reflecting on your experiences in this class. You will be honing your skills of evaluation and justification–and you will be giving me valuable feedback about our course

Purpose: In this letter, you will be reflecting on your experiences in this class. You will be honing your skills of evaluation and justification–and you will be giving me valuable feedback about our course.

The Assignment:

Write a 2 page letter to the instructor evaluating this course and your progress this semester. Please use examples and explanation to justify your evaluation.

You may discuss any of the following in this letter:

*Your strengths and weaknesses as a writer, and how these may have changed or your awareness of these may have been altered.

*The essay that you are most pleased with

*The essay that you are least pleased with

*The difficulty level of the various essays you completed for this class

*The format of this class

*The quality of lecture notes, instructor feedback on papers, and other materials

*The helpfulness of the textbook

I will upload an example for you! PLEASE, do not copy from the example.
*** If you need more information about the class and the papers, let me know.

 

ORDER A PAPER NOW & GET 15% DISCOUNT (CODE: GAC15)

applying business theories, models, and concepts to guide analysis of problems and situations, a key aspect of the business professional’s job.

Assignment Expectations

Applying business theories, models, and concepts to guide analysis of problems and situations
In this SLP assignment for Module 5 our emphasis will be on applying business theories, models, and concepts to guide analysis of problems and situations, a key aspect of the business professional’s job.
Later, in MGT499 (Strategic Management) Module 5 SLP you will continue to develop your application of business theories, models and concepts. In that assignment you will be working on your conceptual and critical thinking skills.
And, finally, in BUS499 (Integrative Capstone) your conceptual and critical thinking skills will be further developed. In Module 5 SLP of that course you will complete an extensive written assignment.
These three assignments build upon each other and aim to offer you the opportunity to enhance and practice your business analytical and problem solving skills.
Mod 5 SLP Assignment: For the present assignment please provide an essay that identifies key organizational efforts that are (or would be) among the most useful or important CSC (COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION) to assure control of important organizational processes. Focus in particular on the core technologies of the organization. You can discuss control efforts and strategies already utilized by your company, and/or make recommendations that you believe would be useful for your organization to consider.
Begin your essay with a thesis statement in the introductory paragraph that identifies what you consider to be the key organizational control efforts that are (or would be) important to the success of your organization, and then develop a persuasive essay to support your thesis.
Remember to use background readings to support your key arguments and to cite and reference your sources. Your goal is to convince your professor, who will require some well-reasoned and well-supported arguments. Actual examples of control and accountability systems in action and how they work in your organization will also help to add support to your arguments, but you need to be more than descriptive. You also need to explain how and why the the controls work and why they are needed.
The grading rubric below has been developed to measure student success in meeting the MGT301 5 SLP expectations related to applying business theories and problem solving. Rubrics for the other two courses are included in their assignments.
Assignment Expectation Weak (1) Marginal (2) Adequate (3) Strong (4)
Organization
10% Demonstrates the ability to organize content logically, concisely, and in a appropriate manner to understanding the functions of control. There is no logical sequence of information. Wording is rambling and unfocused Paper does not follow a logical sequence. Paper follows a logical sequence. There are some minor problems with topic transitions. Introduction and/or conclusion are not clear. Paper follows a logical sequence with an effective introduction and conclusion. Each segment relates to others in a carefully planned framework.
