Comparing Ancient Male Rules

 

Establish a clear thesis about your topic as part of the introductory paragraph (often the thesis is the last thing one determines after doing the basic research and outline; however it will be placed in the first paragraph of your paper).
This is a comparative essay. Comparison approached properly will require some critical thinking on your part. Use a point-by-point approach for the essay. That means, if comparing subject A with subject B, don’t do the first half of the essay on subject A and then the second half on subject B–that will seem like two (2) separate essays and comparisons will tend to get lost. Instead, you should be mentioning both subjects in most of your paragraphs as you compare them throughout the essay. Comparisons will identify similarities as well as contrasts.
Do not try to do everything on your two (2) subjects. You should end up narrowing your focus to a few insights and issues about the subjects being compared. And, from those fairly specific points of comparison, you will develop a thesis and glean some lessons.
Follow closely the instructions below for your specific topic.
Include a concluding paragraph at the end. This paragraph will, in some way, refer back to the thesis established in your first paragraph, since now you have demonstrated and supported it. It may be here that you also include your observations relating your study to the modern workplace or society (see your topic). Try to finish with flair!
Use at least three (3) good quality academic sources, with one (1) source being the class text. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources. You are highly encouraged to use the Resource Center tab at the top of your Blackboard page.
Comparing Ancient Male Rulers. Take any two (2) of these rulers and write an essay comparing them: Ramses II, Shihuangdi, Constantine, Ashoka, Pericles, or Charlemagne. Select rulers from different cultures. You may also propose (for approval or not) a ruler not listed. Avoid lengthy quoting or lengthy close paraphrasing from biographical sources. Make it YOUR comparative analysis. Your paper should:
a) Compare the two (2) rulers in terms of their situation and methods of rule and their apparent ideals and practices, noting similarities and differences. Use specific examples.

b) Consider what your study suggests about the cultures over which they ruled, identifying any similarities and differences between the cultures.

c) From this comparison, suggest lessons about different types of effective leadership in the world of modern business and / or modern politics.

 

Consumerism in Health Care Paper- BENCHMARK

 
Topic Introduction and Summary:

Include:

An explanation to what research shows regarding customer perception of health care over the past 5 years.
An introduction to the topic and its significance to customer service or consumerism in allied health care.
What does the research forecast as the trends, for the next 5 years, to better meet consumer needs?
Methodology:

Provide an overview of the scope of the study in the chosen article by explaining data collection and where to find the data.

Describe the process used to determine the validity and reliability of the research findings to support evidence-based practices.

Results:

Differentiate between the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the data described in the article in terms of descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, or both.

Determine if you have enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the study?

Conclusion:

Summarize your findings of the research as it relates to where we are in health care delivery today. What actions to you see that need to take place to meet the future needs of health care delivery?

Assignment Requirements:

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

The Research on Media Image of Ordinary People in China-taking the program the voice of chin

a
I study mass communication master degree.In this unit the professor let me initiate a substantial research project in a specialist media topic(I have been chose) related to key issues of media and communications .based on the research proposal elaborated in the Unit MED502-6(I will sent to you under ) Research Methods, approved by your course co-ordinator, supervised by an academic supervisor). Syllabus Content Workshops on the main research methods (theory and practices). E.g.: survey, content analysis, qualitative interview, participant observation, and visual analysis.
On completion of this unit you
should be able to:
Threshold criteria Assessment
No.
1
Critically evaluate the
theoretical/scholarly
approaches, research design
and methodologies relevant to /
suitable for an area of study in
the media.
Be able to select and use the appropriate
theoretical framework and methodology for the
chosen area/topic of research
Write a clear, and internally consistent
dissertation, expressing your research design and
critical evaluation of your chosen methodologies
in the form of an effective research
design/methodology statement for your chosen
topic.
1
Submit a research journal, documenting research
activities as they are undertaken.

In this unit you will develop research skills and communicative skills, in order to express your ideas to your supervisor, your unit co-ordinator and your fellow students, and write a clear and academic appropriate dissertation. Contextual understanding In this unit you will understand how to conduct a research, critically reflecting on theoretical frameworks and methodologies appropriate for an area of study in the media

HBS case study- The NFL’s Digital Medial Strategy (business/information systems approach)

