Category: Analysis papers

 
Critical analysis

Please I need this Seminar paper to be a really good paper because in my master year and this assignment will have high marks so I can get high mark to pass it and please please please I need 0% plagiarism because my university is very very very strict about this thing so pleaaase be carful
My Seminar topic is ( NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION) CHOOSE ONE ARTICE FROM THE UPLODED DOCUMENTs AND make IT CRITICAL ANALYSIS JUST ONE ARTICLE NOT MORE THAN ONE AND IT SHOUD BE 1500 WORD PLEASE DON’T EXCEED IT.
HERE IS THE GUIDLINE OF HOW TO DO THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONE OF THE READING: please consider all these steps its very important for the grading

Critical reading: You may find this Study Guide ‘What is Critical Reading’ useful. You might consider the following questions when reading a text:
• What argument is the author making?
• What assumptions underpin the argument?
• Is there anything in the article that you would like clarification of or to know more about?
• Is there anything in the article that you might challenge?
• What difference did reading this article make to how you think about the topic in question?
Please note that you do not need to answer each of these questions individually – they are just there to help you engage with articles while reading.
All of your reading for this module should be critical reading. Each week, you should engage critically with a range of sources from the online reading list. You should prepare notes that will help you discuss your critical reading with the seminar group.

For the assessment, you should develop one of your critical reading notes (from a seminar up to and including seminar 6) into a clearly written article review. This can incorporate your reflections on the article based on your seminar discussions.
You should include the following in your seminar paper:
• Full reference (accurately cited)
• At least a paragraph describing the article
• At least a paragraph summarising the author’s central argument
• At least a paragraph describing the evidence (including the work of any other key thinkers) on which the argument is based, and how this contributes to the central argument
• At least a paragraph evaluating the argument
If you include references to other sources, these must be fully referenced and cited in a bibliography (which can be excluded from the word count). The seminar paper should be no more than 1,500 words long.

((critical analysis))
Critical analysis

Please I need this Seminar paper to be a really good paper because in my master year and this assignment will have high marks so I can get high mark to pass it and please please please I need 0% plagiarism because my university is very very very strict about this thing so pleaaase be carful
My Seminar topic is (ADDRESING HUMAN WRONGS: GENOCIDE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY) CHOOSE ONE ARTICE FROM THE UPLODED DOCUMENTs AND make IT CRITICAL ANALYSIS JUST ONE ARTICLE NOT MORE THAN ONE AND IT SHOUD BE 1500 WORD PLEASE DON’T EXCEED IT.
HERE IS THE GUIDLINE OF HOW TO DO THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS FOR ONE OF THE READING: please consider all these steps its very important for the grading

Critical reading: You may find this Study Guide ‘What is Critical Reading’ useful. You might consider the following questions when reading a text:
• What argument is the author making?
• What assumptions underpin the argument?
• Is there anything in the article that you would like clarification of or to know more about?
• Is there anything in the article that you might challenge?
• What difference did reading this article make to how you think about the topic in question?
Please note that you do not need to answer each of these questions individually – they are just there to help you engage with articles while reading.
All of your reading for this module should be critical reading. Each week, you should engage critically with a range of sources from the online reading list. You should prepare notes that will help you discuss your critical reading with the seminar group.
Critical writing: You may find this study guide useful: https://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/ld/resources/writing/writing-resources/critical-writing
For the assessment, you should develop one of your critical reading notes (from a seminar up to and including seminar 6) into a clearly written article review. This can incorporate your reflections on the article based on your seminar discussions.
You should include the following in your seminar paper:
• Full reference (accurately cited)
• At least a paragraph describing the article
• At least a paragraph summarising the author’s central argument
• At least a paragraph describing the evidence (including the work of any other key thinkers) on which the argument is based, and how this contributes to the central argument
• At least a paragraph evaluating the argument
If you include references to other sources, these must be fully referenced and cited in a bibliography (which can be excluded from the word count). The seminar paper should be no more than 1,500 words long.

 
Examine the data you have collected about the organization you selected to analyze, In a report of approximately 600 words: The company you will be doing the paper on is Buffalo Wild Wings and will attach files.

Give a short description, with examples, of their current competitive landscape

Assess market commonality with key competitors
Assess resource similarity with key competitors
Anticipate potential competitive behaviors in the market
Devise strategic and tactical actions to build competitive advantage
Include citations from at least three references

