A: Discusses each of these three frames of reference-classical, positivistic, and theories of criminal behavior and their relationship to criminal justice policies.
–and–
B. Identifies which of these three frames of reference you align yourself with the most and why?
submitting 4 essays with different topics but needed in the same urgency for 3000 words each.
You must choose one organisation as a case study.!!
You should illustrate your report by way of a case study giving evidence from an organisation you are familiar with to make recommendations for managers in sport.
In writing this reflective assignment make sure you keep the focus on managing people. Theories and concepts evaluated should be applied to address the question and related to management practice.
Marking Criteria Description Weighting
Clear articulation of the management practice, background information and a clearly stated purpose of the report
10%
Review of key literature and demonstration of an understanding of conceptual perspectives
40%
Application of relevant theories to management practice in sport organisations
30%
Clear and logical conclusion that summaries the main points from the entire report
10%
Grammatically correct, logically structured and professionally presented
5%
References correctly cited with reference list correctly formatted 5%
How the Impact of poor American-International Students Friendship on the International Students’ English Speaking Skills
Your Research Methodology and Design
You need to select one of the methods(Survey,experiment, and field research) that we have been studying that seems to best fit the needs of your research question. In other words, describe how you will operationalize you research question of interest. While it may be that more than one method could be employed, you should settle on one method, then describe why it is appropriate or fits the needs of your question of interest (i.e., theory testing vs. theory building; looking for causal relationship; exploration; description, etc.). This will be your rationale for the design choice. You will also provide some detail as to the specific elements of the design, appropriate to the method. For survey, for example, you would identify the population of interest, and describe your sampling plan.
For an experiment, you need to describe the independent variable(s), the dependent variable(s), and how random assignment to condition will be achieved. You should use the language appropriate to the method in describing the variables of interest, the measures to be implemented, the hypotheses tested, the data collection plan, etc. See examples below. You can use the article assignments on each method as other examples to guide you.
MUST BE WRITTEN IN UR OWN WORD!!!!
U CAN MAKE UP THE TEST.
Personality
Task A. Answer the following learning objectives
1. Briefly define personality (beginning of chapter).
2. Describe psychodynamic theory of personality.
3. Describe cognitive-social theories of personality.
4. Describe major trait theories of personality.
5. Describe humanistic theories of personality.
Task B: Tutorial or online activity with specific questions to be answered
1. Define and briefly describe the Big Five personality dimensions: Openness; Conscientiousness; Extraversion; Agreeableness, Neuroticism.
2. Rank yourself on each dimension and support your ranking [why?] with a list of activities you prefer to do [that illustrates each dimension]
Complete an online test which will provide you with your profile. Please note, your anonymous data will also be collected by the authors to complete their own research
Under personal questions at end, you can omit ones that do not apply
3 Provide an image/graph of your online profile and comment on how similar [or different] your [personal ranking [question 2]] score was compared to the test score [question 3]
Task C. Either describe the most interesting/surprising aspect of the chapter or apply (or explain) some aspect of this material to your life (or your future work life).
Word count:_______
References
the unit name is: Love, Sex and Friendship
The essay Question is :
We live in a culture of capitalism. How do capitalist ways of thinking and doing influence modern attitudes and practices of intimacy in romantic relationships?
For this assignment, you need to find a peer-reviewed academic journal article that researches an electronic media topic with a quantitative research method using statistical analysis of the data. How to find a peer- reviewed academic journal article is covered on the first day of the course. The article you use must have been published within the past three years and this article must not be included in the annotated bibliography list from last semester (look this up on Blackboard). Every student must use a different article for this assignment. Please send an email containing a pdf file of the article (no URL links) to instructor to gain approval to use the article for the assignment.
This assignment is a basic exercise to see if you can follow the structure of conducting scholarly research as presented in an academic journal article. After reading and digesting the article a few times, write a paper outlining the following items:
1) Explain what is being researched in the article (the initiating issue or problem) and why the author(s) is/are researching this topic. Identify the topic under investigation and how the author(s) was/were attempting to progress mass media research.
