Nutrition

 
Professors Instructions:
You should create your own personal profile based on age, gender and activity level; you may find the total energy need calculation information on page 380 of your textbook for 3rd edition and on page 400 for 4th edition. FYI-I have the 3rd addition and I can send you a picture of the total energy need calculation page if needed?. You can then calculate your standard RDA/DRI’s goal percentages (USDA Food Guide recommendation) for total amount calories, nutrients, minerals and vitamins. You can find this information in the appendix A of your textbook. Then, you should compare the choices you made in 2 days (your actual intake) to the USDA Food Guide recommendation for your age, gender and activity level. You should also calculate the percentage of calories coming from Protein, Fat, and Carbohydrate for your actual intake.
In the 2 day diet diary, after recording and comparing your data, you should answer the questions which are provided to you are on a separate sheet of paper. Your name and the date should be on the pages. All the forms and the report should be send through Blackboard by assignment link.
Your diet analysis and discussion will not be graded on how well you eat. That’s your responsibility. It will be graded on how well you discuss and analyze it.

Common Mistakes:
When recording your nutrient intake, ignore superscripts; values that read <1 = 0; tr (trace) = 0. Do not include more than one decimal column.
Be careful when adding columns, if you find that a nutrient is more than 150% of the DRI, recheck you math. Be precise using decimal points.
Do not get nutrient values off food labels, they are not complete. Look up the food or a similar food in

Appendix A of the text.
If you chose to do a computerized nutrient analysis, you must still complete forms 2, 3, and 4 and answer the questions.

Note: No reference NEEDED and theres a specific chart that needs to be used to input the information which I will attach.

Personal information: Age 33, Gender female, Height 5.4 and weight 180. My activity level is average. I usual eat boil eggs or cereal in the mornings with a cup of tea. My lunch consist of white tuna in water with a salad with tomatoes, cumbers, advacado and balsamic dressing with a bottle of water or bake or broil chicken with a vegetables. For dinner chicken breast with a salad and a bottle of water. Snack a pear or apple. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me via email or cell.

Homeland Security,— See below for details

 

You have been hired to conduct an incident post-mortem to provide feedback to senior government officials on the performance of various response teams during a disaster event.

Using your answers to Written Assignment 2 (Module 2: Assessing the Situation) as a starting point, describe the steps that you would take to conduct the post-mortem.

What are the key success factors in managing large, multi-agency and multi-jurisdictional response programs?
How can we determine or measure “success” in response?
How can we design drills and tests that specifically evaluate the key success factors for response?

Answer these questions in a memo of 8-10 pages, double-spaced, 12 point, Times New Roman. Your memo should be documented in APA style.

 

Thinking Critically About Issues

 
What did you discover as you debated with your colleagues? Did you or a colleague uncover information that made you consider altering your position? Perhaps the debate helped you to realize how much more you need to know before you are completely clear about your position. As an education leader, you must stay abreast of the issues that matter in yourspecialization to deepen and refresh your knowledge regularly so you are well informed.
In this Discussion, you will look more closely at the case study issue you debated in Discussion 1. To prepare for this Discussion, consider everything you discovered about the case study. Conduct a search to obtain at least three scholarly articles that relate to the issue you debated. Finally, consider how the process of exploring and debating issues relates to your role as a change agent and advanced graduate degree student.
Keep in mind that the articles you obtain may support or refute the position you held in the debate, or they may introduce a different perspective altogether. Your purpose in this Discussion is to learn more about the issue you have been exploring.
Submit by Day 6 (of Module 2) a post that does the following:
• Explains what you discovered about the issue from the debate and from the resources you located for this Discussion.
• Identifies answers to the questions you have raised about the issue
• Identifies new questions you have about the issue.
• Explains how you might apply the critical analysis and research skills you have practiced this week to your role as a student and as a professional.

Keynesian View Paper

The Keynesian view focuses heavily on aggregate demand. Keynesian’s view increased government spending as a way to directly increase aggregate demand. Keynesians argue that the correct use of an expansive or restrictive fiscal policy can control the economic conditions of a country.
Write a 2-3 page paper that addresses the following.

To achieve maximum points for content and analysis, the following elements need thoroughly addressed.

 Compare and contrast the Keynesian View to current U.S. fiscal policy.
 Discuss how the stimulus that was done in 2008-2010 relates to the Keynesian View.
 Analyze if a stimulus approach helps the economic position of the country in the long term.
 Provide at least three sources. Citations to the video, textbook, Bible, and dictionary should be provided on top of the required three sources.

The Bible does not have to be listed in the References page, but does have to be cited in-text.
 Use the Paper Writing rubric provided in the syllabus to ensure you have met all of the criteria.

