Author: admin

 

Is Workplace Fatigue a Factor for Air Traffic Controllers at Tampa International Airport?

Visit ​ ​the ​ ​U.S. ​ ​Supreme ​ ​Court ​ ​website ​ ​posted ​ ​in ​ ​this​ ​Unit. ​ ​Navigate ​ ​the ​ ​site ​ ​and
locate ​ ​the ​ ​“Opinions”​ ​section ​ ​on ​ ​the ​ ​homepage ​ ​and ​ ​choose ​ ​“Opinions​ ​of ​ ​the ​ ​Court”. ​ ​Choose ​ ​any
case ​ ​and ​ ​click​ ​on ​ ​all ​ ​the ​ ​links. ​ ​Answer​ ​the ​ ​following, ​ ​and ​ ​be ​ ​sure ​ ​to ​ ​number​ ​your​ ​answers:
​ ​(1)what ​ ​is​ ​your​ ​general ​ ​impression ​ ​of ​ ​how​ ​the ​ ​information ​ ​is​ ​presented;
(2)​ ​how​ ​does​ ​the ​ ​presentation ​ ​of ​ ​the ​ ​information ​ ​differ​ ​from​ ​the ​ ​way​ ​non-legal ​ ​information ​ ​is
presented;
(3)​ ​how​ ​would ​ ​you ​ ​describe ​ ​the ​ ​terminology​ ​that ​ ​is​ ​used?

 

Running head: ASSESSING THE IMPLICATIONS

Assessing the Implications and Challenges Associated with the Development and

Implementation of the NextGen Air Transportation System
by
John A. Smith

[The title should summarize the main idea of the paper simply and accurately, and be fully
explanatory when standing alone]

Submitted to the Worldwide Campus

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

of Course ASCI 490, The Aeronautical Science Capstone Course, for the Bachelor of Science in Aeronautics Degree

 

Abstract

[The abstract is NOT an introduction. It is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of
the paper. The abstract:

• Allows readers to quickly survey the content of the paper.
• Is accurate, non-evaluative, coherent, readable, and concise.
• Should contain key words that relate it to the paper contents.
• Should contain the four or five most important concepts or main points of the paper.
• Defines the final product to be produced.
• In the proposal is a preliminary statement of intention. It is written in the third person,future tense and is based on the student’s existing

information and knowledge of the field at the time it is written. It will have to be updated in the Capstone paper to reflect what the student actually

did, where it will be revised to the third person, past and present tense (as appropriate).
• Is typically limited to between 150 to 250 words, but must be no more than 250 words]

 

[Note: Page numbers can be any format/location permitted by the APA Publication Manual]

 

2

 

Assessing the Implications and Challenges Associated with the Development and

Implementation of the NextGen Air Transportation System

[The title, exactly as written on the front page, should be repeated to open the body of the
proposal]

Statement of the Project

[This section must briefly:

• Explain the fundamental purpose of the paper (i.e. demonstrating skill at the 11 POs)
• Explain the type of project (in this case, and individual project)
• Describe the student’s degree program]

Introduction

[In the Introduction the student should:

• Introduce the reader to the topic of the paper.
• Provide the reader with any historical or background information the student believes necessary to the aid the reader’s understanding of the

paper.
• Explain why the topic of the paper is important to the field.
• Define the scope and depth of the project.
• Summarize the procedures the student will use in developing the paper (i.e. information and data gathering; analysis, evaluation and synthesis;

application of critical thought)]

The introduction should be concise, and should be limited to no more than one page.

Program Outcomes to be Addressed

Critical Thinking
“The student will show evidence of knowledge at a synthesis level to define and solve problems within professional and personal environments” .

[The student will open each PO section with a direct quote of the PO]

[At a minimum the student must meet the following four objectives for this, and each, Program Outcome:

1. Explain his or her understanding of the PO. This should be as simple as one sentence in which the student explains his or her understanding of

the PO.

 

 

2. Explain how he or she will demonstrate his or his skill at the PO as specifically related to the student’s project topic.

3. Describe what information and data he or she expects will be required to successfully accomplish Objective No. 2 (above) for the PO.

