Strategic management

Strategic management

 

Case Study
Sweet spreads manufacturer faces a sticky future
Hartley’s needs to diversify the family’s 100-year-old jam firm to keep it competitive in a
shrinking market but it is wary of predatory investors.
The challenges facing Hartley’s:
• To expand in a market that is shrinking.
• To diversify into new markets.
• To ensure that management is of top quality.
Fred Hartley knows all about jam but if he makes a wrong move his company could end up in a
pickle. The 41-year old is Managing Director of Hartley & Sons, Britain’s oldest family-owned
jam maker.
The trouble is that fewer people are buying jam and those that are, tend to go for supermarket
brands. Now Hartley’s is trying to conserve its income by diversifying into sauces and even
spring water. For that it needs money but the company is wary of attracting outside investors in
case their involvement changes the culture of the 100 year-old firm. Fred Hartley’s great-grand
father Albert founded Hartley’s in London in 1881. Fred joined straight from school and took
over as Managing Director from his father Tony in 1994. Jam and marmalade still account for
45% of its sales of £33m but the market has been in decline for 50 years. In 1950 there were
about 40 big British manufacturers. Only three of these have survived and Hartley’s is the only
one that remains independent. It employs 220 people at two sites in South London.
“People don’t eat as much jam as they used to,” said Fred Hartley. “A typical English breakfast
used to include toast and jam, while a jam sandwich was a staple snack. Now it is competing
against cereal bars and crisps”. Changing dietary habits have also contributed to jam’s decline
because people increasingly want low-sugar food.
Hartley’s became a household name during the 1960s and 1970s, supplying most of the big
supermarkets. But the rise of supermarkets also initiated the decline of the businesses’
traditional branded business. The supermarkets’ fight for market share in staple products such
as jam and their introduction of cheap own-label alternatives has gradually cut the profit
margins on branded products.
The company saw the change coming. Under Tony Hartley it changed the emphasis of its
business from making jams under its own name to making own-label jam and other products
for supermarkets. Now, about 60% of its business is supplying own-label products, mainly jam
and condiments. Customers include Morrisons, Tesco and Sainsbury, which is its largest client,
accounting for 20% of total sales. Although sales volumes are high, the profit margins are low
and the market has little potential for growth, said Hartley. “The gross margin is down to
between 10% and 15%. You can’t run a business with our overheads on margins like that
forever.”
While own-label jams pick up most of the business in the middle and lower sections of the
market, the top end is still dominated by the branded jams. This area offers much higher
margins, said Hartley but it is overcrowded. “Investment is required for new machinery as well
as marketing,” he said. “French brands such as Bonne Maman created that market and have
established strong positions”.
BSc (Hons) in Business Administration Strategic Management
Strategic Management March 2012 Format 1 © NCC Education Ltd 2012
Instead, Hartley wants to focus on developing niche’ products under the company’s own name,
such as luxury marmalades and a recently launched low-carbohydrate jam. He said these
sectors were still brand-led and offer higher margins.
Marmalade is more attractive because it is largely bought by more mature, wealthier
consumers. Marmalade is also cheaper to produce but Hartley is conscious of the risk in
dedicating resources to markets that are in overall decline or, at best, static.
Hartley’s also sells jam in bulk. It supplies cake makers and produces 100m portion-packs for
the NHS, schools and the prison service. Sales to the trade sector have grown substantially,
rising from £750,000 in 1999 to £4.7m in 2004.
Hartley’s has diversified into other markets. It began making peanut butter in the 1980s and
now has 50% of the market, representing 20% of the firm’s sales. It has also diversified into
condiments, producing own-label products such as apple, tartare and mint sauces. Recently, it
became the sole British cranberry sauce supplier to ocean Spray, the world’s largest producer
of cranberry products. The deal gave Hartley’s 90% of the British cranberry sauce market
overnight and increased its overall sales by £3m.
Hartley sees more potential to develop this side of the business but current sales are largely
low-margin, own-label products. He would prefer to develop the higher margin branded
condiments business but is unsure if the Hartley’s brand is appropriate. A second option, he
said, would be to buy and develop an established brand.
So far product diversification has enabled the company to survive although Hartley knows that
diversification is not just a matter of business development but a question of survival. Despite
new contracts and new products, profits have remained flat for the past three years at about
£550,000. The business has to diversify just to stand still but inevitably this takes it further
away from its core strengths. “It is the classic `busy fool’ situation – working harder and harder
for the same or even less return,” he said.
Last March, the company invested £100,000 in setting up Dragon Ice, a spring-water ice-cube
company in South Wales. It is a joint venture with a Welsh spring water producer and
Hartley’s owns 51% of the business.
It already has small contracts with Sainsbury, Tesco and Asda to supply spring-water ice cubes
but the aim is to introduce ice cubes – water packaged ready for consumers to freeze
themselves at home. It is the first time the company has diversified into a product so radically
different from its traditional market but Hartley believes the potential outweighs the risks.
“We have invested £100,000 so far and it will need at least the same again to really get it
moving. But given the growth of the whole mineral-water market, I see it as a huge
opportunity,” he said.
The company is still wholly family owned and self-financed. Hartley’s younger brother,
Richard, is Sales and Marketing Director but he is the only other family member with any dayto-
day involvement in the business. Both sit on the company’s main board of six, alongside
their father Tony, who is Chairman and three non-family directors. There are no non-executive
directors.
Having a family-dominated senior management team means decisions can be taken quickly
and the business can react swiftly to changes in the market. But the lack of external input is a
BSc (Hons) in Business Administration Strategic Management
Strategic Management March 2012 Format 1 © NCC Education Ltd 2012
weakness as well as a strength. With no non-executive directors, Hartley admits that he relies
on his father “to make the difficult decisions”.
Being self-financed, the company has to rely on its overdraft and existing reserves to finance
investments, which puts sizeable strategic investments out of its immediate reach. The
company is approached regularly by potential investors. Hartley believes that bringing in
external money would jeopardise the balance of the company and reduce the family’s control.
“We can invest £3m to £4m without a problem. It just means that we can’t go out and spend
£10m easily,” said Hartley. “People approach us all the time about investing but what they
really want is to take u