A:evidenced based proposal for a quality improvement/change intervention to be implemented in your healthcare organizationB:be structured using an established reflective model ,critically reflect on the key learnings from “Evaluation, Measurement

 
Mandatory to be specific with your initiative & you should find plenty of resources for the topic you will chose in order to support the
Using assignment template attached it’s a must to follow the bellow instruction
Part A: Quality improvement/change intervention proposal:
[3,000 words, 75% of total grade; assesses learning outcomes 1 – 4]
Prepare an evidenced based proposal for a quality improvement/change intervention to be implemented in YOUR OWN HEALTHCARE ORGANISATION using the following headings:
1. Introduction [Brief background to quality improvement/change interventions, introduction to your subject matter and the contents of your assignment (“signpost”). Reference to the evidence-base will be useful…]
a-General background (setting the stage, why this is an area of interest)
(why its important to healthcare organization using evidence)
b-Introduction to subject matter (more specific information on the matter being discussed\ background on organization ) (use evidence why should it improve )
c- Introduction to contents of essay (an outline of what is ahead for the reader)
Ex: the writer\author healthcare organization in acute care in GCC …..+ mandatory support with evidence + 1page
(chose a topic & search for it \why picked it ?why not others + evidence)

2. The importance of evaluation, research and measurement (EMR) [A critical, evidence-based discussion investigating the importance of evaluation, measurement and research in managing healthcare and/or quality and safety in healthcare.]
(Should include comparison\contrast\advantage \disadvantage\limitation \dependences \interdependences between EMR ex: decide as writer why you go with any idea & support it with evidence \ex: Berwick said …..but… said….however the writer thought….)\(in this topic generally talk what’s imp of EMR ,based on evidence do not focus on topic)( you can use table\diagrham.. for comparison cuz it will save word count )
3. Problem description 
[Nature and significance of the local, organisational problem – this could be meaningful disruption, failure, inadequacy, distress, confusion or other dysfunction in your organisation that adversely affects patients, staff or the system as a whole, or that prevents care from reaching its full potential. Reference to the evidence-base will be useful…]
(what is it ? why its such a problem ?+ reference use ( can use SQUIRE 2.0 standards for quality improvement report see attach )( in this topic focus on the problem \1-2 paragraph )
4.Available knowledge 
[Summary of what is currently known about the problem, including relevant previous studies – this is a critical discussion of the evidence-base in the quality improvement/change intervention area (literature review!). Remember to identify and critique conflicting evidence and draw appropriate conclusions.]
(mandatory to use 10 best article that support topic\change + evidence)
5. Rationale and context 
[An explanation of why you have chosen the quality improvement/change intervention, why it will work and why it is both sustainable and replicable. The context is the physical, social and cultural factors that “makes” your organisation what it is (e.g. external environmental factors, organisational dynamics, team work/collaboration, resources and leadership) and your interpretation of these factors that could affect the effectiveness and generalisability of intervention. Reference to the evidence-base will be useful…]

6. Objectives for the proposed quality improvement/change intervention 
[How you will achieve the proposed quality improvement/change intervention – S.M.A.R.T. statements defining measurable outcomes. These can be “listed” in your assignment. Reference to the evidence- base will be useful…]
7. Study, measures and evaluation for the proposed quality improvement/change intervention 
[Approach chosen for critically analysing and assessing the impact of the quality improvement/change intervention, including your approach to ensure the outcomes will be due to the intervention. This should include the measures chosen for studying the processes and outcomes of the intervention, including the rationale for choosing them, operational definitions, validity and reliability, approach to ongoing assessment and methods to ensure the completeness and accuracy of data collected. Reference to the evidence-base will be useful…]
8. Ethical considerations 
[Any ethical aspects of implementing and studying the proposed quality improvement/change intervention and how these will be addressed, potentially including formal ethics review and conflicts of interest. Reference to the evidence-base will be useful…]
9. Limitations
[Factors which could limit the proposed quality improvement/change intervention’s generalisability, internal validity (confounding, bias or imprecision in design, methods, measurement or analysis) and approaches to minimise such limitations. Reference to the evidence-base will be useful…]
10. Conclusion
[A brief summary of what has been discussed, a suggested course of action and a statement which summarizes your main point or conclusions of the arguments you have made]