4. Describe from what sources the student expects he or she will be able to obtain the information in Objective No. 3 to successfully accomplish

Objective No. 2 (above) for the PO.

Quantitative Reasoning

“The student will show evidence of the use of digitally-enabled technology & analysis techniques to interpret data for the purpose of drawing valid

conclusions and solving associated problems”.

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for theCritical Thinking PO for this Quantitative Reasoning PO]

Information Literacy
“The student will show evidence of meaningful research, including gathering information from primary and secondary sources and incorporating and

documenting source material in
their writing”.

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for theCritical Thinking PO for the Quantitative Reasoning PO]

Communication
“The student will show evidence of communicating concepts in written, digital, and oral forms to present technical and non-technical information”.

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for theCritical Thinking PO for the Communication PO]

 

Scientific Literacy
“The student will show evidence of analyzing scientific evidence as it relates to the physical world and its interrelationship with human values and

interests”.

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for the
Critical Thinking PO for the Scientific Literacy PO]

Cultural Literacy

“The student will show evidence of the analysis of historic events, cultural artifacts and

philosophicalconcepts” .

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for the
Critical Thinking PO for the Cultural Literacy PO]

Lifelong Personal Growth
“The student will show evidence of the skills needed to enrich the quality of life through activities which enhance and promote lifetime learning” .

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for theCritical Thinking PO for the Lifelong Personal Growth PO]

Aviation/Aerospace/Aeronautical Science
“The student will show evidence of advanced concepts of aviation, aerospace, and aeronautics to solve problems commonly found in their respective

industries” .

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for theCritical Thinking PO for the Aeronautical Science PO]

Aviation Legislation and Law

“The student will show evidence of the basic concepts in national and international legislation and law as they pertain to the aviation, aerospace and

aeronautics industries”
.

 

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for theCritical Thinking PO for the Aviation Legislation and Law PO]

Aviation Safety
“The student will show evidence of basic concepts in aviation safety as they pertain to the
aviation, aerospace, aeronautics industry”.

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for theCritical Thinking PO for the Lifelong Personal Growth PO]

Aviation Management and Operations
“The student will show evidence of sound, ethical management principles within standard aviation, aerospace, and aeronautics operations”.

[At a minimum the student must meet the same four objectives as explained above for theCritical Thinking PO for the Aviation Management and Operations

PO]

 

References
College of aeronautics: Undergraduate capstone policy guide. Retrieved from
capstone-policy-guide?module_item_id=17735
[In text citations and references must appear in the Capstone proposal when necessary in
accordance with the rules established by the APA Publication Manual]

 

There are certain universal principles of management that can be applied to any organization, public or private, profit or non-profit. These principles include determining and following the mission statement, and allocating organizational resources efficiently and effectively. There are profound differences, however, in managing organizations in the private sector and the public sector.
In a fourpage paper (excluding the title page and reference page) complete the following:
• Compare and contrast the differences between managing an organization in the private/non-government sector and managing an organization in the public/government sector.
o As an example, one difference between a private sector organization and a public sector organization is that one is funded largely through profits (the private sector) while the other is funded through taxes(the public sector). This difference fundamentally alters the culture of the organization.
• Propose and defend two skills a public sector manager should develop to be more effective in their position.
o As an example, one skill a public sector manager should develop is the ability to generate consensus among a wide array of stakeholders (elected officials, agency managers, the judicial system, customers, etc.).
• Use APA style. Remember to include an introduction with a thesis statement, use transitional words, use a minimum of four sentences in a paragraph, and include a conclusion.
• Use two scholarly sources

Resources
text
Dresang, D.L. (2009). Personnel Management in Government Agencies and Nonprofit Organizations (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman. ISBN: 9780205616794
Article
Jacobs, D.L. (2014, April 4). How to deal with a totally boring job (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/deborahljacobs/2014/04/04/how-to-deal-with-a-totally-boring-job/
Websites
The Society for Human Resource Management (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. (http://www.shrm.org/)
US Office of Personnel Management (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. (http://www.opm.gov/hr_practitioners/)
American Society of Public Administration (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. (http://www.aspanet.org/)
National Academy of Public Administration (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. (http://www.napawash.org/)

Discuss two texts, one(Emerson, “Self-reliance”) that you believe celebrates individualism in some way(s) and one(Winthrop’s “Model of Christian Charity”) that questions its value in some way(s).

literature, compare and contrast essay between Emerson’s “self-reliance” (1854) and Winthrop’s “Model of Christian Charity” (1630) over the theme of individualism. Emerson promoting the idea of individualism, and Winthrop on the other hand valuing society (Theology, everyone need to be where they are meant to be) over individual interest. further instruction will be uploaded.

