Category: Essay

 
JOURNAL MUST INCLUDE A TABLE CONTENT & WORK CITED
ALL PAGES MUST BE NUMBERERED
ALL ARTICLES MUST INCLUDE DATE & SOURCE AS CAPTION
ALL ARTIFACTS MUST HAVE A COMMENT WHY IS IT OF INTEREST
PART 1 CREATE A SHORT PROFILE OF YOURSELF
Are you eligible to vote? If so are you registered to vote? Are you a member of a union? Which one? Are you an active member? Have you voted in the past? Did you vote this year? What is your congressional district & zip code?
Identify some key politicians who represent you. Local, state & national house of representative and senate. Who can you reach when you in need? Create a short directory of your local state & national representative ex office address, email, phone #
Part 2 Select 3 posts which are being contested in the election. You must select one contest for each level of government local, state, federal.
Part 3 Identify an issue of importance to you? Why this issue is important?
Identify 2 interest groups on opposite sides of this issues.
Create a short profile of these interest group include a link of their websites.
Who do they represent? What is their position on the issue? What is their membership like? How do they attempt to influence politics around this issue? What strategies do they use?

 
I’m asked to assess the portfolio strategy of Sahara India Pariwar since 2000
using public information on the products offered and acquired business units. Using the
portfolio tools discussed in the lecture, you have to develop your view on the complex
portfolio mix and its long-term potential. In addition, you have to consider strategic moves
of your case organization that might facilitate further expansion. You have to address the
following issues: (1) develop a method to map the organizations business portfolio; (2)
identify and discuss the areas of key competence and the type of corporate strategy
pursued by the organization ; (3) discuss and critically apply the portfolio matrix model; (4)
analyse and discuss the strategic moves of competitors and your chosen company’s best
response. You may support some of your arguments by analysing company and market
data. I expect that you use tables/figures/portfolio management organizing frameworks to
provide evidence for your argumentation. Sources (available online):  Use the annual
reports  Check for industry reports

 
The Frankenstein Application Essay
Literary works like Frankenstein explore the “human condition” or experiences that humans encounter. Now, you will choose ONE of these topics and explore it using secondary resources to learn more about the novel and its relevant social topics. You might find information about social issues in familiar sources such as magazines, newspapers, or social science journals. Make sure your sources are credible—you do not want a random website or an encyclopedic website such as Wikipedia.
Your sources will preferably be a scholarly ones. Here are some ideas of places where you might find appropriate sources for this assignment:
Your local library
Your thesis statement and paper must address both the literary qualities and the social issues as you evaluate the novel, Frankenstein. However, keep in mind, your essay does not have to answer ALL of the questions listed under each topic. Only answer the questions you feel are the most relevant to the thesis statement you choose. Develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the novel, Frankenstein, and at least three other credible external sources.
You have several options for this assignment:
Option #1: Can science go too far?
There is an ongoing battle between faith or spirituality and science that has been active even before the time of Mary Shelley. What are some of the dilemmas she addresses that are still important today? What are some of the ethical questions she brings up regarding the scientific definition of life and death? What does she illustrate about the power science has to blur the line between life and death? What is a current news item that is similar to this issue?
Hint: Develop a thesis that answers a question like this one: “How and how well does Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein address ethical the issues of science and/or faith for audiences, regardless of when they read the novel?”
Option #2: Discovery
Both Frankenstein and Walton are trying to discover something important to them. What parts of their real lives drive them to discovery? Does that drive still exist today? While we’ve mapped the globe, are there still geographical places for people to explore? In science, are people still trying to discover the meaning of life, how to save life, and how to defeat death? What methods do they use? Are there better ways to accomplish these goals than others? What are some of today’s motivations for discovery?
Hint: Develop a thesis that answers a question like this one: “How and how well does Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein address human discovery as a theme?”
Option #3: Personal Perception
It could be argued that the creature did not consider itself a monster and didn’t do awful things until people treated him like a monster. What are some real world instances in which people’s actions could be a reaction to abuse from others? Who do you feel is accountable in these situations? Why?
Hint: Develop a thesis that answers a question like this one: “How and how well does Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein address the effect of peer perceptions on personal development?”
Option #4: Nature vs. Nurture
The creature argues that had someone properly guided him, he would not have been so wretched. Frankenstein argues that the creature was evil to begin with, so it would have been useless to teach him at all. What are some current debates – especially in education – where these kinds of arguments still arise? How much of behavior do you think is based on nature (how a person IS) and how much is based on nurture (what a person LEARNS or EXPERIENCES)? What examples from the present support your opinion? What do you feel is the truth? Why?
Hint: Develop a thesis that answers a question like this one: “How and how well does Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein address existing personality traits versus how a person is taught to act?”
This assignment should be at least 750 words.
Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.
MLA-style source documentation and Works Cited

 
will be marked for:-
introduction(400-600words)
outline the aims of the literature review
introduced the key concepts of the injury

main body (2000-2200)
have you critically discussed with reference support the key considerations of the injury chosen?
have you related this to the stage of healing/stage of rehabilitation?
have you looked at the whole kinetic chain?have you linked this to the predisposing factors of injury?

conclusion (200-300 words)
have you summarised your key points?