Part B: Reflection:
[1,000 words, 25% of total grade; assesses learning outcomes 5]
Beginning with your prior experience and understanding, critically reflect on the key learnings you have achieved during Module 3 “Evaluation, Measurement & Research” and identify how you can apply these key learnings to your area of practice. [Your reflection must be structured using an established reflective model e.g. Gibbs Reflective Cycle and references are not mandatory] see attached file >>
Rationale of module:
Healthcare professionals need to have the skills and knowledge to assess, implement and evaluate healthcare interventions. Evaluation, measurement and research challenge healthcare professionals to develop a strong evidence-based function within the healthcare services.
Module aim:
To advance healthcare professionals’ knowledge of evaluation, measurement and research and to empower students to choose the right methods for the task at hand.
Learning outcomes:
1. Critically discuss the importance of evaluation, measurement and research in managing healthcare and/or quality and safety in healthcare.
2. Critically evaluate research reports relevant to your field of study. 
(What current knowledge in field? should be used through out whole assignment\ use reference to critical review)
3. Critique key approaches to evaluation, measurement and research (such as performance indicators, 
audit and quantitative and qualitative research methods). 
(ex: I pick audit type 1 cuz ….. & did not pick others cuz ….+evidence to support ur decision) (ex: according to smith etl…)
4. Critically discuss how to evaluate quality improvement/change in a healthcare organisation. 
(ex : the writer choose this evaluation design cuz…. & other are …)why picked this ? why not picked others with reference
5. Demonstrate an understanding of critical reflection on key concepts around evaluation, measurement and research.

Critically discuss : Look at all aspects of the issue; debate the issue, giving your reasons for and against the argument being proposed. Your opinion must be supported by authoritative evidence
Critically evaluate : Appraise, access and make a judgement, stressing strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages.

“Broken Windows” theory,

 
Assignment #10
If you have had any experience with Broken Windows Policing (Stop and Frisk) you can share that experience with your classmates (optional).
Write a brief statement about the following issues:
1) What evidence if any speaks in favor of the success of broken windows policing?
2) Is there are relationship between broken windows policing and recent incidences of police brutality? Why? Why not?
Write at least 350 words covering both issues. Don’t write more than 450 words.

Does Speculation of Futures of Food Commodities Affect its Underlying Spot Price?

 
Topic: Does Speculation of Futures affect Food Prices?

So – tested to see if volatility of future prices affected the spot price.

Now – I would like the Granger Causality Tests

Results and Discussion – for 3 commodities (wheat, sugar and corn)

Data found in Excel uploaded.

Uploaded – GARCH Results and Discussion.
The Methodology for GARCH.

Could I please ask for:
2 and a half pages – Results and Discussion, and 1 and a half page – Methodology with Granger Causality Test, to add onto existing (GARCH). Please have a look at the existing methodology.

Its important I have the Methodology for the Granger Tests to add to current Methodology, along with the results and discussion to add to the “Results and Discussion” section

Strategic Human Resources Management

K1 Outline the relationship between strategic human resource management, business strategies and human resource
functions
K2 Discuss the links between strategic human resource management and organisational strategy, structure, culture
and policy
K3 Evaluate the impact of Australia’s industrial relations environment on strategic human resource management
K4 Assess the extent to which a strategic approach to human resource management can lead to sustainable
competitive advantage for an organisation
K5 Apply a theoretical perspective to the evaluation of human resource policies and practices
K6 Compare and contrast the theoretical and practical perspectives of strategic human resource management
Skills
S1 Recommend changes to human resource policies and practices in order to facilitate a more strategic approach to
human resource management
S2 Investigate and evaluate evidence of the link between strategic human resource management and long-term
organisational performance
S3 Debate the role of strategic human resource management in achieving recognition as an ‘employer of choice’
S4 Evaluate the impact of environmental factors on strategic human resource management
S5 Assess the impediments to human resource management playing a more integral role in overall organisational
strategy
Application of knowledge and skills
A1 Independently apply the theoretical perspectives of strategic human resource management to the evaluation of
functional, operational and strategic human resource policies and activities
A2 Critically evaluate the benefits that can be achieved by ensuring that human resource strategy plays an integral
role in the development of overall organisational strategy

vocabulary acquisition from reading

 
I have already written the first part of my assignment.
what I want you to do is:
1. data collection and statistic part
2. result part and disscussion
3. small conclusion part.
4. prepare the reference page.

Clinical/course outcomes

 
My institution have zero tolerance for plagiarism.

Please read the instructions on the assignment properly.

1. Please do not use the clinical outcomes provided to write this paper. this outcomes is attached just for you to know the course/clinical outcomes for this class.

2. You are to create 3 NEW outcomes that are NOT a repeat of the course outcomes provided.

3. The outcomes must be specific to the clinical environment provided (Medical-surgical/orthopedic) unit.
4. Please be thorough in describing the outcomes and follow instructions attached concerning APA format and other specific instructions to write this paper.