Video HIV/AIDS Reflection paper

 
Reflection paper Rubric

Video summary and reflection paper:
Write a 3-5 page reflection paper of the assigned videos. When you write a reflection paper, you analyze the different subjects gradually then you comment on it using your own opinion. Also you may indicate whether you agree or disagree with the data or analysis and relate this to your life experience, you may also give recommendations. DON’T SUMMARIES THE VIDEO ONLY, GIVE A SUMMARY OF THE SECTION AND ELABORATE YOUR OPINION ON THAT SECTION.
CATEGORY

Score
Introductory paragraph
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. Includes all necessary elements of an introductory paragraph.
( 10 points )

Body paragraphs organization
Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader. Supportive information clarifies and explains the topic sentence. ( 40 points )

Focus on Topic (Content)
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
( 20 points )

Conclusion (Organization)
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is “getting at.” Includes all the necessary elements of a closing paragraph( 10 points )

Grammar & Spelling Format, Articles
Consistently follows rules for spelling and correct use of grammar. Uses complete sentences and consistently indicates paragraphs. Used the correct MLA format, minimum of 5 pages with attached 2-3 articles. ( 20 points )
__________________________________________

Chronic disease management program in poor controlled Diabetic patients

 
Assigment #1

– Identify a clinical problem in your nursing specialty area and develop a PICOT question –→ (my PICOT) In poor controlled diabetes’ patient managed in primary care settings, how does an implementation of a chronic disease management program versus every six month follow up visits impact glycemic values.
– Please using APA format to write this assignment following the instructions below. Use 3 pages not including references .

a) Provide background information to illustrate why this is a clinical problem.
a. Define the clinical problem (e.g., disease (DM), adverse outcome, behavior, etc.)
b. Who is affected by this problem ( In numbers how many people affected by DM )
c. What is the magnitude of the problem (e.g., how many people are affected by poor uncontrolled DM the problem each year)
d. What interventions/strategies are available to address the problem(uncontrolled DM )
e. Why is a research synthesis needed
b) Put your problem into an answerable (PICOT) question. I already developed my PICOT question .

Risk Manegment in Healthcare Administration

 
Outline is as follows.
Risk Management in Healthcare

Risk management strategies attempt to reduce risk and determine when risk are necessary. The importance of having a risk management process in place is critical during trying times. This is true for physicians and nurses as well as administrators.

Risk identification

Core risk management process

Standard reporting

Key risk and calculation

Risk appetite

Business & audit involvement and review

Students will complete one research paper for this class. The paper should be a minimum of ten pages of content, excluding coversheet, abstract and references, and should utilize at least ten scholarly references. Papers must utilize APA format. Topics for papers must also be pre-approved by the professor. Late papers will not be accepted.

Homework Assignment 2

 
Label each answer and explain the importance of variation to health-care organizations and answer the following questions.

1. What might be the key processes for health-care organizations?
2. What are the potential common causes of variation that would have an impact on the key processes of health-care organizations?
3. What special causes might be more important than the others?
4. How might health-care organizations’ business environment be dynamic and change over time?

Application: Personal Philosophy of Public Health Education

 
To prepare for this Discussion:

Select one of the public health education programs you proposed in your Week 2 Discussion. Consider the intended population and the cultural context of the program you select.
• Review the Health Belief Model, Social Cognitive Theory, Theory of Planned Behavior, and other theories and models discussed in Chapter 4 of the Cottrell, Girvan, and McKenzie course text, and in Chapter 5 of the Doyle, Ward, and Oomen-Early course text.
• Determine the theory or model you would use to support this program and why. Evaluate the appropriateness of this theory or model for the culture(s), population(s), and health issues.

Post the following:

. A brief description of one of the public health education programs you proposed in Week 2 (HEALTHY EATING EDUCATION, CANCER AWARENESS PROGRAM AND DIABETES MANAGEMENT). You can choose any of these programs.

• 2. A rationale for the model or theory you would use to develop this program
Support your posting with information from the Learning Resources. Be sure to cite references in APA format.

Occupational Health and Safety: A comparison of the strategies for the control of healthcare associated infection in hospitals:

 
A comparison of the strategies for the control of healthcare associated infection in hospitals: the UK and the Arab Gulf States

Abstract
This will be about 200 words long and gives details of your objectives, method(s), key results and conclusions.

Assessment criteria
The structure of this first project is not as prescribed for the research project.

Title
Please edit the title of the paper if it has any mistakes
Abstract and Introduction (10%)
1. Title – The title should give a clear indication of the problem or issue to be examined.
2. Aims – The topic should be introduced with an explanation of why it is worthy of study together with what you intend to achieve. Rather than identify one broad aim it is better to specify several discrete aims. The introduction should not only “set the scene” but also explain to the reader what to expect in the subsequent sections. This should include a methodology of how the review/work was carried out.

