Category: Business

Write a 700- to 1,050 word proposal that includes the following information:

1. Describe a new compensation plan for your employment team.
2. Explain why your pay system will work.
3. Describe three components of a total rewards package that would motivate employees to reach peak performance.
4. Describe your compensation plan’s benefits to the individual as well as to the company.

 

Review the completed Week One assignment, Management Behavior, the Week Two assignment Career Development Plan Part

Job Analysis and Selection, the Week Three assignment Career Development Plan Part II

Development of Training and Mentoring Program, and the completed Week Four assignment Career Development Plan Part III Performance and Career Management.

 

 

 

 

Place an order for an original paper based on similar instructions with us today. You will receive 100% original essay written from scratch. You are also guaranteed timely delivery in keeping with your deadline, 24/7 customer support and direct communication with your writer throughout the order preparation process.

 

 

 

Obama care: The financial,economic, and social impact on U.S. business and the American people .

10 Minute powerpoint presentation. A 10 minute powerpoint presentation summarizing the whole research proposal.

Place an order for an original paper based on similar instructions with us today. You will receive 100% original essay written from scratch. You are also guaranteed timely delivery in keeping with your deadline, 24/7 customer support and direct communication with your writer throughout the order preparation process.

The expected outcomes of the course
On successful completion of this course, students should be able to:
1. record transactions and prepare financial reports for partnerships
2. describe the conceptual accounting framework and apply the concepts financial
reporting
3. record transactions relating to the management of receivables and inventories
4. describe and account for non-current assets and liabilities
5. identify the profit effects of inventory costs methods
6. prepare properly classified financial statements
7. undertake financial analysis.

Requirement Details:
Consider the following scenario. 25 Marks
Assume your best friend has come into some money to the amount of $10,000. They have decided to
invest this $10,000 into shares in one company listed the stock market. You have just started an
accounting degree so your friend offers to share the $10,000 equally with you if you will prepare a
report on the following three companies they are interested in investing in. As you do feel fairly
competent reading financial statements, you accept the offer. The three companies chosen by your
friend are:
ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Public, ASX: ANZ)
Virgin Blue Holdings Ltd (Public, ASX: VBA)
Wesfarmers Ltd (Public, ASX: WES)
To decide how to allocate the $10,000 among shares of the three companies, you should collect and
analyse information on both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of these companies, and produce
your report from this information.
Ensure your final report is professionally presented in the correct format (including a table of contents)
and is easy to follow. Please use the correct system of referencing (note: You do not have to reference
your figures used in your ratio calculations). You do not need to attach the companies? annual reports or
financial statements as appendices. Ensure you write in academic language, including using correct
spelling, grammar and punctuation.
Your required report should include the following:
Course Profile for: ACCT19084, 2010 Term Three – Page 7
1. Executive Summary (200 words): You must provide a brief overview of what the report (your
assignment) is about, and your conclusion.
2. Introduction (300 words): This should include an accurate but succinct and concise description of
each company. Aspects that may be addressed include the industry the company is in; size (broad);
time it has been in business; any recent changes to the company. You also need to explain briefly
what you are hoping to achieve with your analysis.
3. Body:
a. Quantitative Analysis (600 words): This is achieved by financial statement analysis,
calculating the ratios below. You are to utilize the 2009 annual financial reports of these
companies (you can access these via the Connect4 online library database, or via the
respective companies? websites). You will need to clearly explain what each ratio means, in
addition to your calculation. You may calculate other ratios in addition to those below, but be
aware that penalties will be applied if you have calculated every ratio you have learnt. You
need to justify the use of any extra ratios with respect to what you are trying to achieve by
your analysis (eg. You are interested in investing).
i. Earnings per ordinary share
ii. Price Earnings ratio
iii. Dividend yield
iv. Book value per ordinary share
v. ROA or ROE
vi. Liquidity ratio/acid ratio
Please place your calculations/workings as an Appendix to your report, rather than within the
body of your report.
b. Qualitative Analysis (600 words): You are to utilize the qualitative information contained in
the 2009 annual reports of the companies in addition to other information you may find about
each company. Further qualitative information may be acquired online via the respective
companies? websites or from other resources, such as business press (eg. Australian Financial
Review, the business section of the Age or magazines like Business Review Weekly).
Qualitative characteristics you may consider include: general information about corporate or
business segments; latest key information about a company (eg. Stock or capital market
media releases); strategic direction and corporate focus of the company; social or
sustainability practices (environmental, community/employee programs, etc); industry or
economic factors pertinent to the company; unique attributes or practices of the company.
4. Discussion (500 words): Based on the analysis you have performed above, comment on each
company and whether or not they have been profitable (eg. Have they provided good returns to
shareholders in the past?). Ensure that your comparisons between the companies are valid (eg.
Allowed for differences between industries or utilized industry averages for benchmarking). Also
ensure that you give equal consideration in your discussion to both qualitative and quantitative
aspects. Finally, you need to address any shortcomings or limitations of your analysis.
5. Conclusion (300 words): You need to state your investment decision about which company you
would recommend investing the money in. Then summarise your analysis and discussion above to
justify your decision.
Course Profile for: ACCT19084, 2010 Term Three – Page 8
Marking Scheme
Maximum marks Marks Received
Content (20 marks):
Executive Summary: Reason for report and recommendation. 2
Introduction: Concise summary of companies. 1.5
Quantitative Analysis: calculation of ratios 3
Quantitative Analysis: explanation of ratios 3
Qualitative Analysis: accuracy of answer 1.5
Qualitative Analysis: comprehensiveness of answer 2
Discussion on each company based on analysis: Accuracy of
interpretations 3
Discussion on each company based on analysis:
Shortcomings of analysis. 1
Conclusion: State investment decision 1
Conclusion: Justification of investment decision 2
Presentation (5 marks):
Correct report format 2
Correct in text & end list referencing 2
Correct academic language, spelling, grammar, punctuation 1
Total 25
Grade: HD D C P F
21.25< 18.75< 16.25< 12.5< 12.5>

