Category: Law

 
Requirements:
(1) Critical thinking and thorough analysis of the facts and the relevant laws, and this includes identification of legal issues and principles both from common law and from legislative provisions;
(2) Adequate legal research;
(3) Clarity in your communication, in the structure and in presentation; and
(4) Proper referencing and citations.

****Use footnotes to refer to your sources of information.

 
Prepare a case file for presentation to determine the approaches adopted in the evaluation of the below case study (see uploaded file). This will include your strategy for a suitable management and communication approach to ensure that the health of the neighbourhood is addressed. You must follow the laws of evidence and evidential procedure with particular regard to continuity and integrity of the evidence (use the British Standard for the site investigation assumption)
You should demonstrate your ability to conduct investigations, record and interpret data and draw appropriate conclusions. The file should include an appropriate statutory notice suitably completed with a view to formal service. (See uploaded file for some of the statutory notices).
Determine suitable management and communication approaches to ensure health is promoted within organisations
2. Organise and interpret data and evaluate against prescribed standards to ensure compliance.
3. Solve complex problems using evidenced based knowledge, develop risk based solutions and balance individual needs against the community at large
Marking Criteria
• Meets the required standard for presentation of level 7 academic work.
• Well-structured throughout
• Letters and Statutory Notice/s included in Appendix
• Work follows logical structure and reads well

Note: the statutory notices in the uploaded files are: Record of Noise Disturbance, Record of Dust Disturbance, Control of Noise on Construction sites: Notice imposing Requirements and, Abatement Notice in respect of Statutory Nuisance.
They are to be completed, scanned and then send back in order to complete the case file.

This is a PhD Thesis, and requires careful and intricate discussion/analysis. I require assistance writing Chapters 4 & 5. Instructions have been uploaded in the document file “Wine Law Chapters 4 & 5”. I have included Chapters 1, 2 & 3 already written in a separate document “Regulatory Frameworks in Wine Law_Dec 2015” for your reference. Footnote citations must accord to U.S. Law BlueBook. I require updates from the writer every 3 days, and for them to email me drafts of the PhD thesis chapters.

 
Dear writer,
I am a master of law student in an English university.
I need to get distinction in this assignment, so if (Intellectual property) is not your specific area in law, lets change the writer please.
I have studied number of topics during the semester, and I can choose a topic that belong to one of them.
Have a look at the titles of my classes during the semester below, and choose a topic that related to one of them please.
Notes:
1.Before you start writing, tell me what did you choose and lets agree about the topic please.
2.My paper should be written in the UK system, it called OSCOLA , I didn’t find it in the options of Paper citation style! do you have an idea about that please?
3.Be careful of grammatical and spelling mistakes please as I am not perfect in English language and it maybe hard to me to get them correct.
4. If I like your paper, then I may choose you to write my dissertation in February.

My classes titles during the semester:
1 – Patent History – A History of Innovation?
2: Prizes in history
3: Prizes a new replacement?
4: Government funding / Philanthropy as an alternative
5: Open Innovation Models (other than software)
6: Free and open source software
7: WIPO / UN Development Agenda
8: Access to medicines
9: IP in Universities in the United States
10: IP in Universities in Europe
11: Patent pools
12: Evidence based policy making

 
Answers these questions below:
1. The definition/ purpose of a constitution and the reasons that states have them, and the different types of constitution, also the definitions, explanation and importance of constitutionalism. (see seminar 1).(1100 words)

2. The definition and examples of constitutional conventions and in particular examine the convention of ministerial responsibility to a problem scenario. (see seminar 5).(1100 words)
The questions above are my questions exams there are two question the first one is about constitution, and the second one is about the constitutional conventions please separate of them answer the first alone and the second alone.

Notes of guidance for students:

1. You MUST specify your approved jurisprudential topic and case at the start of your essay.

2. This essay is your opportunity to demonstrate your general understanding of your approved jurisprudential topic and to show that you are able to apply it to current issues in understanding the nature of law. The focus of the essay should thus be your approved topic.

3. You will need to demonstrate knowledge of important and original sources in your approved jurisprudential topic. Make sure that everything is fully referenced with proper citations. See the link to OSCOLA in the links section of the eLP site.

4. References to other jurisprudential or legal examples should be from the point of view of your approved jurisprudential topic. If other disciplines are relevant, such as sociology, psychology, economics, etc, indicate principles without full treatment, although cite references where possible. You must concentrate on the jurisprudence.

5. Work hard at your style. Note in particular from your reading the way different writers present ideas in jurisprudence, e.g. in journal articles. Seek clarity of expression.

6. Your attention is drawn to the regulations governing plagiarism set out in the programme handbook. It is your responsibility to ensure that any material you incorporate from your research is properly referenced. Useful links are included in the ‘links’ section of the jurisprudence eLP site.

 
The United Nations Security Council is often seen as the key actor in maintaining international peace and security. In light of the conflict in Syria, critically discuss the effectiveness of the UN Security Council’s role and action since the conflict began in 2011.

