Is There A Difference Between Being a Lobbyist Or an Advocate?

Is There A Difference Between Being a Lobbyist Or an Advocate?

Overview
This assignment relates to lobbyists and advocates. Is there a difference between being a lobbyist and an advocate? Lobbyists provide support for policy, as do advocates, so what is the difference? Most nurses consider themselves patient advocates; however a political advocate is somewhat different. In this discussion, differentiate between a lobbyist and an advocate. Be sure to discuss a political advocate rather than a bedside advocate.

Topics to include:
• Definition of a lobbyist.
• Definition of an advocate.
• Similarities and differences.
• Why are they both important?
• How does “The National League of Nursing” organization, lobby or advocate for health care policy??

No Exceptions:
 Paper must have a proper introduction and conclusion
 Every paragraph must be at least 4 sentences in length
 All references bust be from within the past 5 years and must be journal article.

Legal issues

work Pages from text book listed below
As e-commerce continues to grow in the United States and abroad, new consumer protection laws are needed. Use the Internet to research recent developments in consumer protection for transactions through cyberspace. (Kubasek et al., 2013, p. 754-5). Consider cyberspace consumer protections that may affect the business in which you work, in which you would like to work, or from a situation you have experienced. Think of this issue from the perspective of a business working with customers; consider how protecting customers may cost your business profits, or, how it might make your business profits by “differentiating” your business from others like it. Then, consider this from the perspective of a legislator or regulator, trying to protect customers from this situation. (Some ideas: identity theft, credit card interest rates, airline baggage fees, etc.). Be creative.
Make a recommendation for a government regulation, or law that you would like to see enacted. Think of the consequences (good and bad) of the proposed regulation or law that you have suggested to businesses, and to consumers. Consider any unintended consequences that might occur. Your paper should have the following sections:
1. Regulation or law proposal. Be very specific in the wording. (Your own idea and words). (20 points).
a. What problem did you find in your research online that your regulation plans to address? Include a citation to the article(s) that describes the problem. (10 points)
b. What consequences might your proposed regulation/law have on affected businesses? Describe one good and one bad consequence. (10 points)
c. What consequences might your proposed regulation/law have on protected consumers? Describe one good and one bad consequence. (10 points)
d. Consider unintended consequences. What might one be? Describe it. (5 points).
2. References
o Include a reference(s) from the problem(s) you found in your online research. (5 points)
o APA formatting required. (5 points)
Check Investors a “debt collector,” collecting “debts,” within the meaning of the FDCPA? If so, did its methods violate the FDCPA? What might Check Investors use to argue in its defense? Discuss. Explain.
7. CrossCheck, Inc., provides check authorization services to retail merchants. When a customer presents a check, the merchant contacts CrossCheck, which estimates the probability that the check will clear the bank. If the check is within an acceptable statistical range, CrossCheck notifies the merchant. If the check is dishonored, the merchant sends it to CrossCheck, which pays it. CrossCheck then attempts to redeposit the check. If this fails, CrossCheck takes further steps to collect the amount. William Winterstein took his truck to C&P Auto Service Center, Inc., for a tune-up and paid for the service with a check. C&P contacted CrossCheck and, on its recommendation, accepted the check. When the check was dishonored, C&P mailed it to CrossCheck, which reimbursed C&P and sent a letter to Winterstein, requesting payment. Winterstein filed a suit in a federal district court against CrossCheck, asserting that the letter violated the FDCPA. CrossCheck filed a motion for summary judgment. Who won? Explain.
8. 25-16
.
For these reasons, the FTC must step in to protect our children from these money-hungry marketers. To fail to do so is to jeopardize America’s future: its children.
• 1. What primary ethical norm is downplayed by this argument?
• 2. In this argument, what is the relevant rule of law to which the author refers?
• 3. What reasons does the author give for tighter control of advertising aimed at children?
• 4. Please state opposing arguments to those set out by the author in this essay.
ASSIGNMENT ON THE INTERNET
As e-commerce continues to grow in the United States and abroad, new consumer protection laws are needed. Now that you know something about current consumer protection laws in the United States, use the Internet to research recent developments in consumer protection for transactions through cybers

Ethics Case Anaylsis

Ethics Case Analysis: ***This assignment focuses on the review of an ethics case problem solving the type of case, breach in standard, application and integration of ethical theory, and final
proposed resolution.
Each student will analyze an actual court case utilizing the following format:
***Type of case (e.g.) Tort
***Breach in standard
***Implications for agency/institution
***Actions taken by supervisor or institution to address the concern
***Organizational changes made to prevent another occurrence
***Monitoring established to assure compliance

Criminal Justice Studies

What is a critical problem that prisons are facing now?
. Find a SPECIFIC passage (short is ideal), or an image, or example (again, short). Explain what is going on in this specific passage. Then, explain why this passage illuminates one concern of the text as a whole. Next, explain how the text sheds light on the problem in which you are interested. Does the passage you selected or the text overall, raise new questions? Having read, discussed, and re-read the text, what is still worth discussing? How would you explain to your peers why it is important to look more closely at the specifics of the text? Think of the mini-paper as an invitation to others to keep thinking about what the author is doing.
1. Introduce the author, the text, etc. JUST JUMP RIGHT IN!
2. Select passages that just reflect easily the author’s text as a whole. A sentence that summarizes the reading isn’t interesting.
Your essay much be: Double-spaced, two pages MAXIMUM. You should use 12 point font — Times New Roman. Please put your name on the essay and put page numbers on the essay. Please remember to re-read your work and edit it for grammar and spelling.