2) How did the author(s) take the topic or issue and get to the research questions and/or hypotheses to guide the methodology of the study? Explain how the authors took the concepts from their initiating inquiry and created observable constructs using a theoretical perspective (theory).
3) Explain which research method is being used. (Note: statistics are tests of data, not a research method). Essentially, you are explaining what the authors observed and how the observed phenomena were measured (which should be explicitly stated as formal research questions and/or hypotheses). Explain how the data were collected.
4) Explain how the findings of the study progress the specific field of research. Since this article is published in a peer reviewed academic journal it is assumed that it has value to the field, explain that value. Do not get caught up in any limitations or suggestions for future research. Remember scholarly research rarely changes the world, but is a small step toward greater understanding of a small specific topic of the field. Identify what that small step was with this article.
This assignment should not summarize the article but analyze how the author(s) of the article went from a basic question of inquiry to an organized study with findings and conclusions. The point of this assignment is for you to demonstrate a basic understanding of what was done in the study and why the study was done this particular way to progress the field of mass media research. Do NOT make the assignment any more than that. Do NOT critique the merits or make judgments about the quality of the research.
This journal article review should not exceed five pages in length. The APA bibliographical reference for the article should be at the top of your essay. If you use other sources beyond the article in your review, then you must list the references at the end in the APA format. Outside sources are not required to complete the assignment.
ASSIGNMENT 2: HYDRAULIC SERVICES
Assume that each of the following is available:
Sewer: DN150 sewer located in the nature strip to the southern footpath of the road, with an assumed
invert level of RL 41.500. Sanitary drainage will connect to this main via a sewer boundary trap
(SBT) located within the property on the northern boundary. Design is required to upstream
side of SBT only.
Stormwater: Stormwater will discharge to a below-grade SDT in southern boundary carpark (see location
and plan dimensions on drawing) and then to the western kerb of the street. The gutter
discharge RL will need to be determined as part of the exercise. Use rainfall intensity data for
Rockhampton based on 20 minute duration (10 year ARI) and accept that Local Council
requires a design based on maximum 90L/s/Ha allowable runoff (i.e. your exercise is to
nominate the SDT depth based on inflow versus allowable outflow at the 20minute peak).
Potable water: DN100 main located in western footpath to the street, with invert at a constant 1.0m below
footpath. The supply authority can only guaranteed a pressure of 18mH and because it is in a
new growth area of the city, you need to install a surge tank as the mandatory design. You
must achieve 150kPa at the most disadvantaged outlet. Consider carefully the facilities and
determine overall capacity (mH and L/s) for a pressure set serving the development from a
surge tank location that you will note on your drawings.
Assessment Criteria
Using your appreciation of hydraulics installations to all levels of the building (Under-floor, ground and first floors
and roof), determine the following noting that you will be assessed on the points in each section:
1. Cold Water Supply System [40% of assignment 2]
Recommend a reticulation system. Provide a single line diagram of the system, indicating pressure zones,
loading units, select pipe sizes to limit velocity to acceptable limits and pressure sets requirements.
a). Single line diagram
Loading units [15% overall]
Pipe sizes [10% overall]
b). Pressure set capacity (in mH and Q) [15% overall including surge tank location]
2. Roof Areas Drainage System [40% of assignment 2]
Design the stormwater drainage system. Provide a single line diagram showing the collection system, including
flow rates, pipe sizes and falls to detention tank, the location of which is at your discretion. Determine detention
tank capacity.
Page 2 of 3
a). Assumptions
Storm intensity calculations [20% overall]
b). OSD tank
Capacity calculations [20% overall]
3. Sanitary Plumbing and Drainage System [20% of assignment 2]
Design the sanitary plumbing and sanitary drainage system, including sizing of pipe work from pans, urinals,
basins, showers and sinks. The single line diagram should extend to the connection with the authorities system,
including the desired invert levels where applicable.
