Category: Ethics

 
Or do other topics:

2. A central theme in the Bhagavad-Gita is the ideal of unattached or desireless action. What is such action supposed to be? Is the ideal coherent and/or attainable?

3. The Bhagavad-Gita outlines three kinds of discipline or yoga. Give an account of these, and explain their goal(s).

4. Give an account of the three gunas, �qualities� or �modes,� said to characterize the operation of �nature� in the Bhagavad-Gita.
Please double space. Include a title page with the following information: title, your name, student number and the course code.

 
write a narrative of 1300-1500 words about the bioethical principles and professionalism issues demonstrated.
This paper is for Professionalism and Medical Ethics class.

 
****PLEASE READ THE DESCRIPTION and the QUESTION VERY CAREFUL and FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTION***

QUESTION: IN THE ETHICS OF CARE, VIRGINIA HELD ARGUES THAT “CARE” UNDERSTOOD AS BOTH A “PRACTICE” AND A “CLUSTER OF VALUES” PROVIDES THE BASIS FOR A NEW ETHICS. THESE ETHICS WOULD PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE TO KANT’S RATIONAL DEONTOLOGY AND MILL’S UTILITARIANISM BECAUSE IT SEES THE CULTIVATION OF PARTICULAR “CARING RELATIONS” AS A CENTRAL CONCERN IN OUR MORAL LIFE. THAT IS, THE RELATIONS OF CARE THAT WE CULTIVATE OR FAIL TO CULTIVATE WITH FAMILY MEMBERS, FRIENDS, NEIGHBORS, FELLOW CITIZENS, AND SO ON, ARE CENTRAL TO OUR MORAL LIFE.

COULD THE ETHICS OF CARE, AS DESCRIBED BY HELD, EXPLAIN RASKOLNIKOV’S PROCESS OF MORAL DEGENERATION AND REDEMPTION IN CRIME AND PUNISHMENT? IF NOT, DO DEONTOLOGICAL OR UTILITARIAN ETHICS EXPLAIN THAT PROCESS BETTER? WHY?

INSTRUCTIONS: It will be graded based on whether: (1) you have a clear thesis to answer the question; (2) you support your thesis with specific evidence from Dostoesky’s novel (Crime and Punishment) in relation to Kant’s, Mill’s, or Held’s philosophical texts.
The main criteria for assessing writing assignments are:

(1) The essay states a clear thesis that addresses the question or issue directly.

(2) The essay presents a clear argument supporting the main thesis in such a way that:

(a) The premises to support the conclusion [thesis] are clearly stated.
(b) Good reasons are provided to support the premises.
(c) The premises do serve to support the thesis (conclusion) according to a well-organized logical pattern (e.g. deduction, induction, analogy).

(3) The essay demonstrates a thoughtful command of some of the relevant readings from the course.

(4) The grammar, syntax, and spelling are correct.

Note: I dont want to get a low grade because this paper will count as my midterm which is %45 of my class grade.

 
Ability to demonstrate an in-depth critical understanding of contemporary professional issues relating to direct practice with children and families in the UK.
Ability to analyze models of active and reflective practice based on a range of different professional settings predicated on services to children and families.
Ability to demonstrate a beginning understanding of theories of paradox and change relating to the people business and an ability to apply this understanding to a complex ethical issue.

 
Key Assignment: Citizenship LLO 1.4 (Pending) and Ethical Practice 5.2 Search the Web Critique

Organizational leaders need to know how to find and interpret information from a variety of resources. The internet is a useful source of information, but it also requires analytical and evaluation skills to assess the validity and appropriateness of information as an engaged member of the community. In order to practice these analytical and evaluation skills, participants will research and evaluate sites that reflect your experience in a community (a website related to ethics within their professional field: medical, business, social service, science, etc.). Your critique must include the identification and description of ethical issues found in the website. The grading rubric identifies the outcomes for this assignment. You must demonstrate an understanding of your ethical beliefs and the ethical beliefs of others; the ability to identify ethical conflicts; and the ability to make ethical decisions.
The final critique (4-5 pages) you submit should include information from the Web Discussion including how your collaborative interaction influences your thinking. Include a citation of the site according to APA format for electronic references, a description of the contents of the site, suggested uses for the information on the site, evaluation of the quality, verifiability, currency and usefulness of the site — identifying who might find it useful and ease of use. Your critique must include how this site contributes to your community identity, the possibility for collaborative activity and how your historical and global literacy provides context and meaning to evaluate the information.

 
Review the “Ethics in Action” scenario in Chapter 46 of your text.
Write a paper of not more than 950 words in which you answer the following questions:
• Do you think that the creation and work of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has resulted in greater independence of auditors of public companies?
• If auditing of financial statements is required primarily for the protection of public investors, should not all PCAOB members be taken from the investment community that uses audited financial statements?
• What regulatory compliance requirements apply to various business situations?
Cite at least 5 peer-reviewed references.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.thics in

 
The individual summative report will be 3000 words in length not including references and appendices.

The final report will include the above project management tools as appendices as well as the following substantive content:

1. One executive summary of the report (250 words)
2. A summary of each individual’s content contribution to preparing for the project presentation. (250 words)
3. Qualitative assessments of each individual’s contribution (250 words)
4. A well-researched report demonstrating the group’s approach to understanding, developing, evaluating, arguing, and rebutting the project issues, including a statement of final position of the group on the issue reached by consensus. (2250 words)

it is final report but i search in type of paper there is no report i choose essay

i have group work with others student when i finish the notes for writing the appendices i will send it to the write to now about it an write it

 

I highlighted in the methodology section. I need to changed the information to reflect regression study. Please explain the regression assumption and the calculation for the study. remove the highlighted area once you are done. the table of content needs to be updated plus the lines to the left of the numbers need to be remove. Can you also put tables in the table in figure sections. Please make sure the references are within the last five years.

 
Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the “Assignment Format” page located on the Course Home page for specific format requirements.

Respond to the items below.

1. What is traditional utilitarianism? With traditional utilitarianism, how do you determine what the moral thing to do on any particular occasion might be? Include mention of the four (4) considerations to determine what the moral thing to do on any particular occasion might be.

2. Why is utilitarianism attractive to many? Discuss three (3) reasons.

3. What is the ecological ethic?

4. How does utilitarianism support the ecological ethic?
5. What is traditional utilitarianism? With traditional utilitarianism, how do you determine what the moral thing to do on any particular occasion might be? Include mention of the four (4) considerations to determine what the moral thing to do on any particular occasion might be.

6. Why is utilitarianism attractive to many? Discuss three (3) reasons.

7. What is the ecological ethic?

8. How does utilitarianism support the ecological ethic?

 
Details:
Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select uustal’s model and use the model to analyze the case provided.

Case Scenario:

A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.

Assignment:

In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:

What is the ethical dilemma here?
Describe the Uustal’s decision-making model you.
How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).
A minimum of three references must be used.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.