Category: English

Give a general explanation about English sentences, paragraphs, jumbled sentences and sentence error.

ASSIGNMENT 2

Choose a  poem from the  list and write an analysis of approximately 250 words in which you will once again discuss how the sound devices discussed in this activity contribute to the meaning of the poem and any other interesting aspects you want to mention (eg., images, symbols, vocabulary, style, what it makes you think of etc.) You will find all of these poems on the University of Toronto Library’s Poets Website located at:

http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/

1. Thomas Hardy – “Channel Firing”
2. John Keats – “Ode on a Grecian Urn”
3. Wallace Stevens – “A High-Toned Old Christian Woman”
4. William Blake – “The Tyger”
5. Percy Bysshe Shelley – “Ozymandias”
6. Samuel Taylor Coleridge – “Kubla Khan”

 
I have already written the first part of my assignment.
what I want you to do is:
1. data collection and statistic part
2. result part and disscussion
3. small conclusion part.
4. prepare the reference page.

Serious attention:Hello, my order will use Turnitin anti-plagiarism software to check, so no copy no plagiarism.，otherwise I will apply refund. Thanks
please MUST finish it on time，no any reason for extend。Thanks
Please ensure the quality for the essay，it is important for me。Thanks

MA TESOL
Classroom Observation Assessment

The assessment for Classroom Observation is split into two parts. In the first, you are asked to discuss approaches to grammar teaching; the second part gives you more freedom, and is based upon your observation of a video or of several videos. Both answers ought to contain a coherent blend of theoretical discussion and analysis of data.

In your assignment you should use at least 10 academic publications (by quoting, paraphrasing etc.), which should then also be included in a reference list at the end of your assignment.
Attention：MUST watch the video i sent to you.
Video link:
https://vital.liv.ac.uk/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_229238_1&content_id=_849554_1
Username:pskshi
Password:19930601sk

Discussion of Approaches to Grammar Teaching

Using published sources to help you, explain and critically compare some current approaches to teaching grammar in the ESOL classroom. Your discussion must include an assessment of task-based learning (TBL), and you should also refer to PPP. If space permits you may wish to extend the discussion to other models you read about.

In the course of your essay, you must refer to the lesson ‘Part One Video: He’s been to Turkey’ (on VITAL, under Assessment) and decide which approach to grammar teaching the teacher seems to have adopted. Please also evaluate the lesson, suggesting possible improvements or alternative approaches. If you wish, you can find another example from a published coursebook that provides a contrast with this teacher’s approach, and compare them. (Any coursebook pages you refer to in your assignment should be scanned as an appendix at the back of your assignment.)

This answer should be no longer than 2,000 words long and contain at least 5 references to academic literature, published in English.

 
Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.

Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.

Assignment 1: Research Topics with Explanation
Due Week 2 and worth 100 points

Read through the list of research topics (located in the Appendix), or by clicking the link here, on which to write a research paper. Select three (3) topics that interest you most and identify two (2) credible sources for each topic. Note: This is one (1) of several parts that will build toward a final draft of your persuasive writing research paper.

Write a one to two (1-2) page paper in which you:

Explain the reason for selecting topic one (1), identify the audience, and provide a preliminary thesis statement.
Explain the reason for selecting topic two (2), identify the audience, and provide a preliminary thesis statement.
Explain the reason for selecting topic three (3), identify the audience, and provide a preliminary thesis statement.
Identify and document six (6) credible sources (two (2) for each topic) that you would expect to use. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis statement.
Associate the features of audience, purpose, and text with various genres.
Recognize correct APA documentation and reasons to document and avoid plagiarism.
Write clearly and concisely about selected topics using proper writing mechanics.
Use technology and information resources to research selected issues for this course.
Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.

 
Using your thesis statement and research, present the problem that needs to be addressed with your proposed solution. Note: Your solution, advantages, and challenges, will be in Parts 2 and 3.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

1.Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion).
2.Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. (Revised from Assignment 2)
3.Describe the history and status of the issue and provide an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
4.Explain the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
5.Explain the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.). and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
6.Explain the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
7.Provide a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution.
8.Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
9.Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences throughout the paper.
10.Support claims with at least three (3) quality, relevant references. Use credible, academic sources available through Strayer University’s Resource Center. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:

•Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
•Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
Note: Submit your assignment to the designated plagiarism program so that you can make revisions before submitting your paper to your professor.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

•Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis statement.
•Recognize the use of summary, paraphrasing, and quotation to communicate the main points of a text.
•Analyze the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, logos in writing samples and for incorporation into essays or presentations.
•Prepare a research project that supports an argument with structure and format appropriate to the genre.
•Recognize how to organize ideas with transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
•Incorporate relevant, properly documented sources to substantiate ideas.
•Write clearly and concisely about selected topics using proper writing mechanics.
•Use technology and information resources to research selected issues for this course.

