Category: Law

 
European IP Law and its impact on intellectual property rights. Peer to Peer downloads and Internet protection

Order Description:
What we need is a proposal along the following guidelines, as provided by our supervisors:
2. The Plan is not a ‘mini-assignment’, it is not assessed and there are no formalities involved with the submission. That said, the bullet points below offer some guidance.
a. Formulate a Title.
b. This initial plan should be no more than 1000 words.
c. It should give a preliminary indication of your intended reading materials.
d. There is no need to reference the plan.
If you can do this properly, let us know otherwise please refund our payment. If we’re happy with this, will assign you the ALR and then the full dissertation paper, 15,000 – 18,000 words.

 
With reference to EU legislation and decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union, critically analyse the extent to which Member States can restrict or prevent the free movement of persons on grounds of public policy or public security.
Font: Arial
Font size: 12
Line Spacing: 1.5
Sections/Headings: Permitted.
Referencing: Numeric, i.e., citation by footnote; OSCOLA style recommended;
Bibliography: Compulsory; un-annotated.
Word limit discretion: 10% under or over.

please use asocial referencing and footnotes

 
please use a lot of academic journals as you can see this essay has to be based on quite a lot of criticism. Please use the treaty of lisbon, process, architecture and substance by paul craig
and directives:direct effect, indirect effect and the construction of national legislation by paul p. craig and
please do use the EU Law:text, cases and materials by paul craig and grainne de burca,
Fosters on EU law by nigel Foster. use other journals on democratic
deficity.
also use other journals and good text books please.

when writing the essay, I have attached what my professor said about the assignment like what to include please read it carefully and use it and please always relate back to the question. you could write down the intro as mentioned in my professors note and in the main body you could explain the institutions and talk about the history as you go along so it does not sound repetitive. when writing the essay please do not go in depth with the European Central Bank and the Court of Auditors as they are not very important for this essay please do footnotes and a bibliography page
I have my lecture slides uploaded, you do not have to use them, they are there for background information. please always use treaties when you could and few cases.
You will see yellow highlights in my professor’s notes please follow what they say.

i just wanted to add on the instructions and say make sure you go back and read the file that is called EU law Autumn essay question because this is the essay question . just add this to the rest of the instructions please xx
“please focus only on the EU may include minor things about the US but it has to have a relation with the EU, please do an inro as said in my professors notes and please write down a conclusion as well “

 
1) You are required to address the following question which asks you to critically
discuss the quote from Stewart Manley’s recent article on Secret Trusts.
2) You are required to write your answer in the style of a short academic article. Please read this question in conjunction with the
information set out clearly in the slides that will accompany the lecture.
3) You will need to write clearly, address the task that you have been asked to
undertake and provide a strong narrative thesis throughout your response –
dealing with the subject matter of the question.
4) You are required to use robust academic sources to support the points and
arguments that you make in addressing the question.
5) You are required to use footnotes and provide a bibliography in a manner that
conforms to the OSCOLA protocol.
6) Word Count – INCLUDING FOOTNOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY – 3500 words.
Question:
“Secret trusts are scrutinised in every trust law text-book. Numerous scholarly articles have debated their theoretical
basis. Yet they remain a conceptual conundrum. Is a fully secret trust testamentary or inter-vivos? Is it express or
constructive? Should its apparent failure to comply with the requirements of the Wills Act be disregarded to prevent
fraud or because it is dehors (outside the scope of) the will?”
Stewart Manley, ‘Reconceptualising the fully-secret trust’ (2015) 21 Trusts and Trustees 802
Critically discuss.

 
LLM … International Commercial Law … Coursework
Question
Fast Carry Ltd. agrees to carry SS Ltd.’s goods on board Fast Carry Ltd.’s ship, The Angel, from London to Buffalo, USA. A bill of lading covers the contract of carriage by sea and it expressly provides that the Hague-Visby Rules shall govern the contract of carriage by sea.
The goods are stowed on deck under a mere liberty clause. On the way to Buffalo, half of the goods are washed off deck and the other half are damaged by rainwater because the tarpaulins are not placed properly over the goods though they are provided to protect the goods against rainwater.
Fast Carry Ltd. comes to you for advice regarding its liability arising from the above stated incidences under the Hague-Visby Rules. Fast Carry Ltd. also would like you to provide a critical comparison between the Hague-Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules regarding the issue of carrier’s duties and immunities because Fast Carry Ltd. wants to know whether its position as a carrier would have been better under the Hamburg Rules.
Word count 2500
References bibliography not included in word count.
Oscola references