 
Please read and analyze the assigned case.(The NfL Digital Media Strategy, will be attached) Your analysis must address the following questions: a. Which alternative would you recommend, and why? Use the financial, performance, and other information provided in the case to justify your answer. You must also use information from five other reputable sources (e.g., news, trade, or academic journal articles, but not including the case). b. Be sure to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each option. What are the realistic outcomes and risks of your recommendation? Multiple alternatives—including their benefits and risks—must be assessed. Papers focusing on only one alternative will be downgraded. c. Chapters 6 and 11 from The Case Study Handbook (Ellet, 2007) may be helpful references. Again, please use the financial, performance, and other data in the back of the case to support your answer. You must also use information and/or data from six other reliable sources (e.g., news, trade, or academic journal articles, but not including the case). Avoid common mistakes when writing case reports. These include, but are not limited to: • Don’t re-tell the case. Get to the point. What should they do? • Avoid giving abstract advice. Be specific. Support your recommendations with sound reasoning based on reliable data. Remember: numbers are your friends. • Beware of afterthoughts. For example, do not suggest an idea at the end of the paper in order to “cover your bases.” If the idea is useful, it should be addressed throughout your paper.

please follow the following format
1p-intro(introductory to business, setting, main character, who is he, whats the dilemma, layout possible strategies and why they are important and relevant)
2p- criteria to be used to analyse options( must state 2-3 criteria that are relevant to weighing the multiple options outlined in the intro.
p3-discus the pros then the cons of the first option based on the criteria
p4-discuss the pros and cons of the second option based on the criteria
p5- discuss the pros and cons of the remaining option if there is a third,
p-6 state your action plan for implementation of the best option( back your self up with sources, select one option and go with it, feel free to rant here. if both options are good, rank them, and discuss the priority of the order you have placed them in.
p7- conclusion, be short, firm, and simple, to the point. business style

: Business Law, case study

 
Case study (mid-term paper):
One Italian firm COTONI PREGIATI SRL and one US firm (New Jersey Inc.) are separate and independent corporate entities. They conclude a distribution contract, where the US Company is granted the exclusive right to distribute the Italian knitwear produced with the Italian high quality cotton, in the US, Spain and parts of Latin America/Caribbean.
The contract between the two companies contains set as law of the contract the Law of New Jersey and includes an MED-ARB clause.
After a while, COTONI PREGIATI SRL starts suffering profit losses allegedly due to delays in the distribution activity of the US distributor. On the other hand, the US firm claims that the products delivered by the Italian company are defective and rejected by the US and Spanish clients.
 Provide a brief description of the basic elements that such a contract should have included,
 Analyze the possible dispute resolution methods and remedies available to the parties 
beforehand, in the light of the specific features of the case,
 Explain why the firms preferred to include those clauses in the contract. 
Aims of the Course:
1. achieve a basic understanding of the international business law environment;
2. examine legal aspects of international business with particular reference to the formation of business contracts, the sale of goods, the international commercial arbitration, the intellectual property, the distribution, the corporations;
3. offer a comparative approach so as to understand how legal problems are treated in different social and cultural environment;
4. enable students to identify the key legal risks of engaging in international business and to make business decisions necessary to operate a business in the international legal environment;
5. achieve a critical understanding of global ethical concerns and corporate responsibilities of international business. 
Please bear this in mind when you are writing your midterm assignment.
General Instructions:
The assignment has been designed to marry the theoretical analysis and practical application of the concepts of Business law. This assignment will therefore require students to show a critical understanding of the different issues at stake (categories of contracts, category of transaction and risks thereto, remedies and drafting techniques).
The report should display a coherent structure i.e. title page, contents page, introduction, analysis, findings, conclusions, recommendations, referencing and appendices. Depth, relevance and variety are the crucial elements of quality research. (Wikipedia is not considered to be a relevant source of information).

PERSONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

 
ABOUT PERSONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.
this is a one page discussion on the following question: What is at least one area in your life that you would like to improve for the sake of your own personal growth and development?

HINT: think in terms of how you see yourself aand what others may think of you, WHAT KIND OF CRITICISMS DO OTHERS HAVE OF YOU. THIS WILL BE WHAT YOU WILL NEED TO IMPROVE UPON IN ORDER TO GET A DIFFERENT, MORE POSITIVE RESPONSE FROM ENVIRONMENT AND MAKE YOU A BETTER PERSON..

pls I don’t want stuff about procrastination, organization, etc. secondly I don’t need any reference, and hope my paper its free from plagiarism. thanks

Intellectual Property Rights and Terrorism

 
I. Introduction, Research Question, and Hypothesis: This section shall provide an overview of the topic that you are writing about, a concise synopsis of the issues, and why the topic presents a “puzzle” that prompts your research questions, which you will include. This section will be 1-2 pages. This section can be preceded by an epigraph that creates interest in the topic. Ensure that you follow proper format for epigraphs!!

II. Review of the Literature: All research projects include a literature review to set out for the reader what knowledge exists on the subject under study and helps the researcher develop the research strategy to use in the study. A good literature review is a thoughtful study of what has been written, a summary of the arguments that exist (whether you agree with them or not), arranged thematically. At the end of the summary, there should still be gaps in the literature that you intend to fill with your research. It is written in narrative format and can be from 3-5 pages depending on the scope and length of the paper.

