Informal case study 1

 

Apply one or two of the ethical principles described on pages 3-5 of Ethics and College Student Life to one of the opening case studies in Chapter 4 or 5 (i. e. 4.1, 4.2, 5.1, etc.)

I want my paper in 3 parts
1- Introduction of case. Cite the source
2- Analysis of behavior.
3- If we could turn back the clock.

Format the paper according to APA guidelines.

SIDNEY LUMET’S NETWORK

(1976)
SSAYS MUST BE TYPED AND DOUBLE SPACED IN MLA FORMAT.
4 – 5 PAGES (not including “Works Cited”)

The essay is to be both a research paper and a formal analysis of a film. Reference Librarians are very helpful and will direct you to other necessary resources you will need to satisfactorily complete the research essay.
ANY CITATIONS, QUOTATIONS, OR IDEAS THAT ARE NOT YOUR OWN MUST BE REFERENCED. IF NOT, YOU ARE PLAGIARIZING.

PLAGIARISM AND OTHER FORMS OF CHEATING: DON’T EVEN THINK ABOUT IT !!!!
YOU WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT AND WILL AUTOMATICALLY FAIL THE CLASS.
———————————————————————————————————————
I N S T R U C T I O N S:

This assignment is based on
Sidney Lumet’s Network (1976).

The film is available for re-viewing at the CSI Media Services Office in the Library. In addition, the film is in print on VHS and DVD and are widely available online (Amazon.com) and at local retailers (Best Buy, Barnes & Noble etc…).

You are to construct your essay based on the following questions and discussion points:

Briefly describe and summarize (in your own words) Mr. Jensen’s famous “forces of nature” speech to Howard Beale?

Give an example of how the worldwide corporate and financial domination that Mr. Jensen spoke of continues today. Name a specific company or corporation that owns and controls several media outlets. How much control does that particular company have over its media content?

Briefly summarize Howard Beale’s “turn off your television set…turn them off…” sermon / speech during his first revised newscast.

Did audiences perceive this film as pure satire or fantasy in 1976? How has this film become less of a satire and more of a “prophesy” about the current state of reality television?
(NOTE: This question will require you to locate original 1976 newspaper and magazine film reviews as well as other relative material to support your answer).

________________________________________________________________________

VALID SOURCES FOR AN ACADEMIC RESEARCH PAPER INCLUDE:

Original film reviews (New York Times, Variety Magazine, Cinema Today).
Books about specific films or directors (filmographies, biographies, and autobiographies).
Interview transcripts (with directors or actors…Ex: Hitchcock / Truffaut).
Video and audio interviews (must be cited properly and written transcription-style in your finished essay).
Critical essays by notable film historians (Robert Osbourne, Roger Ebert etc…).
SOURCES THAT ARE NOT VALID INCLUDE:
– Personal blogs, Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter
Wikipedia or any other facsimile.
Product reviews from commercial retail sites (Amazon, Barnes & Noble, About.com)
IMDB (International Movie Database) reviews and plot summaries.

Ask the Dust

 
I only need my essay, that I will upload, to be revised.
The professor’s instructions are:
1- Editing the introduction more and make it more clear.
2- Add a thesis sentence in the introduction.
3- Have quotations from the novel Ask the Dust by John Fante all over the essay.

Jimmy Connors

 

PERSUASIVE ORAL PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS

Your oral report will consist of a PowerPoint presentation that includes a minimum of 11 slides for a duration of at least 15 minutes. Your slides should be creative, unique, and attractive and should include video and/or audio clip(s), pictures, clip art, and sounds.
The content of your slides should provide a detailed description and background of your celebrity and results from your methodology section. Include a discussion of your:

• data collection method;
• charts/graphs of your study population and/or demographics; and
• charts/graphs of your study results.
This powerpoint related to the persuasive report i just ordered

anything connected with Business Economics or Marketing…

 
Undergraduate Major Project

The chosen topic will require you to:

• Identify/formulate problems and issues
• Conduct literature reviews
• Evaluate secondary information
• Investigate and adopt suitable methodologies
• Determine solutions
• Process secondary data
• Critically appraise and present findings using appropriate media.

What is required in a dissertation or project?

The learning outcomes indicate that you will be expected to demonstrate some or all of the following:

• Evidence of scholarly research. Examples are using search facilities in the library (CD ROMS, book and journal indices etc.), and showing evidence that sources have been located and sensibly used. Material obtained from sources such as news reports, online discussion forums etc is another possibility.

