5Kurdish adult L2 learner’s acquisition of English verbal inflectional morphology (past tense ed) “please look at the order description and your email address for detailed instructions”

5Kurdish adult L2 learner’s acquisition of English verbal inflectional morphology (past tense ed) “please look at the order description and your email address for detailed instructions”
Dear my writer
Please I want you to write my dissertation in a high quality and get 75%. So please follow the instructions
• Use100 references
• Send me the pdf file of the references or the available link of the references because we have been asked to show the references to the professor
• go in depth of the topic and avoid repetition and digression
• Reference in-text with page number
• Use more journals than books
Information about dissertation
Please I want you to write argumentative dissertation and discuss about “Kurdish adult L2 learner’s acquisition of English verbal inflectional morphology (past tense ed)” you can find more information about challenging Kurdish L2 learners of English in the research proposal that is in the second word attachment.
• I have 12 participants; I will send you the transcription of the spoken tests of the 12 participants in 15 of July, when I will get the permission from the school to do that and test the the participants.
• the dissertation should consist of 5 chapters: introduction, literature review, methodology, results, analysis and discussion and finally the conclusion.
• Use a list of figures and abbreviations for the dissertation.
• By 20/07/2014 I want you to finish the introduction and literature review.
• And finishing the methodology by 27/07/2014. Around (700) words which for the introduction that should consist of general background about the topic, problem statement, significance of the study, research questions and hypothesis.
• The literature review should be around 5000 words and consist of some subtopics according to your effective research about the study.
• I will send you extra information after meeting my supervisor about the methodology and collecting data whether I need to use ANOVA or paired t-test, whatever my supervisor agrees.
• And please I want you to give me two months for asking revision, just in case if my supervisor does not agree with some points of the tasks of the dissertation that you are going to write about.
Our dissertations will be judged according the following conditions:
“A” is the highest grade and “F” is the lowest grade
Aspect of the submitted work Quality of individual aspects of the work
A B C D E F n/a
Concept, argument and structure
Methodology
Analysis and discussion
Writing style, spelling and grammar
Followed assignment instructions, formatting and departmental referencing guidelines
Please focus on the affecting first language on the second language like transfer theory. Please follow the attached instructions, I need the literature review by 20th of July.
Kind regards
Dlshad

Finance Mathematics

Topic: Finance Mathematics
hi Sir/Madam,
With this thesis, I hope you can read the requirements carefully and fulfill all detailed requirements. This is very important to me.
As per conversation with the customer service Casey. My professor requires me to submit 3 drafts to him before the final deadline which is 27th August.
Draft and submission time:
Part 1 draft needed on 13rd August
Part 2 draft needed on 20th August
Part 3 draft needed on 25th August
Final submission (100% completed and revised):
27th August
These files (download it from the 1st link of dropbox below):
1. project topic and requirements
2. marking guidelines
3. the LaTex Template (This thesis must be completed in LaTex version Very important!!)
4. an outline completed by me. you can amend it slightly to suit your content for the thesis.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/81295965/financial%20maths%20master.rar
These documents (download the zip file from the 2nd dropbox link below) include
1. the reference books the project description indicates
2. some materials I downloaded from websites, hope they could be helpful.
These documents (download the zip file from the 2nd dropbox link below) include
1. the reference books the project description indicates
2. some materials I downloaded from websites, hope they could be helpful.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/81295965/FM%2Bdessertaion%2Bopinions%2Band%2Bref%2Bbooks.raThank you very much and Keep in touch anytime if you have questions.
Roger

Business Plan Part 2

Topic: Business Plan Part 2
A continuation of business plan part 1
Students will propose a business model, examine the requirements for establishing and running that business model and produce a business plan detailing this research.
The Business Plan will be submitted in two parts – Report 1 and Report 2
In Report 2 students will explain how their business will work, what resources and infrastructure they will need to establish and run the business and examine the profitability of the business.
Having completed the above, the student will assemble the information submitted in report 1 and the information compiled for Report 2 into one document for final submission as Report 2.
The number of resources to be used are free