WORD LIMIT – 3500 words (maximum) and not less than 3100 words
The word limit does not include footnotes, appendices or bibliography. Footnotes must be used for references only. Any narrative or description contained within footnotes or appendices will be disregarded by the marker. References must be made in OSCOLA format.

The following rules apply to word limits for the coursework assessment:
a. Word count includes everything in the main body of the text (including headings, tables, citations, quotes, lists, etc.).
b. The references, footnotes (provided footnotes only include references) and bibliography are NOT included in the word count.
c. There is no penalty for exceeding the word count but the marker WILL stop reading once the word limit has been reached and nothing further will be taken into account in the allocation of marks. Therefore students will be penalised for a failure to be concise and for failing to conclude their work appropriately.
d. The word count needs to be clearly and correctly stated on the title page of the assignment. Incorrectly understating the word count constitutes an assessment offence and may result in further action.

 
European IP Law and its impact on intellectual property rights. Peer to Peer downloads and Internet protection

Order Description:
What we need is a proposal along the following guidelines, as provided by our supervisors:
2. The Plan is not a ‘mini-assignment’, it is not assessed and there are no formalities involved with the submission. That said, the bullet points below offer some guidance.
a. Formulate a Title.
b. This initial plan should be no more than 1000 words.
c. It should give a preliminary indication of your intended reading materials.
d. There is no need to reference the plan.
If you can do this properly, let us know otherwise please refund our payment. If we’re happy with this, will assign you the ALR and then the full dissertation paper, 15,000 – 18,000 words.
In a phrase by phrase comparison, here’s the opening of my alleged “proposal” as plagiarized clumsily by your writer. “In the current electronic world, intellectual property (IP) has emerged to be the major assets for their respective organizations (Kamardeen, 2015). In situations whereby a particular firm undertakes the legal frameworks for dictating ownership and IP usage, it can realize high savings on time and finances and avoiding frustrations and litigations. The internet’s advent has brought revolution in the mechanisms through which information exchange takes place between different individuals (“Patenting of Biosimilars?”, 2014). Some tools have changed human perceptions regarding quick information access the internet, however, the high levels of computing and internet have disabled the application of traditional IP laws (Roughton, 2008). Despite the common belief, only because it is simple to distribute information by use of internet does not guarantee the right of that path. My thesis proposal will entail my findings on the research regarding writing corporate policy towards protecting IPR and its essentiality for various reasons.” And here’s the relevant opening of the Ubiquity 2004 article. Find any similarities? “In today’s electronic world, an organization’s intellectual property is sometimes its biggest asset. Much time andmoney can be saved, and frustration and litigation avoided if company policy dictates ownership and use of intellectual property. The advent of the Internet has revolutionized the way information is exchanged between people. Few other tools have changed our perceptions about quick access to information as the Internet has. However, the spread of computing and the Internet have made it difficult to apply traditional intellectual property laws. Despite popular belief, just because it’s easy to distribute information using the Internet does not mean that it’s right to do so. In this paper I argue that writing corporate policy protecting intellectual property rights is essential for many reasons.” If I was in the mood and had the time, I would shoot down the whole document, but since this time (or so I hope) you will get a decent writer to write an original, there’s no point. Simply so that you are aware so no other naïve student looking for a decent service will have to go through the same headache.

 
please answer the question as simple as you can .

” Using OSCOLA reference system ”

Recommended books : (1) Elspeth berry, Mathew J. Homewood, and Barbara Bogusz, Complete EU law text , cases and Materials (2nd ed, oxford university press , 2015 )

(2) Foster on EU law (5th ed, oxford univ press 2015)

(3) P Craig and G de Burca , EU law , Text, cases, Materials (6th ed, oxford university press , 2015 )

“please answer the question as simple as you can ”

Explain the principles of direct, indirect and incidental effect of European Union Directives and member state liability and critically consider why the Court of Justice felt it necessary to develop these principles

 
The writer must be a qualified writer in UK, since I’m studying in UK university.
This order consists of two separate coursework, one is titled as Construction Law and the other is Advanced Construction Law. Two files to be uploaded, each represents the questions and guidlines of each coursework.
OSCOLA referencing style should be strictly followed.
Writer must strictly adhere to the minimum word counts shown at the end of each question (plus 5 – 10%), regardless of number of pages. Completed work for each coursework should not be under any circumstances ONE word less than the mentioned word counts, which is as following for each coursework:
1- Section A 1,800 words
2- Section B 1,350 words
Writer must respect the deadline with no impact on work quality, and it is necessarily required to complete at first the Construction Law coursework (file no. 1), since in case any unexpected delay happens, this coursework deadline is earlier than the second one.
The writer may use whatever sources he or she feels are most appropriate, however, a list of essential sources is being prepared to be considered by the writer, and will be uploaded very shortly. This should not delay the writer to start working.
Writer must include a table of content and bibliography and to arrange it should adhere to the coursework guidelines stated at the beginning of each coursework file.
A plagiarism report is required.
All the above must be read in context with the coursework guidelines stated at the beginning of each coursework file.