By now, you should be aware that the findings from a research study are only part of the story. As a consumer, hoping to inform practice by use

of an evidence base, you want to know much more. A sound research study includes all the steps highlighted in previous weeks: reviewing existing

literature, focusing a research question, choosing a qualitative or quantitative method for answering the question, designing the study

including selection of data collection procedures and/or measures, procedures used, data analysis plan, and findings. In addition, the study

commonly discusses how ethical concerns were addressed and acknowledges the limitations of the study. For this assignment, you review a

published research study with two purposes in mind:
Observing the structure and content of the article
Comparing the content of the article to the recommended content of sections for a research study.
By Day 7
Submit a 7-10 page critique and review of the article. Follow the guidelines below:
Use the quantitative or qualitative research article that you located and that your instructor approved as part of the Week 5 assignment.
Provide an APA reference for the article you select.
If you selected a quantitative research study, use the “Quantitative Article Review and Critique. If you selected a qualitative study, use the

“Qualitative Article Review and Critique.” Respond to all the questions.
Be sure to include the questions in your critique. This will cause your Turnitin report to show high similarity to other students’ papers.

However, do not be concerned about that. Do, however, appropriately paraphrase and cite specific details from the article you review.

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

The above quote is often cited by policymakers and pundits to explain why history is important to the formulation of foreign policy. After

reading Analogies at War, and completing our section on individual cognition and foreign policy decision-making, complete an essay that

answers the following questions:

What is the role of analogical reasoning in the decision-making process? To what extent shouldhistory guide foreign policy? Analogies at

War is twenty years old. Have policymakers improved their use of history? Paying attention to the AE framework, describe how historical

analogy can be applied to foreign policy decision-making toward X (X = Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, North Korea, Ukraine, China – choose one).

What are the strengths and shortcomings of the analogy that you have chosen?

Read case study 23-1 at the end of Chapter 23 in Cooper (page 269), and discuss the following:
1. How would you explain in anatomical terms the client’s diagnosis during the initial assessment visit?
2. How would you educate the client on THREE “red flags” specific to that diagnosis and what would you tell him to do?
3. Explain why he has those two specific contraindicated movements in relation to the anatomy of the elbow and his injury.

Complete the Clark Workplace Civility Index Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

After you are finished, read the assigned article:

Lachman, V. D. (2015). Ethical issues in the disruptive behaviors of incivility, bullying, and horizontal/lateral violence. Urologic Nursing,

35(1), 39-42. Retrieved from http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?

direct=true&db=c9h&AN=100927729&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Next watch the video by clicking on the link below.

Video (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Transcript (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Reflect on what you observed in the video as you answer the following:

1.Based on what you observed, what leadership skills should you, as Masaya’s preceptor, model for your fellow coworkers to promote his

acceptance into the work-group or team.
2.Does incivility seem to be an issue in the scenario?
3.Describe any common themes you discovered among the article, the video and the Civility Index
4.Share how you may improve your score on the index based on what you have read.

Public Administration
Government organization (federal, state, or local) or a nonprofit organization to concentrate on as you explore the various topics of the

course. The organization may be one you are working for or are familiar with. As you progress through the readings and assignments in the

course, think about how these topics are related to the organization you selected. The Learning Resources, the Discussions, and the Application

Assignments throughout the course will guide your thinking as you complete the Final Project.
Must contain the following sections on the organization you selected. You should review the Introduction, Learning Objectives, and Learning

Resources for each week for inspiration and to ensure you include relevant information for the sections of your paper.
1. Organization Context: For this section, you will integrate the history of the organization you selected and describe the impact of the U.S.