As a literature review, this section should identify the common themes and theories that the prior research identified. In this section what you do is look at the conclusions of prior research and identify what the common themes are you see in those conclusions. You then identify those themes.
III. Methodology and Research Strategy: This section provides the reader with a description of how you carried out your qualitative research project, and the variables you identified and analyzed. It describes any special considerations and defines any limitations and terms specific to this project, if necessary. This section can be brief or more complicated, depending on the project, written in 1-2 pages.

IV. Analysis and findings are not the same as conclusions. In the analysis component of this section you identify how you analyzed the data. The second part is the finding you got from your analysis of the data. The findings are the facts that you developed, not your interpretation of the facts. That interpretation is conducted in the conclusions and recommendations section of the paper. Findings will come from the prior research you examined and your analysis of those prior findings to create new findings for your paper. While there may be some facts that are such that they will stand and translate to your paper, the intent is to create new knowledge, so you will normally analyze the data to create your own findings of what facts that data represents.

V. Conclusions and Recommendations is the section where you give your interpretation of the data. Here you tell the reader what the findings mean. Often the conclusions and recommendations sections will mirror the findings in construct as the researcher tells the reader what that researcher sees as the meaning of that data, their conclusions. Then, drawing on those conclusions, the researcher tells the reader what they believe needs to be done to solve/answer the research question. This section may include recognition of any needs for further research and then finishes with a traditional conclusion to the paper as a whole.

VI. References (or Bibliography): This section will contain all references, cited in Turabian Parenthetical format and alphabetically arranged. Entitle this section as “References”.

Psoriasis

 
Jason 19 years old, is an engineering student in the first year of his university course and has moved out of home into a shared house.
He has a family history of psoriasis and he unhappily followed his mothers example and developed psoriasis in his late teens. The skin inflammation is evident in his scalp elbows and knees usually doesn’t cause too much inconvenience, but it can flare up and spread at an alarming rate without any warning. This has been happening every couple of months, but seems to occurring more often in recent times. the lesions are pink, inflamed with fine flaky scales and he can’t help itching them. The itching can make the lesions bleed and heal very slowly.
Lately he has noticed something different : aching and pain in the spine, neck and shoulders which worries him because his mother had psoriatic arthritis.
Jason passes a bowel motion every second day and his housemate complain of a putrid malingering smell in the bathroom after these visits. The lounge room regularly has to be evacuated due to the awful smell of his ever present flatulence. In a boyish way he is pleased with this, but knows it cannot be healthy thing.
Jason dosent drink alcohol or smoke.
Typical daily diet
Breakfast- Bacon and eggs with white toast . Orange juice
Morning tea- Coffee scroll with margarine. V energy drink
Lunch- Italian meatball sandwich in white bread with margarine
Afternoon tea- Sausage roll with sauce
Dinner- Chicken parma with chips and veg. Raspberry cordial
Questions
Answer the following questions making sure that u are within word limits. support your answers with evidence from the literature and cite all your sources using APA referencing style.
1- Analyse the case . Include the major aspects of Jason’s condition and its causes, his current diet and his lifestyle choices. (200 words)
2- Draw up a list of your treatment objectives (100 words)
3- Select 5 nutrients/ foods that u would include in your prescription. Explain the rational behind each of your choices (250 words)
4- foods/ nutrients would u remove or limit in jasons diet. Explain the rational behind your choices (150 words)
5- Plan a menu for one day taking into account your treatment protocol. you do not need to include weights or volume measures, it is sufficient to use portions (100 words) main referring hecchtman, L. clinical natutopathic medicine 2012. and pubmed. some Australian referencing

EEG request

 

This urgent request is for

1. add more (stronger) theoretical perspectives
2. add more theoretical backgrounds(more of social scientific backgrounds / sociological backgrounds) (It’s enough for sound and its characteristic parts. Please don’t add more)
Please kindly add more literature reviews to support the theory. (from media effects, sports and emotions, etc)
The new title of dissertation is “An evaluation of Spectators’ Sounds on the Brain Interaction of Television Audiences during Sports Games: focused on the EEG analysis.

Quantitative assignment

 
Quantitative Assignment

3000 words

A report based on analyzing data from a survey at a Sports Centre.

– Evaluation and analysis of a survey undertaken on the users of a University Sports Centre

– Consider the design of the questionnaire itself

– Undertake some analysis (in SPSS) of the data set that was created by using this questionnaire

The report includes appropriate tables and graphs and a set of references. Use SPSS for data analysis.

There are 4 attachments to this report file

– The data file you will analyse (called ‘servqual.sav’)

– The questionnaire < Service Quality Questionnaire>

– Servqual into methods (to be used as the basis for your evaluation and conclusion)

– SERVQUALvariable list.