Demonstrates the ability to support a central point or viewpoint throughout the paper. Insufficient elaboration and/or support (e.g., summaries, listings) in the paper. Limited elaboration and/or support in the paper. Support with some specific details and elaboration in the paper. Support through both specific details and elaboration apparent in the paper.
Content
70% Demonstrates the ability to address an identifiable purpose in paper—the implementation and use of control in the organization. The purpose is not identified, is unclear, or inappropriate in the paper. Purpose is occasionally unclear in the paper. Clear purpose, but not consistently sustained throughout the paper. Clear purpose sustained throughout the paper.
Demonstrates the ability to gather and sort information and data on a particular subject matter or topic. Does not have a grasp of information and appropriate data. Topic is poorly developed. Supporting materials are absent or vague. Trite ideas and/or unclear wording reflect a lack of understanding of topic. Seems uncomfortable with information and data. Topic is evident but with little or no elaboration. Seems comfortable with the information and data. Topic is evident with some supporting details. Demonstrates full knowledge of the topic with explanation and elaboration. The topic is well developed, effectively supported, and appropriate for the assignment. Critical thinking is clearly and creatively expressed. Data choices are well thought out.
Delivery
20% Demonstrates the ability to use appropriate word choice and grammar in the speech. There are many sentences with grammatical errors. Some sentences are incomplete/halting, and/or vocabulary is somewhat limited or inappropriate. There are a few sentences that are complete and grammatical. Word choice is not always appropriate for presentation. Sentences are generally complete and grammatical, and they flow together easily. With a few exceptions, words are chosen for their precise meaning. All sentences are complete and grammatical, and they flow together easily. Words are chosen for their precise meaning. Word choice illustrates grasp of content and enhances presentation.
Demonstrates the ability to make an effective speech outline that is free from bias (e.g. sexism, racism, ageism, heterosexism, etc). Language chosen for a presentation is inappropriate and exhibits bias. Uses clichés, slang, jargon, racist, or sexist language. Some readers may be offended. Language chosen for the paper is free from bias with one or two minor exceptions. Language has no apparent bias. There is some inappropriate language. Language is completely free from bias.
The link to “The Trident Guide to the Well Written Paper” (instruction on writing papers, citing sources, proper referencing, and so forth) is http://support.trident.edu/files/Well-Written-Paper.pdf
SLP Expectations:
In this paper, your ability to think critically and provide insightful analysis is the key. You do not want to just describe a few organizational control efforts, you need to bring together ideas, examples and background readings to convince your professor that your thesis statement is sound. Remember to organize your paper for clarity and document any outside resources.
? The following criteria will also be used to assess your paper:
>Precision: Does the paper address the question(s) or task(s)?
>Breadth: Is the full breadth of the subject, i.e., all the keys to the assignment, addressed?
>Depth: Does the paper/report address all elements of the topic in sufficient depth? Does it include and apply the background readings and other background resources? Are they included as references?
>Critical thinking: Are the concepts of this module applied accurately, logically, and relevantly?
>Organization: Is the paper organized in a coherent and systematic manner? Are headings included in all papers greater than 2 pages?
>Clarity: Is the writing clear and the concepts articulated properly? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of response to the questions, or are thoughts conveyed through excessive use of quotations?