Emotional IQ

Complete the Emotional IQ test at http://www.queendom.com/tests/access_page/index.htm?idRegTest=3037. Save your results. Then, based on your test results prepare 6 to 8 PowerPoint slides in which you:
1. Identify and justify four (4) areas of Emotional IQ a public leader should address in identifying their specific traits, behavior, and skill set.
2. Using any type of leadership style (transformational, charismatic, authentic, etc.), discuss how Emotional IQ influences each of the following:
• Leadership communication
• Culture, values, morals, and courage
• Developing teams
• Motivation and empowerment
• Influence and power
Develop a plan for how a public leader can overcome his/her weaknesses in Emotional IQ.
Debate the pros and cons for how adaptability can affect a public leader’s leadership abilities with others.
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

s over. I can’t see anybody wanting to get involved other than to
consolidate it into someone else’s business.”
Source: Nigel Walton (2011)
Questions:
Task 1 – 50 Marks
What are the key strategic issues (internal and external) impacting upon Hartley’s future
growth?
Task 2 – 50 Marks
What recommendations would you make to Fred Hartley regarding future competitive and
corporate strategies?
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (Code GAC13)

Physicians Moving to Mid-Sized, Single-Specialty Practices.” Case Study

“Physicians Moving to Mid-Sized, Single-Specialty Practices.”
Case Study
Go to http://www.hschange.org, and search for the article title “Physicians Moving to Mid-Sized, Single-Specialty Practices.”
Part 1: What does this research indicate about trends for physician group practice? Are doctors likely to practice alone these days, with one partner, or in larger groups? Explain the trend you are seeing in this data. Why is it happening?
Part 2: Study the trends reported here for doctors in solo or duo practice versus for those in larger group practice. Pay special attention to the Supplementary Table at the end of the report, which breaks this data down into physician specialties. Which types of specialties are most likely to continue in solo or duo practice? Which specialties are showing the strongest trends in forming groups? Why do you feel that this is the case?

ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (Code GAC13)

Traffikicking Woman and Children

Traffikicking Woman and Children
1) According to the United Nations the trafficking of women and children for sexual purposes has been increasing in recent years. Analyze the crime and develop recommendations to combat the crime. Your analysis should include discussion on the extent of the crime, its nature, its victims and current legislation on the problem.

ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (Code GAC13)

 

Global Warming, Water, Oil, will we be eating healthier in the future?

Global Warming, Water, Oil, will we be eating healthier in the future?

what’s expected in the future for industries opportuniy with climate changes?

cover all of the following topics for this paper: Global Warming, Water, Oil, will we be eating healthier in the future? what’s expected in the future for industries opportuniy with climate changes?

ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (code GAC13)

 

Explain, with the aid of diagrams, the construction and operating principles of the following types of protection devices:

Circuit Protection and Polyphase Motors
Explain the construction of over-current protection devices
Explain the operating principles of circuit over-current protection devices
Explain the operating principles of earth fault protection devices

1. Explain, with the aid of diagrams, the construction and operating principles of the following types of protection devices:

a. Airblast circuit breaker

b. Oil-filled circuit breaker

c. High rupture capacity fuse

d. Residual current device

e. Earth fault relay

 

 

Task 2 – Learning Outcome 5.1
Describe the types and explain the construction of induction motors

2. Describe the construction of the following types of three-phase induction motors; you may use diagrams to aid your description.

a. Single cage

b. Double cage

c. Wound rotor

 

 

Task 3 – Learning Outcome 5.2
Explain the operating principles and methods of starting induction motors
3. Explain the operating principles of a three-phase cage rotor induction motor. Your explanation must include the terms:

a. Rotating magnetic field
b. Mutual inductance
c. Slip
d. Synchronous speed
e. Torque
4. The following are all methods of starting a three-phase induction motor. In each case, explain how the starting method works, state the type of motor the starter is used on, and a typical power range for that motor.

a. Direct-on-line

b. Star-Delta

c. Inverter / soft start

 

 

Task 4 – Learning Outcomes 5.3
Analyse the methods of speed control of induction motors

5. Describe and analyse two different methods of controlling the speed of three-phase induction motors.
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (Code GAC13)

 

 

Accounting and Decision Making

Accounting and Decision Making

Summative Assignment
CASE STUDY INFORMATION

Dyed in the Wool Limited

Dyed in the Wool Limited (“DITW”) is a long established UK company making specialist fire retardant and waterproof textiles for industrial, defence and commercial markets.
The CEO is Jim Riley, who took over from his father when he retired 30 years ago. Jim and his family own all the shares in DITW.

In recent years Jim has been worried about DITW’s core market. Defence sales are declining due to cutbacks in the armed forces, and new entrants to the market are offering stronger technological solutions for proofing fabrics. To counter the effect of this decline, two years ago Jim decided to diversify DITW’s activities, investing in a new subsidiary company, HomeSpun Limited. HomeSpun is run by Mr Riley’s nephew, and sells furniture and home textiles to retail customers from three stores in the local area.

Jim’s background is in industrial manufacturing, and whilst he has no formal retail or accounting training, he is astute when it comes to gross margins, selling prices and manufacturing costs. DITW has a history of profitability over the years and pays out substantial annual dividends to the family shareholders, but until recently cash was also retained in the company for reinvestment in equipment and production facilities. The main manufacturing site, which was acquired by Mr Riley’s father over 50 years ago, is a former WWII munitions factory with 5 acres of land and buildings with plenty of space for expansion.

However, starting up the new retail subsidiary has seen cash flow out of DITW to fund start-up losses on lease costs, staffing, advertising and buying stock for the shops. Traditionally DITW was not the best at chasing its receivables and now with the additional pressure of HomeSpun’s cash requirements, DITW has been forced to use an overdraft for the first time. In fact, the company recently asked its bank for a third increase to the overdraft limit at £900,000, trebling the original request for facilities. The bank has notified DITW that it will not approve any further amounts beyond this latest agreement and has asked for copies of DITW’s financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2012 as soon as possible.

An interim accountant was recruited 6 weeks ago at the request of the company’s bankers. The new accountant has started to analyse HomeSpun’s management accounts. He is concerned about the lack of cash compared to the profits being reported. He wants to run some stock takes in the stores against the cost of stock reported in the management accounts as well as review the “buy now pay later” policies being offered to customers on large items in the shops.

In spite of the cash difficulties, Mr Riley is pleased with DITW’s investment in the new retail venture and is determined to continue expanding. HomeSpun has a very visible local presence, and local government and press have given it significant positive coverage about job creation and local enterprise development. He wants to continue with the roll-out of new store openings and is considering investing £1m in a joint venture (“JV”) manufacturing opportunity with Pratash Furniture & Textiles in Mumbai. This JV would manufacture a range of products already sold in HomeSpun’s shops, and supply directly to HomeSpun at a lower cost than buying from existing third party suppliers – Jim Riley says it will “cut out the middleman” and improve gross profit margins.