a). Pipe work sizing
FU loadings [10% overall]
b). Single line diagram
Layout and pipe sizes [10% overall]
Standards
Criteria Unsatisfactory
[Fail]
Satisfactory
[Pass]
Good
[Credit]
Very Good
[Distinction]
Excellent
[High
Distinction]
Marks
awarded
(maximum
100 which
will be
multiplied by
0.15)
< 50 points 50 – 64 points 65 – 74 points 75 – 84 points 85 – 100
points
Hydraulics
design
Very poor or no
assumptions
Diagrams
inadequate or
incomplete
Incomplete
schematic
Section(s) of
assignment
missing
Basic
assumptions
but needing
justification
Very basic
schematic
Little thought
in logistics
Adequate
assumptions
with capacity
to operate
effectively
Schematic
acceptable
All requests
included
Assumptions
fully inclusive
and detailing
sizes, grades,
venting etc.
Clear
evidence of
critical
thought in
logistics and
schematic
presentation
Professional
submission
encompassing
all
requirements
in a realistic
resolution
Learning Outcomes Addressed
Interpret building regulations
Regulatory knowledge
Communicate professionally within regulatory frameworks
Recognise environmental connections with built form
Assignment weight: 15% of group work
Due Date: Week 8 (handed-in during tutorial)
Page 3 of 3
School of Engineering
ASSIGNMENT/REPORT COVER SHEET
This sheet must be attached to all material being submitted for marking.
Student names:
Student numbers:
Unit name and number: 300725 Construction Technology 6 (Services)
Tutorial group:
Tutorial day and time:
Lecturer/Tutor:
Title of assignment: Assignment 2
Length:
Date due:
Date submitted:
Campus enrolment: Penrith
Project Leader Declaration (must be signed)
Declaration:
I hold a copy of this assignment if the original is lost or damaged.
I hereby certify that no part of this assignment or product has been copied from any other student’s work or from any
other source except where due acknowledgement is made in the assignment.
No part of the assignment/product has been written/produced for me by any other person except where collaboration has
been authorised by the subject lecturer/tutor concerned
I am aware that this work may be reproduced and submitted to plagiarism detection software programs for the purpose of
detecting possible plagiarism (which may retain a copy on its database for future plagiarism checking))
Signature and date:
Note: An examiner or lecturer/tutor has the right to not mark this assignment
LAW 201- hrm and law
INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT
(Maximum 2000 words
Your individual field work activity will involve attending the Fair Work Tribunal/Fair Work Australia (FWA), hearing and explaining a case, discussing the business ethics it raises, and detailing the process of dispute resolution in a report. The report will require you to research, review and comment on the relevant law, related business ethics, and the form of dispute resolution associated with the case you heard.
The format of your report will be
Assessment Criteria
Evaluate FWA- 20%
Discuss the ethical issues in the observed case- 10%
Identify the facts of the observed case- 10%
Illustrate the relevant law relating to the observed case- 20%
Appraise the legal arguments of Counsel in the observed case-20%
Assess the judgement of the observed case-20%
TOTAL
100%
*APA REFERENCING
Course Title: Managing Service Operations
Assignment title: Benihana Simulation Analysis
Place: Upload electronically
Assignment overview:
After an induction to the online simulation each individual student will receive a “course link” that will allow access to the Operations Management Simulation: Benihana. Each student will test and run the first five simulation challenges and leave their simulation results on the simulation web site. At the end of the simulation and on the basis of challenge 6, students write a discussion of their simulation performance, the strategy adopted in challenge 6, and the lessons learned from the simulation form the perspective of service operations.
Overall aim:
The aim of this assignment is to confront the student with a simulation exercise and present their analysis and solution. The student will demonstrate his analytical and decision making skills in problematic situations encountered in the life of a restaurant manager.
