Diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament using MRI.
this project has 2 parts this is my first part has many sub parts in the Literature review . all ponts are in the word file should be covered
anatomy ,physiology , symptoms, ACL appearance on MRI, ACL protocols, advanced or new sequence of ACL MRI
every thing in the file and sake me plz if its not clear better than doing some thing that not required (up dated references )
Title: A critical analysis of power in organisations
What: Working in small groups, you will explore the dimension of power in organisations. This will be done using a case-based analysis employing a critical view of power in the organisation
A case is a current organisation which has a history worthy of interrogation or an organisation with an issue you want to investigate.
and the group have chose this case :
“The particular incidents of Coca-Cola using violence against its workers to stop them from joining unions.”
so my part is to write about :
• identify the consequences, impacts and effects of power in the selected case
Sources: Journal articles, print and social media, public documents, organisation web-sites. Media sources can be scoped for examples but theoretical sources must be used for analysis
The development of prejudice in childrenAnalyze one children’s book
A CHECKLIST FOR ANALYZING BIAS IN CHILDREN’S BOOKS
Check the illustrations
• Look for stereotypes. Some illustrations are blatantly stereotypical; others may be
more subtle in ridiculing characters based on their race or sex.
• Look for tokenism. Check to be sure that the illustrator has not simply used white
characters colored in and that all people of color do not look alike.
• Examine who is doing what. Are only white men active or in leadership roles? Are
women or people of color in passive or subservient roles?
Check the story line for bias in the following areas:
• Standards for success: do people of color have to exhibit white behavior in order to
succeed? Must people of color be extraordinary in order to succeed?
• Resolutions of problems: are problems solved by white people? Are societal problems
explained or are they treated as inevitable? Are minority people considered to be the
problem?
• Role of women: are achievements of women and girls based on their looks? Could the
same story be told if the sex roles were reversed and the characters were men or
boys?
Look at the lifestyles
• Are the contrasts between people of color and whites negative?
• Are people of color presented in settings other than the barrio or ghetto?
• Does the author sincerely present an alternative lifestyle without negative value
judgments?
• Are women and those of diverse family styles fairly represented?
Weigh the relationships between people
• Are the whites or males in the story in control?
• Are the family structures stereotypical?
Note the heroes
• If the heroes or heroines are persons of color or women, do they avoid all conflict with
whites or with men?
• Are they admired for the same qualities as white and male heroes or heroines?
Consider the effects on a child’s self image
• Are standards established that limit the child’s aspirations and self-esteem?
• Are there positive and constructive role models for children of color and for females?
Consider the author’s or illustrator’s background, if possible
• If the book is about people of color or women, does the author or illustrator have the
experience and knowledge necessary to create nonbiased descriptions or
discussions?
Check the author’s perspective
• Is the author or illustrator’s personal perspective limited?
• Does this view distort the story in any way?
Watch for loaded words
• Some words carry insulting or derogatory connotations.
• Does the author avoid the use of such words as “savage,” “treacherous,” and
“primitive” when describing people of given ethnic, cultural, or social groups?
Look at the copyright date
• The copyright date is no guarantee that a book is nonbiased, but more recent books
generally present a more authentic view of people of color and women than those
published in the 1960’s and before.
Program Evaluation of Red-Light Camera Program. complete the Capstone Project, you will write a paper that addresses the following:
1 Getting Started –
• Write 2–3 sentences describing a problem or issue related to public administration, public policy, or nonprofit management and leadership.
• Identify which type of Capstone paper (Program Evaluation) would be appropriate for this particular problem or issue. The Red-Light Camera Program in the City of Chicago.
2 Research Question
• Identify your research question. Is the Red Light Camera Program in the City of Chicago benefiting the driving public by reducing all types of accidents at intersections.
• Write a 1-page rationale for your research question, including why the question is relevant to public administration, public policy, or nonprofit management and leadership.
