Posted on

Enterprise Architecture Application

1. Introduction
Does the introduction explain clearly and succintly the business problem to be solved? Fully ok, but see important question in the text!
2. Exposure of the idea
2.1 Does the author explain clearly and in a language appropriate for a management
audience what ‘X’ is (X= Process Improvement / Information Architecture / SOA/…)?
To some extent
ok as a start, but you must expand on what you have
learnt about process improvement, and refer to the
practices we discussed in class. This assignment doe
snot show that you have learnt in class.
2.2 Is there a clear explanation of how ‘X’ is expected to solve the business problem? Fully
Is the content up-to-date? To some extent relate to notable process impriovement practices (kaizen,
six sigma)
3. Effect on the Enterprise
3.1 Why: Does the author describe a strategic motivation (objective) that companies
would want to achieve using ‘X’ Fully
ok
3.2 Where / What Does the author describe in which part of the organisation this change
would have to be applied and what would change? (business and solution) Fully
4. Implementing the change
4.1 When: Does the author describe under what circumstances this approach would be
suitable? Fully
4.2 Who: Does the author describe who would be responsible for initiating the necessary
change? To some extent
4.3 How Does the author describe the change could be approached organisationally? Fully
5. Conclusion
Have relevant issues from the body of white paper been accurately summarised? Fully
Presentation
Cover Sheet To some extent
Layout and Format Fully
Referencing
Referencing for all written material should follow one of the accepted referencing
standards (use APA6 or AGPS Harvard system of bibliographic referencing) Fully
Referenced material is relevant Mostly include references to kaizen and six sigma so that the
reader knows you considered various existing methods
Does the author Quote a definition from a source, and explain in more detail in his/her
own words? Fully
Does the author follow the rule that long text (>10% of your assignment) copied from the
Internet is not acceptable even if qouted? Fully
Expression
Novelty of Thinking and Intellectual Ability in Expressing Ideas

Posted on

Innovation and Global and Cross-Cultural Impact

Part 1 of the assignment requires you to compare and contrast the readings on the concepts of innovation presented in Units 2, 3, 4 and 5 coupled with networks and alliances. Similar to the Unit 1 assignment, indicate the strengths and pitfalls of these concepts, providing two examples of each.

Part 2 of the assignment requests you to formulate an innovation strategy which incorporates the concept of:

Open networks and collaboration.
Alliances, into a technology-driven industry of your choice.
Global and cross cultural impact.

Please provide case study examples of organizations where these concepts have been or could be applied. For this paper you can use a single or multiple case study examples.
Written Requirements

Posted on

literature review

 
Read approx. 200 total pages from at least 4 different sources. This reading may be from magazines, journal articles, internet resources, (Those sources could be all from the internet but different website) etc. These readings will concentrate on storytelling technique, skills learning, history, theory, cultural issues, interdisciplinary applications, international perspectives, etc.
Produce a 4 page report focusing on your reactions and personal applications of the material you are reviewing. Please include all the bibliographic details of each book, chapter, or journal article, including # of pages read

Posted on

Financial Crisis in Japan- the Lost Decades?

 
This is a economic research paper about Financial Crisis in Japan. The main text is 13 pages, and 2 pages for the proposal. Please follow the guideline that need to answer 3 question in the proposal. I also upload a sample of good proposal from my classmate. Please check it.
For the main text about this research paper, it can say anything about financial crisis in Japan using a economic approach. Such as causes, effects and others. It is better to use some charts to prove the argument.
The last important things is it requires a good tittle for the assignment.

