First discuss how the issue came about(both historically and via case law). Next discuss other cases that have occurred since its inception. Finally discuss your (informed) opinion of how you see the topic developing in the future.(main part) Additional cases to support: (Sherman v US), (Hampton v US), (US v Russell) And MUST have 5 academic sources
Provide, as a minimum, a 200 word response based on the following question. Both Suleiman I and Akbar ruled over diverse, multi-ethnic empires. How did these rulers approach the challenges of ruling such a diverse population and why do you believe they ruled in such fashions?
Guidelines for Art History Research Paper: Follow the exact guidelines from the book, “A Short Guide to Writing About Art,” by Sylvan Barnet, Chptr 13, pgs. 270-306. Length: 3-5 typed pages long. Double-spaced. 12” font with strict 1” margins. Sources: at least three secondary sources that must be listed in a bibliography at the end. General textbooks will not be acceptable as secondary sources, and the only approved Internet source is the online Grove Dictionary of Art (Oxford Art Online). When citing an article in the Grove Dictionary of Art, be sure to look for the name of the author of the article you are citing—it is usually either in the left margin or at the end of the article. Articles in art history journals, which you access through Jstor, are acceptable sources.
Include a Title, which conveys the content in an intriguing way without being silly or outrageous. Include an Introduction. This is your first paragraph setting out what your paper will do and hinting at the conclusions. Include a thesis statement either at the start or end of the paragraph. Don’t forget a conclusion, in which you sum up your main points. Make every effort to link your topic to the themes within Baroque and its magnificence. All quotations are to be marked as such and acknowledged fully in your footnotes.
Endnotes: use them! Art history papers do not use parenthetical notes. Follow the format for endnotes in Sylvan Barnet’s Guidebook. Bibliography: a list of your secondary sources, arranged alphabetically after the endnotes. Follow the format for bibliography in Sylvan Barnet’s guidebook. Illustrations: provide illustrations for the works of art you discuss. Number your illustrations and provide captions (name of artist, title of work of art, present location) at the end of your paper. In your text, you should refer to the illustration within parentheses after the title of the work of art: e.g., Bernini, Cathedra Petri (fig. 1). See further tips in Sylvan Barnet’s guidebook. Titles of paintings are underlined or italicized! Number your pages!
_________________________________________________________________________________
Message to professor from student:
A painting that struck me in class was that of Rigaud’s depiction of Louis XIV, in royal portraiture, and his “glamorous” legs. I thought it would be a brilliant endeavor to have a look into Baroque painters’ portrayal/depiction of their subjects legs, their pose, and their garments, and what was the underlying message; Essentially that the depiction was indeed calculated, and, neither negligent nor random. I will use as well as Rigaud’s Louis XIV (1701), and Rigaud’s Philip V (1701), and possibly one or two more pieces, offering more noble portraiture support.
Professor’s response to student:
So, for Rigaud’s Louis XIV, you might ask: What was the prevailing fashion for men in this period? You must incorporate the stockings and shoes worn as well (those high-heeled red shoes of Louis). Be certain to use specific names of each piece of clothing. Regarding his pose, (assuming a dancer’s 4th position), then you must include: When were dance positions first established? What do we know about Louis as a dancer? And, did he participate in court dances around the time of Rigaud’s portrait? How do all these components support your thesis statement?
By way of comparison, you might look for a few comparable noble state portraits with the full-length portrayal, including legs, of other Baroque kings before and after Louis, such as the Spanish king, Philip IV Habsburg, and/or the English Charles I (Stuart). How are they dressed (and why,) and do they expose leg similarly or differently? What does their pose mean or how does it prove different from your main subject of Louis XIV? Were male fashions different at their respective courts? Did these other subjects participate in dance performances? You will have to look for a book or two on the history of Costume with discussion of 17th-century dress, and on the history of Dance with a section on 17th-century practices. Please contact me if you need to add a fourth or fifth page to this research paper. The more in depth and quality info you can include, the better, without dragging it on. Concise and scholarly are my requirements. This will be turned in to “TurnItIn”.com so it must be 100% ORGINAL writing.
Discuss the role of technology in WW2 for Germany vs USSR and Japan vs West. How it affects the outcome of the war and the differences in both.
