Category: Essay

 
Assignment: Assessment Paper

Purpose
To culminate your personal experience on self-assessment using the results from your Golden Personality Type Profiler Student Feedback Report, class discussions, and activities.

Overview
Throughout this course, you have been asked to complete assessment activities. Now is the time to critically look at the results of The Golden Personality Type Profiler assessment in regards to where you see yourself and how you work with others today and in the future. What did you learn about yourself? What would you like to change? What are you aware of, but would not change?
Action Items
1. Review the grading rubric (below) for this assignment.
2. Write a 2-page business brief to yourself that addresses the following items. Include the results of your assessment as an appendix to your business brief.
a. What did you discover about yourself from the assessment results? This could be something you already knew and the assessments confirmed or something new about yourself.
b. Where do you see yourself at the end of the program? At the end of 5 years?
i. From the assessment, what are your leadership strengths that you want to continue to enhance? Provide steps to continue building on your strengths.
ii. From the assessment, what are the leadership areas you want to improve? Why are these areas important to future career plans? Provide steps on how to improve these areas.

Criteria:-
Discusses the assessment results.
Proficient:-
Addresses and develops the assessment results and demonstrates solid ability to accomplish the assignment.

Criteria:-
Discusses your leadership strengths and improvement required for future career plans.
Proficient:-
Discusses and develops the leadership areas and demonstrates solid ability to accomplish the assignment.

Criteria:-
Synthesizes relevant information and materials to provide evidence of critical thought.
Proficient:-
Consistently and effectively synthesizes information, which provides strong support to main ideas.

Criteria:-
Develops ideas with clarity and logic.
Proficient:-
Develops ideas with clarity and logic. Ideas flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other.

Criteria:-
Uses concrete language.
Proficient:-
Consistently uses proper terminology and provides specific examples to support ideas.

Criteria:-
Considered holistically, demonstrates the ability to write at the graduate level.
Proficient:-
Considered holistically, the student demonstrates a proficient ability to write at the graduate level.

r.
The essay must have:
-Introduction
– 3-5 Body Paragraphs
– Conclusion

There must be in-text citation along with Bibliography at the very end (Harvard style referencing). Must not be plagiarised whatsoever. The references for the readings that I upload in the document must be used to write this essay, along with more resources that you can find.

There are 3 essential readings for this assignment that I shall upload.

 
I will upload the sheet The format:

1. As Project Manager:
A) Name: Jack
comments:………………………..
Points Awarded: %100
B) Name: Arti
comments:………………………..
Points Awarded: %100
C) Name: AJ
comments:………………………..
Points Awarded: %100

2. Team member:
A) Name: Jack
comments:………………………..
Points Awarded: %100
B) Name: Arti
comments:………………………..
Points Awarded: %100
C) Name: AJ
comments:………………………..
Points Awarded: %100
NOTE: Everyone was excellent so be positive. Everyone got %100

Benchmark Assignment – Heritage Assessment

The learning activity and corresponding assignment in this topic requires students to perform a heritage assessment with families selected by the student from their local community.

Interview three families from different cultures. One family can be your own. Compare the differences in health traditions between these cultures.

Assess three families using the “Heritage Assessment Tool.” In 1,000-1,500 words discuss the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment to evaluate the needs of families and develop plans for health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration. Include the following:
1.Perform a heritage assessment on three families.
2.Complete the “Heritage Assessment Tool” for each of the three families interviewed. These must be included with your submission to LoudCloud.
3.Identify common health traditions based on cultural heritage. Evaluate and discuss how the families subscribe to these traditions and practices. Address health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration as they relate to your assessment.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title

Attached Documents

Turnitin Report

Similarity Index

Final Submission

Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Discuss the Usefulness of Applying a Heritage Assessment in Evaluating the Needs of the Whole Person.

Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is not offered.

Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information, or does not meet criteria for word count.

Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person meets requirements of the assignment.

Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is offered in detail.

Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
20.0 % Family Interviews

Interview of three families from different cultures not offered.

Interview of three families from different cultures is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information regarding the comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures.

Interview of three families from different cultures that provides comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures meets requirements of the assignment.

Interview of three families from different cultures that provides comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures is offered in detail.

Interview of three families from different cultures that provides comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
20.0 % Identifying Common Health Traditions

Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is not offered.

Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is offered, but is incomplete, lacking relevant information.

Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage meets requirements of the assignment.

Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is offered in detail.

Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
20.0 % Evaluate How Families Subscribe to These Traditions and Practices

Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices is not offered.

Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices is offered, but is incomplete, lacking relevant information.

Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices meets requirements of the assignment.

Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices is offered in detail.

Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

 
What is the potential legal/ethical impact of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)? Also, what is your opinion; do you endorse ESSA?
Remember: Initial posting: minimum 150 words-maximum 200 words with in-text citations/references.

NOITE / This Question for Final Exam, please answer three questionsand write 5 pages,1375 words for each, Also don’t make any plagiarism for all it
QUESTION 1

Describe the process by which risks are perceived and then translated into behavioural decisions when purchasing food for yourself, for children below the age of 11, for the elderly or for visiting friends to the house.
1375 word
QUESTION 2

Critically distinguish between radical, idealist, opportunist and realist activists. Outline how you would engage with any one of these groups in a food activism context of your choice.
1375 word
QUESTION 3

From your knowledge of the components of the ‘marketing mix’ and the ‘macro marketing environment’, critically analyse the features of each and briefly suggest how they might, (or might not) be of use to a marketer in persuading consumers to reduce their consumption of sugar.
Briefly discuss whether the concept of market segmentation might be useful in this task

 
You should rely entirely on the course reading materials and lectures. Make sure you establish a clear thesis and defend it with references to appropriate reading. Somewhere in your first paragraph, there should be a sentence that begins: “In this paper, I will argue that . . .” or something similar. Strong papers will also consider counterarguments and defend against them. Structure your paper carefully and address the issues as directly and concisely as you can. Avoid verbosity, lengthy introductions, and irrelevancies.

When and under what conditions is it possible to mobilize people for action? Choose an example of EITHER regime change OR political violence to answer this question. Make an argument about the relative importance of the different factors that you think explain the phenomenon you chose, drawing on the cases and theories discussed in class. No matter what position you take or question you choose, be sure you make references to competing theories and how they apply to the specific country and question.

OR

What are the prospects for democracy in China? Based on what you know about democratization from the readings and lecture, provide an answer to this question. (There is no need to do extra research!) What factors would different theories point to as significant? What other information would you need about China in order to make a more definitive argument? If you were advising Chinese democrats, what (if any) lessons would you draw from existing theories and from the cases (for example Germany and Russia) we covered in class?
Use the sources on this website: AUC Blackboard under the course comparative politics

 
Each student must submit a personal financial plan prepared for a person or family of his/her choice.

The paper must encompass all parts of a financial plan. Each part must be addressed on a separate page or pages, both through written description in sentences and paragraphs and recommendations and relevant quantitative matters. Your writing style should be as if you were presenting it to the “client,” not to the professor.

The outline of the paper should be:
Background A brief summary of the client(s) bringing the individual(s) to life for the professor. This is the only section that should be addressed to the professor.

Summary of Your major significant recommendations generally in
recommendations a phrase or sentence for each recommendation.

Balance Sheet Evaluation plus the normal statement you should be familiar with.

Cash Flow Planning Background and recommendations plus statement including current year and next two years projected data.

Tax Planning Background and recommendations plus statement including current year and next two years projections.

Investment Background and recommendations plus overall asset allocation and Morningstar Sheet for one fund.

Risk Management Background and recommendations plus life and disability insurance needs worksheet.

Retirement Background and recommendations plus retirement planning worksheet. Anyone not performing a retirement needs analysis will receive at least one grade lower

Estate Background and recommendations.
Overall SWOT Analysis
Your grade will be based on the substance of your recommendations, your ability to capture the essence of the “clients'” goals and problems in writing, the quality of your supporting tables, and your ability to integrate the supporting tables with your descriptive material. Perhaps the most important factor will be the depth and extent of your analysis and specific recommendations. The paper will be due on the day of the final exam.

 

use assessment marking guide to flow with the charter in responding- or how to address the questions looking at those marks. It is below the course description paper but now you are looking at assignment one.

In defining the project you need to do it in three and half or so sentences.

Background of the organisation- 2 good paragraphs.

Expected outcomes: Do five smart objectives. When you get to the milestones…you are repeating the five objectives (Smart) and their due dates. Showing progress through the project-Matrix here. On the financial, i am attaching a separate document. What is in white stays the same…what is in yellow you can change-this is on the section of the financial analysis. The table is already done so you are estimating what is need for the project like initial cost etc etc. If you don’t understand let me know. Lets do distinction. Do in text ref where you feel it is reasonable remember this is a charter. Anyway when you read the assignment one…you will see all the requirements and pay attention to the marking guide. Answer the way the question is asked but read
Detailed marking criteria can be found in the Marking Guides section of this course description with other info which needs to be in the charter e.g risk analysis- what is major and what else…And go to that requirements to be addressed.