AFRICAN LAW!!

Demonstrated knowledge and understanding of contract law 30%
Demonstrated knowledge and understanding of tort law 30%
Ability to apply case law and statute to support an argument 20%
Presentation of the work in a clearly written and scholarly

law and ethics2

you are the Chief Executive of a Local Health Network is New South Wales. E is a patient in one of your hospitals. E had suffered from anorexia since her early teens, brought about by serious sexual abuse which she experienced between the ages of 4 and 11. Despite the challenges of her illness, she was universally described as intelligent and articulate and had completed several years of a medical degree at university before her illness rendered it impossible to continue. She had undergone a number of admissions for medical and psychiatric care, including legislative sectioning on about 10 occasions. In July 2012 E signed a document saying that she did not want to be resuscitated or to be given any medical intervention to prolong her life.
In October 2012, she signed another advance directive in a standard form, assisted by her mother. Following her discharge and return to the community, a familiar pattern re-asserted itself. By early 2013 E was drinking very heavily. She was re-detained in March 2013 and was initially fed by tube but opposed this and tube feeding was stopped. As a result, she has not been taking any calories at all since the end of March. On 20 April 2013 E was admitted to a community hospital for palliative care and placed on an ‘end of life’ care pathway with high doses of opiate medication, to which she is physically addicted.
E has been diagnosed as suffering from a very rare triad of anorexia, alcoholism and personality disorder. Her parents, although not wanting E to die, did not support any further medical intervention unless there was a real prospect of success. E’s treating doctors are doubtful about further coercive treatment. The NSW Health Solicitor has been instructed by you and she has relied on the advice of an expert, who advised that highly specialized treatment was available, which had not been tried, that although not without significant risk might return E to relatively normal life. The treatment involves a number of medical interventions including forcible feeding and using chemical sedation.
The Department of Health, on your behalf, has applied to the NSW Supreme Court in its parens patriae jurisdiction for orders on how to proceed.
What do you think will be the outcome of this application? In addressing this issue, include the following:
1. Does E have the capacity to refuse life-sustaining treatment, including feeding? (10 marks)
2. Were E’s attempts to make binding advance directives refusing treatment valid? (10 marks)
3. A. If the court decides they were valid, what is the procedure the health service should follow to enact those directives? (5 marks)

B. If the court decides they were not valid, what test will the court apply to decide whether or not the proposed treatment of force –feeding is valid? What will their decision be after applying the test? (5 marks)
4. What are the ethical factors, legal principles, and critical thinking framework(s) that you, as a health service manager, would apply in balancing the value of Es life in one scale and the value of her personal independence on the other? In considering your answer please pay particular attention to how you would manage the team treating E, some of which may object to the way the matter proceeds. (10 marks)

Proof Requirements and Sentencing

Topic:
Assignment

While working an undercover detail in a neighborhood known for drug activity, you notice a vehicle stopped at the intersection waiting for the light to change. The man in the vehicle makes eye contact with you. You approach his vehicle and begin carrying on a conversation with him. You ask him if he needs anything, and he responds by asking you, “What do you have?” You ask him what he is looking for, and he tells you he is looking to score. You show him a small bag containing a white powdery substance; he asks how much, and you respond, “20 dollars.” He hands you a $20 bill, and you give him the bag and tip your hat to signal that the transaction was completed. At this time, the man drives off and is stopped a block away by a marked unit. The individual is placed under arrest for drug possession and purchasing drugs, and he is taken to jail.

The individual is charged with possession of a controlled substance. At his trial, he claimed that he was a victim of entrapment by the police. He was found guilty and sentenced to serve 5 years in jail and given credit for the 3 months he already had served in jail.

Assignment Guidelines

Address the following in 1,150 words:

Research and provide 2–3 case briefs on specific case law related to the entrapment defense as it may or may not apply in the case scenario.
Your case briefs should follow this format:
–Title: Title of the selected case

–Facts: Summary of the events, court timeline, evidence, and so forth

–Issues: Issues that were present in this case

–Decisions: The court’s decision and the conclusion to the case

–Reasoning: The rationale behind the final decision

–Dissenting opinions: Any dissenting opinions, and an explanation of what they were and why they were raised
Answer the following questions:

1-Did you have probable cause to approach the defendant while he was parked at the traffic light? Why or why not? Defend your answer.
2-Do you feel that the entrapment defense is a valid one, considering the assignment scenario? Why or why not? Defend your answer.
3-Is providing the opportunity for someone to commit a crime the same as entrapment? Why or why not?
4-If the substance were marijuana, how much would be needed for a misdemeanor charge? A felony?
Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

Memorandum of law

Write a Memorandum of Law (MOL)
 (1) page
 Discussion/Analysis
 Conclusion (Does my client Mr. Pitt have a case?)
MOL will be based on 2 hypothetical cases
 Vreeland v. State of Alassippi; and
 Monroe v. State of Alassippi
PLEASE TIE IN THE ABOVE FACT-PATTERN IN THE MOL