Literature review (40%)
A literature review is a critical and evaluative account of what has been published on the chosen topic. It should include:
1. an explanation of key terms e.g. safety culture
2. identification of relevant legislation, standards and guidance
3. identification and discussion of relevant research within the chosen topic
4. a proper Harvard citation to each source You must engage in the research literature as the basis of your review, otherwise the project will not be at the required level.

Analysis of the issue in the context of the literature (40%)
1. Here the issue in respect of the chosen organisation is first described (it should have been briefly mention in the introduction) and then analysed and discussed with reference to the literature.
2. Some projects amount to simple narratives or catalogues of factual material. At the other extreme they express personal opinions with little or no hard information or examples to support them. Neither is acceptable.
3. Show that you have analysed and discussed the information rather than having merely described it.
4. Make reference to the literature identified in the literature review.

Conclusions and Recommendations (10%)

1. Every project should lead to conclusions, positive or negative. The conclusions should be related directly to the title and aims of the investigation and be based on the information derived from the investigation.
2. It may be appropriate to make recommendations if for example the assignment requires you to assess management practice in a workplace. They may concern changes in policy, procedures, protocols, practices, equipment or training. They may indicate a range of options. Possibly you may recommend no change.

Presentation and references
1. A bibliography is NOT required.
2. The project should have a clear structure which divides up the content into logical blocks and also links the blocks together in a logical manner, thereby enabling the readers to rapidly gain a clear over-view of the work.
3. The form to aim for is about midway between an English essay and a business report, avoiding the completely continuous text of the former, which can be difficult for the reader to assimilate but also avoiding the “bullet-point”, note form of the latter, which does not allow you to show the logical build-up of your argument. It is essential that you build-up a logical case from the Introduction through to the Recommendations and demonstrate it.
4. Charts, tables, graphs and other types of illustration should be used, where appropriate, to support points made in the text. Their significance should be explained. It is the writer’s job to do this: it is not the job of the readers to work it out for themselves. All charts etc should be explicitly referred to in the text.
5. Presentation of quantitative data, e.g. in tables or graphs, should be clear and accurate, with axes labelled.
6. You must write in good clear well-punctuated English. Avoid the use of colloquial expressions and slang. Avoid also the use of the First and Second Persons ie “I” ,”We” or “you”. It is often a good idea to get a friend to read your project to identify grammar and spelling errors – it is not your supervisor’s role to correct the English.

Discussion

 
Unit 7 (183 words)

What process would you use to create professional standards and institutional ethics within your healthcare facility, and what sources of information would you use to set those standards and ethics?

Unit 8 (183 words)

List five areas of negligence for allied health professionals. Discuss the standard of care in each area, and how that standard can be applied to the healthcare facility.

Unit 9 (183 words)

Healthcare providers need communication skills to effectively handle situations with patients, family, coworkers, and employer–employee conflicts. How do you propose to train providers to gain these very necessary skills?

Health Care Ethics

 
The authors of this text Morrison and Furlong (2014) provide an overview and explanation why a foundation in healthcare theory and principles is important for providers of care in various roles and health care systems. They acknowledge that the changes in the way the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) 0f 2010 is premised is changing health care in this country highlighting that; “health care will receive even more scrutiny and must provide high-quality, patient-centered, researched-based care with fewer or different types of resources.” Attention will be focused on how care is provided as well as the costs associated with care, and you as a manager will be responsible for various services in your organization.
Please discuss why you should have a foundation in ethics if you are involved in health care? And
How can knowledge of ethical theory assist you in your role (or planned role) in health care?

mesenchymal stem cells in tooth and oral cavity

 
the origin of mesenchymal stem cells and their types in the mouth and tooth
e.g.
dental pulp DPSC, apical papilla SCAP, periodontal ligaments PDLSC, dental follicle DFSC, gingival fibroblast GFSC, and gingival epithelial stem cells GESC.

it is functions and usage in dentistry and dental treatments.

control special purchase medicine

 

2. Abstract – 200-300 words (on page 2)
3. Table of Contents with page numbers (on page 3)
4. Introduction should contain Topic statement & Objective
5. Background / Literature Review (about the topic)
6. Methodology / Approach (research design, procedures)
7. Results
8. Discussion (of the results)
9. Conclusion / Summary (with Recommendations)
10. Appendix / Tables / Stats
11. Resources / References / Bibliography
Note:
• Font: Arial / Times new roman
• Size: 12 pt
• Margin: On all sides 1 inch except on Left side 1 ½ inch.
• Alignment : Flush left
• Spacing: One and half line
• 20 pages max
• Number of copies: 2 (one for submission)
• Number each page as a Footer
• Cover page: Topic/Author/Course/Semester/Date-Year/Organization on Cover page
• Preferred Reference Style for one author (more than 3 use first name with et al):
• Within the body of the document use Ref. number only as Superscript (small font) or in brackets.
• Note for Title Page
Title, Author, Statement below Authors name (by Author Name):