Category: Education

 
Findings chapter
Big structural changes needed so the chapter/subheadings reflect the cycles of action research. The findings chapter needs to match the methodology chapter. In the methodology I said that I would look at generating meaning over time as cumulative cycles feed into the next to create the findings through action research process. At this time the findings are static they do not feed into each other and read as if each stage rather than cycle ends with a definite conclusion and does not flow into the next cycle or offer implications for it. Stating the number of people said x does not fit with the methodology. The chapter needs transparency for how the themes were reached and analysed. It must be a self contained chapter that can be understood fully through reading just this and not the rest of the thesis. Signposting is required as to how sources fit together, justification of them and their implications for the next cycle of action research. Analytical coding – tabulation should be in the appendices. The chapter must reflect the phases of action research within cycles of data gathering. Phases are informing each other to reveal themes eg. The first stage focused on x and the data from this generated xx and was used to inform cycle 2 xxx. Reflect on the stages of the research and the sources of evidence. The core purpose of the study is to look at the process to improve practice to uncover understandings. In the introduction to the chapter reflect on the processes and relate stages to action research cycle and summarise. Do not talk about frequency of response as it must match the analysis that I use which is cycles to generate themes. Start by identifying key themes then develop my discussion and link this to literature. Provide headings for all of the tables in the chapter and refer to them in the text. I have groups of quotes must explain how I arrived at these labels. Check the mode of analysis is consistent between chapters. Provide citations when say something is evident from responses of students. Avoid general statements and support all statements with the sources of evidence over time and for initial analysis. Do not use words such as half/most as these are too general and not justified. Explain how all of the points arise and how themes appear over time and across action research cycles. Be specific over what opportunities means especially when used in relation to teamwork. Do not use the words results as it is cumulative over time. Which cycle of the research do points link to? Return to research design and cycles throughout chapter. What determined the choices made? Must be careful that the analysis of how things are reached is not methodological as it is a findings chapter.

 
HI DEAR

i need help to edit and fix this HW if u could please help me with that
I post for u my work with the comment of my Pro in the 4 first pages ( curriculum unite plan ) u will see my Pro was writ a little comment because I did not do correct but u will see i have a little thing to change it
but the problem in the page number 5 to 8 the essay for the unit plan not good at all

so i post for u example from one of the answer student she really do it very good and the Pro say its excellent and she say do like this student

so i post all thing for u to edit and correct the all HW

AND I NEED FOR IT ETHER CURRICULUM MAP (I SENT FOR U THE WAY TO DO THE CURRICULUM MAP WITH THE STEPES ( in picture
SO

I NEED

1- (CURRICULUM MAP ( I POST FOR U THE STEP IN THE PICTURE

2- THE CURRICULUM UNIT PALNE

3- THE ESSAY FOR THE CURRICULUM PLEEEEEEAS FOR THIS ESSAY SEE and follow THE GUIDELINES
This is the good example answer work from good student that my Pro say do it like her

i post for u ether expiation of my teacher from the class for the C MAP , C UNIT , and the essay that should match with the guideline
for the essay like what I say see the guideline and do it the what the guideline say pleeeeeas

 
“I just want to ask if you did find hard to help me with the Norway film could you instead Analyse one Academic book for children ?

The book called Amazing Grace by Mary Hoffman.Caroline Binch
FRAME FOR ANALYSING CHILDREN’S LITERATURE

Sharing literature with young children is about enjoyment and learning, but what are they learning?. Thinking critically about books and ‘reading between the lines’, helps those who work with young children make that sharing as rich as possible.

{or something like that}
Bibliographic details
this section = the same

Summarise the story. e.g.Who are the characters? When and where is the story set? What happens?
What is the underlying idea or message? What would the story encourage children to think about? e.g. right and wrong, conflict, different points of view, identity…
How is the story written and why? e.g. Are sentences short or long, descriptive or action-packed? What sort of vocabulary is used (alliteration, repetition…)? What mood/tone does that create?
Describe and comment on the illustrations
e.g. sensitive, detailed, humorous… How do the illustrations work with the written text? What impact might the pictures have on the reader?
Reflect on why you chose this book and what you think are its strengths (and weaknesses, if any). And how you might use this with young children?”

—
A message from client:
“I just want to ask if you did find hard to help me with the Norway film could you instead Analyse one Academic book for children ?

The book called Amazing Grace by Mary Hoffman.Caroline Binch
FRAME FOR ANALYSING CHILDREN’S LITERATURE

Sharing literature with young children is about enjoyment and learning, but what are they learning?. Thinking critically about books and ‘reading between the lines’, helps those who work with young children make that sharing as rich as possible.

