7-2 Discussion: Implementing Multiple Revision Strategies
Discussion: Implementing Multiple Revision Strategies (GRADED)
In a discussion board, discuss the steps you plan on taking to revise your critical analysis essay. Use the reading from earlier in this module as guidance.
When discussing these steps, be sure to point to specific areas of your draft that you plan on revising based on your reverse outline as well as instructor feedback, and explain how you will approach that process this week.
Before you begin writing, please review the assignment rubric (click here) to make sure you fulfill all of the required tasks in your response. You can also download/print the rubric by clicking here.
Your initial post should be three fully developed paragraphs (5-8 sentences each).
ENG 122 Discussion Rubric
Your active participation in the discussion forums is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions are designed to help you make meaningful connections between the course content and the larger concepts and goals of the course. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance.
Requirements for Discussion Board Assignments
Students are required to post one initial post (1) and to follow up with at least two (2) response posts for each discussion board assignment.
For your initial post (1) you must:
- Compose a post that fully addresses the assignment prompt.
- In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Module Seven, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Take into consideration material such as course content from the current module and previous modules, when appropriate.
For your response posts (2) you must:
- Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial post thread.
- In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Module Seven, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating that “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion prompt.P(5.u)
Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.
| Critical Elements | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (85%) | Needs Improvement (55%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
| Prompt | Fully addresses assignment prompt, connecting personal experience and reflection in a rich, detailed, engaging manner | Fully addresses assignment prompt, connecting personal experience and reflection in an engaging manner | Addresses assignment prompt, but there are holes or gaps in describing and reflecting on one’s personal experience | Does not address assignment prompt | 20 |
| Comprehension | Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail | Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and detail | Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail | Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea | 25 |
| Timeliness | N/A | Submits initial post on time (100%) | Submits initial post one day late (55%) | Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) | 10 |
| Engagement | Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail | Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail | Provides response posts with some explanation and detail that may lack connection to original post | Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail | 25 |
| Writing (Mechanics) | Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise, using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations | Writes posts that are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations | Writes posts that are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations | Writes posts that others are not able to understand and does not use proper citation methods where applicable | 20
|