 
LLM Company Law coursework
Question

Liam, John and Ming are directors of Sunny Ltd. They hold 30%, 30% and 40% of the shares respectively. Sunny Ltd recently rejects a contract of sale of flour with Flour Ltd as John and Ming say the price of the flour is not suitable for Sunny Ltd. However, Liam finds out that John and Ming later make a profit by entering into the contract of sale of flour with Flour Ltd in their own names. John and Ming have not informed Sunny Ltd regarding their conduct of contracting with Flour Ltd.
Sunny Ltd. is now in compulsory liquidation and its assets amount to £13,200. The creditors have submitted the proofs of debts. The cost of winding up is £10,000 and the interests on all the debts are £6,000. Three employees of Sunny Ltd. are claiming for their unpaid salaries for the last 5 months, each person in total seeks to claim £6,000 respectively. And there are three unsecured creditors who are claiming £1,000, £3,000 and 4,000 respectively.
Liam is not happy with the conduct of John and Ming and he comes to you for advice. He would like you to:
1. advise Liam whether John and Ming have breached any of the statutory directors’ duties;
2. advise the liquidator regarding payments of the claims listed above.
Word count 2500
References oscola
References and bibliography not included in word count

 
Paper it is on a bill proposed by Nancy Munoz an assembly woman in the the state of new jersey. This bill is under the NJ legislature website. please follow following directions for paper
Write a paper analyzing the topic/bill selected ,
paper is no longer than 10 pages;
contains a minimum of eight references;
is in APA format;
contains the following elements;
a short description of the policy and policy issue the bill addresses,
a background on the development of the bill including factual history, political issues and ramifications, the stage of the policy in terms of formulation and/or implementation,
the key stakeholders involved in this policy and their influence;
how the policy can or did become a priority on the political/legislative agenda;
a brief identification of the social, ethical, cultural, economic and environmental dimensions of the policy/policy issue;
a plan for policy implementation;
a plan for evaluation and ideas for modification of the policy issue;
the expected future of this policy/policy issue in terms of improving the health and well-being of US citizens;
the likelihood the bill will pass;
a description of the role nursing and other healthcare disciplines will play in ensuring that this policy/policy issue is properly implemented and evaluated to achieve its desired impact and added value to US health care.

 

 
Serious attention:Hello, my order will use Turnitin anti-plagiarism software to check, so no copy no plagiarism.，otherwise I will apply refund. Thanks
please MUST finish it on time，no any reason for extend。Thanks
Please ensure the quality for the essay，it is important for me。Thanks
Subject：Corporation Law and Economics
Critically analyse following statement，indicating whether you agree or disagree with it，in whole or in part，and why：

Question：“The limited liability rule gives directors of public corporations the incentive to assume too much risk. Conversely，directors would be too risk-averse if shareholders had unlimited liability.”

5000 words
Please attention:MUST Finish it on time。
Important attention：Reference must use footnote style ，like below

 
1. Choose 10 Sources:
Books, journals, articles and or magazines about ARGUMENTS FOR and AGAINST THE RIGHT TO DIE ( Physician assisted suicide)
2. Create a WORK CITED page for those sources
3. Write an ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY for those 10 sources, making sure your use 3 to 5 sentences for each of those 10 sources. ( maximum 4 pages)
4. Using your 10 sources, write a SEPARATE PAGE that will serve as INTRODUCTION and a THESIS ( one page) to this Research Report paper-
Debate: The Right to Life vs The Right to Die.
Please follow carefully the uploaded examples and instructions.

This order of 5 pages hastwo parts: 1.Annotated Bibliography:four (4) pages 2.Introduction and thesis to the research report: Debate The Right to Life vs The Right to die:one (1) page.Please ask the writers to follow the rest of instructions and samples carefully.

 
You need to submit one file including:-

A Title Page – including your name, student number, and total word count

Part 1 – Questions with your clients’ answers. Each question should have its own answer immediately following it: (maximum: 600 words, 7.5 marks)

Part 2 – Relevant law: (maximum: 1,000 words, 10 marks)

Part 3 – Reasoned recommendations to the client: (maximum: 400 words, 7.5 marks)