3 Literature Review
• Write a 12-page literature review that includes a minimum of 25 relevant scholarly articles, research reports, and/or other academic sources. Be sure to follow the literature review guidelines provided in the Machi and McEvoy (2012) text.
4 Types of Data and Research Methods
• Write 4 pages explaining the types of data that may help you answer your research question, including which research method might be best if you were to collect data for your Capstone Project and why.
5 Conclusions and Recommendations
• Write 3 pages explaining conclusions you might make, based on the analysis of the literature you found and your proposed research. Include recommendations, as well as how you might disseminate this information to relevant stakeholders.
The papers should include the following components:
• Problem statement: The general social/policy problem, organizational dynamic, or topic
• Research question: A properly framed research question that addresses the problem
• Relevance: How the research project is relevant to public administration and policy or nonprofit management and leadership
• Theory or conceptual framework: What is the underlying theory that best explains the phenomena or policy being studied?
Effects of Urbanization on Aquatic Ecosystem must not simply summarize the literature on the topic but critically evaluate it. This involves describing and critiquing the research questions, experimental and sampling designs, analysis of results, and interpretations of papers that have been published in this field. You do not need to do this in detail for every paper that you cite. You must select 4 articles of primary literature (i.e. with original results, not review papers), for which you write detailed critical evaluations as part of your literature review (e.g., two to three paragraphs devoted to each of these 4 articles). These should be 4 articles that you determined through your research to be key papers in the literature on your topic.
Please note that the assignment is not merely to write in-depth analysis of 4 articles. You are to write a comprehensive literature review that incorporates 20-25 articles. Within this review you should include more detailed discussions of 4 of these articles.
Please take note of the following features of this paper that you should emulate.
• The introduction provides general background but then focuses on a specific topic for the review, stating clearly the scope of the review (i.e. what is and isn’t covered).
• The review is organised in a logical fashion with subheadings.
• The review concludes with a prospectus of the status in the field and directions for further research.
• You must format your references as in the reference list of this paper.
• In the text of your review, cite references by author surname and year Additional guidelines: • Length of 5000 words (excluding the reference list), double-spaced, Times New Roman font, 2 cm margins, page numbers, indentation at the start of each paragraph, clear subsection headings.
• Include a title page, table of contents (listing the subsections), abstract and the body of the review, conclusions/prospectus, and reference list.
• Around 20-25 references cited, at least 4 of which must be from the current year, and any 4 chosen to critique in depth. You may not include more than 4 citations of websites. You are meant to be reviewing published scientific papers from professional scientific journals.
• There is no need to quote one of your sources directly unless you are making a point about their particular word choice.
Marking Criteria
• The table of contents displays a logical organisation for the review.
• The abstract summaries in one paragraph the scope and major findings of your review.
• The introduction gives general background and establishes the scope of the review.
• The body of the review meets all criteria outlined above.
• The body of the review demonstrates comprehensiveness, critical thought, and effective communication through writing.
• The body of the review includes 4 in-depth critiques that demonstrate critical evaluation of scientific research.
Fictional University Case Paper
1. Develop a 5-7 page (max.) substantive evidence-based position paper (E.g. cite research) based on the question(s) presented.
2. Use at minimum 20 references. Note that the majority of these references come from a list of required readings that I will attach later.
3. Follow APA guidelines from the 6th Ed. Manual American Psychological Association.
4. Papers will be typed in 12-font Times New Roman and include a title and reference page (see APA).
5. The title page, reference page and appendix (charts) are in addition to the 5 pages of content (note: an abstract is not required).
Fictional University Background (mock institution)
Fictional University was founded in 1910 as a public state research university with over 28,000 students and whose charter is to provide access and affordable tuition to students from the state and region while contributing to the community’s economic and social
well being. The university reports directly to the State Governing Board whose has oversight on university policies, operations, hires/contracts, human resources, judicial/general counsel and other areas and operations. This year, the state legislature is requiring the university to cut $15 million dollars from its annual budget. The university President is an innovative forward thinking leader who aligns with the neo-liberal leadership shift of many U.S. universities and is actively exploring and launching new strategies to meet the budget, honor the charter and to advance knowledge generation and delivery.