• Evidence of independent thought. This can be provided by comments on the theories and opinions of scholars, commenting on secondary data etc.

• Interpretation of evidence. Pure description of an event, situation, opinion etc. without explanation or analysis is not sufficient. Similarly; quotations in your dissertation should not be used simply for their own sake. One way of using them is to support a particular viewpoint or argument. You are not rewarded simply for reproducing the words of other writers. If tables are included make sure that you give the source of the data and that you use them (to support an argument, comment on a theory etc.). It cannot be emphasised too strongly that mere description alone is not sufficient – you must analyse, evaluate, or interpret your data and information.

• A conceptual understanding of the topic chosen, using an appropriate theoretical framework. Thus, when choosing a topic, students should remember that a central purpose is to allow the application of appropriate theory.

• Clarity and lucidity of argument and expression in the presentation of your findings. This aspect is very important, but it can present special difficulties for students whose first language is not English. Here we are not looking for perfection in either grammar or sentence construction, but examiners must be able to understand what you are trying to say.

• Competence in the use of bibliographies, footnotes or other referencing, and other appropriate skills. Some guidance on this is presented later.

What is the word limit?

The maximum length of the undergraduate dissertation is typically 10,000 words, or equivalent. There is no minimum length, but you should write enough to demonstrate that you have achieved the aims of your dissertation or project; however, it is unlikely that this can be done in less than 9,000 words.

Note: The maximum number of words does not include footnotes, the abstract, the bibliography, indented quotations, appendices and tables.

What is the required format?

• Your dissertation must be written in English in typescript form on A4 paper. Your name must not appear on the dissertation. You must submit one hard copy of the dissertation to the iCentre and one digital copy through Grademark. Both the hard copy and the digital copy are required (to enable double blind marking by two markers) – if you submit only one of them, it will be considered a non-submission. It is also advisable to retain a copy for your own records. Please note submitted dissertations will only be returned in cases of failure.

• When you submit the copies of your dissertation you may be asked to submit, either on disk, using Word, or in manuscript, your working papers which have formed the basis of your dissertation; for example, copies of articles, working notes and summaries, completed questionnaires and tapes or notes of interviews. These may provide the basis for a viva voce should that be necessary. These will be returned to you after the assessment process is complete.

• The cover sheet of the dissertation must include the following declaration: ‘I declare that the above work is my own and that the material contained herein has not been substantially used in any other submission for an academic award’.

• The dissertation must be prefaced by an abstract. This is not an introduction but a summary which outlines the plan and argument of the dissertation. It should include brief details of the methodology employed. The abstract should not be longer than 300 words. It should be included immediately after the title page and it will be examined as part of the dissertation.

• A list of contents, such as the glossary, chapters, and appendices – with page references – should be included at the front of the dissertation.

• Pages should be numbered and double-line spacing used.

• Your dissertation must be held together in a suitable spine binder with a disclaimer page which will be available in Appendix 7 and on your VLE.

• Diagrams, figures, tables, and illustrations should be incorporated into the text at the appropriate place, unless there is a series of them or they are continually referred to throughout the text. In this case they should be placed in appendices at the end of the work. You are advised to use a drawing package for diagrams and scan in other illustrations.

• The work of other authorities must be acknowledged. When quotations or general references are made they must be suitably referenced by using the Harvard system.

• Appendices should not contain material which is not used or referred to in the text. Similarly, illustrative material should not be included unless it is relevant, informative, and referred to in the text.

• A bibliography should be included at the end of the dissertation and should list, alphabetically, all the sources (including magazines and newspapers) that you have consulted. Books should be listed as: Author (surname then initials); date, title, edition, publisher. Other sources such as journals, magazines, and newspapers should be treated in a similar fashion. If sources are used which are not written in English then the English translation is required in the bibliography.
STRUCTURE:

Abstract
Set out on a page of its own immediately after the title page. The abstract is likely to be the last section to be written. It is a short (300 words maximum.) summary of the project (not an introduction) and should indicate the nature and scope of the work, outlining the research problem, key issues, findings and your conclusion/recommendations

Table of Contents
An outline of the whole project in list form, setting out the order of the sections, with page numbers. It is conventional to number the preliminary pages (abstract, table of contents) with lower case Roman numerals (i.e. (i), (ii), (iii) etc.) and the main text pages (starting with the first chapter) in Arabic numerals (1, 2, 3, etc.) as shown below.