Posted on

Daclizumab HYP versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

 
INSTRUCTIONS: JOURNAL CLUB/WRITTEN ANALYSIS/REFERENCES AMA STYLE
ARTICLE FOR ANALYSIS:
– Kappos L, Wiendl H, Selmaj K, et al. Daclizumab HYP versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1418-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501481. PubMed PMID: 26444729.
NOTE:
-I WILL UPLOAD 3 DOCUMENTS: THE ARTICLE FOR ANALYSIS, THE TEMPLATE FOR ANSWER THE QUESTIONS AND THE ARTICLE ON HOW TO PREPARE ARTICLE ANALYSIS, AS A PDF SINCE I CAN’T DO COPY PASTE-
INSTRUCTIONS:

1. The student groups will collaborate in preparing A WRITTEN ANALYSIS of the journal article indicated below. This document is editable and the text boxes will expand to accommodate your answers to the template questions. All questions should be answered to insure that you develop a thorough summary of the most important elements of the study. Each group member should upload a copy of the document to Blackboard Assignments by the due date below.
– Answers to all questions must be in full sentences with correct grammar and spelling; no credit will be given for Yes/No answers. Copying and pasting from the article text is NOT acceptable. Your answers should be in your own words! Plagiarism rules apply to this assignment and will be enforced.
I

INSTRUCTIONS:
• Group members should collaborate on all answers so that all members come away with a complete understanding of the study under analysis. You are expected to learn from each other as you apply your new knowledge of literature evaluation to an actual research article. With some concepts, one member may have a better understanding than the others in the group and provide clarifications to the other members for the benefit of all.
THIS PART(B) IS ONLY IF YOU NEED HELP ON HOW TO DO THE ARTICLE ANALYSIS.

B. ALL STUDENTS READ “Presenting at Journal Club: A Guide” by Clare Atzema, MD, for an overview of Journal Clubs and how to prepare and present a research article analysis.
I CHOSE ARTICLE CRITIQUE AS A “TYPE OF PAPER” BUT IS A WRITTEN ANALYSIS.
LET ME KNOW IF ANYTHING.

Posted on

Shaping the Environment Presentation

 

Select one work of architecture featured in the text (I have uploaded the chapters—chapter 15 focuses primary on architecture).
Using the building that you selected as an example, explain how a building acts as a kind of sculpture to transform the space around it.

Look through your textbook for an example of a sculpture that you feel would amplify the message that your selected building communicates to onlookers (I have uploaded the chapters—chapter 13 focuses primary on sculptures).

Present your explanation for how the building and the sculpture might work together to create a unified message to the class in a 6- to 8-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation WITH detailed speaker notes in the notes section.

Include the following:

1) When was the building created?

2) Where is it located?

3) What is the building’s original purpose?

4) Who was the architect? What was his or her background and nationality?

5) When was the sculpture created?

6) Who was the sculptor? What was her or his background and nationality?

7) Where was the sculpture originally located?

8) For what purpose was the sculpture originally created?

9) Why do you think the building and sculpture go together or complement each other?

10) Compare the form and function of your selected building and sculpture with the form and function of crafts and decorative arts found within your home or another environment, such as a school, restaurant, or public building (2-slides).
For example, for sculpture you might compare with one of the following:
– Table settings and decorations
– Jewelry
– Wall decorations
– Textiles
– Crafts
– Vases and flowers

**Please be sure to use the text I have uploaded as much as possible. If you need to use an outside source, please make sure the source is credible and that I can find it online or in a store/library as well.

Also, I have uploaded the cover of the book (for citation purposes), as well as the table of the contents and index to help you with finding information within the chapter.

Posted on

Assignment 3.1: Behaviorism

 
Assignment Details: Perform the following tasks:

Review the literature on classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and cognitive learning.

Use the internet, library resources, your textbook, and other resources.

Write a 2-4 page paper summarizing your findings.

Write a paper that includes the following:

Provide a basic description for each theory: classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and cognitive learning. Include the major components of each theory.

Describe the influence and contributions for each of the major theorists: Pavlov, Watson, Thorndike, Skinner, Bandura, and Tolman.

Do you think human behavior is as simple as rewards and punishments? Why or why not?

Do you agree/disagree with Skinner’s view that humans have no free will? Why or why not?

Do you agree/disagree that humans are simply products of their environment? Why or why not?

What theory do you think is most accurate in describing human learning and behavior? Why?

Must have an abstract and reference page

Posted on

What can be done to enhance self-determination in adults with serious mental illness? Research Question: What can be done to enhance self determination in adults with serious mental illness?