{or something like that}
Bibliographic details
this section = the same

Summarise the story. e.g.Who are the characters? When and where is the story set? What happens?
What is the underlying idea or message? What would the story encourage children to think about? e.g. right and wrong, conflict, different points of view, identity…
How is the story written and why? e.g. Are sentences short or long, descriptive or action-packed? What sort of vocabulary is used (alliteration, repetition…)? What mood/tone does that create?
Describe and comment on the illustrations
e.g. sensitive, detailed, humorous… How do the illustrations work with the written text? What impact might the pictures have on the reader?
Reflect on why you chose this book and what you think are its strengths (and weaknesses, if any). And how you might use this with young children?”

Paper should reflect the importance of implementing a leisure education curriculum into the class day for students with special needs including intellectual, learning disabilities, and emotional/behavioral disabilities. Additionally, the paper should work as the groundwork to support grant funding for such implementation. There should be a strong emphasis on the writings of Dattillo, Cszymentmehi, and others in the fields of experiential education and recreational therapy.

 
A Suggested Format for Your Literature Review

1) Statements of the problem(s):
This part usually makes clear what the problems are. For example, students’ inability of dealing with expository texts, or students with less exposure to print before they come to school requiring more attention from teachers to keep up.
The description of the problem should be as detailed as possible. Usually some literature would be cited to support your argument about the existence of the problem(s). Your classroom experience can also be used as part of the description.
The length varies. I think one or two paragraphs of about 200 words might be a good one for this class.

2) Methodology
This section will focus on how you go about identifying and collecting the literature and how decide on using which ones from your search that has identified literature. In particular, you may want to pay attention to the issues of reliability and manageability. You need to set up the criteria through which identification of literature is accomplished. Usually in identifying scholarly literature, you will describe how you locate it, make decisions to include it, and rationales for its sufficiency on the topic.

3) Results and discussions
This section summarizes the results of your literature review and organizes your interpretations of the results. You need to present convincing evidence to illustrate that the arguments you are advancing to summarize the literature are valid or make sense. Usually a themed approach is the best way to synthesize literature on a topic. Do not report the results simply as annotated bibliography. In addition, your interpretations would usually have practical implications for teachers, which you should state clearly.

4) Conclusions
You need to conclude by pointing out the limitations of your literature review and the directions of possible future literature reviews on the topic.

5) References
This serves as a separate entity from the paper proper. Use APA style for reference list.

Some helpful notes about the review of literature paper
Procedures:
In reviewing the literature to write the paper, you would consider including the following procedural practices:

Collect peer-refereed journal articles only on the topic you have decided to pursue.

Read carefully and take AMPLE notes to familiarize yourself with the topic.

Consider the themes or central elements in the papers and try to organize them into a reasonable structure for writing.

Be careful about the conclusions and always use support from the literature to back up what you have been discussing.

Be careful editing and revising the paper. Invite someone to read it over for you if need be.

Structure of the paper:
State the purpose
Describe the search criteria (methods)
Discuss the literature you have collected and read
Draw conclusions
Reference section

What needs to be taken care of?
Writing, reasoning, APA style
Demonstrate your knowledge of the topic

How long?
It should be about 10 pages without counting the references. It needs to be typed with 12 point font. You need to clearly mark the page numbers. Please use a separate cover sheet.

 
At least 7 solutions for recycling education and awareness program In Bambui, The solutions has to be in Bambui area, pictures and graphs are optional, pros and cons of each solution With respect to requirements, cost, environment, ease of use,
maintainability, etc and References are required ( electronic references preferred )

 
Review “Sample Arizona AIMS Exam Questions.” This contains seven assessment items for fourth-graders from the standardized Arizona AIMS exam. Complete this assignment in three parts:
1. Complete a “Table of Specifications” using the table format provided. Begin by analyzing each of the seven assessment items. For each item, create a learning objective aligned to what the assessment item is measuring. Write these learning objectives in the first column under “Learning Objectives.” Then, for each assessment item, classify the item, indicating its type (e.g., multiple choice, essay) under the level of knowledge/skill the student is being asked to display in the item.
2. Review each assessment item for cultural bias (e.g., ethnic, gender, or socioeconomic bias). Write a short description of your review beneath your Table of Specifications.
3. Lastly, create new assessment items for each of the original seven assessment items using a different Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Level than what was originally required. Be sure your new assessment item aligns to the learning objective you wrote, or, if you prefer, re-write the learning objective slightly to more accurately reflect your new assessment. Include the learning objectives, the new assessment items, and their Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Level classification beneath the statement of bias.