 

 

 

 

Place an order for an original paper based on similar instructions with us today. You will receive 100% original essay written from scratch. You are also guaranteed timely delivery in keeping with your deadline, 24/7 customer support and direct communication with your writer throughout the order preparation process.

 

 

Select two articles in academic research journals related to the field of leadership and/or the topic you are working on this semester. For the purposes of this assignment make sure that the articles contain a substantial literature review.

Read the article and then provide the following information, where possible, in your summary of the literature review:

1. Provide information about the articles by journals, authors, dates, page numbers, etc.

2. What was the purpose of the research-why did the authors undertake the projects?

3. Are there clear statements of the basic research questions or problems? Try to state what they are in a sentence for each.

4. Was there a research question or hypothesis?

5. Do the literature reviews relate to the research questions?

6. Did the authors evaluate, organize, and/or synthesize in the literature review? How would you evaluate the efforts?

7. Did the authors use any of the following techniques that Leedy and Ormrod suggest that those doing literature reviews should use? Indicate what they did and how successfully you felt the authors used any of them:

a. Comparing and contrasting theoretical perspectives

b. Showing how approaches to the topic changed over time

c. Describing general trends in the research findings

d. Identifying discrepant or contradictory findings, and suggesting possible explanations

e. Identifying general themes that run through the literature

8. How did the literature review in the articled you critiqued help you understand how to do your own literature review?

 

 

 

 

Place an order for an original paper based on similar instructions with us today. You will receive 100% original essay written from scratch. You are also guaranteed timely delivery in keeping with your deadline, 24/7 customer support and direct communication with your writer throughout the order preparation process.

Preferred language style: English (U.S.)

Cases are to be approached with a decision-making orientation of a single individual at some specific point in time. Students should take the approach that allows them to show the greatest depth of insight into the case.