 
Essay question:

The influence of the literary canon weighs heavily on many postcolonial texts. But many such texts also find inspiration in the practice of rethinking, critiquing, and responding to the dictates of the canon. Examine the role of the canon in one primary text on the course. You may of course refer to other texts to support a more general case.

Primary text to be used in answering the question is Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys.

Essay guidelines:

• Incorporating a thesis statement.
• Topic sentences at either the beginning or end of every paragraph. This should, wherever possible, connect the particular point of the paragraph to the overall thesis statement.
• Incorporation of research.
• Demonstrated strong understanding of the primary text being covered.
• Demonstrated strong understanding of relevant theoretical and conceptual issues.
• Where appropriate, critical engagement with ideas and information covered in lectures.

 
This paper develops a yearly English teaching plan for the fifth grade of a elementary school in Spain. The annual teaching plan is focused on the personalization of education according to the different intelligences of the students of the classroom. To fulfil this, first, I conduct a literature review on the implementation of the theory of multiple intelligences in elementary education. The didactic development annual programme encompasses fifteen different unit plans for an entire academic year. One of them is designed in detail being its procedures focused on multiple intelligences and cooperative learning methodologies.

This project contributes to implementing the theory of multiple intelligences in FLT and to the personalization of education in a particular class group. The secondary contributions are the following:
First, to describe the different tools and strategies that can be applied to obtain a diagram of the different intelligences of our students.
Second, to contribute to the analysis of the most recurring kinds of minds in the group and to propose activities especially focused on the students’ intelligences.
And finally, and perhaps most important, it will provide a list of specific proposed activities that will focus on each of the different types intelligences to work with in class.

It is not necessary to do the teaching plan following the Spanish educational law neither come up with a specific group of students. I personally will add it later.

.

– Rationale for the study: (why you think the study needs to be done)
Learners keep committing the same errors year after year and by analysing the errors I believe that there will be a chance to find the reasons of the errors and help to avoid committing the same errors every time. The study will reveal the most common errors and will raise teacher’s awareness about the common errors made by Omani learners.

– Questions the study aims to address:
What are the most common grammatical and lexical errors committed by learners?
Which are more frequent errors, grammatical or lexical?

– Research Methodology: (how you intend to get and analyse data)
It will be a homemade corpus. Exam papers will be investigated by using corpus linguistic procedures. These exam papers are digitized and they will be from the Tests and Examination Administration Department in the Ministry of Education in Oman. They will be from first semester in the school academy year 2014-2015. The examinees’ age is about 17-18 years old. They have been taught English as second language in Omani schools since they were at the age of seven.

– The structure of the dissertation
Chapter 1:
Introduction (1000–1500 words)
•Says what the topic is, why you became interested in researching it, and discusses the nature of the issue or problem that the dissertation deals with.
•The research questions could also be introduced at this point.
•Finally, you outline the structure of the dissertation.

Chapter 2:
Review of literature and theoretical framework (4000-5000 words)
This may also extend to two chapters in some cases.
•Outlines the findings/issues raised by other studies that are relevant to your project.
•Should be state-of-the-art in its focus.
•Should be critical rather than just a descriptive list of studies you have read.
•Addresses contextual issues relevant to your study.
•Leads up to a statement of your research questions.

Chapter 3:
Methodology (approx 2000 words)
Generally includes:
•Description of participants.
•Description of the research method(s) and the procedures employed to collect and analyse data.
•How you have ensured validity and reliability of your data.
•Outline of piloting stage.
•Description of how ethical issues were addressed.
( I have contacted the authority in the ministry of education and they gave me a letter to receive the needed data. It took more than one month to receive the entire data file as it was the second semester examination time for the diploma sttudents and after that declaring the results so they were busy and even the computer processing the data that I need was slow.)

Chapter 4:
Results (4000-5000 words)
•Presentation of your findings as they relate to your research questions.
•If new themes emerged from the data, you can set them out here.
•Be critical in how the data is presented.
•Avoid merely listing answers to your questionnaire/interview guide.

Chapter 5:
Discussion (3000-4000 words)
•Compares and contrasts your findings to those of the studies you discussed in the lit. review.
•Did you find something similar to the other studies or something different?
•If different, why do think this was? What are some potential causes?

Chapter 6:
Conclusion (approx 1000 words)
•Summarises main findings (not a cut and paste job!).
•Outlines practical implications of the research by revisiting the research questions.
•Sketches future research possibilities.
•Discusses limitations and drawbacks of the project.

