Posted on

Play therapy contributor

 

What is your name? Where are you from? Describe your place in history and any important events that are occurring. Tell about your personal experiences that shaped your professional work. What kind of work do you do? What are your research interests? Tell about your theoretical approach, the role of play in your work, how it came to be, who influenced you the most, and what people will do in the future with your approach.

Part 2
Continuing to write as the contributor, discuss the client case study. What are your goals in therapy in this case, and what kind of interventions would you use with the client to reach those goals? Provide a brief transcript of your third session with this client. What kind of ethical problems might you encounter and how would you handle them? Finally, give a prediction of how long your therapy might last with this client and how you might approach termination.

Posted on

Epidimiology

 
The Signature Assignment is a culminating project in which requires students to synthesize and integrate knowledge in the course and apply it to a situation resembling a professional practice.
The paper should be 11-12 pages (excluding title page, bibliography, appendices, etc.). Please include literature references.
•Please choose an infectious disease..
•Understand the interaction between an infectious agent, host, and the environment.
•Learn about modes of the infectious disease transmission and what affects transmission.
•Apply the principles of infectious disease transmission dynamics.
•Understand the role of immunity in infectious disease epidemiology.
•Apply course concepts and disease elimination strategies.
Course Learning Outcomes

1. Illustrate variables that influence the occurrence of disease
2. Identify primary, secondary, and prevention measures for disease control programs
3. Identify high-risk groups based on rates of disease
4. Use descriptive epidemiologic analysis to study a public health issue
5. Interpret an epidemic curve
6. Evaluate whether there is a cause-effect relationship between independent and dependent variables.
7. Interpret attack rate tables, measures of association, and strength of confidence intervals
8. Identify reservoirs, mechanisms of transmission, and control measures for an infectious disease.
9. Apply epidemiologic principles in investigating an outbreak

Posted on

Reviewing the Literature Theory

 
Locate a minimum of 15 peer-reviewed articles that describe the problem or issue and that support the proposed solution. Eight of the 15 articles must be research-based (i.e., a study which is qualitative, quantitative, descriptive, or longitudinal).

The “Table of Evidence” document is a tool you can use to organize information from the study articles you have chosen for your literature review. Use this tool as a guide to ensure you have captured the key information that should be incorporated into your literature review narrative.

Begin your search for literature by utilizing the databases located in the GCU Library. Contact your instructor, the librarian, or library staff for additional researching tips and keyword suggestions.

Preview each of the 15 articles chosen by reading the article abstracts and summaries. Article abstracts and summaries provide a concise description of the topic, research outcomes, and significance of findings.

Analysis and Appraisal

Write an analysis and appraisal (1,500-2,000 words): This section should build and support your case, in the reader’s mind, of why your problem, purpose, and proposed solution are valid.

Remember, you are building an argument to prove your case to do this project; this is not simply an article review.

Analyze and appraise the selected articles to support your problem, purpose, and solution. Appraise each article by answering the following questions (one to two sentences is sufficient to answer each question):

How does the article describe the nature of the problem, issue, or deficit you have identified?
Does the article provide statistical information to demonstrate the gravity of the issue, problem, or deficit?
What are some examples of morbidity, mortality, and rate of incidence or rate of occurrence in the general population?
Does the article support your proposed change?
Group the analyses based on the content of the articles and the support each article provides for your project.

Incorporating a Theory

In addition to the review of the literature and theory paper, write a paper of 250-500 words in which you:

Find a theory that will assist you in your implementation or support your solution to your problem.
Describe this theory in simple terms.
Describe why this theory supports your project.
Describe how you will incorporate this theory.
General Requirements:

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Posted on

sustainable solutions paper (apple inc)

 
submit your completed SSP. Your submission should include the following (with exact sections/headers per the SSP Template):
1.Introduction (at beginning of SSP after cover page)
2.Executive Summary (at beginning of SSP after Introduction)
3.Revisions to your Week 4 SSP
4.Boids Analysis
5.Industry Evolution Modeling
6.Life-Cycle Assessment
7.Sustainable Value Framework Analysis
8.Conclusion
9.References (Per APA 6th edition manual)
CTopic: Managing for the Future

Posted on

Assignment 4

 
Include a draft of Chapter 3 for your Proposal. Include the following Level 2 headers: (a) Participants, including a description of the population, sample, and sampling procedures; (b) Instruments, including an overview of your data collection instrument, discussion of the survey development and pilot test; (c) Procedures, including your research design, data collection procedures, and data analysis procedures; and (d) Limitations of the proposed study. See below for additional information and chapter layout for a quantitative study. If you are conducting a qualitative or mixed methods study please contact the instructor for the appropriate template for Chapter 3.

Posted on

sourcing potato’s for elevation burger Kuwait

 
1) Read the “sourcing potato’s for elevation burger Kuwait”
2) Prepare two page report “Use easy vocabulary “
3) Make sure to itemize your response to identify the question you are answering (no need to rewrite the question only add the letter of the questin)
4) List of the question
A. What are the challenges facing TABCo in sourcing potatoes?
B. Is there an ethical dilemma facing Ali Ashkanani in sourcing potatoes for elevation burger? If so, then explain. What do you recommend ali to do?
C. How do you view the approach ali Ashkanani took in solving the potato-sourcing problem? What would you do differently?
D. What do you recommend TABCo to do moving forward? Support your response with figures from the case. You may need to take into account TABCo’s cost of capital and growth rate. Clearly state and justify your assumptions. Use Microsoft excels to conduct a net-a-present-value for the different alternatives.