Learning outcomes (from the CRS):
• identify key trends and parameters of the evolving context of service organizations, and their effects upon service operations and the people in them
• apply fundamental models and technique of planning, decision-making and monitoring systems in long-term and day-to-day operating situations
• use current quality tools and techniques for improving service processes
• develop methods for organizing processes and delivery systems in contexts of technological change
Organisation & methodology:
The individual simulation report should be a 2500 words analysis of your simulation performance and a reflection on the lessons learned inservice operations, using the following outline:
Cover page (course title, faculty, student name, assignment title, date, words count)
Table of content
List of tables and list of figures
1. Introduction (background to the simulation, assumptions, limitations)
2. Discussion of the decision parameters (variables)
3. Presentation and analysis of the simulation results (best strategy: challenge 6)
4. Reflection of lessons learned
Performance benchmarks:
Graduate skill assessed Below standard 70 – 79% 80 – 89% 90 – 100% Weight
Knowledge Inadequate facts or concepts collected. Limited in scope and very descriptive in style. Knowledge irrelevant for purpose. Develops and demonstrates a limited depth of knowledge in a complex and specialized area or interdisciplinary area and/ or applied areas where they are working towards current limits of theoretical research or understanding. Develops and demonstrates great depth of knowledge in a complex and specialized area or interdisciplinary area and/ or applied areas where they are working at current limits of theoretical research or understanding. Develops and demonstrates an excellent depth of knowledge in a complex and specialized area or interdisciplinary area and/ or applied areas where they are working at current limits of theoretical research or understanding to challenge contemporary thinking or paradigms.
20%
Analysis Data has not been sufficiently well analyzed to draw appropriate conclusions. Argumentation and discussion is very limited or shows a lack of understanding of the evidence collected. Demonstrates limited ability to deal with complexity and scope in the knowledge base where the applications of paradigms, concepts and theory have not been sufficiently developed. Limited selection of tools and techniques for problem solving. Deals with some levels of complexity and applies concepts, theory and paradigms. Clearly recognizes lacunae and/ or contradictions in the knowledge base and makes appropriate selection of tools and techniques for problem solving. Deals with complexity and applies a wide range of concepts and theory where lacunae and/ or contradictions in the knowledge base have been clearly identified and discussed. Makes appropriate selection of tools and innovative techniques for problem solving.
30%
Synthesis and Creativity Unable to find, categorize idea and rely information in an acceptable way for this level. Synthesizes some information/ ideas and creates a more limited redefinition of existing knowledge with limited scope to new situations. Autonomously synthesizes information/ ideas and creates responses that expand or redefine existing knowledge and/ or develop new approaches to new situations. Autonomously synthesizes information/ ideas and creates responses that challenge existing knowledge and/ or develop innovative solutions to new situations.
20%
Application Lacks originality in the application of knowledge in professional level context. Applies a very limited range of professional skills and shows no understanding of how the outcomes of work in the area may be applied. Demonstrates some originality in the application of knowledge in professional level context. Applies a limited range of professional skills and shows some understanding of how the outcomes of work in the area may be applied. Demonstrates originality in the application of knowledge in a variety of professional level contexts. Applies a range of professional skills and reflects on current practice. Shows an understanding of how the outcomes of work in the area may be applied, to inform judgments to the development of practice. Demonstrates originality in the application of knowledge in a wide and often unpredictable variety of professional level contexts. Applies a significant range of complex professional skills, practices and techniques and reflects on and subsequently modified practice. Shows an understanding of how the outcomes of work in the area may be applied, to inform judgments and make original contributions to the development of practice.
20%
Presentation
Does not meet a number of key requirements and fails to follow an acceptable style. Often unclear and untidy Organized and coherently structured work. Presents ideas to facilitate comprehension in an orderly manner with acceptable referencing and minor errors of detail. Work coherently and comprehensively organized and structured. Presents ideas with considerable attention to detail which facilitates effortless comprehension in an orderly manner and accurate referencing. Presented work with exceptional clarity that demonstrates ability to attend to all detailed aspects of organization and structure of discussion and all supporting evidence. The work has the qualities consistent with published material.
Awesome! We will spare no effort to give you a most pleasant experience.
But, that’s not all
You get a massive 35% on your first order
Get Discount NowOur record is the best in the industry but this is hardly a surprise; we handpick our writers after they are proven to be consistent, reliable and completely able in their areas of expertise.
Order your custom essay paper, research paper NOW and we’ll turn your frustrations into a sigh of relief
Order Now