WHAT I LIKE TO SEE IN A DISSERTATION PROPOSAL
A dissertation proposal is a presentation of the first three chapters of your dissertation. These first three chapters, then, are not static, but are works in progress and should be treated as such. This means that you will continue to search the literature and update as you find new material, for example, or as interaction with your participants leads you in new directions. Because you are conducting Action Research, which is cyclical, every cycle of investigation should lead to new ideas and discoveries as you move through the process. One last thought on the way Action Research is conducted and written — work on writing in active voice. In other words, avoid sentences like, “This study will…” It’s not your study that’s doing this work — it’s YOU! Consequently, feel free to say, “I will…” and when you’re done, you can say, “I did it!”
The approval process of the proposal always begins with your mentor. Then the remainder of your committee will have the opportunity to read your work. Often, members of your committee will approve with recommendations for revision. Plan on completing multiple iterations of your work!
This is what I like to see in a dissertation proposal — I hope this helps you organize your thinking as you put your proposal together. Creativity is welcome and I realize that the research problem and method can drive the organization of the proposal. Use this only as a guide — your judgment in what you present should prevail. I would like to see some semblance of these headers, however, to help organize the work so that it’s easy to follow and captures everything needed. But remember – This is YOUR study!
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY
Introduction: Begin with an introduction that tells us what you’re studying and why you’re interested in this. What has drawn you to this topic and why do you think it’s important? What is the relevance of the problem to the field?
Background of the Problem: Describe some of the important information that readers need to know to understand why this is a research problem and why it should be studied.
Statements of the Problem: After providing some background, concisely state what the research problem is in a couple of paragraphs, including why we need to care about this. Why is this a problem that should be researched?
Research Question(s): Every dissertation study MUST be guided by research questions. Often, in qualitative studies, there is a main question followed by sub-questions. Quantitative studies should also have hypotheses in addition to research questions. This is not part of a qualitative study, however.
Purpose of the Study: This section should answer the important “So what?” question. In other words, what is the larger purpose this study will fulfill? Your main purpose is to answer or address your research questions, but your secondary purpose is to address a larger problem through your results.
Significance of the Study: Drawing from the purpose discussion, who will most benefit from your work? Who in the profession will be most interested in seeing your results and why?
Nature of the Study: How will you conduct the study? Give a brief but specific discussion of the study itself, including method(s).
Assumptions and Limitations: What are the givens with which you’re approaching this work, and what might get in your way? Your assumptions should be methodological, theoretical, and topic-specific. Your limitations might be potential design flaws, issues with participants, or both. They are issues that might impede your ability to draw conclusions from your data once it’s collected. You should also discuss delimitations, or areas that are intentionally being excluded from the research and why.
Definitions of Terms: List and define any terms that might be unfamiliar to the reader and that help to explain what is being measured through your work.
Summary: Summarize your chapter with a transition to the remainder of the proposal or final dissertation.
CHAPTER 2 – LITERATURE REVIEW
A good literature review should contain the following:
• A description of the “line of research” — in others words, what is the history of study of this problem? Where and how will your study contribute to this line?
• Identify, describe, and evaluate the studies that have come before yours on this research problem. What studies support your work and have helped you to determine the research problem, research questions, and significance of your study? Where are the gaps in that research? What unanswered questions have they created that your study might address?
• What is your theoretical framework? How has that helped you to select the focus for the study and potentially guide your analysis and interpretation of the data you hope to collect?
• Are there any studies that support the selection of your methodology and approach to your work? In other words, are there mostly quantitative studies that precede yours and you think a qualitative study is in order as a result? Is this a topic that has never been studied using focus groups, or phenomenological interviews, or surveys, or? Has the group you intend to study never been studied on this topic? These are all questions that help you to address the gap in the literature that your study may fill.
• Any other literature that supports the work you are doing.
• Provide a summary of the literature at the end of the chapter with a clear description of the gap your study will attempt to fill.
Remember — a good Literature Review is research-based, meaning that you should mostly be focused on previous studies in the area you intend to research.
CHAPTER 3 – METHODOLOGY
Chapter 3 is an extremely important chapter in that it presents the step-by-step approach you will use to conduct your study. Think of it as the blueprint for the house you are building and ask yourself, “If someone else were to read my work, would they be able to do EXACTLY what I did?”
Some of Chapter 3 mirrors the work that you did in Chapter 1. In Chapter 1 you described the research question and why it is being asked. In Chapter 3, you are describing exactly how you intend to go about answering it.
A good Chapter 3 should include:
• Purpose of the Study: You should begin by re-introducing why you’re doing this at all.
• Research Design: Define more fully the design of your work. What do you intend to do? With whom? Where and when? How? What instruments do you intend to use (i.e., interviews, surveys, focus groups, etc)?
• Target Population and Participant Selection: What is your sampling method? How will you recruit and choose your participants? How will you avoid coercion? How will you obtain informed consent?
• Data Collection and Data Analysis: Describe in detail and present the instruments you will use (interview questions, focus group procedures, surveys, etc.). Describe in detail how you will collect the data and once collected, how you will analyze your data and present your results.
• Ethical Considerations: How will you protect your participants and the data you collect? Are there any particular concerns for your study that should be addressed? How will you address them?
• Expected Findings: What do you think you’ll have when all is said and done? What are you really going for in this study?

