Posted on

Entrepreneurship

 
Please have the paper completely free from Plagiarism.
please use 25- 30 references
The references should be:
Relevant
Recent- up to date
Credible

1- Please read the attached document carefully, it is very Important for me to get an A-A++, so I would please like you to follow the instructions on how to get an A-A++ on this attachment.

2- The attachment describes everything.

3- The MOST important part of writing this paper, is for it to be “CRITICAL”, the tutor has emphesized ALOT about writing this paper CRITICALLY. So not just writing literature, but taking the literature from the different references and analysing them and being CRITICAL with adding your own opinion- so that it shows you have understood what you read from all those 25-30 references.

4- There has to be an example that glues all the literature together, and apply the theories.

5- The quotations shouldn’t be more than 10% of the whole paper.
When using a quotation, please explain how it is related to the subject.

6- The paper should not be more than 2500 words. The introduction is 10% (250 words), the main body is 80% (2000 words) and the conclusion is 10% (250 words).

7- The Main Body should include the following:
a-Justification for choosing journals using clear method (must be reputable journals)
b- method justification
c- Aim & objectives which include (similarities and differences)
d- Review
e- Main body Conclusion to include (implications; limitations and future directions)

8- Please try to have RECENT references, not old ones and research academic articles published in ABS (2015) listed, high quality journals

9- The sources should be: Relevant, Credible, Recent and a different range.
10- The essay should be ANALYTICAL (shows the strength and weaknesses of the subject for example), and MUST include Supportive evidence.
11- PLEASE PLEASE follow all these instructions above carefully.

Posted on

Cognitive Dissonance

 

Write a 2-3 page (double-spaced) essay that addresses the following questions. Note that you do not need to go in any sort of order. Feel free to structure the paper however you’d like and discuss any impressions you had of the reading that are not prompted below, but make sure to also address each of the following prompts (the ones in bold):

What were your overall impressions of the reading? Were you surprised by the extent to which we justify our decisions and/or are unwilling to admit and confront our own mistakes?
Provide two examples of cognitive dissonance in your own life. How did you resolve these issues? Did you change your attitudes, your behavior, or both?
Tough question: why is it that we seem SO afraid to make mistakes, be it at work, in school, etc.? Where do you think this fear comes from? Is there anything we can do to overcome it?
Do you think that there is anything we can teach our children or learn from a young age that might make us less likely to fall into a dissonant state or to be more willing to admit to our own hypocrisies?

Posted on

LLB EUROPEAN UNION LAW

 
Question:
LLB EUROPEAN UNION LAW
Word Limit: 2,500
‘The establishment of direct effect and the supremacy of EU law was a mistake. The various rationales employed by the Court of Justice to justify their development have been seriously flawed. The principles governing the supremacy of EU law are far too strict while the principles governing direct effect are an incoherent mess. Yet these problems can be resolved easily.’

Critically discuss this statement with reference to relevant treaty articles, decided cases and academic opinion.

(word limit:2500, use OSCOLA style, footnote, numeric system, including Bibliography)

Posted on

Health Information Technology in the United States: Progress and Challenges Ahead, 2014

 
Scholarly critique of the attached report on the measurement of Health Information Technology (HIT) impact on health care outcomes

Title of the report:
Health Information Technology in the United States:
Progress and Challenges Ahead, 2014
(1) Summary of study
• A brief summary of the methods used.
• The main findings and the ways in which they were interpreted by the author(s).
• The conclusions reached by the author(s).
(2) Critique of study
• Is the argument logical?
• Is the report well-organized, clear, and easy to read?
• Are the author’s facts accurate?
• Have important terms been clearly defined?
• Is there sufficient evidence for the arguments?
• Do the arguments support the main point?
• Is the report appropriate for the intended audience?
• Does the report present and refute opposing points of view?
• Does the report help you understand the subject?
• Are there any words or sentences that evoke a strong response from you? What are those words or sentences? What is your reaction?
(3) Personal reflection
• What is the origin of your reaction to this topic? When or where did you first learn about it? Can you think of people, articles, or discussions that have influenced your views? How might these be compared or contrasted to this report?
• What questions or observations does this report suggest? That is, what does the report make you think about?
(4) Writing style and presentation

Posted on

law school addendum

 
� Optional Statement on Diversity: Describe an experience of yours that speaks to the possibilities and challenges of diversity in an educational or a workplace setting.
� Optional Statement on Obstacles Overcome: Describe a setback or a failure in your life. What did you do to overcome that obstacle? What did you learn about yourself from that experience? If this situation happened again, would you do anything differently?
� Optional Statement about Your Academic Record or Standardized Tests: If you believe that your academic record or your results from standardized tests, like the LSAT, does not accurately reflect your ability to succeed in law school, tell us about this.
� Optional Statement Regarding Disability: If you believe that you have a disability that prevented your college GPA, LSAT, or other credential from accurately reflecting your ability, and you would like these disability-related circumstances to be considered, identify your disability. Please provide a statement that tells us how the disability prevented or hindered your academic performance, and the following information: (a) The date of onset or discovery of your disability; (b) the effects of your disability on your past academic performance and on standardized tests; (c) what, if any, accommodations you received in elementary, high school, college and graduate school; (d) any improvements in your academic performance after receiving accommodations; and (e) the ways in which your performance reflects your high achievements despite your disability.