Fictional University Case Paper
With the 21st century underway, Fictional University has been tasked by its governing board to prepare for university-wide re-design and is seeking input from stakeholders like you. As such you are asked to provide:
a) Rationale on how and why the university will need to position itself for 21st century intellectual entrepreneurs (E.g. students and faculty) in order to grow and sustain its value and significance as a public state university.
b) Identify, describe, and support one key re-design initiative the university should undertake based on the President’s neo-liberal/industrial model of leadership.
c) Describe how the overall re-design and your initiative will impact the social contract universities and colleges have when working in tandem with their respective communities and state to provide “a public good” such as, educate its citizens, facilitate economic growth through job creation, and other direct and in direct benefits/challenges as it positions itself at 21st century university.
Briefing Report
You are employed in the population health division of the American Government Department of Health. The government has requested a series of briefing papers that will provide a clear overview of selected health issues and guide her decisions in relation to recommended actions, including policy, funding and/or service delivery concerning these issues.
You have been asked to prepare a briefing paper for the Minister on ONE of the following issues:
Topic: Alcohol – there is considerable public concern about alcohol-related harms at individual and societal levels, and the Minister wants to set an effective national agenda to respond to this issue.
I will write the conclusion so main focus is the for you to complete the body.
The final stage of the marketing audit is for you to evaluate how well the marketing mix of the organisation is performing for your chosen organisation. NB: as before, if you have a large range of product offerings, it is a good idea to focus on just one.
Incorporating theoretical concepts into your discussion from chapters 7-14 and with the use of other theoretical sources and secondary research, please discuss the following:
1. Outline and describe the 8 marketing mix concepts theoretically and apply the components to one of your products offerings. As part of your application be sure to explain and evaluate all of the 8ps’ of marketing (product, prices, promotion, distribution, partnerships, people, processes and physical evidence).
2. Given your evaluation of your overall marketing strategies, the competition and broader contemporary issues facing marketers today, provide recommendations for your organisation. Your recommendations should focus on each of the 8ps and illustrate how contemporary issues may impact on your organisation and its marketing strategy.
More information on how to complete this assessment will be provided on Interact 2
Rationale
This assessment assesses the following learning outcomes:
be able to apply the marketing mix and aspects of branding and positioning to a specific target market and be able to evaluate competitors’ programs; and
be able to discover and evaluate how contemporary issues of environment, social media and other technology, society and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) might affect marketing.
Marking criteria
Criterion :The various skills to be assessed
Fail
Pass
Credit
Distinction
High Distinction
Communication Skills
This is about the presentation of the work including :Structure, Format, Grammar, including images
Value 10%
Grade range 0-4.5
Poor grammar, spelling, punctuation, concepts were not clear, no paragraphs or formatting- no images, tables or illustrations
Marks 0-2
Some grammatical errors, sentences were clear and complete clear structure and formatting using headings, and sub headings, some illustrations and diagrams, but not explained and only decorative
Marks 2.5
Minor grammatical errors, sentences were clear and complete, structure and format were used to aid the reader including diagrams, tables and images, that were relevant to argument, but were still not fully explained or described
Marks 3
Free of grammatical errors
Structure and format were clear Sentences were well constructed. Language was concise. Excellent use of diagrams, images and tables that were both visually appealing as well as clearly relevant and explained
Marks 4
Free of grammatical errors
Structure and format were clear, logical and consistent. Sentences were well constructed. Exceptional use of diagrams, images and tables, clearly relevant, explained and insightful links made
Marks 4.5
Theoretical analysis skills
This criterion is about defining, describing and evaluating the concepts that were found when researching the topic Value 40% Grade range 0-18
Concepts were not defined, described or evaluated, mainly listed without explanation
Marks 0-8.5
Concepts were defined, there was an attempt to provide descriptions with examples to explain, limited analysis
Marks 9-11