Constitution on public administration. You can find this information in the articles on the Federalist Papers referenced in a number of the

weeks of the course.
2. Legal Foundation: For this section, you should move beyond the Constitution and consider the legal basis for your organization. This might

include administrative laws that regulate the organization, or it might include laws related to the establishment of the organization (if it is

a government one).
3. Connection to Public Service: For this section, you should consider how the organizational culture embodies a public service ethos.
4. Ethical Issues or Dilemmas: For this section, you will describe a past or current ethical issue or dilemma the organization faced, or a

potential dilemma it needed to manage. Describe how this ethical issue might have been addressed to avoid an ethical breach.
5. Management and Leadership: For this section, consider the formal and informal leadership structures of the organization.
6. Power and Civic Engagement: For this section, you will analyze the sources of power within the organization and how the organization engages

the public.
7. Accountability: For this section, you should describe how the organization maintains responsibility to its stakeholders or constituents.
8. Intergovernmental Relations: For this section, you should explain how your organization coordinates efforts with other public or private

entities, and the challenges that are faced in intergovernmental relations.
9. Public Financial Management and Budgeting: For this section, you will analyze how financial management and budgeting occur in your

organization and what impact budget objectives have on that organization’s public service mission.
10. Challenges, Opportunities, and Trends: For this section, consider how challenges, opportunities, and trends may impact your organization

internally). Also consider how your organization might impact social hange (externally).
Demonstrate both breadth and depth of knowledge and critical thinking appropriate to graduate-level scholarship. It must follow the APA

Publication Manual (6th edition) guidelines and be free of typographical, spelling, and grammatical errors. The project should be 15–18 pages

in length (double-spaced), not including the title page, the abstract, and references.
Be sure to support your Final Project with specific references to all resources used in its preparation.
Grammar and Plagiarism Checking

Enter your myWalden user name and password at the prompt.
Adams, G. B., Balfour, D. L., & Reed, G. E. (2006). Abu Ghraib, administrative evil, and moral inversion: The value of “putting cruelty first.”

Public Administration Review, 66(5), 680–693.

Agranoff, R. (2011). Federalist no. 44: What is the role of intergovernmental relations in federalism? Public Administration Review, 71, s68–

s77.

Aldrich, J. H., & Grant, R. W. (1993). The Antifederalists, the first Congress and the first parties. Journal of Politics, 55(2), 295–327.

Arnold, P. E. (2011). Federalist no. 70: Can the public service survive in the contest between Hamilton’s aspirations and Madison’s reality?

Public Administration Review, 71, s105–s111.

Bilmes, L. J. (2011). Federalist nos. 67−77: How would Publius envision the civil service today? Public Administration Review, 71, s98–s104.

Bingham, L. B., & O’Leary, R. (2011). Federalist no. 51: Is the past relevant to today’s collaborative public? Public Administration Review,

71, s78–s82.

Boyne, G. A. (2004). Explaining public service performance: Does management matter? Public Policy and Administration, 19(4), 100–117.

Bryer, T. A. (2013). Designing social media strategies for effective citizen engagement: A case example and model. National Civic Review, 102

(1), 43–50.

Clemmitt, M. (2007). Universal coverage: Will all Americans finally get health insurance? CQ Researcher, 17(12), 265–288.

Cooper, M. H. (2004). Tobacco industry: Do ads and new products still target teen smokers?. CQ Researcher, 14(43), 1025−1048.

Donaldson, S. (2006). Outside, looking in. Public Integrity, 8(3), 207–214.

Ersoy, A. F. (2012). Mothers’ perceptions of citizenship, practices for developing citizenship conscience of their children and problems they

encountered. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(3), 2120–2124.

Glaser, M. A., Hildreth, W., McGuire, B. J., & Bannon, C. (2011). Frederickson’s social equity agenda applied. Public Integrity, 14(1), 19–38.

Hoggett, P., Mayo, M., & Miller, C. (2006). Private passions, the public good and public service reform. Social Policy & Administration, 40(7),

758–773.

Jost, K. (2008). Gay marriage showdowns: Will voters bar marriage for same-sex couples? CQ Researcher, 18(33), 769–792.