Contents Page
List of Tables i
List of Figures ii
List of Abbreviations iii
Acknowledgements iv

Chapter 1 (Title) 1
1.1 (First Section heading)
1.2 (Second etc.)
1.3 (Third)

List of tables and figures
You can present a list at the beginning of your dissertation/ project of the tables and figures you have included.

A table is a presentation of data in tabular form; a figure is a diagrammatic representation of data or other material. Tables and figures should be clearly and consistently numbered, either above or below the table or figure. Each table and figure should have a separate heading (caption). The reader should be able to understand what the table or figure is about from this heading / caption without referring to the text for explanations. The numbers of the tables and the figures you use in the text and in the lists at the beginning should correspond exactly.

Main body of document, appropriately structured (this structure may vary depending on the nature of your dissertation.)

Bibliography / References
Appendices (these should only contain material which is genuinely supportive of the argument in the main body of the dissertation).
Referencing

The use of references can cause difficulties. You must use the Harvard System of Referencing. The essence of this system is that whenever you quote from a primary or secondary source you add in brackets, immediately after the quotation, the surname of the author, the year of publication, and the page reference

Example of Harvard referencing

Carter persisted with the ‘responsible’ import based recovery programme, hoping that the Germans and Japanese would ultimately follow their example. As a consequence of this policy the US trade deficit increased from $9.5 billion in 1976 to $31.1 billion in 1977 (Stein 1998, p159).

(Stein 1998, p159) would appear after a direct quotation, or as in this case, the presentation of an idea. Direct quotes of more than 30 words or so should be indented on either side.
Example:

In my view, and notwithstanding some of the really important theoretical insights and results that the concept has generated, there are problems in trying to apply the concept of utility that have not had the attention they deserve. However, economists are now beginning to take more interest in the extent to which psychological evidence can inform the development of economic models.
(Anand, 2006, p223)

All books etc. you have cited in the text are listed in a reference list at the end of the dissertation in alphabetical order: author, initials, date, title, place of publication, publisher. Stein would thus appear as:

Stein, J (1998) The Locomotive Loses Power: The Trade and Industrial Policies of Jimmy Carter; in Fink, G & Graham, HD (eds) The Carter Presidency: Policy Choices in the Post New-Deal Era, Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.

Note that this is a chapter in a publication edited by someone else. The full volume also needs to be cited thus:

Fink, G & Graham, HD (1998) The Carter Presidency: Policy Choices in the Post New-Deal Era, Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.

Note the use of italics in these two examples. It is always the title of the book that is italicised.

If there is more than one book, journal article etc. by the same author your references will normally be distinguished by the year of publication. If the author has published more than one work in the same year, show them as 1992a, 1992b etc.

Ensure that your document is spell-checked and pay particular attention to grammatical and punctuation errors.
Good scholarship, referencing and academic misconduct

In your project, as with all academic work, you will be expected to demonstrate a high standard of academic referencing. To recap, this is for three reasons:

1 To show the breadth and depth of research you have carried out (i.e. get good marks!)
2 To enable the reader to follow up on interesting ideas/research that you have discussed.
3 To avoid being accused of plagiarism.

As a level 6 student you should know all of the following information, but experience tells us that it is useful to include a re-cap.

What is good scholarship?
Academics (including you!) are engaged in the generation of new knowledge and insights that contribute to what we already know about the natural, supernatural and social world – this is called ‘scholarship’. Good scholarship is the result of conventions that help the readers of academic research to see exactly what is new, what is the work of others and how it all fits together – the main way this is done is through the referencing system.

Put simply, authors (including you) need to make it clear what are not their own ‘new’ ideas, by adding a citation after every idea or set of ideas they write about that are not their own. There are several different ways of doing this that have evolved from different academic disciplines (just as there are lots of different world languages). In the Business School we use the Harvard Referencing System.

An excellent resource about referencing

We suggest that you select ‘in depth’ mode from the drop-down menu on the bottom left of the page.

What do I reference?
As the above section suggests, you should attribute all your sources regardless of the medium the material comes in (e.g. You Tube video, journal article, blog, radio programme, book chapter etc.) There is a general rule of thumb that says that which is ‘common knowledge’ does not need to be referenced, but of course, what counts as common knowledge? So-called ‘common sense’ hides many assertions and prejudices that good quality academic work should seek to expose. A useful technique to use if you want to include general assertions is to use constructions like:

‘Arguably,’ or ‘It is reasonable to assume…’
But do take care, even assertions need some justification in the text to be credible.