Please be sure that all the paper is taking to the main company no need for any concept . Thank you

Posted on

Reflective blog / Learning journal and Business plan

 
TASK 1

Reflective blog / Learning journal – section
Generate 100 ideas for a business
Record your 100 ideas and initial thoughts about the process
Evaluating your 100 ideas; Consider the relevance of Kanter critical reflection to your process.
Develope one business idea
-Draft your Business Model Canvas (BMC) hypotheses for a business Idea; Consider the relevance of Sarasvathy critical reflection to your process
Test your hypothesis / pivot ; Consider if the prototype has helped you to change your idea
Evidence of ‘talking-to-people’ and incremental reflection on what this input has meant in terms of testing your hypotheses.
Walk in the customers shoes
Observe customers
Talk to people
Run a survey
Design a ‘near-real’ experiment
– Talk to 10 customer; Record details of your customer interactions; consider the ‘Think / Act / Do cycle’
Design for viability
– Develop an operational plan; Talk to 10 customers; Record details of your customer interactions; are your hypotheses changing? How does this relate to Sarasvathy?
Design for viability
– Develop a team plan and job descriptions; Talk to 5 suppliers; Record details of your customer interactions; what academic theory is most relevant to you at this stage?
– Develop a cash-flow statement from start-up to breakeven / viability; Reflect on the iterative process of development
Design for growth
-Work through the RBV framework; Consider if you are now an effectuator or causator
Thinking about the future
– competitive strategy; Explore the process of planning versus experimentation
Design for growth
– Work through alternative future scenarios (5 year worst-case and best case); Consider the resource implications of success / failure
Work on your BMC for viability and BMC for growth; Record your process and analyse accordingly
Continue to test your hypotheses / refine; Record your process and analyse accordingly

Marking criteria. (2000 words or more)
Critical use of appropriate entrepreneurial theory (40%)
-You need to use your reflective evidence from within each of the identified sections (identified below) to critique identified theory from within the field of entrepreneurship. Harvard referencing must be used
Journal and reflection on ideation (15%)
-This period maps the creative time where you develop the initial idea. Evidence should be given of the evaluation of the 100 business ideas
Journal and reflection on business design for viability (15%)
-This period maps the initial design phase where you developed the business model and functional areas through an iterative process of design, customer interaction and experimentation

Journal and reflection on business design for growth (15%)
-This period maps the final design phase where you developed the business model and functional areas through a process of forecasting and strategic planning

Consideration for development / action plan (15%)
– Following your weekly reflection and critical review you should present an action plan based on your analysis of how you will do things differently in future for each phase e.g. ideation, business design for viability, business design for growth.

TASK 2

Develop a business plan
Business plan section
The business model / plan should not exceed 2000 words, excluding appendices.
Marking criteria
Success / Business model (10%)
– Overview of your business model; This could include a vision, and should articulate your story of business.

Viability summary (5%)
-The plan explains how the business model will reach viability, being the point at which the business reaches breakeven and is economically sustainable.

Components of Business Model Canvas (10%)
-The plan uses the components of the BMC to describe the business model required to reach this level of viability.

Hypotheses (15%)
-The hypothetical linkages between the components of your business model are identified with an explanation of how robust / believable they are e.g. number of customers / suppliers / consulted; observations made; surveys completed.
Growth summary (5%)
-The plan communicates how the business will grow from initial viability to a more ambitious implementation over an extended timeframe (for example 5 or 10 years).

Components of Business Model Canvas (10%)
-The plan uses the components of the BMC that need to change in order for the business model to grow over the identified extended timeframe.

Hypotheses (15%)
-The hypothetical linkages between the components of your business model are identified with an explanation of how robust / believable they are i.e supported through scenario planning, sensitivity analysis, Cost, data-forecasts (Budget, break even analysis)

Evidence base (20%)
-The business model has been developed with evidence of: robust primary research, customer interaction and consultation with experts; diligent use of relevant analytical tools such as scenario planning, etc. Evidence of these must be provided within the appendix

Communication of plan (10%)
-The plan is clearly and consistently communicated, with appropriate grammar and relevant referencing where necessary. Visual techniques are used as appropriate to simplify and reinforce delivery

Posted on

final paper

 
please review the attached paper and fix any error that found in it. after reviewing, please answer these two questions which related to the paper:
1- What are some of the various theories about the function of play? Did you find any evidence to support these theories?
2- – Can play be used as an indicator of normal development? Why or why not?

Posted on

Literature Review Final 5/3

 
In this assignment, you will rewrite your Literature Review Draft, which includes the utilization of the feedback from the peer review process, if needed. Your paper will consist of 1,500-2,000 words that utilize the research process, incorporate three articles, and include the following:

An introduction to topic.
An explanation of how the literature review is used in research.
A discussion of the ethical considerations for data collection.
An explanation of what the data reveals in terms of statistical analysis.
An evaluation of whether there is enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the specific study.
A summary of the conclusions from the literature review.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. abstract is required

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin <11.

Posted on

the causes of pragmatic failure

 
i should include these points:
Chapter Two: Literature Review
1-Definitions of pragmatic failure
2-The classifications of pragmatic failure
3-Analysis of pragmatic failure from the theory of adaption:
-Failure to Adapt to the Language Users
-Failure to Adapt to the Physical World
-Failure to Adapt to the Social World
-Failure to Adapt to the Mental World
beside adding more ideas and points