Your paper should be a research paper investigating a work of art, or a group of works of art, or an artist, or a topic in some depth, not a broad survey, such as "Indian art" or “Song dynasty landscape painting.”

 

Content of the paper:

Your paper should be a research paper investigating a work of art, or a group of works of art, or an artist, or a topic in some depth, not a broad survey, such as “Indian art” or “Song dynasty landscape painting.”

A paper should not be a summary of the textbook or class notes.

Consult at least three books or journal articles on your topic; pay special attention to recent studies, particularly those from university presses and scholarly journals. The success of the paper depends heavily on the quality of your bibliography.

One important source you can easily use to find useful scholarly articles is HYPERLINK which MSU library subscribes, and you can search for key words and download articles. For example, if you want to write a paper on an artist, you can search the artist’s name.

Do not write on topics with no connection to the course, for example, African art.

Organize your paper around your thesis (your idea, your argument, your opinion, your own understanding concerning works of art).

Your thesis or argument should not be too simple or vague; for example, “Buddhist art is great,” “Japanese architecture is influenced by Chinese architecture.”

Your thesis should be of scholarly nature ; it should not be an aesthetic statement

If you do not have a thesis or idea about an art work, you may want to write an introduction to an art work (its date, the artist, its historical background, its style, its function etc.) or a topic, or an artist. But this type of paper will not receive an A, unless you demonstrate in your paper that you are a thoughtful, careful, and serious researcher, and present your materials well.
This course emphasizes the importance of writing. It requires a paper outline with an annotated bibliography (due on 11/4) and a paper (5-7 pages, due on 11/25). The outline (one page, typed) should include your basic bibliography–at least three books or journal articles on your topic, and you should explain why you choose these sources. It must be based on solid research, demonstrated partly by your bibliography. The purpose of the outline is to help you and give you some guidance, and make sure that you are on right track: the topic is meaningful, manageable, and can contribute greatly to your knowledge and understanding of the course. The topic must be related to the materials covered or to be covered in the course or approved by the instructor.

The paper should show your independent research on a topic beyond the levels of the lectures or the textbook. A paper should include careful description, discussion, and explanation of a work of art, or a group of related works of art, or an artist, or a topic. It should not be a hodgepodge of different sources without your own synthesizing or analysis. Critical comments from the instructor are not intended to criticize you, but to improve your paper and writing skill. Late paper will not be accepted. The best papers will be recommended to participate in the Lee Scholarship competition conducted by the Asian Studies Programs.

If you use library materials, do not write on them; do not make marks on library books.

Format of the paper:

Paper based on web-information (except scholarly journals in electronic form) is not acceptable.

Purchased paper is not acceptable.

Provide page number.

Use font no. 12, double space.

Illustrations: make a copy of the art work you discuss in your paper, and if necessary, copies of other images you discuss in the paper, and attach them at the end of your paper (do not insert them in your text) as “fig. 1,” “fig. 2,” etc. Don’t cut images from books, particularly library books. For illustrations and images, you can use the Visual Resource Library.

Provide the sources of the images.

Provide footnotes for citations of sources; use correct format.

Provide a bibliography; use correct format.

Do not use cover.

Give a title to your paper.

At the beginning of your paper, you may want to write an introductory paragraph, introducing your subject, your thesis, and the structure of your paper.

At the end, you may want to write a summary.

It is an introductory course in traditional (not modern) Asian arts and cultures with the focus on greatest works of visual art. It is designed for students without any background in Asian cultures or art history. The course shows some main trends and unique characteristics of the most important cultural developments as seen certain greatest artistic monuments. The course concentrates on topics of art and history, art and religion, art and philosophy, aesthetics, style, and creative process of art. It pays special attention to cultural exchanges and common themes that ran through different areas of Asia. Meanwhile, it emphasizes indigenous traditions to highlight uniqueness of different heritages. It adopts historical and comparative perspectives to achieve an understanding of the pre-modern Asian civilizations in their own terms and from a holistic view of Asia. The goal of the course is to provide a basic framework of knowledge and images of traditional Asian arts and cultures.

Research paper

 
In this evidence based research paper we are comparing 2 treatments,
medications, or any surgical procedure etc. and then compare and
contrast those 2 treatments and then analyze the outcome that which
one is better. Just follow the PICO format in the attached file.
Definitely have to put randomized control trial in research. Need to
compare information from at least 3-4 articles and put the sources in
APA or any form you want. You can compare and treat anything like
wound eschar treatment with santyl or med honey etc. or use of insulin
pump vs insulin shots. Or any medication comparison for diabetes,
heart attack or anything. it’s more like a summary of 4-5 articles on
the same drug, treatment, or surgical procedure depending on what you

Saving Lives in Saudi Arabia: Reforming a culture of recklessness bravado on the kingdom’s roads