Jost, K. (2010). Prosecuting terrorists. CQ Researcher, 20(10), 217−240.

Jost, K. (2013). Gay marriage: Will the Supreme Court end curbs on same-sex unions? CQ Researcher, 23(11), 257−280.

Katel, P. (2008). Affirmative action. CQ Researcher, 18(36), 841−864.

Koliba, C. J., Mills, R. M., & Zia, A. (2011). Accountability in governance networks: An assessment of public, private, and nonprofit emergency

management practices following Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 210–220.

Light, P. C. (2011). Federalist no. 1: How would Publius define good government today? Public Administration Review, 71, s7–s14.

Light, P. C. (2011). Federalist no. 85: Has the national government become an “awful spectacle”? Public Administration Review, 71, s155–s159.

Lynn, L. E. (2009). Restoring the rule of law to public administration: What Frank Goodnow got right and Leonard White didn’t. Public

Administration Review, 69(5), 803−813.

Mantel, B. (2013). Gun control: Should lawmakers tighten firearm restrictions? CQ Researcher, 23(10), 233−256.

McCurdy, H. E. (2006). Vision and leadership: The view from science fiction. Public Integrity, 8(3), 257–270.

McGovern, K. (2011). The promise of administrative conservatorship vs. the threat of administrative evil in the mission of public service.

Public Integrity, 14(1), 51−66.

Menzel, D. C. (2006). The Katrina aftermath: A failure of federalism or leadership? Public Administration Review, 66(6), 808–812.

Modlin, S. (2011). Who really runs county government? The county manager in the budget formulation process. Public Administration & Management,

16(1), 21–45.

Morgan, D. F., Kirwan, K. A., Rohr, J. A., Rosenbloom, D. H., & Schaefer, D. L. (2010). Recovering, restoring, and renewing the foundations of

American public administration: The contributions of Herbert J. Storing. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 621–633.

Nagel, J. H. (1991). Psychological obstacles to administrative responsibility: Lessons of the MOVE disaster. Journal of Policy Analysis &

Management, 10(1), 1–23.

The new laboratories of democracy: How local government is reinventing civic engagement. Part one: Structure and form. (2009). National Civic

Review, 98(2), 3–8.

Newbold, S. P. (2011). Federalist no. 27: Is transparency essential for public confidence in government? Public Administration Review, 71,

s47–s52.

Pfeffer, J. (1992). Understanding power in organizations. California Management Review, 34(2), 29–50.

Posner, P. L. (2011). Federalist no. 30: What is to be done about the federal budget? Public Administration Review, 71, s53–s61.

Radin, B. A. (2011). Federalist no. 71: Can the federal government be held accountable for performance? Public Administration Review, 71,

s128–s134.

Riccucci, N. M. (2007). The ethical responsibilities of street-level bureaucrats under welfare reform. Public Integrity, 9(2), 155–173.

Rosenbloom, D. (2008). The politics–administration dichotomy in U.S. historical context. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 57–60.

Rosenbloom, D. H., O’Leary, R., &Chanin, J. (2010). The future of public administration and law in 2020. Public Administration Review, 70,

s314−s316.

Stillman, R. J., II. (1987). The constitutional bicentennial and the centennial of the American administrative state. Public Administration

Review, 47(1), 4–8.

Stivers, C. (2008). The significance of the administrative state. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 53–56.

Teachout, Z. (2012). Legalism and devolution of power in the public sphere: Reflections on Occupy Wall Street. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 39

(5), 1867–1894.

Ventriss, C., & Barney, S. M. (2003). The making of a whistleblower and the importance of ethical autonomy: James F. Alderson. Public

Integrity, 5(4), 355–368.

Warner, M. E. (2010). The future of local government: Twenty-first-century challenges. Public Administration Review, 70, s145–s147.

Wedel, J. R. (2011). Federalist no. 70: Where does the public service begin and end? Public Administration Review, 71, s118–s127.

Weeks, J. (2012). Farm policy: Does U.S. farm policy promote unhealthy eating? CQ Researcher, 22(29), 693–716.

Wright, B. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter? Public Administration Review, 67(1), 54−64.Find further information

about optional readings: