ACCESS OF HISPANIC INMATES TO CORRECTIONAL EDUCATION (GED) IN CALIFORNIA AND ITS”S IMPACT ON THREE YEAR RECIDIVISM RATESI

ACCESS OF HISPANIC INMATES TO CORRECTIONAL EDUCATION (GED) IN CALIFORNIA AND ITS”S IMPACT ON THREE YEAR RECIDIVISM RATESI need the below corrections please. I have uploaded my dissertation. The highlighted sections in yellow are the latest revisions please keep those highlights in yellow and add the new citations (in pink highlighter) the reviewer is asking for in chapters 1 and 2. Chapter 1 only needs the added citations. In regards to chapter 2, 3 and 4 please add the corrections in pink so that reviewer knows what was changed. Add about a page or so for each chapter depending on which chapter needs more information. Chapter 5 does not need corrections. Also include the new references on the reference page. Please check to make sure grammar and word usage is correct on the dissertation.

doing criminology

 
Task: Critically evaluate two empirical research studies (one quantitative, one qualitative) in criminology. Your reflection must address the following set of questions about both research studies:
Research question: What is the research question(s) or problem? Please explain.
Theoretical framework: What was the theoretical framework (i.e., literature review which includes theories and/or past research used to introduce and justify the relevance of the study)? Please discuss the most important elements of the theoretical framework and whether it was appropriate for the research question(s) addressed in this study.
Hypotheses: Were any hypotheses stated? What were these hypotheses? Were these hypotheses justified adequately in terms of the theoretical framework and prior research? Please explain.
Methodology: Was any particular research design used? Was any particular sampling method used? Was a survey, participant observation, qualitative interviews or some other data collection method used? Discuss the methodology used by the authors and how well the methodology was suited to the research question posed and the specific hypotheses tested, if any? Explain why the author(s) chose this particular method?
Results: Discuss the main findings in relation to the research question(s). Discussion and conclusion: What additional research questions and hypotheses are suggested by the study’s results? Discuss the findings in relation to the theoretical framework used and social policy questions.
HINT: Stronger papers will discuss the two research studies together (comparing/contrasting).
Your critical reflection must be 2,000 words, and in essay format (i.e. a reasoned critical reflection in narrative form), use APA referencing guidelines, and follow the formatting requirements set out in the course profile.

Death penalty and supermax prisons

 
Please answer below questions in that specific order by labeling each question with an appropriate letter. Please use attached articles as reference.
(a)Using the death penalty as an example, discuss the advantages and disadvantages, respectively, of using public opinion to guide corrections policy.
(b)Describe how and why prison privatization may be more effective than public prisons, evaluate the
evidence in support of (or against) privatization, and justify why you think privatization efforts should be terminated, continued, or expanded.
(c)Identify and describe three strategies for improving corrections. In so doing, discuss
why—based on theory, logic, or research
—they are, or appear likely to be, effective

Life in prison

 
Please answer below questions in that specific order by labeling each question with an appropriate letter. Please use attached articles as reference.

(a)Identify and describe a challenge associated with adjusting to life in prison.
(b)Describe how and why this challenge might be greater for some groups.
(c)Compare and contrast two different strategies
for improving inmate adjustment and why one might
be more effective than the other.
(d)Explain how supermax incarceration might
both worsen and improve inmate adjustment.
(e)Explain how private prisons might both worsen
and improve inmate adjustment.

Spams and Cybercrime ( should address the perspective “Forensics and law”)

 
 Margin sizes of 2.54 centimetres
 Font of Calibri
 Font size of 11
 Line spacing of 1.15

Research paper 6 papers excluding reference + annotated bibliography

Write a research paper on this topic:
(Spams and Cybercrime)
the research paper should address the following perspective:
(Forensics and law)

The question:
Forensic investigation of spam campaign:

e.g.
Son Dinha, Taher Azeba, Francis Fortinb, Djedjiga Mouheba, Mourad Debbabia. “Spam campaign detection, analysis, and investigation”, Digital Investigation. Volume 12, Supplement 1, March 2015, Pages S12S21.

(This reference are a starting point for the research. You should find additional relevant material)

Complete a literature search related to the subject area from your perspective to find out what other has been written about in this area.
You should collect as many relevant papers as possible; but you should use your time wisely and focus on reading the abstract rather than the full paper. You should consider the quality of the publication or the venue that it was presented.

should demonstrate your understanding of the issues relevant to the research question. The paper should clearly answer the research question, and all the content should be relevant to the research question.
The paper is supposed to be a critical evaluation of the literature, rather than a simple repetition of several sources using your own words. This means that you have to summarise, interpret, reflect and be critical about what you have read and about the sources you actually use.
It is up to you to structure the paper logically and to ensure coherence among sections and paragraphs. The language used should be specific, precise, objective, direct and simple. Do not use colloquial language. Apart from short quotes, use your own words and use short sentences, appropriate for technical writing.

Please use in-text citation where required (not enough just listing the references at the end of the), based on the Harvard referencing style2.

Also, be careful, I would like the reference come in the sentence where you use the ideas and information, with page number please
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
TITLE
+
annotated bibliography

The annotated bibliography is an alphabetical list of relevant references written using the Harvard referencing style1.
Annotate the bibliography by restating
* the main arguments
* provide a short summary (i.e. just summarize the main findings, without a critical analysis) of the most important related works in your reference list.
You should annotate a minimum of 3 (most relevant to your research question) sources, 400 words, excluding the entire bibliography list.

( This assignment contributes to the assessment of the following module learning outcomes,
1- Critically evaluate methods and techniques used for cybercrime
2 – Critically analyse the extent to which methods and solutions to cybercrime, proposed in research papers, apply in practice and what are their limitations.

Prison sentencing/overcrowding

 
This is a proposing a solution essay.You try to convince readers tha a problem exist, that it is serious, and that your way of definging and solcing the problem makes sense. What exactly is the problem? When was it first noticed? What or whom does it affect? What are its effects? How far does it extend? What were the causes? What, if anything has been done to alleviate the problem? What other alternatives exsist? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each alternitive? What is the best alternative, or will a combination be needed?
5
Topic: ethical crises of suppliers (procurement)
Essay Content: Unfortunately, there are many examples of companies that sourced with suppliers wholater had major ethical or social responsibility crises. Find one such example reported in the popular press within the last five years (since Fall 2010).
• Describe the buying company, the supplier, and the ethical/social issue; include dates.
• Did the buying company suffer any serious repercussions from this event? What were they, and how severe?
• Did the supplier suffer any serious repercussions from this event? What were they, and how severe?
• Most companies would not intentionally source from an unethical or socially irresponsible supplier. In this case, what do you think the buying company overlooked? Why?
• Did the buying company put anything in place to prevent this from happening again? If not, what could/should they have done?
• Be sure to include the citation(s) for source(s) of information.
Format:
• The essay must be 400-600 words in total length.
• The essay must be formatted as a Word file (.docx file extension) or as a PDF.
• Use double line spacing and 12 point font.
• Do not include any graphics, pictures, or charts.
• The file name of your essay must be ONLY your MSU PID. For example, the file name should formatted as “A41234123.docx”with no extra spaces or characters. The essay file name andthe document itself must contain no other personal identifying information. IF YOUR FILE IS NOT LABELLED CORRECTLY, IT WILL NOT BE GRADED.
Submission:
• Essay files must be submitted to the appropriate D2L dropbox no later than 11:30pm on Tuesday, December 1, 2015.
• Late assignments are not accepted for any reason and will be scored as a zero for the essay portion. There are NO exceptions so plan accordingly and don’t wait until the last day (or last minute).
Academic Honesty:
• Feel free to cite and paraphrase from reputable sources but do not directly copy or quote from any sources (published or unpublished).
• Citations should be in any easily understandable format.
• Any evidence of plagiarism will be graded as a zero.

Grading:
• As described in the course syllabus, essays will be graded by student teams. See the syllabus and posted grading instructions for further details.
• Up to 10 points can be earned based on how well your essay is ranked by the student team.
• If you participate in your grading team, you will earn up to an additional 5 points.
• For this assignment, there are 15 total maximum points.
Each student grading team must submit the completed grading form to the appropriate D2L dropboxby 11:30pm on Thursday, December 10, 2015. If the form is not completed on time, no team members will earn points for grading

To what extent is female sexual offending overlooked by the criminal justice system and society? Why is this?

What impact could this have?It is a Criminology essay. Sources should be mainly from the UK, not USA or somewhere else. Essays should be no more than 3,500 words in length. References should be more academic, like books, articles, journals, not non-academic websites. Don’t be plagiarised. The essay should be sound and coherent. The intro and conclusion should give a good orientation to the readers. It should be good to focus more upon aspects that you introduce. Be specific on your explanations. Please do expand on it. Also, try to think of the conclusion as a summary of the most important points as well as the overall answer, implications, limitations of the research that you have examined and any recommendations that you want to leave the reader with. ***I will send you a file which contains everything you have to write in the essay and the structure of the essay and the references that you can use in the essay. Please follow the instructions

Civil and Criminal Forfeitures: Federal and State Practices

 
This paper is to be typed, double-spaced and 3-5 pages in length of text. References and citations will be in APA format that can be found on the TU Library homepage. Proper grammar and spelling is required. *NOTE: the APA guide addresses on-line materials

Research Paper Guidelines

1. Students may choose their own topic for the term paper, as long as it is a topic relating to the Law and Criminal Procedure. If you are unsure if your topic meets this requirement, please email me and ask. You will not be able to make a passing grade on the term paper if your paper is not on topic.
2. This paper is to have an introduction, body and conclusion.
3. Must have at least one citation.
4. References and citations are to be in APA format. If you have questions concerning APA, please refer to the APA manual on the TU library home page or contact the instructor for assistance.
5. Paper is to be 3 to 5 pages, double-spaced (at least 900 words, not including
the cover page and reference page.
6. Proper grammar and spelling are required.
7. Paper must contain a reference list of sources used.
8. Students can select a topic of their choice. Besides using your textbook as a source, you must also use two other additional outside sources for your paper. For example, you may use the internet, academic journal databases, books, encyclopedias, videos, newspapers, etc.
9. Papers must be placed in the Assignments Folder in blackboard.
10. note: Do not use Wikipedia..it is not a credible source
11. Do not write in the first person perspective.
12. If you are caught plagiarizing, you will not be allowed another opportunity to
Complete another paper.
13. There will be no proof-reading on the instructor’s part. Also, what you turn in the first time will be the paper graded by the instructor. There will not be any re-submissions allowed for any reason. This includes turning in the wrong paper, a rough draft or an incomplete paper.

Text book is: Criminal Procedure (7th Edition) by John M Scheb II must be used as one of the reference. If access is needed to this text book I have a digital rental through yuzu and can provide username and password.