Approximately 30% of HomeSpun’s annual sales could be supplied from the JV entity.
DITW’s Board, led by Jim Riley, has some decisions to make. The company cannot secure further overdraft funding from the bank, yet HomeSpun continues to be cash consumptive and tax and dividends in DITW are due for payment in the next three months. In addition, DITW will need to raise further funding if the expansion plans (new stores and JV opportunity) take place. Financing options under discussion include:

• OPTION 1. Seek third party investor or venture capitalist to provide £1.5m new share capital to fund the £1m investment into the JV, payment of the 2012 dividend and any immediate cash requirements in HomeSpun (forecast at £54k cash outflow for Year 3). The overdraft would continue in place under this scenario.

• OPTION 2. Approach the bank to convert the £910k overdraft into a £2m long term loan at 8% annual interest, secured on land and buildings. This would pay for the £1m investment into the JV with a small amount of surplus to fund the forecast cash outflows for HomeSpun in Year 3 at £54k.

• OPTION 3. Walk away from the JV and slowly repay the overdraft by improving working capital management and withdrawing dividend payments for the next few years (Jim Riley has already flagged up that his family shareholders will not countenance this option willingly).

The accountant has distributed an email ahead of a Board meeting as follows:

Agenda for Board meeting

1. Completion and presentation of DITW’s year end financial statements.

2. Analysis of HomeSpun’s performance against budget since launch.

3. Review of operating cash cycle and cash outflows in DITW and HomeSpun.

4. Evaluation of trading and investment implications of the JV opportunity.

5. Options for raising further funds for the business.

Relevant financial information (see Appendices 1-5) has been prepared ahead of the Board meeting and distributed to all Board members.

Appendix 1
DITW draft Financial Statements
The draft Income Statement and Statement of Financial Position for DITW for the years ending 31 December 2012 and 2011 are reproduced below. These are in draft format pending the outcome of discussions at the Board meeting.
Income Statement for the year ended 31 December 2012:

2012 2011
£000 £000

Revenue
26,387
28,853
Cost of goods sold – labour
Cost of goods sold – material purchases (13,942)
(8,542) (14,052)
(10,387)
Gross profit 3,903 4,414

Factory overheads
(1,631)
(1,570)
Distribution costs (354) (398)
Sales and marketing costs (517) (495)
Administrative costs (623) (596)

Profit before interest and taxation
778
1,355

Interest charges
(51)
(22)
Profit before taxation 727 1,333

Taxation
(222)
(407)
Profit / (Loss) after taxation 505 926

Dividends declared
(425)
(750)
Retained profit 80 176

Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2012:

2012 2011
£000 £000
Non-current assets
Land and buildings 3,000 800
Plant and Equipment 1,953 2,358
4,953 3,158
Current Assets
Inventory 2,709 2,654
Trade receivables 2,056 1,909
Investment in HomeSpun Limited 1,451 651
Cash 9 278
6,225 5,492

Current Liabilities
Trade payables (2,699) (2,851)
Taxation payable (222) (407)
Bank overdraft (910) 0
Dividends payable (425) (750)
4,256 4,008

Net assets 6,922 4,642

Equity
Called up ordinary share capital 300 300
Revaluation reserve 2,200 0
Retained earnings 4,422 4,342
6,922 4,642
Additional notes:

• The carrying value of land and buildings has been increased to £3 million at 31 December 2012. This figure is based on an offer of £2.5million from a property developer (which Jim felt substantially undervalued the premises) earlier in the year. Since then the property market has slowed down a little but it was suggested that the balance sheet would look stronger by increasing the valuation attaching to the land and buildings, in the context of potentially raising money for the business.

• The depreciation charge in 2012 was £317,000. A piece of equipment which was carried in the books at a cost of £520,000 less accumulated depreciation of £388,000 was sold during the year at £100,000, resulting in a loss on sale. Both depreciation charges and any loss on sale are included in “factory overheads”. The new accountant has noticed that DITW often seems to sell equipment at a loss, although Jim Riley feels the company’s depreciation policies are adequate.

• DITW owns 100% of the shares in HomeSpun Limited. DITW contributed a lump sum to start the business, and has since been topping this up with further sums as required. There is no formal loan in place, so the investment has been shown in current assets.