1. Select a single person whose role you will play in the case. (Initially these will be assigned beforehand). Normally this person will be mentioned by name or by position in the case. Once you have chosen an individual, you must be that person as much as possible for the analysis. You cannot imbue this person with “desirable” characteristics that differ from those directly given or indirectly deducible from case facts and evidence. You are stuck with this person’s strengths, weaknesses, history, preferences, power and limitations. Once you have chosen an individual, you cannot assume that this person possesses all case facts. If there are case facts that your individual would not normally know, you must at least give a hint as to how this individual obtained this information. 2. Select the decision to be made (e.g. the most difficult, the most important, and/or the most interesting). This decision can be one that has been made before the case begins, that occurs during the period of the case, or that must be faced at some time subsequent to the end of the case. The decision selected should be a challenging one and should provide significant opportunity for the student to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the issue. 3. Select a single point in time. Once you have chosen, you are stuck with the information that was known at that time. You cannot assume this individual has knowledge of case facts that are known to you, but that had not occurred by the time chosen for your analysis. There is one exception to this limitation. For the person you have chosen, you may use future actions/statements by that person as indications of that individual’s character. Presumably the individual’s values are known to that individual, but the reader finds these out only during the case events, some of which may take place after your selected point in time. 4. Do not summarize the case. Use case facts only to support your analysis; they have no independent value. Students may not modify case facts, but may interpret, supplement or challenge them as they see fit. 5. There is never “enough” information in cases. The cases are real and you may supplement your knowledge by library or other research. It is difficult, though not impossible, to receive an “A” grade without demonstrating outside research. Each case has a bibliography at the end. If there is still some piece of information that is both missing and critical, you may assume some “logical” fact (provide me with a footnote or some other hint to your analysis of why this missing information is important and why your assumption is “logical”). Present your case analysis in the following format: a. At the top of the paper indicate your choices of individual and point in time. b. “Problem finding” is frequently the most difficult part of the analysis. It is a skill that takes intellect, creativity, effort and practice. State the problem faced by this individual succinctly (one clear sentence if possible). This statement should reveal the issue you see as the focus of your analysis and should necessitate a decision on the part of your chosen individual. This sentence is often the last one to be written in final form, since your views will change as you go deeper into the analysis. A provisional statement will be enough to get you started, since it is likely to be revised more than once. The remainder of this paragraph will explain why this is such a problem for this individual. This explanation might include such items as individual strengths/weaknesses, constraints (time, power, information), opportunities, complicating factors and how they are important to understanding the problem. “Problem finding” may be the most difficult part of the analysis, since it should not be stated to obviate any particular choice among alternatives. You may find particular difficulty when the “problem” is clear to you, but is unlikely even to be sensed by the individual you have selected. c. Indicate the goals and objectives this person has that are directly related to the problem above. “Maximizing profits” is probably too general to help in a specific instance. Be as precise as possible. Individuals are not limited to “worthy” motives. Organize this section around 2 or 3 major goals; otherwise confusion and conflict will result from a “laundry list” of desirable outcomes. These goals and objectives should form the foundation for your analysis of the alternatives. d. Devise the means by which this individual can measure the attainment (or progress toward achieving) these goals. If you cannot measure goal attainment, then perhaps you ought to reword your goals. e. Order the major alternative solutions-rejected solutions first. There should be at most 2 or 3 alternatives. i. For each rejected solution, indicate first, the reasons why the individual considered this alternative at all. What are the positive aspects of this course of action? (Relate to the goals and lbjectives section). [If there are no positive aspects, then this is not a viable alternative and should not be included here (any fictitious and unrealistic alternatives will be termed “straw man” choices). If an “alternative” is not truly viable and realistic, then put its rejection into the problem paragraph as a constraint or totally eliminate it.] Then for each rejected alternative, you should indicate why it is rejected (based on goals and objectives). ii. For the chosen alternative, indicate first, any drawbacks this individual sees in following this path. Then indicate why this is the best alternative. This is often a lengthy analysis and would include some assessment of the uncertainties involved. f. Indicate any specific actions this individual will take to implement and enforce this decision. Be as specific as possible. The analysis does not end merely by making a choice among alternatives. If an action is common to all alternatives, it probably belongs in the implementation section. 7. When finished, the case analysis should “hang together” in the sense that the chosen alternative should have some chance of solving the problem and achieving the stated goals. You will frequently find that you will have to reevaluate your statement of problems and goals continuously as the analysis proceeds.

 

 

 

Place an order for an original paper based on similar instructions with us today. You will receive 100% original essay written from scratch. You are also guaranteed timely delivery in keeping with your deadline, 24/7 customer support and direct communication with your writer throughout the order preparation process.