Describe what the trend is for that area “historically” and what trend you anticipate to occur over the next month, six-months, and 2 years based on the index from your area
. Next, discuss which types of real estate development projects you believe would be most successful in this area over the next 1 to 2 years – commercial, residential, warehouse, multi-unit residential, mixed use, etc.
Please explain your reasoning of why you think certain types of development projects will be more or less successful than others. Reference the Case-Shiller data and other economic data as necessary to support your case.
Throughout history, people have told stories of leaders who have been corrupted by their power. The very definition of leadership as “a process by which an individual influences the group to achieve a common goal” implies the power to exert influence. Leaders must exert power in order to lead. But they must also strive to understand the complexities of power. Research by French and Raven and by others provides insight on the types, or bases, of power available to a leader, the process of choosing among those bases, and the motivations for leaders’ choices. Recent research also explores the effectiveness of using individual bases of power in particular situations and the effects the use of certain bases of powers have on leaders and those they lead. Armed with this information, leaders can avoid utilizing certain bases of power when the choice may lead to negative consequences. They can instead choose to wield power in ways that will foster organizational success. Understanding the bases also gives both leaders and followers insight into situations they observe and difficult interpersonal interactions they negotiate.
To prepare:
** Read and analyze Case Study 7.1, “Three Shifts, Three Supervisors” in Chapter 7 of course text.
**Post an analysis of the case study. Identify two of French and Raven’s bases of power in the case study and explain how these bases of power can be used to exert influence. Also, explain how you might use your knowledge of French and Raven’s theory to resolve one of the problems presented in the case study. Justify your response.
• Documentary Analysis Instructions –
Students will write 10 document analyses on the assigned readings. These assigned readings come from the online reader, American Perspectives.
Sign in with –
Username – ijeumeugo75
Password – ugochi75
Assigned documents:
Unit One Readings:
1. “Ragged Castaway”
2. “The Horrors of the Slave Ship”
3. “Jamestown Fiasco”
• Assignment required Pages : 6
Unit Two Readings:
4. “Declaration of Independence”
5. “The Cherokee Removal Through the Eyes of a Private Solider”
6. “Nat Turner Rebellion”
7. “The Monroe Doctrine”
• Assignment required Pages : 8
Unit Three Readings:
8. “Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments”
9. “Excerpts from on “Civil Disobedience”
10. “President Lincoln’s Letters to his Generals”
• Assignment required Pages : 6
Abbreviated Document Analysis Worksheet
1. List three important points (do not use quotations, use your own words).
a. On the document analysis you will list 3 important points in the reading AND write why those points are important-historically.
b. Your document analysis would look like:
i. important point
ii. important point
iii. important point
Then paragraph explaining why/how points relate or important to history.
2. Write a paragraph on why these points are important (historically).
3. When you have completed ALL ten, then upload your work as ONE FILE
Resources –
*Online Reader–American Perspectives
Sign in with –
Username – ijeumeugo75
Password – ugochi75
Essay 2 –
The essay question is:
Andrew Jackson carried the power of the presidency to new heights. Use evidence from the text to explain how he did so.
DEVELOPING YOUR ANSWER: At almost every turn, Jackson behaved as a forceful activist and engaged in direct confrontation with his opponents. The combination of these two qualities made the presidency unusually powerful in his hands. To document Jackson’s activist approach and his confrontational style, the following should be included in your discussion:
1. Indian policy: Jackson’s Indian removal policy and actions and his blunt refusal to implement the Supreme Court’s decision in Worcester v.Georgia
The nullification controversy: Jackson’s public confrontation with John C. Calhoun and his dramatic preparations to use military force against South Carolina
Instructions –
(1) Simply listen to the lectures
o Origins of the Constitution UR
o New Republic URL
o Age of Jefferson URL-
o Era of Good Feelings and Jackson Democracy URL-
o American Society and Economy Transformed URL-
(2) AND review the textbook chapters 7-11.
o from the online reader, American Perspectives
o Sign in with –
o Username – ijeumeugo75
o Password – ugochi75
(3) You should start reading and answering the questons concerning Zinn’s book –
In a seven to nine page typed, double-spaced term paper, you are to choose from one of the two choices offered below. Your finished paper must be well cited with a bibliography or works cited page at the end. I expect to see at least five credible outside sources used in support of your discussion. Your title page, must list the course title, section time, date and your name. The paper is due no later than the fourteenth week of instruction.