Please write a maximum of 750 words.

Posted on

Health Information Technology in the United States: Progress and Challenges Ahead, 2014

 
Scholarly critique of the attached report on the measurement of Health Information Technology (HIT) impact on health care outcomes.
(1) Summary of study:
• A brief summary of the methods used.
• The main findings and the ways in which they were interpreted by the author(s).
• The conclusions reached by the author(s).
(2) Critique of study:
• Is the argument logical?
• Is the report well-organized, clear, and easy to read?
• Are the author’s facts accurate?
• Have important terms been clearly defined?
• Is there sufficient evidence for the arguments?
• Do the arguments support the main point?
• Is the report appropriate for the intended audience?
• Does the report present and refute opposing points of view?
• Does the report help you understand the subject?
• Are there any words or sentences that evoke a strong response from you? What are those words or sentences? What is your reaction?
(3) Personal reflection:
• What is the origin of your reaction to this topic? When or where did you first learn about it? Can you think of people, articles, or discussions that have influenced your views? How might these be compared or contrasted to this report?
• What questions or observations does this report suggest? That is, what does the report make you think about?
(4) Writing style and presentation:
• Well organized and cited everything
• Use as much references as you want.

Posted on

NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION) ((((critical analysis))))

 
Critical analysis

Please I need this Seminar paper to be a really good paper because in my master year and this assignment will have high marks so I can get high mark to pass it and please please please I need 0% plagiarism because my university is very very very strict about this thing so pleaaase be carful
My Seminar topic is ( NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION) CHOOSE ONE ARTICE FROM THE UPLODED DOCUMENTs AND make IT CRITICAL ANALYSIS JUST ONE ARTICLE NOT MORE THAN ONE AND IT SHOUD BE 1500 WORD PLEASE DON’T EXCEED IT.
HERE IS THE GUIDLINE OF HOW TO DO THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONE OF THE READING: please consider all these steps its very important for the grading

Critical reading: You may find this Study Guide ‘What is Critical Reading’ useful. You might consider the following questions when reading a text:
• What argument is the author making?
• What assumptions underpin the argument?
• Is there anything in the article that you would like clarification of or to know more about?
• Is there anything in the article that you might challenge?
• What difference did reading this article make to how you think about the topic in question?
Please note that you do not need to answer each of these questions individually – they are just there to help you engage with articles while reading.
All of your reading for this module should be critical reading. Each week, you should engage critically with a range of sources from the online reading list. You should prepare notes that will help you discuss your critical reading with the seminar group.

For the assessment, you should develop one of your critical reading notes (from a seminar up to and including seminar 6) into a clearly written article review. This can incorporate your reflections on the article based on your seminar discussions.
You should include the following in your seminar paper:
• Full reference (accurately cited)
• At least a paragraph describing the article
• At least a paragraph summarising the author’s central argument
• At least a paragraph describing the evidence (including the work of any other key thinkers) on which the argument is based, and how this contributes to the central argument
• At least a paragraph evaluating the argument
If you include references to other sources, these must be fully referenced and cited in a bibliography (which can be excluded from the word count). The seminar paper should be no more than 1,500 words long.

Posted on

marketing communication.

 
Each group member must produce their own Press Release
& Blog post relating to the ‘Day Out’/visitor attraction featured in your Group Presentation.
(Two documents). The Press Release should describe the media circulation envisaged eg local TV.

Quality of written English/appropriate style for each
Communication 25%

Engaging/creative content for editors/readers 50%
Appropriate formatting/layout/presentation for
each communication 25%

Posted on

Differentiated Instruction Strategy

 
Journal Review
The focus will be on
Differentiated Instruction Strategy for students with mild and moderate disabilities.

You will conduct your own research and write an article review that focuses on a specific differentiated instruction strategy.There have to be four different articles on four different strategies. (One strategy per article)
There must be a different strategy for each review, for a total of four different strategy reviews. You will start with an article summary and an explanation of why the author is an authority on the subject. Then, you will give a summary of the strategy, followed by a critique of the strategy. All articles must be less than five years old.