• One of DITW’s customers has been disputing invoices raised on a long-term contract to supply materials. As at 31 December 2012 the total outstanding balance to this customer shown in receivables was £219,750. Jim Riley is confident that this sum will be recovered in full, but £137,000 relates to amounts due over 90 days and there are rumours in the industry that the customer may have financial difficulties. No provision has been made in the accounts against any part of this receivable. Inventory includes approximately £105,000 of materials specific to this customer, which are not sold to any other customer.

• There is also some confusion over a particular batch of pre-invoiced sales. DITW raised invoices for £52,000 on 30 December 2012 for goods which were still in stock at 31 December and would only be sent to the customer in early January 2013. The invoices were shown within revenue for 2012, and an additional £52,000 shown in receivables, plus a reduction in stock value of £44,200 which matches the entry in cost of sales. The accountant wants to reverse this transaction because the stock had not been physically delivered to the customer by 31 December 2012. However, he is meeting resistance from Mr Riley, who says the only reason the stock had not been sent was due to the Christmas holiday period and that in the light of the potential fund raising, the company should be putting “its best foot forward”.

• Interest is paid as soon as charged. Both tax and dividends due are normally paid within 3 months of year end to clear the full amount outstanding.

• Regarding presentation of the financial statements, the new accountant has explained that DITW is no longer exempt from preparing consolidated accounts and that the financial statements will need to be prepared on a consolidated basis prior to external publication.

• Finally, DITW launched a successful patent protection case against a competitor during 2011. The legal outcome concluded in favour of DITW and the competitor was required to pay damages of £30,000 which have been netted off administration costs (i.e. reducing the administration costs shown) for 2012. DITW’s legal costs on the case were £27,000, which were shown within administration costs in 2011.

Appendix 2
HomeSpun: Original budget and latest forecasts

A business plan was produced by HomeSpun’s management to support the original request for finance from DITW. The launch date for the business was 1 January 2011. The original profit and cash budgets from the business plan are shown below:

 

HomeSpun started trading on 1 January 2011. The sales, costs, profit, working capital balances and cash flows for the first two years of trading are shown below. All cash deficits to date – £651,000 in 2011 and £800,000 in 2012 – have been subsidised using further investment from DITW. HomeSpun’s management has used the actual results for 2011 and 2012 to develop a revised set of forecasts for the business for 2013 – 2015 as follows:

 

Appendix 3
Analysis of product costings for joint venture deal

Pratash Furniture & Textiles has identified three products, A, B and C, which are believed to represent an average cross-section of the overall range that the JV entity could produce for HomeSpun. Pratash has produced cost estimates for each of A, B and C which are shown below. Ex-factory (India) costs are shown in UK £ at current exchange rates, and the possibility of exchange rate movements impacting the financial data has not yet been taken into account.
Product A B C

Direct material cost 1.30 2.05 0.67
Direct labour cost 0.80 1.20 1.12
Variable overhead per unit 0.30 0.88 0.75
Fixed overhead per unit 2.05 3.56 2.98
Total cost ex-factory (India) 4.45 7.69 5.52

Estimated transport & duty to UK
1.56
2.69
1.93
Estimated cost landed in UK 6.01 10.38 7.45

The accountant at DITW has produced the following comparison table showing the potential uplift in gross margin from sourcing the products via the JV compared to the current situation is shown as follows:

Product A B C

Current
Selling price 19.99 24.99 22.99
Purchase price landed in UK from present distributor 9.86 13.55 12.25
Gross profit per unit 10.13 11.44 10.74

Potential
Selling price 19.99 24.99 22.99
Landed cost from JV entity 6.01 10.38 7.45
Gross profit per unit 13.98 14.61 15.54

Accountant note:

Taking the average product cost on the sample of three JV-sourced products and comparing this with the average cost on those same products as currently purchased indicates a significant potential uplift in gross margins might be available under the JV scenario.

If the JV went ahead on 1 January 2013, these new product costs could improve gross margins on 30% of HomeSpun’s revenue for Years 3 to 5 of the forecasts.