Posted on

Poetry Essay on Time

 

For this assignment, I need an OUTLINE in 12 hours. A ROUGH DRAFT in 4 days. Is that doable? Please call me or send an message to me.

Grading:

The points you earn for this assignment will be placed in the “Writing” category of the course. The outline is worth 20 points, the rough draft is worth 50 points, and the final draft is worth 200 points (100 points for grammar and 100 points for content.

Objectives:

• To demonstrate your mastery of poetic and literary devices

• to practice the art of literary analysis in a compare and contrast paper, sharpening your analysis skills along the way

• to demonstrate your deep understanding of some of the essential questions (themes) we have discussed this semester

• to master the art of revision

• to give you an opportunity to engage with both your imagination and your critical thinking skills as you pull together your own original argument.

General requirements for all topics:

3-5 pages (3 pages minimum and 5 pages maximum), double spaced, MLA standards for heading and citation, minimum of six quotations used for textual support (at least three from each poem, but certainly, you will probably need more). Be sure to include an introduction, body paragraphs (you decide how many you will need), and a conclusion. Your intro should include a hook sentence, a sentence that introduces the poems with their authors and titles, and a thesis that is one clear and specific sentence at the end of your introduction. Use formal language (no slang or colloquial words), eternal present tense, and plenty of hearty analysis that, whenever possible, specifically addresses the language in the lines you quote for evidence. Note: Discussing poetic and literary devices is often essential to a successful literary analysis paper that addresses poetry. As such, be sure to discuss the devices in the lines you cite that are relevant to your overall argument.

Topic: Time

Many of the poems we have studied explore the inevitable passing of time or the inevitability of death. Do these poets offer any sense of hope, celebration, and/or optimism while considering time’s inevitable passing? After choosing two of the following poems, analyze how their ultimate messages about time create parallels or differences that enable readers to better understand an overall truth about time’s passing.

Here are the poets and poems:

Billy Collins’ “Design”
Robert Frost’s “Design”
William Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 60”
Edward Smallfield’s “after niedecker”
Ezra Pound’s “A Station in the Metro”
William Carlos Williams’ “The Red Wheelbarrow”
(Other options would be Yeats’ or Eliots’ works, but I imagine you now feel fatigue when thinking of them).

Posted on

Technical Writing

 
In consideration of the following attached technical writing planning questions construct a 1 page complaint letter based on the following criteria:
1. You have identified an area at your company that offers a poor customer experience or an inside process that hinders employe productivity.
2. Address a letter to a fictitious owner of the process at your company who should know about your complaint.
3. Make your complaint in a third person voice and be as objective and positive about solving it in a helpful manner.
4. Then explain how you believe the matter or process can be improved.