Here are some guiding questions to consider when doing the critical review. Also, as the introduction, I would like a summary of the thesis project so that the readers can understand the critique better.
I need an academic type of writing and a critique of the document of the file I sent
Guiding Questions
does the structure work well? How could it be better?
Is the evidence presented well?
Is the contribution to knowledge clear and well supported?
Were the methods appropriate to the research question, and are they clearly described?
What works particularly well about the thesis and the research approach, and what could be improved?
If you were the examiner, what questions would you plan to ask in the viva based on this written thesis?
Overall, what have you learned from reading the thesis? Also, lessons learnt in terms of how a good thesis should and should not be.