Appendix 4

Basic financial ratios

Revenue growth (%) = Revenue (yr 1) – Revenue (yr0)x 100
Revenue (yr 0)

Return on capital employed (%) = Profit before interest and taxationx 100
Equity plus Liabilities

Return on investment Profit before interest and taxation x 100
Investment cost

Gross profit margin (%) = Gross profit x 100
Revenue

Net profit margin (%) = Profit before interest and taxation x 100
Revenue

Inventory days = Inventory (year end) x 365
Cost of goods sold

Receivables days = Trade receivables x 365
Revenue

Payables days = Trade payables x 365
Purchases (Cost of goods sold)

Current ratio = Current assets
Current liabilities

Acid test or Quick ratio = Current assets less inventory
Current liabilities

Debt/equity ratio (%) = Total debtx 100
Total equity

Capital gearing ratio (%) = Total debt x 100
Total equity + Total debt

Interest cover (times) = Profit before interest and taxation
Interest charges

Dividend per share (pence) = Total dividends approved x 100
Number of ordinary shares
Appendix 5 – Present value table
Required:

As part of a business report which communicates the financial information, issues and potential solutions available to DITW ahead of the difficult decisions it must make, you are required to discuss and critically evaluate the following questions. You should use appropriate accounting and financial techniques to support your conclusions and recommendations.
1. Identify and critically discuss at least FOUR areas of subjective judgement in DITW’s financial statements for 2012. As part of your discussion, you should highlight any changes that you would recommend to ensure that the final statements are in accordance with the IASB’s Conceptual Framework and present a “true and fair” view as required by the Companies Act 2006 and GAAP.

2. Prepare the Statement of Cash Flows for DITW for 2012. Use only the financial statements and related accounting information provided by DITW in the original case study.

3. Critically evaluate HomeSpun’s performance against its original budget to date, highlighting possible reasons for the variances between budgeted and actual results. You should focus on HomeSpun’s sales, costs, profit and return on investment in your answer, and may use relevant financial ratios and variance analysis techniques to support your evaluation.

4. Calculate the operating cash cycles for each of DITW and HomeSpun in 2012. Using this information as well as the Statement of Cash Flows that you prepared in Q2, explain why DITW and Homespun are facing cash flow problems and recommend solutions for the Board which might improvecash generation in both arms of the business.

5. Differentiate between (i) absorption costing and (ii) marginal costing, discussing the reasons why DITW and Pratash Furniture & Textiles might have chosen absorption costing for the cost estimates shown in Appendix 3.
6. Critically evaluate the JV opportunity with Pratash Furniture & Textiles using an appropriate investment appraisal technique. You may assume that the JV starts on 1 January 2013 and runs until 31 December 2015, and that DITW’s cost of capital is 10%. Ignore the impact of tax. Your answer should recommend whether the proposed investment should proceed, supported by discussion of at leastTHREE other factors that the Board should take into account in their final appraisal of the investment opportunity.

7. Critically discuss the three options available to DITW for raising further funds for the business. Your analysis should highlight the effect on DITW’s liquidity, capital structure and financial risk from Options 1 (raising equity) and 2 (raising debt). You may base your calculations on the financial statements for DITW given in Appendix 1, making relevant adjustments as appropriate to each scenario.
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (Code GAC13)

 

Strategic management

Strategic management

 