 

 

NEED A PAPER WRITTEN? ORDER NOW, GET 15% DISCOUNT (CODE GAC15)

Equity and Debt Essay

Assignment:

American Superconductor
As you know from reading through the background materials, the decision to use debt or equity to raise money is not a decision taken lightly by management. So when several years ago, in 2003 American Superconductor decided to raise funds through equity it was definitely a major decision that required intense discussions at the highest levels of management.
Read the article below about American Superconductor and do some of your own research using the CyberLibrary and internet search engines. You can also take a look at the official American Superconductor webpage http://www.amsc.com/

Assignment Expectations:
After doing your research, apply what you learned from the background materials and write a three page paper answering the following questions:
What are the advantages and disadvantages for AMSC to forgo their debt financing and take on equity financing? Do you agree with their decision? How can a company’s cost of equity be determined? Is there a tax deduction from the use of debt financing? Please explain.
Explain both of your answers thoroughly. Be sure to support your opinions on these assignment questions with references to the background materials or to other articles in your paper.

Read the article below available in Proquest:
American Superconductor switch ; Westboro company plans to raise money through a stock offering, Andi Esposito. Telegram & Gazette. Worcester, Mass.: Aug 26, 2003. pg. E.1 from library portal via coursenet.
Abstract (summary)
“AMSC’s management and board of directors believe the decision to forgo a secured debt financing and to adopt an equity financing strategy under current market conditions is in the best interests of our shareholders,” said Gregory J. Yurek, chief executive officer of AMSC. The 265-employee company has operations in Westboro and Devens and in Wisconsin.
Finally, the Northeast blackout “shined a lot of light on the problems we have been talking about as a company for three to four years,” Mr. Yurek said. AMSC products, such as a system installed this year in the aging Connecticut grid and high temperature superconductor power cables and other devices bought by China for its grid, are designed to improve the cost, efficiency and reliability of systems that generate, deliver and use electric power. “We are a company with products out there solving problems today,” he said.
Full Text
WESTBORO — American Superconductor Corp., whose power grid products have gained heightened visibility since the Aug. 14 Northeast blackout, has scuttled plans for a $50 million secured debt financing and will instead raise the money through a public stock offering.
The company will disclose the number of shares to be sold from the company’s treasury, the amount of the expected proceeds and names of underwriters in a Securities and Exchange Commission registration statement that will be filed within two weeks, AMSC said yesterday.
AMSC had told shareholders in July that it expected to close at the end of this month on a secured debt financing package made up of a five-year term loan of up to $30 million from three groups of institutional investors, $10 million in subordinated notes and a $10 million bank credit facility.
The company hadn’t identified the investors or bank.
“AMSC’s management and board of directors believe the decision to forgo a secured debt financing and to adopt an equity financing strategy under current market conditions is in the best interests of our shareholders,” said Gregory J. Yurek, chief executive officer of AMSC. The 265-employee company has operations in Westboro and Devens and in Wisconsin.
The company’s stock, which closed yesterday at $12.20, up 60 cents on the Nasdaq Stock Market, has risen 305 percent this year.
Mr. Yurek said three factors led to the decision. First, AMSC has picked up revenue momentum and is on track toward achieving its target of $45 million to $50 million in revenue this year, more than doubling revenue of fiscal 2003.
Secondly, AMSC’s high temperature superconductor motor and generator business unit, which is working on a large U.S. Navy contract, was profitable in the first quarter ended June 30 — one quarter ahead of expectations.
Finally, the Northeast blackout “shined a lot of light on the problems we have been talking about as a company for three to four years,” Mr. Yurek said. AMSC products, such as a system installed this year in the aging Connecticut grid and high temperature superconductor power cables and other devices bought by China for its grid, are designed to improve the cost, efficiency and reliability of systems that generate, deliver and use electric power. “We are a company with products out there solving problems today,” he said.
At June 30, AMSC had cash reserves of $12.1 million. Last year the company spent $48 million to fund operations. But this year, because of cost savings and other steps, spending is forecast at $13 million to $15 million.
AMSC needs the money for general corporate purposes and to scale up manufacturing at Devens of its second-generation high temperature superconductor wire.
Copyright New York Times Company Aug 26, 2003
Word count: 446
Indexing (details)
Cite
Company/organization
Name:
American Superconductor Corp
Ticker:
AMSC
NAIC:
334419
Title
American Superconductor switch ; Westboro company plans to raise money through a stock offering: [ALL Edition]
Author
Esposito, Andi
Publication title
Telegram & Gazette
Pages
E.1
Number of pages
0
Publication year
2003
Publication date
Aug 26, 2003
Year
2003
Dateline
WESTBORO
Section
BUSINESS
Publisher
Globe Newspaper Company, Inc.
Place of publication
Worcester, Mass.
Country of publication
United States
Journal subject
General Interest Periodicals–United States
ISSN
10504184
Source type
Newspapers
Language of publication
English
Document type
NEWSPAPER
ProQuest document ID
268865037
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/268865037?accountid=28844
Copyright

 

 

NEED A PAPER WRITTEN? ORDER NOW, GET 15% DISCOUNT (CODE GAC15)

Financial Analysis on Oak Knoll Based Questions

Use the data that I attached to answer the following questions:

1.Is development of Oak Knoll feasible?
If so, what are the major, outcome-determinative variables, e.g. sales prices, market rents commercial
space, leasing plans, absorption rates, financing terms, construction costs, scale of project, zoning
changes, and how do they affect feasibility?
If not, what makes it impossible (or unlikely) that a successful development proposal can be put forth
2.What are the major financial and economic factors which determine profitability (or lack thereof)?
3. in the file that i attached, use the "IRR" sheet to analyze that what the investor do to
get higher IRR by control the rents since rent price decrease will lead to IRR decrease? make some
investment opinions on it.

 

 

NEED A PAPER WRITTEN? PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW & GET 15% DISCOUNT (CODE GAC15)

Healthcare Law

Mr. Albert Crenshaw, aged 45 years, is employed as a computer specialist. Through his employer in the

private sector, he has obtained health coverage with the Happy Family Health Plan, which is an MCO.
Happy Family has a network of participating physicians who have agreed to provide services to Happy
Family enrollees.