Choose THREE of the people, or groups, in Eric Foner’s Voices of Freedom reader and fully develop them analytically. I DO NOT want three separate biographies but a paper that compares and contrasts the individual selections in a flowing narrative that focuses on the idea of freedom. How did each interpret the concept of American freedom? What contributions did they make to their times? What challenges did they face? How did they see the idea of freedom extended to others? Besides the Voices reader and the textbook an additional five outside sources are required. NOTE: encyclopedias are not credible sources for citation in a research paper.
Books that have to be references!!!
1. Give me liberty! An American History Seagull Forth Edition Volume 2
2. Voices of Freedom A Documentary History Eric Foner Fourth Edition Volume 2
The focus and defense are your to determine. Give yourself some leeway and just make a judgment as to both. In this paper I want to see some effort at thinking about the topic assigned critically.It is up to you if you want to use quotes from all the sources or use a couple based on your defence chosen . If you choose to use one, and you think you can make a compelling essay by just focusing on one.. great. . ENGAGE IT CRITICALLY AND THOUGHTFULLY and PROVOCATIVELY WITHOUT ERROR. DO NOT USE ANY OTHER SOURCE BUT THE ONE I PROVIDE. INCLUDE ASPECTS OF CULTURE AND CONTEXTS. Provide quotations from the sources to back up your claims.. Write from a Senior Masters Student. Make it so everything flows beautifully.. Make sure everything is Gramatically Correct and the Critical engagment starts from PAGE 1.. not blabber on before and have the essay start later.,,, The author for the sources is L.MOS! If you have any conflictions, or things dont make sense from the sources, make sure you focus/state them in the essay. You are free to question things if you think about a different scenerio/concept that wasnt addressed by the author
Textbook 1: Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin.
Textbook 2: Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II
POLS322 Fall 2015
Paper I
Below is how you might organize your paper. It does not need to have this organizational structure, if you
prefer another. But the mission of the paper as described below, must be included in whatever format and
framework you select.
Suggested Framework and Objective:
I. Introduction: tell the reader what to expect in the paper. Write this LAST.
II. Brief summary of each book (no more than 3 pages total): highlight the main themes and pertinent
examples as you see them to the reader who you believe HAS NOT VREAD THE BOOIK.
III. What are the implications and insights relevant for transnational European integration which you can
draw from each book (be sure to briefly explain for the reader trans-national integration, and be explicit about
citing the page numbers in each book from where you are drawing your explicit examples for demonstrating
connections to transnational integration). There is no correct and set connections here – you are the author —
use your imagination to frame your argument and draw the linkages. Simply use logic and clear exposition to
support your connections.
IV. What are the implications and insights relevant for supranational European governance which you can
draw from each book (be sure to briefly explain for the reader supranational governance, and be explicit about
citing the page numbers in each book from where you are drawing your explicit examples for demonstrating
connections to supranational integration). There is no correct and set connections here – you the author, you
use your imagination to frame your essay in a manner that will convey to the reader how the linkages between
the book’s examples and your interpretation of their relevance have a broader meaning for Europe today.
Simply use logic and clear exposition to support your connections.
V. What are the implications and insights relevant for European political union which you can draw from
each book (be sure to explain for the reader in rough terms what a union would mean for Europe, and be explicit
about citing the page numbers in each book from where you are drawing your explicit examples for
demonstrating connections to the idea of a union of European states. There is no correct and set connections
here – you the author, you use your imagination to frame your essay in a manner that will convey to the reader
how the linkages between the book’s examples and your interpretation of their relevance have a broader
meaning for Europe today. Simply use logic and clear exposition to support your connections.
VI. Overall conclusions and a discussion of implications: Here you wish to briefly summarize for the reader
the main points to be taken from your preceding analysis (sections III – IV). Then, tell the reader the value of
each book as a source for understanding the importance, relevance and overall significance of the contemporary
European experience, and the experiment in supranational governance and political union. Keep in mind the
reader should want to know how they can draw the linkage and connection of the past to the present, and future.