 
Re-write the thesis based on my supervisors comments and the new Literature Review. The thesis is to be 10 chapters, containing about 90000 words, as outlined below;
1- Introduction about 6000-8000 words
2- Literature Review 8000-10000 words
3- Methodology 6000-8000 words
4- Theoretical Framework 8000-10000 words
5- Case Studies -Two chapters 8000-10000 words each
6- Qualitative Results 8000-10000 words
7- Quantitative Results 8000-10000 words
8- Discussion 8000-10000 words
9- Conclusion 8000-10000 words
I have attached a few files:
1- Thesis 3 files, because each file has one of my supervisor’s comments,
It’s bit messy and a bit old because it was the first I wrote. So many things changed after I rewrote my Literature Review with new question and objectives. With this you just need to except the changes then try to update the sources, statistics, etc. However we don’t need the whole thing. You need to divide it into Introduction and Theoretical Framework chapters:
• Introduction. I think it’s better to write it last and I want you to keep the Aziz family story and come back to it in different chapters.
• Theoretical Framework. Start from section 8. You need to update the theories and delete the ones that have no use in the whole thesis.
• Section 10, Research Methods has changed significantly since we (my previous supervisor and I) decided to delete the focus group and the new media platform because we had too many research tools. See the COC and the new Methodology chapter.
2- COC final document, similar to the thesis files.
3- Literature Review. Rewrite it, based on my supervisor’s comments and update the sources, statistics etc.
4- First draft of Methodology. I’ll send the updated version when I finish it. Rewrite it based on my supervisor’s comments and t update the sources, statistics etc.
5- Case Studies. Two chapters devolved and devolving countries. Rewrite it based on my supervisor’s comments and update the sources, statistics etc.
6- Qualitative Results. I don’t think you need to make lots of changes here. Rewrite it based on my supervisor’s comments and update the sources, statistics etc. Try to fit with thesis writing style.
7- Quantitative Results. Still working on it & I’ll send it when I finish, I don’t think you need to make lots of changes here. Just rewrite it based on my supervisor’s comments, and update the sources, statistics etc . Also, to fit with thesis writing style
8- Discussion – you need to write the whole chapter
9- Conclusion – you need to write the whole chapter

• After you finish the reading, I would like you to please send me a plan and outline for the whole thesis

• Since the maximum words in one order is about 55,000 and I need about 80,000-90,000 words, I am going to place two orders- the first one of about 55000 words to cover;
o Introduction
o Literature Review
o Methodology
o Theoretical Framework
o Case Studies 2 chapters

Then I’ll place another order to cover
o Results -Two chapters
o Discussion
o Conclusion
But I want the same writer to work on both orders so we’ll have one whole thesis written by one writer and in one writing style.

Industry Analysis

 
smartphone industry analysis in the form of a report, 2000-2500 words.

Use accurate and frequent Harvard style in text referencing.

iDeep research will be evidenced by a substantive bibliography (4 pages)

Use of relevant marketing literature, industry sources and original and customised illustrations are expected.

Approach to Managing Projects – professional report

 
It is essential that project managers have a clear strategy and approach as to how they will manage projects. Without a clear approach at the outset of a project there is little chance that the project management will function or operate effectively, it will become a series of loosely connected activities
that is reactive rather than pro-active. Projects that have a clear approach and strategy have an integrated focused organisation and are significantly more successful. It is therefore an essential part of the development of your individual approach to management that you consider and develop how you will manage projects.

Scenario
The clients for a project have provisionally appointed you to manage their project, before confirming the appointment they would like to be confident that you will be successful. The final appointment will be discussed and confirmed at a meeting of the Board of Directors. In order to make their decision, the
Board of Directors have asked you to submit a report that explaining how you propose to manage the project.

Task
Write a proposal (in the form of a professional report) to the Board of Directors that sets out your personal approach to management, your project strategy and how you propose to manage the project.

Make up of essay

Intro – no more than 80 word

Main body of paper should be focused on the Feasibility and probable success of the strategy, approach and proposals

conclusion – no more than 80 words

Emphasis of the paper should be on quality and usability to the client
The paper should be critical – do not be afraid to generate an opinion, but whilst still respecting that the client is the client.

Only secondary referencing should be used.
peer reviewed journals only to be used, newer than 2012 only

no diagrams or charts

Urinary Tract Infections

 

Week 10 Discussion

Increase text size
Decrease text size
Print Page
Urinary Tract Infections

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are caused by bacteria—most often Escherichia coli. However, certain viruses, fungi, and parasites can also lead to infection. The infection can affect the lower and upper urinary tract, including the urethra, prostate (in males), bladder, ureter, and kidney. Due to the progression of the disease and human anatomy, symptoms present differently among the sexes as well as among age groups. It is important to understand how these factors, as well as others, impact the pathophysiology of UTIs. Advanced practice nurses must have this foundation in order to properly diagnose patients.

To prepare:
•Review Chapter 29 in the Huether and McCance text. Identify the pathophysiology of lower and upper urinary tract infections. Consider the similarities and differences between the two types of infections.
•Select two of the following patient factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Reflect on how the factors you selected might impact the pathophysiology of the infections, as well as the diagnosis of and treatment for the infections.