Each enrollee is required to choose a PCP from Happy Family’s list of participating physicians.
Because Mr. Crenshaw had recently moved to the area, he did not know any doctors. Therefore, he chose
Dr. Julia Smith as his PCP because she was on the list for Happy Family’s network.

Dr. Smith is a physician in private practice. Happy Family entered into a participating physician
contract with her because she was willing to provide services at a discount. In paying Dr. Smith,
Happy Family withholds 20% of her fee for each visit and puts that 20% into a risk pool. At the end of
the year, Dr. Smith will share in any money left in the pool.

Happy Family’s participating physician agreement is a standard form contract. It specifies that
participating physicians are independent contractors, rather than employees or agents of Happy Family.
In addition the contract between Happy Family and Dr. Smith provides that it may be terminated by
either party, with our without cause, on 30 days notice to the other party.

In the community in which Dr. Smith practices, it has been routine medical practice for many years to
give an electrocardiogram (EKG) to any patient older than 40 years who complained of chest pains.
However, on October 5, 1998, Happy Family sent a bulletin to Dr. Smith and the other participating
physicians with regard to Happy Family’s new policy on EKGs. Under that new policy, EKGs will only be
covered by the plan if the patient is older than 50 years.

Approximately 3 weeks later, on October 25, 1998, Mr. Crenshaw began experiencing chest pains after
working out at his gym during his lunch hour. He immediately went to Dr. Smith’s office. She knew Mr.
Crenshaw was covered by the happy family health plan, and she remembered the recent bulletin she had
received from the plan. Dr. Smith examined Mr. Crenshaw but did not perform an EKG, even though
performing an EKG under those circumstances was the routine practice in the community at the time.

Dr. Smith advised Mr. Crenshaw that he was safe for him to go back to work. Mr. Crenshaw did go back
to work, where he died of a heart attack two hours later.

As soon as Dr. Smith heard about the death of Mr. Crenshaw, she called the president of Happy Family
Health Plan. Dr. Smith told him that from now on she was going to order an EKG for every patient who
needs it, regardless of age. The next day, Happy Family responded by giving Dr. Smith 30 days notice
of termination from the plan which would effectively prevent her from treating any Happy Family
patients.

Subsequently, Mr. Crenshaw’s widow sued Dr. Smith for medical malpractice in state court. The
plaintiff (Mrs. Crenshaw) had an expert witness who testified that Mr. Crenshaw would not have died if
he had been given an EKG instead of being sent back to work. Mrs. Crenshaw also claimed that Happy
Family gave financial incentives to Dr. Smith to encourage her to provide less care to patients
covered by the plan. According to Mrs. Crenshaw and her lawyer, those financial incentives should be
illegal and, at the very least, should have been fully disclosed to Mr. Crenshaw.

In response, Dr. Smith denied that she was liable for the death of Mr. Crenshaw. According to Dr.
Smith, she satisfied the new standard of care as established by the Happy Family Health Plan. In
addition, Dr. Smith’s lawyer argued that the financial arrangements between Dr. Smith and Happy Family
were entirely lawful and that Dr. Smith had no legal obligation to disclose her financial arrangements
to Mr. Crenshaw. Finally, Dr. Smith’s lawyer contended that the medical malpractice case should be
thrown out of court a cause of the federal law known as ERISA, which regulates employer-sponsored
health plans such as Mr. Crenshaw’s plan.

In addition, Mrs. Crenshaw sued the Happy Family Health Plan in state court for damages caused by
Happy Family’s improper denial of benefits. According to Mrs. Crenshaw, Happy Family’s refusal to pay
for a necessary diagnostic tests was a substantial cause for her husband’s death. Therefore, Mrs.
Crenshaw claimed that she is entitled to $1 million from Happy Family to compensate her and her
children for 20 years of Mr. Crenshaw’s lost wages. In addition, she asked the court to make Happy
Family pay $10 million in punitive damages to teach them a lesson and encourage them to change their
policy for the future. However, Happy Family’s defense lawyer responded that the case against Happy
Family may only be heard in a federal court because of the federal ERISA law on employee health plans.
Moreover, according to Happy Family’s lawyer, even if Mrs. Crenshaw wins the case, she cannot recover
$1 million in lost wages or $10 million in punitive damages for Happy Family. Rather the most that she
can possibly recover against Happy Family is the cost of the EKG exam, which would have been covered
by the plan.

Who is likely to prevail on each claim, and why?