Case Study
Sweet spreads manufacturer faces a sticky future
Hartley’s needs to diversify the family’s 100-year-old jam firm to keep it competitive in a
shrinking market but it is wary of predatory investors.
The challenges facing Hartley’s:
• To expand in a market that is shrinking.
• To diversify into new markets.
• To ensure that management is of top quality.
Fred Hartley knows all about jam but if he makes a wrong move his company could end up in a
pickle. The 41-year old is Managing Director of Hartley & Sons, Britain’s oldest family-owned
jam maker.
The trouble is that fewer people are buying jam and those that are, tend to go for supermarket
brands. Now Hartley’s is trying to conserve its income by diversifying into sauces and even
spring water. For that it needs money but the company is wary of attracting outside investors in
case their involvement changes the culture of the 100 year-old firm. Fred Hartley’s great-grand
father Albert founded Hartley’s in London in 1881. Fred joined straight from school and took
over as Managing Director from his father Tony in 1994. Jam and marmalade still account for
45% of its sales of £33m but the market has been in decline for 50 years. In 1950 there were
about 40 big British manufacturers. Only three of these have survived and Hartley’s is the only
one that remains independent. It employs 220 people at two sites in South London.
“People don’t eat as much jam as they used to,” said Fred Hartley. “A typical English breakfast
used to include toast and jam, while a jam sandwich was a staple snack. Now it is competing
against cereal bars and crisps”. Changing dietary habits have also contributed to jam’s decline
because people increasingly want low-sugar food.
Hartley’s became a household name during the 1960s and 1970s, supplying most of the big
supermarkets. But the rise of supermarkets also initiated the decline of the businesses’
traditional branded business. The supermarkets’ fight for market share in staple products such
as jam and their introduction of cheap own-label alternatives has gradually cut the profit
margins on branded products.
The company saw the change coming. Under Tony Hartley it changed the emphasis of its
business from making jams under its own name to making own-label jam and other products
for supermarkets. Now, about 60% of its business is supplying own-label products, mainly jam
and condiments. Customers include Morrisons, Tesco and Sainsbury, which is its largest client,
accounting for 20% of total sales. Although sales volumes are high, the profit margins are low
and the market has little potential for growth, said Hartley. “The gross margin is down to
between 10% and 15%. You can’t run a business with our overheads on margins like that
forever.”
While own-label jams pick up most of the business in the middle and lower sections of the
market, the top end is still dominated by the branded jams. This area offers much higher
margins, said Hartley but it is overcrowded. “Investment is required for new machinery as well
as marketing,” he said. “French brands such as Bonne Maman created that market and have
established strong positions”.
BSc (Hons) in Business Administration Strategic Management
Strategic Management March 2012 Format 1 © NCC Education Ltd 2012
Instead, Hartley wants to focus on developing niche’ products under the company’s own name,
such as luxury marmalades and a recently launched low-carbohydrate jam. He said these
sectors were still brand-led and offer higher margins.
Marmalade is more attractive because it is largely bought by more mature, wealthier
consumers. Marmalade is also cheaper to produce but Hartley is conscious of the risk in
dedicating resources to markets that are in overall decline or, at best, static.
Hartley’s also sells jam in bulk. It supplies cake makers and produces 100m portion-packs for
the NHS, schools and the prison service. Sales to the trade sector have grown substantially,
rising from £750,000 in 1999 to £4.7m in 2004.
Hartley’s has diversified into other markets. It began making peanut butter in the 1980s and
now has 50% of the market, representing 20% of the firm’s sales. It has also diversified into
condiments, producing own-label products such as apple, tartare and mint sauces. Recently, it
became the sole British cranberry sauce supplier to ocean Spray, the world’s largest producer
of cranberry products. The deal gave Hartley’s 90% of the British cranberry sauce market
overnight and increased its overall sales by £3m.
Hartley sees more potential to develop this side of the business but current sales are largely
low-margin, own-label products. He would prefer to develop the higher margin branded
condiments business but is unsure if the Hartley’s brand is appropriate. A second option, he
said, would be to buy and develop an established brand.
So far product diversification has enabled the company to survive although Hartley knows that
diversification is not just a matter of business development but a question of survival. Despite
new contracts and new products, profits have remained flat for the past three years at about
£550,000. The business has to diversify just to stand still but inevitably this takes it further
away from its core strengths. “It is the classic `busy fool’ situation – working harder and harder
for the same or even less return,” he said.
Last March, the company invested £100,000 in setting up Dragon Ice, a spring-water ice-cube
company in South Wales. It is a joint venture with a Welsh spring water producer and
Hartley’s owns 51% of the business.
It already has small contracts with Sainsbury, Tesco and Asda to supply spring-water ice cubes
but the aim is to introduce ice cubes – water packaged ready for consumers to freeze
themselves at home. It is the first time the company has diversified into a product so radically
different from its traditional market but Hartley believes the potential outweighs the risks.
“We have invested £100,000 so far and it will need at least the same again to really get it
moving. But given the growth of the whole mineral-water market, I see it as a huge
opportunity,” he said.
The company is still wholly family owned and self-financed. Hartley’s younger brother,
Richard, is Sales and Marketing Director but he is the only other family member with any dayto-
day involvement in the business. Both sit on the company’s main board of six, alongside
their father Tony, who is Chairman and three non-family directors. There are no non-executive
directors.
Having a family-dominated senior management team means decisions can be taken quickly
and the business can react swiftly to changes in the market. But the lack of external input is a
BSc (Hons) in Business Administration Strategic Management
Strategic Management March 2012 Format 1 © NCC Education Ltd 2012
weakness as well as a strength. With no non-executive directors, Hartley admits that he relies
on his father “to make the difficult decisions”.
Being self-financed, the company has to rely on its overdraft and existing reserves to finance
investments, which puts sizeable strategic investments out of its immediate reach. The
company is approached regularly by potential investors. Hartley believes that bringing in
external money would jeopardise the balance of the company and reduce the family’s control.
“We can invest £3m to £4m without a problem. It just means that we can’t go out and spend
£10m easily,” said Hartley. “People approach us all the time about investing but what they
really want is to take u