What does Bloodlands and Savage Continent have to offer the student of modern and contemporary Europe in
terms of understanding and appreciating the strengths, weaknesses, promises and shortcomings of the European
experiment in post-national governance? This component of the paper puts things into perspective for the
reader. IT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SECTION OF THE PAPER, and PUNTING ON THIS SECTION
WILL DEVASTATE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF THE PAPER. Clarity, coherence, and logical
consistency are critical parameters of evaluation for this section.
Length: 10 – 12 pages. Bibliography at end for any source (including primary books, Bloodlands and Savage
Continent) you draw upon. You are required to use ONLY Bloodlands and Savage Continent
How did the periods in Europe between 1940 – 1956 marred by ethnic cleansing, dislocation and resettlement of nationalities, genocide, and revanchist impulses impact the ability of the EU to govern through a supranational system, create a trans-national
Textbook 1: Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin.
Textbook 2: Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II
POLS322 Fall 2015
Paper I
Below is how you might organize your paper. It does not need to have this organizational structure, if you
prefer another. But the mission of the paper as described below, must be included in whatever format and
framework you select.
Suggested Framework and Objective:
I. Introduction: tell the reader what to expect in the paper. Write this LAST.
II. Brief summary of each book (no more than 3 pages total): highlight the main themes and pertinent
examples as you see them to the reader who you believe HAS NOT VREAD THE BOOIK.
III. What are the implications and insights relevant for transnational European integration which you can
draw from each book (be sure to briefly explain for the reader trans-national integration, and be explicit about
citing the page numbers in each book from where you are drawing your explicit examples for demonstrating
connections to transnational integration). There is no correct and set connections here – you are the author —
use your imagination to frame your argument and draw the linkages. Simply use logic and clear exposition to
support your connections.
IV. What are the implications and insights relevant for supranational European governance which you can
draw from each book (be sure to briefly explain for the reader supranational governance, and be explicit about
citing the page numbers in each book from where you are drawing your explicit examples for demonstrating
connections to supranational integration). There is no correct and set connections here – you the author, you
use your imagination to frame your essay in a manner that will convey to the reader how the linkages between
the book’s examples and your interpretation of their relevance have a broader meaning for Europe today.
Simply use logic and clear exposition to support your connections.
V. What are the implications and insights relevant for European political union which you can draw from
each book (be sure to explain for the reader in rough terms what a union would mean for Europe, and be explicit
about citing the page numbers in each book from where you are drawing your explicit examples for
demonstrating connections to the idea of a union of European states. There is no correct and set connections
here – you the author, you use your imagination to frame your essay in a manner that will convey to the reader
how the linkages between the book’s examples and your interpretation of their relevance have a broader
meaning for Europe today. Simply use logic and clear exposition to support your connections.
VI. Overall conclusions and a discussion of implications: Here you wish to briefly summarize for the reader
the main points to be taken from your preceding analysis (sections III – IV). Then, tell the reader the value of
each book as a source for understanding the importance, relevance and overall significance of the contemporary
European experience, and the experiment in supranational governance and political union. Keep in mind the
reader should want to know how they can draw the linkage and connection of the past to the present, and future.
What does Bloodlands and Savage Continent have to offer the student of modern and contemporary Europe in
terms of understanding and appreciating the strengths, weaknesses, promises and shortcomings of the European
experiment in post-national governance? This component of the paper puts things into perspective for the
reader. IT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SECTION OF THE PAPER, and PUNTING ON THIS SECTION
WILL DEVASTATE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF THE PAPER. Clarity, coherence, and logical
consistency are critical parameters of evaluation for this section.
Length: 10 – 12 pages. Bibliography at end for any source (including primary books, Bloodlands and Savage
Continent) you draw upon. You are required to use ONLY Bloodlands and Savage Continent
Awesome! We will spare no effort to give you a most pleasant experience.
But, that’s not all
You get a massive 35% on your first order
Get Discount NowOur record is the best in the industry but this is hardly a surprise; we handpick our writers after they are proven to be consistent, reliable and completely able in their areas of expertise.
Order your custom essay paper, research paper NOW and we’ll turn your frustrations into a sigh of relief
Order Now