 

NEED A PAPER WRITTEN? PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW & GET 15% DISCOUNT (CODE GAC15)

How does donor�s intervention affect agricultural banking: a case study of three West Africa Countries (Mali, Senegal, and Burkina Faso).

How does donor�s intervention affect agricultural banking: a case study of three West Africa Countries
(Mali, Senegal, and Burkina Faso).
ATTENTION!!!

CLIENT NEEDS PROPOSAL ASAP!!! The rest of the paper can be prepared later.

The original research proposal was written about three african countries. I want you to select only
one country (the poorest or the one with highest level of agriculture lending\donors) and collect data
for all the banks in the country.
also: The reference list must be improved with an higher number of citation of academic literature
(now you have more reference from international organizations than academic one)
– The methodology has to be explained in detail looking also at what is done by someone else in a
similar framework.
I need to be done major part of the paper during next couple of weeks… the proposal is already
written so I need additional 10 pages around…

 

 

NEED A PAPER WRITTEN? PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW; GET 15% DISCOUNT (CODE GAC15)

International tax

I’d like you to do

(1) a research proposal of dissertation in 200 words

(2) Topic -international tax law (the professor highlight at Revenue Rule , Permanent Establishment
(PE) , Profit , Transfer Pricing and Interpretation of Tax treaty)

(3)Up-to-date interesting issues,
-it d b perfect if it can b thailand or any country in ASEAN which is about The ASEAN Economic
Community (AEC) 2015,
-or the UK or USA tax editing issue

(4)writing level (IELTS) 7.0

(5) deadline 21 Nov 12

 

PLACE AN ORDER TODAY AND GET 15% DISCOUNT (CODE “GAC15)

Counter-brand and alter-brand communities

The chosen brand for this topic is “Mini Cooper.” If you find any other brand that is more suitable

for the coursework instruction, please kindly suggest and wait for my approval first. The instruction
is to analyse how consumers changed the brand by showing evidence of a change in meaning and analysing
the implications of this – both for the brand itself and the brand community. Please also use relevant
theories to support. Internet sources shouldn’t exceed 6. Word limits apply to the main body of text
(title, text, tables, footnotes and diagram) must be 1,450-1,500 words. **must not exceed or less than
the limits.

 

 

PLACE AN ORDER TODAY AND GET 15% DISCOUNT (CODE GAC15)

Instructional strategies and techniques in a 3rd grade science classroom.

PLEASE use 3rd Grade Science classroom either physical science Magnetism and electricity or earth

science.
ALL REFERENCES must be peer reviewed journal articles.

There are times when a teacher uses instruction that is scripted and rigorously developed and times
when instruction needs to be more open-ended and moderately defined. Quality teaching utilizes both
the behavioral and the cognitive paradigms. Knowing when and where to use each is part of the art of
teaching.

Select a classroom, subject, and a population of students. Choose a subject’s subtopic for this unit
(but not the same subtopic you used in previous units).
Design a unit plan. Include descriptions of instructional strategies and how these strategies will
help adapt instruction to individual learners.
Describe how you would use more structured activities including, but not limited to, direct
instruction, task analysis, and examination of prerequisite abilities.
Describe how you would use more open-ended techniques such as brainstorming and exploratory
activities.
Remember to fully describe how each strategy helps customize individual learning and meets the needs
of all students. In addition, describe how each strategy might reinforce or complement other
strategies.

Include the following components in your APA paper:

an introductory paragraph that describes the class and its setting
overall goals and objectives
a narrative on each strategy
an ongoing summative assessment and evaluation of student progress and student understanding

 

A balanced score card report for a fictional company in the computer industry named ACME computer group