 
” A vision for Gifted education in Saudi Arabia from different angle”
I want to publish this paper in an educational journal,
needs update and rewrite to be:
1. 6050 words.
2. new reference 2014- 2015.
3. any additional things it is need to be accepted for publishing in a good educational journal, even changing the title of the paper.

The presentation needs to include information on the learners, a definition if appropriate drawn from literature of specific factors including the aetiology, the context for the learning experience/transition. The main focus is on explaining how and why specific strategies were used. 4 references for further sources of information need to be identified and presented as an annotated list.
Duration of presentation: 10 minutes. Equivalent to 1000 words
I work as a higher level teaching assistant in a mainstream primary school. 41% of the students are on the SEN register.

 
LEARNING,TEACHING &ASSESSMENT IN PRACTICE (MAX WORD 3250 WORDS)

Plagiarism 10%.

Section requirements
1. Introduction:
Outlines effectively and clearly what will be discussed in the assignment, including an outline of the content. You should identify your place of work and also consider the context of mentorship in nursing.
Suggested content (300 words)
You should outline what you are going to discuss in the assignment.
Briefly introduce your working environment and the importance of mentorship in clinical practice. It is expected that this would be supported by the literature.
2.Main Body:

Discuss the underachieving student and the role of the mentor, identifying key qualities of an effective mentor
Identify learning style/s and their application to learning, teaching and assessment of your student
Application of learning theories for example: andragogy/pedagogy, cognitive and behavioural
The importance of the clinical learning environment
Assessment to promote learning in practice.

Suggested Content (2850 words)
Explore the literature related to under achieving students and the consequences of failing to fail the student.
Identify the common behaviours of underachieving students
The role of self-awareness and emotional intelligence
Explore the literature related to the role of mentor in clinical practice and the unique relationship with their mentee.
Discuss the range of learning styles and the ways in which learning styles can be identified. Ascertain why learning styles are key to learning, teaching and assessment.
Specify your mentees learning style and apply to your discussion and analysis.

Determine how knowledge and application of learning theories in your role as mentor can enhance student learning. Demonstrate how you would apply theory to mentorship.

Explore the literature to consider how the clinical environment impacts on the student learning experience.
Consider the Importance of orientation/induction to the team and clinical area. Discuss the learning opportunities and resources in your own practice area to maximise student learning.
Development of relationships with both the mentor and the wider team should be evident and demonstrate how this can support or obstruct learning.
Provide evidence of SWOT analysis and how you make use of this in practice. This can relate to student/mentor/clinical learning environment.

This section should emphasise the value of accurate record keeping.

Consider objective setting during the initial interview using a SMART approach

The importance of two way feedback (student and mentor)

The process of providing timely assessment, focusing on the significance of the mid (formative) and final (summative) assessment
3. Conclusion & Recommendations
This section should summarise the main aspects of your essay. There should be no new points being made or references here.
Suggested Content (100 words)
The recommendations should be what you have learned as a mentor having completed this module and how this will impact on your future practice as a mentor.

4. One reference compulsory for each 100 words.

For reference, Books & Article should be with in last 5 years.

eg:- of ref model (Harvard referencing)
As a professional discipline, this knowledge is important for guiding practice. (Liehr & Smith, 2008).

ref list eg:-
Royse, D.D. (2008) Research methods in social work(5th ed.), Stamford : Cengage Learning

Preference link for Research Assignment
• Joanna Briggs InstituteURL
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)URL
• Scottish Inter-collegiate Guideline Network (SIGN)URL
• The Cochrane CollaborationURL
• Library LinksURL

Singapore nursing board (SNB) reference should have in the introduction and main body.

About mentor:-

The mentor works in restructured hospital in Singapore. Mentor working experience is 10 years in an acute stroke unit. Mentor specializes in neuroscience and certified clinical instructor. Mentor designation is senior staff nurse.

In this assignment must have 3 feedback session- 1) 48 hrs, 21/2 weeks (formative) and final (summative).

Scenario- must be in the appendix and not including the word count

scenario

‘A second year student will be coming to your work area for a 5 week placement with you as their mentor. You have been informed that the student had been underachieving in their previous placement. Discuss how you, as a mentor, would develop learning, teaching and assessment strategies to support the student to achieve a successful outcome. Utilise /refer to the module content, the learning opportunities and resources in your practice area and further reading to develop your discussion. Conclude your discussion with how the learning gained would apply to your future practice as a mentor’.