It is also a good idea to completely avoid cutting and pasting text from the internet, even if you correctly enclose a paragraph in quotation marks and add the reference underneath, you are unlikely to get many marks since this is not your own work and does not demonstrate your understanding.

Quotations are good to see, but use them judiciously for the above reasons. If you can say it just as well yourself, write it in your own words and add the citation at the end of the sentence / passage.

You need to include page numbers for all direct quotations.

A useful reference, particularly with regard to referencing new electronic sources is at the following:

https://libweb.anglia.ac.uk/subjects/reference/citation.php

If your supervisor and marker suspect the work may not be your own, then you may be invited to discuss your work in a viva voce (verbal exam). The details of this will be issued to you if required.

9. Presentation

You are required to use the following format:

• Use A4 size paper only.
• Type doublespaced. (You may want to use single spacing for indented quotes, footnote materials and the bibliography).
• Use one side of paper only.
• Margins should be approximately:
o 3 cms on left hand side of page to allow for binding.
o At least 1 cm on the right hand side
o 3 cms top and bottom.
• Pages should be numbered in a single sequence from the contents page onwards.
• Short quotations can run in the text within single quotation marks (double quotation marks reserved for quotations within quotations). Quotations longer than about 30 words should be set in from the side of the page (normally the indent should be more than the paragraph indent).
• Always write in complete sentences. Do not resort to note form.
• Do not use abbreviations in the text unless they are for the organisations documents etc which are commonly initialised or referred to by acronyms eg. BBC
• All abbreviations must be explained when they first appear and included in the front of the document following the contents page and the list of tables and figures.

choose one

 
Length: 2,000 words (you can go 10 per cent higher so the range is 2,000–2,200 words including
the question, references and the bibliography).
Please remember that plagiarism (copying from the internet or other written sources without
giving references to your sources) is a very serious academic offence. Students found guilty of
plagiarism will have their mark for that assignment reduced to zero, and in extreme cases may be
expelled from the University. When you submit to Turnitin, the essay undergoes a plagiarism
check.
Please ensure that you don’t base your essay entirely on non-academic web sources (e.g. news
snippets, corporate information, PR sources). Do NOT cite Wikipedia or Google (unless you are
using these companies as a case study). Make sure that you consult and reference academic
books and articles, recommended for this module (many of which are available as e-readings on
Blackboard or as e-books from the library database).
As this is an academic essay don’t forget to include:
• An introduction – that sets out what you are going to write about and how you will
structure your essay (about 100-200 words)
• A conclusion – that summarises your key findings and arguments (about 200 words)
• A bibliography at the end of the essay with at least 8 sources. At least 5 of these should
be academic sources i.e. not newspaper articles or online news items.
(8)
• References to your reading in the text e.g. (Gauntlett, 2007: 33). We want you to use the
Harvard system of referencing. For a quick guide to referencing look at the last page of the
Module Document (available on Blackboard) or the Referencing Guide under the ‘Study
Skills’ section of Media and Society Blackboard pages.
Here are the essay questions:
Choose one of the following questions. Don’t forget to write the full title of the essay you have
chosen at the start of your essay. Within your 2000 word answer, please make reference to some
examples (of media content, products, and/or organisations).
1. With reference to academic sources how might the study of media history help us to
understand contemporary media? Illustrate your answer with one or two examples.
2. Citing academic sources briefly explain the main characteristics of public service
broadcasting/media. Can public service broadcasting/media survive in a multiplatform
digital on-demand media landscape?
3. Citing academic sources how do both political and economic forces shape media
production? To answer this question choose one particular media industry or type of
content as a case study, and make this clear in your introduction.
4. Citing academic sources what do you understand by the term globalisation and how is
globalisation manifested in either radio or television or the PR industry or journalism or
social media (just choose one industry)?
5. Some commentators argue that direct media effects (e.g. violence) are very difficult to
prove. Citing academic sources how persuasive are the arguments for media effects?
6.With reference to academic sources what do you understand by the term consumer
society and why is consumption so important for the creative and media industries?
7. With reference to academic sources why are the media important during a General
Election or a Referendum? (Tip: you may want to think about the media’s ability to foster
a ‘public sphere’ (Habermas) for the open exchange of ideas).

