Category: Law

The Law

On each of  the following ;-

(a)Privacy Policy. (b)Real Name Policy . (c)Free speech Policy.

answer the questions in separate paragraphs

1- Tell me the law

2- Explain the law with your own words.

(Introduction – Thesis – Body)

3- how is related to the social media. (Conclusion) * you need to give your opinion about the law)

Brian is a UK manufacturer of Panel Saws (PS) which he has supplied to manufacturers in both UK and Germany for ten years. Brian now plans to sell his machines in France.

Brian has since learned that French legislation requires a licence to import PS’s. The French have placed an annual limit on the number of PS’s that may be imported and have strict regulations which state that any manufacturing machinery, including PS’s , can only be sold through government outlets.

In addition, they will only consider licence applications once a year in August.

France also has Health and Safety legislation in place which requires the PS’s to be fitted with an external filtration system to collect sawdust from the cutting process. This legislation has only recently been introduced following a research article linking sawdust with breathing problems. The research suggests that the external filtration system reduces the risk by 75%. Most of the PS’s manufactured in France already have the filtration system. Brian’s machines do not comply but do have an internal filtration system which, in Brian’s opinion, is much more efficient than the external ones required by the French legislation.

Advise Brian as to the application of EU law on the free movement of goods to this situation.

 

federal government
• Essay One
The purpose of this assignment is to give students an opportunity to discuss a key political science concept, and to show a basic understanding of academic research and reporting skills. Students will write an essay, 750-1000 words in length, on a topic selected from the list below. The assignment is to be formatted according to the American Psychological Association (APA) style. Papers not formatted properly will lose points. Students should use Times New Roman or Arial 12 point as the paper’s font, double space the text, and create one inch margins on all four sides of the page. Assignments must be in a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) format. Click the “Essay One” link above to submit the assignment.
• Describe the formal amendment process, as put forth in Article V of the Constitution and explain why the founders chose those rules for formally amending the Constitution.
• Provide an explanation of the informal process of amending the Constitution.
• Define “loose construction” and “strict construction” methods of constitutional interpretation, and describe how each perspective aligns with formal versus informal methods of change.
• Explain whether you favor a method of loose construction or strict construction of the Constitution. Identify what you view as the benefits of your perspective
my book is the enduring democracy and its a federal government class

 

Imagine that you are a contracts officer for the Internal Revenue Services (IRS), and that your supervisor has tasked you with the procurement of a new software system for processing tax returns. You have recognized that contract administration involves those activities performed by government officials after they award a contract. Once an award is made, contractors receive the contract, which includes provisions to minimize the risk and define rights and obligations, from the Internal Revenue Service.

Review Federal Acquisition Review (FAR) “52.246-1 Contractor Inspection Requirements”.

Note: You may create and/or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.

Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:

Evaluate the importance of the standard default clause. As a contracts officer for the IRS, suggest two (2) ways in which you could combine the standard default clause with the FAR’s delay provision for the protection of both parties to the contract.

Speculate on the impact that a contracting officer’s changes to the payment terms within the software contract would exert upon both the government and the contractor. Analyze the requirements for a contracts officer to successfully effectuate a change order on behalf of the government. Conclude whether or not the change order is the most secure method for making a contractual change. Justify your response.

Examine the inspection criteria that FAR 52.246-1 articulates, and discuss the necessity of each requirement. As a contracts officer for the IRS, suggest two (2) improvements that you could make to the inspection procedure in order to make the procedure more efficient.

Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia does not qualify as an academic resource.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Identify and apply the appropriate Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses to meet compliance in contracting actions and dispute resolution requirements.

Explain the basic elements and compliance issues of the federal procurement framework (contract formulation, solicitation, costs, payment, financing, administration, and closeout).

Use technology and information resources to research issues in procurement and contract law.

Write clearly and concisely about procurement and contract law using correct grammar and mechanics.

 

Law
Make an analysis of the effect of Filartiga v. Pena-Irala Court’s 1980 decision in domestic and international law.

Please note: use up to 15 sources maximum resources and cite them. first draft of the case note.

The case note requires up to 10 pages or around 2,500 words.

 

law of foreign investments
1- law of foreign investments in (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and UAE)
2- please the references is so important to be from formal sources
3- I choose 10 you can make it more based on your needs and you can make it less than 10 but not less than 7

Issue: was John guilty of speeding

± Rule: A person will be guilty of speeding if he exceeds the speed limit, which in Nevada is whatever is reasonable under the circumstances. [Cite statute.] Courts determine whether the speed was reasonable by examining the weather, road and traffic conditions. (cite to Case A)

± Analogous Case: For instance, in Case A the court held that 80 mph was a reasonable speed under the circumstances. [Cite case.] In that case, the driver was traveling 80 mph on a four-lane highway that was mostly straight, but it had two moderate curves in the thirty miles of highway on which the defendant was driving. Traffic was light but intermittently moderate; it was a bright, sunny day and the road was dry. [Cite to case.] Because the traffic pattern was mostly light and because of the perfect weather and road conditions, the court held that the driver could travel safely at 80 mph, making that a reasonable, legal speed under the circumstances. [Cite holding.]

± Argument/Application Section: John can argue that his speed was reasonable because unlike in Case A, in which the court held that eighty-miles- per hour speed was reasonable, John was driving only 75 mph. Also, like the road in Case A, the highway John was driving on had four-lanes, and the weather was similarly sunny. Furthermore, like the mostly straight road in Case A which had two moderate curves in thirty miles, the road on which John was traveling was mostly straight, with only four curves on a twenty-mile stretch. John’s road, like the road in Case A, was dry and the safety of the road itself had not been affected by the earlier rain. The water was only on the shoulders. Finally, as in Case A in which the traffic was at times moderate, the traffic in John’s case was also at times moderate. Since the court in Case A held that 80 mph was a reasonably safe speed under similar conditions, John will argue that he could reasonably travel safely five miles per hour slower. The speed was safe because the road was dry and traffic was at worst moderate. Also, even though the road had a two more curves than in Case A, the road on which John was driving had long stretches of straight road as in Case A. Thus the court should hold that he was driving at a reasonably safe speed under the circumstances.

± Conclusion: The court will probably find that John’s speed of 75 mph was reasonable under the circumstances. The similarities between Case A and John’s situation are analogous since the road was dry in both cases and both involved a driver on a relatively straight, four-lane highway without heavy traffic. Therefore, just as in Case A, the court will probably hold that John was driving at a safely, and thus a reasonable rate of speed under the circumstances.