Clear and relevant definitions and descriptions with examples, some attempt to develop analysis by comparing and contrasting of concepts
Marks 11.5-14.5
Clear definitions, descriptions with examples and analysis of concepts with comparison, with clear evaluations and conclusions
Marks 15.5-17.5
Clear definitions, descriptions with examples and analysis of concepts with highly insightful and perceptive comparisons, evaluations and conclusions
Marks 18
Application skills
This criterion is about linking theory to a specific context, explaining how it relates to a product/company and making recommendations Value 40% Grade range for 0- 18
There was no or limited application to the case study, no examples provided no recommendations
Marks 0-8.5
Case study was described and identified. The context was connected briefly to theory, but the recommendations were not well supported by arguments
Marks 9-11
Case study was described and identified. The context was connected to theory with clear links. There were relevant market discussion and recommendations were supported
Marks 11.5.5-14.5
Case study described and identified and insightful evaluations were made. The context was connected to theory with clear, creative and logical links. There were relevant, well supported recommendations and market discussions with explicit connections to theoretical arguments
Marks 15.5-17.5
Case study described and identified and insightful evaluations were made. The context was connected to theory with exceptional, logical and imaginative links. The market discussions and recommendations were highly relevant , realistic and supported with explicit connections to theoretical arguments
Mark 18
Referencing Skills
This criterion was about the application of APA referencing Value 10% Grade range 0-4.5
There was limited or no attempt at in text or end of text referencing
Marks 0
There was an attempt to apply referencing, but style and application were inconsistent and some points remain unreferenced
Marks 2
Referencing applied. However style/application was inconsistent with some errors in text/reference list
Marks 3
Both the in text and end reference list were consistent in terms of style and application of APA6.
Marks 3.5
Both the in text and end reference list were consistent in terms of style and application of APA6. Referencing apparent in all places where expected.
Marks 4.5
Requirements
Online submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your subject lecture.
this is a short report you are preparing for the CEO of your company. Be clear, concise, and direct. Include enough detail to demonstrate what you learned about your topic area
We are most interested in the quality of your thinking, your ability to research a topic, and ability to express yourself in writing
The purpose of this learning experience is to encourage you to learn more about a specific topic, demonstrate your global business acumen, communicate this information, and have fun in the process
Cover the following areas in your paper
Reasons for selecting this topic
Based upon your research, what new things did you learn about this topic
Share the three (3) most unexpected facts you learned about this topic
Discuss any controversial issues related to your topic
Write a conclusion – forecast five (5) years into the future and give your predictions about what items will affect your topic area and what your topic area will look like
List the sources you used for your research.
. it is just a question & answer essay. so u just need to answer the three questions in the “your task details”
2. u just need to finish the individual part, which the questions are the same as the group task
3. the format for this order is just like:
4. a. the agency/ organisation’s……..
5. answer: …….
6. b. the DIRKS methodology…
7. answer: …….
8. c……
9. answer: ……
10. the word limit for this order is 1650 words, don’t care too much about the requirement, which is 1000-1500
11. reference in this essay is VERY VERY VERY important, if u don’t adequately cite and reference your sources in your individual submission using the APA style then you will not achieve a Pass grade for this assignment. So please keep an eye on the reference, and u must use APA style. Again, reference is VERY IMPORTANT in this essay
12. u must refer to ISO (international standard organisation) in this essay. u must refer to ISO once and once again. It is also VERY VERY VERY IMPORTANT in this essay. ISO 15489 is a main one standard, u also need to refer to the other one according to the case, which I would attach in the file.
13. this assignment is very important in my unit, ‘cuz it is the last one assignment, so please work hard in this order,
Awesome! We will spare no effort to give you a most pleasant experience.
But, that’s not all
You get a massive 35% on your first order
Get Discount NowOur record is the best in the industry but this is hardly a surprise; we handpick our writers after they are proven to be consistent, reliable and completely able in their areas of expertise.
Order your custom essay paper, research paper NOW and we’ll turn your frustrations into a sigh of relief
Order Now