You have been working for Global Delivery Company for the past two years. During that time they have treated you well, giving you two salary increases and better than average yearly reviews. You have made a number of friends at the company and much of your social life has revolved around these friends and the company. To this point there has been very little turnover and, with the exception of normal water cooler chat, little controversy regarding the policies and procedures of the company.

However, you have just heard that Susan, a 58 year old employee who has been with the company for 26 years has been let go for no apparent reason and replaced with a 19 year old man who is the younger brother of Susan’s manager.

You barely know Susan and, for that matter, you do not know many people who know Susan outside of work. She has a reputation of being a conscientious and hard worker, seldom missing a day, and being pleasant to work with. Several of your co-workers are extremely upset with the situation and see it as a foreshadowing of things to come.

Using the information that you have taken from the text and from the class, discuss this situation as it affects you and your co-workers. Be sure to take into account the three specific components of attitude — cognitive, affective, and behavioral. Describe your perceptions and the perceptions of others. Is there a role conflict? Are there ethical issues involved? How do you view GDC, the company for whom you work?

Based on all this, analyze the situation as you see it in a paper of between 750 and 1000 words.
 

 

 

Place an order for an original paper based on similar instructions with us today. You will receive 100% original essay written from scratch. You are also guaranteed timely delivery in keeping with your deadline, 24/7 customer support and direct communication with your writer throughout the order preparation process

If you’re unable to open .docx, .xlsx, .pptx files please check this
page http://www.singaporedelivery.com/open-office-2007/ or
http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/866

Look at 3 primary criteria:

1- Relevance of the research question from both a managerial and an
academic perspective
a. Managerial: will your research bring added-value to improve managerial
practices?
b. Academic: will your research bring new knowledge to your field? Is the
research methodology rigorous?
2- Research feasibility
a.      Is your research feasible in a period of 4 years?
b.      Is data easily accessible?
c.      Will it be easy to collect primary data?
3-      Proposal quality
a.      Writing style
b.      Argumentation
c.      Structure and organization

When writing this proposal, take care to answer the following questions:
How Interesting and important is my research? Is my research feasible? Can
I produce an excellent dissertation and subsequent academic papers?

Formatting requirements
The writer is kindly request to follow strictly the guidelines below when
submitting the proposal: use only this document to submit your research
proposal which must comply with the following formatting requirements:
-Font: 12 point, Times New Roman
-Title 1: 14 Times New Roman Bold
-Title 2: 12 Times New Roman Bold
-Title 3: 12 Times New Roman underlined
-Text [Including references]: Double-spaced, justified

Anti-Plagiarism policy
The University has a very strict policy with regards to plagiarism and has
therefore put very rigorous procedures and measures of control into place.
The work will be screened for plagiarism through specific ant plagiarism
software (e.g. Turnitin).
Therefore, the outcome must me Original and creative work and I do not want
to be turned down because of academic dishonesty

Also, in the template there are other very important guidelines that must
be followed. Kindly go other them prior to start.
After this been said and after you review the material ( template ) I have
uploaded earlier, please advise the following :

1.      How many pages would it require?
2.      How many sources does a Doctorate proposal require?

 

 

 

Place an order for an original paper based on similar instructions with us today. You will receive 100% original essay written from scratch. You are also guaranteed timely delivery in keeping with your deadline, 24/7 customer support and direct communication with your writer throughout the order preparation process.

 

 

This essay has a word limit of 850 words and is split into 3 questions. So an equal distribution of words allocated to each argument is advisable i.e. 275 words for each question.

Question 1: “In what ways does Watson suggest that US economic and political hegemony is vulnerable? To what extent has the role of the US in the global economy been changed by the election of Obama and the economic crisis and recession?”

Question 2: “In what ways does Ikenberry suggest that China is becoming a formidable global power?  In the author’s view what is the historical uniqueness of the post-war Western order? How do these features provide the Western order with a remarkable capacity to accommodate rising powers?”

AND

Question 3 (This is a Critical Thinking Question)

Question 3: “Contrast the different ideological positions in these two articles regarding the US?”

 

 

 

Place an order for an original paper based on similar instructions with us today. You will receive 100% original essay written from scratch. You are also guaranteed timely delivery in keeping with your deadline, 24/7 customer support and direct communication with your writer throughout the order preparation process