Post on or before Day 3 a description of the pathophysiology of lower and upper urinary tract infections, including their similarities and differences. Then explain how the factors you selected might impact the pathophysiology of the infections, as well as the diagnosis of and treatment for the infections.

*********MUST USE RESOURCES LESS THAN 5 YEARS AND MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PROFESSOR AND STUDENTS. ALSO USE PAGE NUMBERS IN THE CITING SO THAT THEY KNOW WHAT PAGE YOU RECEIVED THE INFORMATION FROM. MUST USE TEXTBOOK ALONG WITH ANOTHER RESOURCE.

Develop a strategic management plan – REPORT

 

a strategic management plan for a regional tourism association or business within the hospitality industry. The focus of the strategic management plan will be the application of contemporary theory taking into account emerging and long-term trends and developments.
The report must address the following:
1. A brief overview of the business including; size, location, vision and mission
2. Situation Analysis
a. General environmental analysis (chapter 2). Evaluate the following trends and predict the segments that you expect to have the most influence over your business and why.
i. Technological trends
ii. Demographic trends
iii. Economic trends
iv. Political/legal trends
v. Sociocultural trends
vi. Global trends
vii. Physical environment
b. Industry analysis
i. Porter’s five forces model. Discuss and evaluate how attractive the industry is in which your firm is competing.
c. Competitor analysis
i. Identify key competitors and overview their objectives, strategies, strengths, weaknesses and capabilities.
d. Internal analysis
i. Assess the firm’s strengths and weaknesses through a value chain analysis. Note, strengths are internal resources and capabilities that have the potential to be core competencies place the firm at a competitive advantage and visa versa for weaknesses.
3. Identification of Environmental Opportunities and Threats and Firm Strengths and Weaknesses (SWOT analysis).
a. Attempt to match firm strengths with opportunities. How would you minimize environmental threats?
4. Strategy Formulation
a. Strategic alternatives
i. Identify 2-4 alternative strategies (business-level chapter 4, corporate-level, chapter 6).
ii. Demonstrate how each alternative links in with the firm’s strengths, capabilities and core competencies. How do these alternatives take advantage of opportunities and minimize environmental threats?
iii. Which alternative is the best and why?
5. Implementation and Action Plan of Strategic Alternatives
a. Implementation issues, e.g. structural changes, leadership, new controls, incentives, etc.
b. Action plan- brief overview of who, what, where, when and how?

Teaching-Evaluation Method Paper

 

Directions: Select an evaluation/teaching method. Discuss and analyze the appropriateness and effectiveness for a particular population of patients, students or new nurse employees. please choose the particular population nursing students because those who I am focussing on

Evaluation Methodology – 35%
e.g. demonstration using human simulation; paper and pencil tests.
Include a definition and description of this method from the literature. Cite several professional references (5 or more).

Population – 5%
Describe your selection e.g. young adults – define from literature.

Effectiveness – 50%
Discuss how your selected evaluation/teaching methodology has achieved desired learning outcomes for your selected population.
What are the learning outcomes that can and cannot be achieved using this evaluation/teaching method?
Include research showing the effectiveness of your selected teaching/evaluation method on your chosen population of learners (at least 2 professional references).

Format – 10%
Spelling, grammar (use of Standard English), typed or use of word processor. Submitted on due date.
WWW.APAStyle.org is a good resource.

follow the grading rubric
Guidelines for paper are followed. Reflection and preparation are evident in the paper including multiple professional references , it has to be within 5 years updated and relevant and includes comprehensive analysis of topic and synthesis of course content and research. Paper is well written using Standard English, is free of spelling and grammatical errors, and references are properly cited and documented using APA style.

English writing

 
– the paper is based on this RPF http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-AI-15-056.html
– you are writing a summary for a government grand proposal which is longer then the normal one 1000 words
– because you are soliciting money your project should be argumentative you need to convince them that your project is worthy, necessary and worth the investment
– the project should be professional and clearly organized it should show understanding of the current state of the research you need to include some bibliographical summary
– The Project Summary should be a self-contained description of the project, consisting of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, and a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity
-The overview includes a description of the activity that would result if the proposal were funded and a statement of objectives and methods to be employed. The statement on intellectual merit should describe the potential of the proposed activity to advance knowledge. The statement on broader impacts should describe the potential of the proposed activity to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes.
– It should be informative to other persons working in the same or related fields and insofar as possible understandable to a scientifically or technically literate lay reader. The Project Summary must contain a summary of the proposed activity suitable for dissemination to the public. The Project Summary is meant to serve as a succinct and accurate description of the proposed work when separated from the application. This Summary must not include any proprietary/confidential information.
– don’t use past accomplishments or the use of the first person

Proposal Evaluation

 

In your analytical report,
Explain any problems with the content: feasibility, persuasiveness, specificity
Evaluate any issues with writing: concision, clarity and grammar
Correct any problems with formatting: memo header, headings/bullets, graphics