reference formating APA
is the literature review current?
good flow and structure to the work?
may choose sub headings and should consult relevant bio mechanical texts to underpin their written response.

also i have received some instructions after my proof reading

1. Please don’t bullet point in an academic piece of work
2. Stick to the word counts allocated for each section
3. Do not include treatments – this is not what you have been asked to do.
4. Need to relate each key consideration back to the injury and why it is important
5. Reference your points
6. If you quote then it needs to be referenced correctly
7. Please don’t put in specific exercises, this has not been asked of you

 
1. Resource Analysis: (3000 words + bibliography)
Write an essay analyzing a resource that is part of your everyday life. This could be a resource such as clean air or fresh water, sustenance such as a beverage or food item, access to knowledge such as a piece of scholarship or a database, a mode of communications/transportation, material or media you use in your own creative practice, a film, artwork, or other socio-cultural artifact. Track how this item becomes a resource, how and in what ways it becomes a commodity or a kind of property, and the framework through which it accrues value or exchangeability. How is access to this resource distributed? How does access to this resource allow you certain privileges or exclude others? How does it allow you to feel a certain way in your everyday life? Next, consider how this resource might itself be made more “common” or how this resource might be reframed or rethought in a way that enhances or problematizes the communization of life. You are required to critically discuss the arguments of at least three texts from the required reading list.

The module entails:
“Commons” are typically defined as resources that we don’t pay for and that are shared by a community. The term finds its legal origins in the shift to early capitalism, and contemporary political theorists have sought to re-invigorate the concept by reconceptualising the notion of the commons as a form of social practice resistant to the reproduction of capitalist growth and uneven power relations. “Theorizing the Commons” surveys the work of political theorists, artists, and activists who have called upon the idiom of “the commons” in order to refute the enclosure of social relations under late capitalism and reimagine the ownership, sharing and dispersal of resources necessary for the institution and maintenance of global justice and sustainability. This module focuses on the history of primitive accumulation and the acceleration of “new enclosures” in the wake of global ecological and financial crises, yet we will also attend to the ways that aesthetic practices might prefigure potential processes of communization. Through close readings of texts from within the Marxist tradition as well as anarchist thought, autonomism, environmentalism, feminist theory, critical race theory, and cultural studies, we will explore the ways in which the structuring principles of late capital—particularly shifting modes of accumulation, ownership, private property, exchange— mediate our understandings of commons and commoning. The main overarching questions to explore include: What is the commons and what are its forms; how have communism, autonomism, anarchism, aesthetics, labor practices, or the university articulated notions of the commons?; how are land, ecology, rights, sense, information and culture constituted as common?; how do aesthetic practices mediate the production of common sense and emergence of communing?; how does the commons adjudicate the relationship between exchange, difference, equality and precarity?

 
This is the final essay from my English writing class. Its purpose is to show what have I learnt from the process of composing and revising the two research projects, Historical Conversation Project and Advocacy Project. Our instructor want us to do it in a rhetoric perspective, which means you have to persuade the reader that you learnt something from it. I will include the detailed prompt of this assignment, as well as the prompts of those two assignments, and the first , second, final drafts of both projects in attached files.

In the prompt of this reflective introduction, you will find there are four discrete sections under “B. Reflective Introduction.” But since you did not write those essays and you are very unlikely to know the composing process, I want you to do only the last 3, so “2. Rhetoric, Argumentation, & Multi-modal Communication;” “3. Revision” and “4. Transfer.” But if you feel like you have something to say about how do you start composing a research paper, you can add those to the first section “1. Your Composing Process.”

Since you have my drafts, you can read and compare them to say what have been changed and how those changes make a difference, and what have you learnt through the revision. Also, I will upload screen shots of some comments my instructor gave on my paper. You can integrate some your own experience and what you have learnt during you writing career into this essay. But please keep it reasonable, and don’t go too far. For example, you can’t say what have you learnt when drafting another essay in sociology class. All the examples have to be from the drafts I uploaded to you. Remember, this essay is to persuade your reader what you learnt from the two projects, and how can you apply the knowledge you learnt to other classes. Please try to pretend you were me, a biology major undergraduate, and the person who wrote the two projects were you.

It is very helpful if you can insert some screen shots of the sections in my paper you used as examples. And I will also upload three sample reflective introductions that my instructor gave me as references. Those samples are more or less the final piece I am expected to submit.

You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment.
First, use the selection of links below ONLY to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein. You may focus most of your attention on this first critique.
Choose from among these sources:
Literary Criticism collection:
1. Evaluate the critic/author:
Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have (education, professional career, other publications, etc.)? (If you are using a credible author, you should be able to find her/his credentials fairly easily)
2. Find the thesis of the article: What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?
3. Evaluate the thesis: Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.
4. Evaluate the support: Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?
Next, locate a second critique about the novel, and discuss how this second critique agrees and/or disagrees with the first one. For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, does the second critic agree with this assessment? If the first critic believes the novel is autobiographical, does the second critic concur? These are just a few examples of how you can include this second critique in order to have a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay.
In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims are supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen, or the novel, Frankenstein.
Using proper MLA2 style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques.
This assignment should be at least 750 words.
Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.
Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited. In other words, you need three sources total cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page.