo is arguing that this is affecting the sales of his cheeses in Germany.

Critically discuss and advise Pueblo as to how the law on the free movement of goods (as applied by Articles 30 and 110 TFEU) can be argued to the various payments and taxes levied in the above scenario.

QUESTION 3

Critically analyse the extent to which conduct by undertakings that may affect competition is regulated by Article 101 TFEU.

Your answer should include specific case examples and evidence of background reading.

QUESTION 4

Brewmaster plc is a company based in the UK that produces beers and soft drinks. It has recently experienced the following issues in relation to trading its products within the EU:

(a) Belgium requires that beers sold within the country comply with Belgian labelling rules. All Belgian beers comply with this, but Brewmaster’s beers do not. Brewmaster argue that this is unfair as it would be too costly to label their beers differently for Belgium. Belgium also requires that the labelling states a health warning. Brewmaster’s beers do not include this. As a result of these requirements Brewmaster are prevented from selling their beers in Belgium.

(b) Bewmaster would like to sell its soft drinks in Germany. The German authorities state that Bremaster’s soft drinks contain additives which are prohibited in Germany which has banned all imports that contain the additives. Bewmaster argue that their soft drinks are accepted elsewhere in the EU and therefore should be accepted in Germany.

(c) Recently, due to high alcohol consumption in Sweden the Swedish authorities have introduced a law that restricts the advertising of alcoholic drinks. This has made it more difficult for Brewmaster to promote their beers in Sweden causing them to lose market share in favour of national brewers.

Critically discuss how EU law on the free movement of goods (as applied by Articles 34 and 36 TFEU and relevant case law) can be applied to the above events and advise Brewmaster on whether the restrictions they have encountered are likely to be in breach of EU Law.b