Course Assignment: Balanced Scorecard Paper

Create a hypothetical business that will compete in an industry in which you are interested. Using
knowledge gained from this course and previous coursework; develop the strategic objectives for your
business in the format of a balanced scorecard. The strategic objectives are measures of attaining
your vision and mission. As you develop the vision, mission, and values for your business, also a SWOT
analysis should be considered AND conveyed in your paper. Be sure to consider all of the following
four quadrants of the balanced scorecard when developing your strategic objectives:
1. Shareholder Value or Financial Perspective, includes strategic objectives in areas such as:
a. Market share
b. Revenues and costs
c. Profitability
d. Competitive position
2. Customer Value Perspective, includes strategic objectives in areas such as:
a. Customer retention or turnover
b. Customer satisfaction
c. Customer value
3. Process or Internal Operations Perspective, includes strategic objectives in areas such as:
a. Measure of process performance
b. Productivity or productivity improvement
c. Operations metrics
4. Learning and Growth (Employee) Perspective, includes strategic objectives in areas such as:
a. Employee satisfaction
b. Employee turnover or retention
c. Level of organization capability
d. Nature of organization culture or climate
e. Technological innovation
Address at least three strategic objectives for each of the following four balanced scorecard areas
identified above (financial, customer, process, learning & growth). For each strategic objective,
address a goal and rationale to support the goal using a balanced scorecard format. The goal and
rationale to support the goal should be in quantitative and qualitative format.

(For example a strategic objective in the shareholder or Financial Perspective is “Increase in Market
Share”. The goal to actually measure this strategic objective of market share increase could be
“Increase market share by 2% for each of the next three years”. The rationale to support the goal
could be ?Increase the portfolio of communications products, by introducing one new cellular phone to
the commercial market on a quarterly basis generating an increase in market share of 2% on an annual
basis over the next three years.?

Provide a 10-12 page paper that explains your critical thinking on how you derived your objectives
from your vision, mission, values, and SWOT analysis. Note for this paper the use of headers (level
one and level two) are required specifically for the balanced scorecard strategic objective
perspective and measurement criteria explanation. Consult the APA 6th edition manual on pages (41-49,
62-63) for additional details regarding level one and level two headers, or contact me should you have
any questions subsequent to reviewing the APA manual. Points will be deducted if the level one and
level two headers are not included in your paper specifically for the balanced scorecard strategic
objective perspective and measurement criteria explanation.

Also, be sure to include the title page, running head and abstract in your paper. (The title page,
abstract page, and reference page(s) are not included in the page count.) This assignment must include
a minimum of five sources (published 2007 to date for research purposes), and cited on the reference
page in APA format. Post this assignment as an attached WORD document to the Laulima ?Assignment? link
by November 21, 2012, no later than 11:55 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST).
Recommended Article Sources

? Business Week: Prominent magazine covering global business news.

? Dollars and Sense: Publishes economic news and analysis, reports on economic justice activism,
primers on economic topics, and critiques of the mainstream media?s coverage of the economy.

? Entrepreneur: Offers entrepreneurs the information, services, and expert advice to ensure
small business success.

? Financial Times: Leading newspaper of international business, finance, politics, and
economics.

? Forbes: Contains articles for CEOs and individual investors alike. Articles include profiles
of companies and private investors, as well as helpful statistics.

? Fortune: Columns include features on the marketplace, tech movers and shakers, career trends,
U.S. politics, and European business.

? Harvard Business Review: Premier forum of the business world written by authorities in
business and business education.

? Money Week: Comment and analysis of UK and international financial news, with investment and
financial advice.

? Wall Street Journal: Premier source for the latest global business and financial news.
Written Feedback

Content Development (30%)
Subject Matter:
? Key elements of assignments covered
? Content is comprehensive/accurate/persuasive
? Displays an understanding of relevant theory
? Major points supported by specific details/examples
? Research is adequate/timely
? Writer has gone beyond textbook for resources

Higher-Order Thinking:
? Writer compares/contrasts/integrates theory/subject matter with work environment/experience
? At an appropriate level, the writer analyzes and synthesizes theory/practice to develop new
ideas and ways of conceptualizing and performing
Organization (10%)
? The introduction provides a sufficient background on the topic and previews major points
? Central theme/purpose is immediately clear
? Structure is clear, logical, and easy to follow
? Subsequent sections develop/support the central theme
? Conclusion/recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper
Style and Mechanics (60%)
Format–20%
? Citations/reference page follow guidelines
? Properly cites ideas/info from other sources
? Paper is laid out effectively–uses, heading and other reader-friendly tools
? Paper is neat/shows attention to detail
Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling–20%
? Rules of grammar, usage, punctuation are followed
? Spelling is correct
Readability/Style–20%
? Sentences are complete, clear, and concise
? Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied structure
? Transitions between sentences/paragraphs/sections help maintain the flow of thought
? Words used are precise and unambiguous
? The tone is appropriate to the audience, content, and assignment