 
Normally I don’t notice my body. I’ve always been relatively thin and people tell me that I appear to be fit even when I know that I’m not. Growing up, I wore glasses, was physically awkward, and didn’t feel particularly attractive, so I studied diligently and lived more in my head than my body. Sure, I love fun clothes, but more for how they make me feel than how I look in them. On top of all this, I live in Cambridge, Mass. where you can pair a Chanel dress with Birkenstocks and no one would look twice.
But the other day after a shower, I caught myself in the mirror. Suddenly noticing the scars from all my surgeries, the colostomy bag on my abdomen and the power port embedded in my chest, it felt like I was looking at someone familiar but not me. I was jolted into accepting that this is really me, now.
The noises from the kids getting ready for school snapped me back to starting my day, so I got dressed and moved on.
Later, I reflected on how much my life has changed since I was diagnosed with colorectal cancer four years ago. Sure, there were the physical changes, including my shorter hairstyle. Nothing says “chemo patient” like a super-short hairstyle.
After each physical change occurred, it was upsetting, and then I would get used to it. I got used to the way my once-flat abdomen now pooches. I got used to dealing with the colostomy bag. I got used to the power port. I even love the super-short hair.
The diagnosis itself shook the ground beneath me, but I was lucky enough to find a new stable spot to stand. Then the ground shook a few more times: When I learned of a recurrence, and then another. When I learned it was stage four. When I learned that I would need to integrate chemotherapy every other week into my otherwise happily full calendar. Each time, I was unsettled for awhile, then eventually got used to the change and found a new normal.
It is the intangible changes that rock my daily life and the life of my family.
Most people would say that, on my good days, I look like any other person walking around. They can’t see the change in how my mind works, but it looks like this:
I watched my husband drive a new, sporty car into our driveway. He has been thinking about getting a sportier car since we met 20 years ago, so I was thrilled for him.
The boys and I made a big fuss about the car, then we continued with our evening.
Later, I asked my husband what made him decide to get a new car today. I didn’t mind that he didn’t consult me; it is just unlike him to do anything without careful thought over an extended period of time.
“We talked about this,” he reminded me, without defensiveness or blame. “I asked if you wanted to look at cars with me, and I told you that I was trying to decide between a practical car and something sporty. Do you remember?” He showed me a few brochures. “We talked about it with our neighbors at the party last month. You told me to go for something sporty, something that made me feel good.”
I remembered none of these conversations (blame it on chemo brain). But, like a doddering old lady, I knew they all very likely happened and I genuinely appreciated that my husband explained things so patiently and kindly.
Our children are impacted by my inept mind. For example, I cannot seem to keep track of which day is library day and which day they have movement. At ages 5 and 8, they are fully responsible for knowing when to return their library books and when they need to dress for sports. Honestly, I am not much help here: It’s not my picture of the totally on-top-of-everything mother I aspire to be, but it is our reality.
My energy level is unpredictable as well. One minute I am dancing; the next, I am sacked out on the sofa. One minute I tell the kids we are headed for the museum, and just before we leave the house, I abruptly cancel and tell them to play together in the backyard instead.
Like my body, this is not the life I envisioned. It falls short of the “me” that I hold in my mind.
Then, just as suddenly, I re frame it. So my kids have a crazy, unpredictable mother. They wouldn’t be the first, and they seem to take it in stride. My husband became a very involved father, and he would say a better parent than he even envisioned. I allow myself to be taken care of, in ways that I never imagined I would need, much less welcome. We lead less stressful, lower-key lives together, and we learned that we have quite a resilient relationship. I see blessings around every corner and find few things to complain about.
So my body has missing parts, added parts, and scars, but it still seems to work. My life has daily bumps and twists and turns, as well as joy and beauty. If I feel that my body, my life, or I, fall short in any way, it is because those things are not what I imagined they would be, and not necessarily because of what they actually

Result (Data and Analysis) of ongoing work.

=======

I think your work on this chapter can be better if we use some charts.I will upload your work I think is good.

I would like this work complete before November 8, 2015.

I will also upload some examples on charts that would help for the analysis of the 4 areas mentioned in the work I uploaded. Please add the charts and analyze let’s see.

These areas; Education, Capacity Building, Environment and Health Care were mentioned in the work. You need to provide charts similar to what is uploaded for data and analysis of these areas.

Also I think the you should provide more detail of the empirical studies that are most closely related to the research you plan to undertake.
You need to provide discussion of the data you will collect related to CSR and performance as per Ilter (2013). Companies profits overtime to justify your claims of CSR.

You should be able to obtain the information from annual reports and company web sites.

Please use “the case study approach

In my view you need to collect data related to CSR and performance as per Ilter (2013). This information should be available in company annual reports.

 
The reference material used to refer to the company (market review) should be recent (2-3 years or less) and not old. Other literature used can be from any year. Imagine that you have been appointed as the international strategic brand manager for an FMCG (fast moving consumer goods) company of your choice. Your company have assigned you to analyse and assess their integrated marketing communications (IMC) mix strategies for the UK market and recommend future actions.

The report has to cover the following areas:

Literature review: You are expected to conduct an extensive review of marketing communications literature with a particular focus on how segmentation, positioning and branding strategies can facilitate the design and implementation of integrated marketing communications mix.