 
This is for a U.S. native English speaking and writing personalized professional doctoral writer who has a PhD. Planning and Public Policy PhD. And/or Qualitative research methods, on a 5 Day delivery schedule.
Detailed Instructions: Use thoughtful historically grounded insights, examples, ideas, and findings from planning literature ONLY to support and meet the guidelines as set out below. All examples and illustrations must be documented cases in city or regional (urban) planning with supporting qualitative or quantitative data in APA format. Paper: 26 pages @ 275 words per page = 7,150 words / Format: APA writing style / double space / Font: Times New Roman / Size 12 point / Site all sources in APA style / Reference page in APA style / Using
1. Cite all examples you used to illustrate your point in APA.
2. Must be original work!
3. Do not plagiaries, Cite everything in APA style, as its only plagiarism if it is not cited.
4. It is okay to use others work for references but it MUST be cited in APA format.
5. Cite all references in APA style, in the body of the paper and on reference page.
6. The paper must be submitted both electronically as well as on paper, and will be subject to plagiarism screening, including screening by a commercial plagiarism detection service.
7. Some of the commercial screening services will permanently retain the text of this paper in order to facilitate routine screening of papers submitted by others in the future.

Quantitative Research Method, “DIFFERENCE of MEANS – T-TEST” in the City and Regional (Urban) Planning Profession:
General Concept Tell them what you are going to tell them / Write 2 pages about 550 words:
• Introduction: Introduce Difference of Means – Method “T-TEST” to City and Regional (Urban) Planning by:
o Pose a couple fishing question that could be answered by using the Difference of Means – “T-TEST“ research method in the planning profession.
• Background information
o Put together a condensed history or back story on the Difference of Means – Method “T-TEST“ research method.
o What is typical and atypical for the Difference of Means – Method “T-TEST“ research method?
• Setup and outline the paper by telling the reader what you are going to tell them in this paper.
• Transition to…
Applications of the Difference of Means – “T-TEST” Method Tell them / Write 4-6 pages, about 1100 words with diagrams and examples mixed throughout.
• What is the purpose of the Difference of Means – “T-TEST “research method, (use planning examples to explain)
• Why and when it is best to use the Difference of Means – “T-TEST” research method in the planning profession.
• Applications in city and regional (urban) planning (use good and bad examples)
• Transition to…
Mechanics of the Method Tell them / Write 2-4 pages about 550 words with diagrams and examples mixed throughout.
• How does the Difference of Means – “T-TEST “research method work?
• Formula, graphic, illustrations, etc.
• Explain or approach from an urban planning profession prospective
• Use urban planning examples
• Transition to…
What You Do Tell them / Write 8-10 pages, about 2200 words with diagrams and examples mixed throughout.
• Create a urban planning research question of your interest
• Provide step-by step guideline (with screenshots examples if possible) of how to perform the Difference of Means – “T-TEST” test
• Present the results / findings
• Explain or interpret the results / findings
• Transition to…
Two Case studies From Top Planning Journals in City Regional (Urban) Planning Validate what you told them / Write 4-6 pages, about 1100 words per case study with diagrams and examples mixed throughout. (Copy and Paste information, diagrams, findings directly from case study, be sure to cite in APA format)
• Background information about the case study
• Research question(s)
• Dependent variable(s), independent variables, unit of analysis,
• Why they used the Difference of Means – “T-TEST” method?
• How the author(s) used it?
• Findings and interpretation of the results
• You critical assessment of the study: o Articulate why you believe is or it is not an appropriate use of the Difference of Means – “T-TEST” method?
o Does it have Validity and reliability, why or why not?
o Does it make since in the context in which it is being used?
• Transition to…
Conclusion Write 2 pages about 550 words:
• Simplify what you told them and tell them why you told them Additional Comments Direction: • Stay on topic • Avoid random or separate points or ideas
• No random statements or facts. • No statements without backup facts and documentation, APA cite style
• Be sure to articulate clearly and concisely, so the ideal, point, example, or illustration is conveyed and is clearly understood.
• Be persuasive and entertain the reader by using facts and documentation, which are relevant and are backed up by creditable planning reports or literature. Cite in APA style.
• Tell the reader what you are going to tell them, tell them, and then tell them what you told them.
• Use transition statements between thoughts and paragraphs.
• Tell the reader what it is you are telling them clearly and without a lot of wordiness.
• Use published literature in national recognized planning journals as well as published urban planning case studies to illustrate or give your position validity and reliability.
• Write a conclusion which summarizes what you clearly articulated and documented as to why the reader should give validity to your position or findings.
• Tell the reader what you told them and how and why you believe this method is the one to use in these instances.