 

week 7 action learning

Topic: week 7 action learning

Week 7 Action learning
INTRODUCTION
Action learning is the idea or philosophy that underpins this whole programme, and you have already begun to learn how to practice it in your Learning Set. Action learning is inherently critical because it involves the problematising of situations that may have been taken for granted but can become ‘problems,’ i.e., issues that require action for improvement and vehicles for study and learning. The process of action learning involves questioning and challenging yourself and your colleagues in the Learning Set and also questioning assumptions and practices outside the set. In the organisational world and beyond, questioning that concerns problems and difficult issues already involves some level of critique and critical thinking. Consider the implications of action learning for your practice and its potential contribution to your learning as a leader, as you complete this week’s activities.
Return to top
OBJECTIVES
Learning objectives for Week 7
On completion of this week, students will be able to:
Apply the key ideas of action learning
Assess the importance of questions in an action Learning Set or team
Evaluate theories of leadership learning

This assignment consist of 3 tasks :-
1- PROBLEMATISING WRITE-UP (750-850) word counts
2- Learning set week 7 (750-850 word counts)
3- Learning set responses (for later to be explained)
please make each task in separate file and separate references list and introduction and conclusion as each will be uploaded separately in the assignment .
please know that this is week 7 of the doctoral practitioner , therefore i will upload the media file to which you need to write your problematic write up as it is accumulative process from
week4-week5-week6 until week 7
please know that this is week 7 of the doctoral practitioner , therefore i will upload the media file to which you need to write your problematic write up as it is accumulative process from
week4-week5-week6 until week 7

PROBLEMATISING WRITE-UP

Topic: week7 assignment (PROBLEMATISING WRITE-UP)
please read the instructions and tell me what you have understand before starting , because this will save us time and avoid deviation from the main instructions .

Comparative Study between Indian and UK Oil Industry

Comparative Study between Indian and UK Oil Industry: Strategic Comparison and How to Increase Their Market Share
File attached.
*Introduction Chapter- 1200 word
*Conclusion Chapter- 1200 words
*Personal Reflection – 500-600 words
*Executive Summary or Abstract (brief not
more than 150 words)
please dont go up with the word limit. I appreciate for your work you did in previous chapter.

 

Conceptual frameworkdiagram

Topic: 2nd Conceptual frameworkdiagram
Review exercise 3.2 on page 70 of the PDF about conceptual frameworks. Create a second conceptual framework diagram for your study and think about the following questions:
• Do both diagrams produce insight into what you think is going on with the variables in the study?
• Which diagram would be easier or more practical to test?
• Which diagram would fare better during testing? Why?
• What are the implications of both diagrams?
• Which diagram has implications more fitting of your study?
• Is it easy to distinguish between the diagrams?
• How could your study distinguish between the diagrams?

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)
Course:EDU673
Course Material:
Required Text
Puckett, K (2013). Differentiating Instruction: A Practical Guide. Bridgepoint Education: San Diego, CA.
Some Resources used:
Tangient LLC. (n.d.). Differentiated instrucional strategies: Differentiated strategies for assessment. Retrieved from https://differentiatedstrategies.wikispaces.com/Differentiated Strategies for Assessment
Tangient LLC. (n.d.). Differentiated instrucional strategies: Differentiated strategies for assessment. Retrieved from https://differentiatedstrategies.wikispaces.com/Differentiated Strategies for Assessment
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): This framework demonstrates the combination of content expertise, information delivery expertise (pedagogy), and instructional technology implementation all used to enhance learning.
As your textbook and webpages point out, TPACK combines pedagogical knowledge, content knowledge, and technological knowledge to transform learning opportunities into student-centered opportunities for lesson engagement, global connections, and web interfacing through 21st century technology advancements. The TPACK framework demonstrates the interplay of three knowledge bases:
1.Pedagogical Content Knowledge: This area is where most teachers have their foundation- as a content expert who delivers knowledge using the foundations of pedagogy.