DO NOT attach a CA1 form or any other form of cover sheet;

The LNG INDUSTRY IN NIGERIA

 
I actually want a POSTER
RESEARCH TOPIC
THE LNG INDUSTRY IN NIGERIA

RESEARCH QUESTION
WHAT IS THE FUT TURE OF LNG INDUSTRY IN NIGERIA?

THREE OBJECTIVES: ( EXAMPLES, probably TO BUILD MORE LNG PLANTS IN NIGERIA (SINCE THE INDUSTRY IS DOING WELL AND THEY EXPORT 90-99%OF THE LIDUEDFIED GAS, get foreign investors for funding and partnership, GENERATE REVENUE FOR THE GOVERNMENT, turn the 20% of gas flared during this process into renewable energy for the utilization of their country)

LITRATURE REVIEW;
DATA COLLECTION: IS IT PRIMARY OR SECONDARY DATA COLLECTION?
METHODOLOGY: THE KIND OF PHILOSOPHY YOU RE LOOKING AT. USE THE RESEARH ONION (saunders et al.,2009) . AND CHOOSE THE ONE YOU ARE USING. THEN GIVE ME AN ONION DIAGRAM OF IT.
THEORY
USE AMODEL FRAME WORK.

Memo feasibility

Write a 1-2 page memo, addressed to me, regarding your recommendations for 3 of the feasibility studies that you would most like to see go forward. In other words, if you had some “seed” money to put down on 3 of the topics, which ones? Why would you pick each one? Perhaps there is a theme or perhaps the issue is so pressing that it demands immediate attention.
In this memo, you are in the role of decision maker – you must write persuasively.
You must be specific in this memo. Your writing should be clear, concise, and correct.
You may not choose your own topic.
You must also format carefully. Memos have certain structural requirements that must be met, purpose statement, etc., and good technical writing also calls for headings, prose, and bulleted points. So, the overall format is important.
This assignment will be submitted through a turnitindropbox. That dropbox will be available to you beginning at 11:00 am the day of our final examwhich is Thursday. November 19. The exam must be in the dropbox by 5:45 pm on Thursday, November 19.
I will be in our White classroom, WHITE 202, during the scheduled final exam period. You may write the memo there in class, or you may decide to post the exam to the dropbox remotely from your own computer. The choice is yours – as long as I receive the exam to the dropbox by 5:45 that day, we’re fine.
If you do decide to write the exam in the classroom, you will have to bring a computer with you.

Development across the Lifespan

Please watch the two videos provided in the links and from the two videos please write a essay from the two videos You do not need to summarize the videos, you have to write the essay that has THREE PARAPHARSES or DIRECT QUOTES (Quotes and paraphrases need to be at least 7 WORDS to count toward the requirement) to support your ideas on something that that made you say “Aha!” and explain how it enlightened you (the instructor wants us to show critical thinking in what you write so no video summary). Or find something from the videos that made you think “Huh?” and explain why it was confusing. PLEASE MAKE SURE . connected to the topic of development across the lifespan. THREE PARAPHARSES or QUOTES to support your ideas. You can find sources for these paraphrases and DIRECT quotes from the video, for example a Ted Talk video. Please Keep in mind: 1) Specific concepts from sources must have a reference to count toward the requirement. 2) To strengthen the content of your paper use ideas from sources that provide insights into the topic, rather than a definition. 3) Quotes and paraphrases need to be at least 7 WORDS to count toward the requirement. 4) Encyclopedias and dictionaries (online or in print) are not in-depth enough for assignments. Simply Psychology, Wikipedia.com, Ask.com, Encarta.msn.com and Infoplease.com will NOT be counted as a source to meet the requirement. 5) Make sure the quotes and paraphrases are clearly connected to the topic of Thinking, Language and Intelligence. For example if the topic is psychological disorders. Make sure the quote is about psychological disorders. Picking a quote from the source about heart disease would not count toward the requirement. Please use APA (in APA formatting.

Second Optional Extra Credit Assignment Instructions

 
Write a one-page position paper (double-spaced) on whether pursuing a policy of corporate social responsibility is a useful part of a company’s competitive strategy.

Things to consider that may help you focus your paper:

Costs: Do the benefits of pursuing corporate social responsibility outweigh the costs of implementing it?

Benefits: What are the potential benefits of being socially responsible? Can this lead to an improved brand image? Can this result in long-term savings?

Consumers: Does corporate social responsibility actually matter to consumers?

Politics: Do you think corporate social responsibility can help MNCs improve relations with government around the world?