Market environment review: Provide a brief review of the UK market of your chosen product/brand. Identify the key competitors, market trends and relevant environmental factors that may have significant influence on your strategic decisions.
Company strategies: You are now required to analyse the IMC strategies of your chosen organisation in light of the theories and research findings discussed in the literature review and address the following issues:

1. Target audience: Analyse the target segments in terms of the behaviour, attitude and lifestyle.
2. Brand positioning: identify and discuss the choice of brand/concept which is being promoted with reference to competitive positioning and differential appeal.
3. Media selection and communication mix management: Identify and assess the media and IMC tools used by your chosen organisation.

Your own recommendations: You have to explain how your chosen organisation can make their IMC strategies more effective and competitive.

 

The deadline for this paper is Nov 4th 2015 @ 2:30pm GMT-9 (Alaskan)

**Please read all the below information provided to help better understand the concept, idea , requirements and goal of this paper

Please write an analysis of a non fiction document of your choice, you may search for a text in any area. A news story,speech or advertisement would make for a good subject.

Consider the chosen document in terms of one, or one set of rhetorical concepts from either of the following:
-Orwell (1956) “staleness of imagery” and “lack of percision” (pg.357)
Focus on one or more of the following: dying metaphors,verbal false limbs, pretentious diction, meaning less words.
-Plazek (2012) liberal and conservative ideologies
– Hayakawa (1990) the poetic’s of advertising; sponsored poetry
– Lakoff (1980) one’s view of the world in terms of metaphorical categories
– Lynn (2001) alternative readings, ambiguity

The paper should include ALL of the following elements:
– Introduction with a clear, detailed thesis
– Explanation of the analytical concept(s) that you are using to analyze your chosen document (refer to, cite, paraphrase either Orwell, Plazek, Hayakawa, Lakoff, or Lynn)
– The context in which your chosen document was produced or displayed (its historical moment,audience, etc)
– A summary of the document’s contents
– A close reading of the document (analysis) in which you quote key words and phrases and explain how they demonstrate your rhetorical concept.
– Lastly, Ongoing discussion and a conclusion that explain how the document succeeds or fails in being persuasive or effective by utilizing the rhetorical concepts you’ve identified.

You may wish to (but are not required to) use outside sources for information about the context of the document your are analyzing. All sources you incorporate in your paper should be cited.

 

Answer TWO questions in total. One question from section A, one question from section B.
Maximum NINE double-spaced pages TOTAL for both questions. Each question 4.5 pages. Citation and appendixes are not included in 9 pages.
You are reminded that in answering the questions, you should make use of all available resources including the readings and case studies on class slides and additional research from online sources.
You should submit an individual exam and all answers should include fully sourced bibliography including FIVE additional sources drawn from your own additional research.
Failure to do so leads to a 10-percentage point penalty.
Use 11pt Times New Roman and the default margins in Microsoft Word.

1. Analyze how companies can manage uncertainty in their strategic planning. Use examples and cases to support your arguments.

Section B
2. Evaluate the importance of resources and capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Illustrate your arguments with real cases and examples.

Please use at least 5 real life research information

 
Using the final report (uploaded!) please Create a PowerPoint display for me to present a summary of the research report findings in a presentation . Assignment question is” Create a formal presentation (please do a powerpoint) summarizing all the information you have collected in the report and include relevant legislation and codes of practice. Structure and format your presentation in a clear manner”

 
Please submit it to writer id #344251

Assignment 2 (3000 words) – Analysis of a unit of work (unit 6).
This assignment requires you to analyse and use an existing a whole unit of work (attached under: Ass2_Unit6)

Part 1: Analysis of a unit of work (unit 6) (1000-1500)

Part 1 requires you to critically evaluate a unit of work given in terms of:

• the range of approaches and methodologies to language learning and teaching this unit of work encompasses.
Discuss whether there is a focus on a particular approach, eg, are the students asked to memorise / rote learn/ repeat (audio-lingual); are students required to complete a task (task based learning) or an information-gap type activity (communicative language learning); is there a focus on a specific genre? 300 – 400

• the clarity of the objectives and target language/ exponents being taught 200-300
• the selection and sequencing of the activities 200 – 300
• to what extent language exponents and skills are integrated in the activities 200 -300
• the learner group, their needs and their language level for which the unit of work would be most appropriate 100
Describe the learner group this unit is designed for: ESL students, students of English as an international language etc; what language level the unit assumes and; the students language learning needs.
Part 2: Extension, addition, omission and substitution (unit 6) (1500 – 2000)

This section of the assignment requires you to focus on the unit of work:
• Comment on any extensions, additions, omissions or substitutions you would make if you were teaching this unit to the learner group you identified in Part 1, above. 500
• Give reasons for your decisions. 500
• Describe how you will assess student learning. 300
• Describe how you will evaluate the success of the unit of work. 200
• Identify any problems you anticipate in carrying out the unit of work and suggest how you would go about overcoming these. 300
• For added or substituted activities, list the resources you will need for these, and reference the materials you have used or drawn on. 200
Note pls use subheadings in Part1&2