Emotional IQ

Complete the Emotional IQ test at http://www.queendom.com/tests/access_page/index.htm?idRegTest=3037. Save your results. Then, based on your test results prepare 6 to 8 PowerPoint slides in which you:
1. Identify and justify four (4) areas of Emotional IQ a public leader should address in identifying their specific traits, behavior, and skill set.
2. Using any type of leadership style (transformational, charismatic, authentic, etc.), discuss how Emotional IQ influences each of the following:
• Leadership communication
• Culture, values, morals, and courage
• Developing teams
• Motivation and empowerment
• Influence and power
Develop a plan for how a public leader can overcome his/her weaknesses in Emotional IQ.
Debate the pros and cons for how adaptability can affect a public leader’s leadership abilities with others.
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

s over. I can’t see anybody wanting to get involved other than to
consolidate it into someone else’s business.”
Source: Nigel Walton (2011)
Questions:
Task 1 – 50 Marks
What are the key strategic issues (internal and external) impacting upon Hartley’s future
growth?
Task 2 – 50 Marks
What recommendations would you make to Fred Hartley regarding future competitive and
corporate strategies?
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (Code GAC13)

 

“Physicians Moving to Mid-Sized, Single-Specialty Practices.”

“Physicians Moving to Mid-Sized, Single-Specialty Practices.”
Case Study
Go to http://www.hschange.org, and search for the article title “Physicians Moving to Mid-Sized, Single-Specialty Practices.”
Part 1: What does this research indicate about trends for physician group practice? Are doctors likely to practice alone these days, with one partner, or in larger groups? Explain the trend you are seeing in this data. Why is it happening?
Part 2: Study the trends reported here for doctors in solo or duo practice versus for those in larger group practice. Pay special attention to the Supplementary Table at the end of the report, which breaks this data down into physician specialties. Which types of specialties are most likely to continue in solo or duo practice? Which specialties are showing the strongest trends in forming groups? Why do you feel that this is the case?

ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (Code GAC13)

Air pollution Control

Air pollution Control

Write an eight page reprot of the Technological advancements that happened in the past 2 decades and your expectation of the same in the coming 2 decades for the Topic Air pollution Control

ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (Code GAC13)

 

Indonesian nationalism and the development of the Indonesian language

Indonesian nationalism and the development of the Indonesian language

Subject: Asian Studies
In what ways are Indonesian nationalism and the development of the Indonesian language related to each other? You can choose to look at this from a combination of different historical, political and/or social perspectives.(Compare the similar situation with other Asian countries, China,Taiwan or Japan)

-INTRODUCTION: Say what you are arguing and what you are going to do in the essay in the introductory paragraph. Use sentences like ‘This essay is going to discuss/examine…firstly…secondly…’ in the end of the introduction to show arguments clearly.

-CONCLUSION: restate the arguments in this essay briefly and in the same order as those in the introduction.

-BODY paragraphs: 1.Have a topic sentence at the beginning of each paragraph by stating the main argument. 2.Within a paragraph (an argument), using ‘firstly’ ‘secondly’..to list all the points. 3.Make sure each paragraph is connected/related to another and show the connections. 4.Use headings or sequence numbers to make the whole essay easy and LOGICAL to follow/read.
Have a clear argument that runs through the essay. Show how you evaluate conflicting theories or policies or strategies or approaches.

-REFERENCE: only use academic books and journals as reference to support the arguments. ALWAYS support the arguments (and points within the main arguments) with evidence/reference, and avoid direct quote and run-on/informal sentence. Don’t just gather all the materials without logic! Explain/show the relevance for every reference. The document that I uploaded and listed below must be mainly focused on.

————————–
Abas, Husen. Indonesian as a unifying language of wider communication : a historical and sociolinguistic perspective.

Alisyahbana, S. Takdir. 1962. Indonesian language and literature : two essays. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University, Southeast Asia Studies.

Anderson, Benedict R. O’G. Imagined communities : reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism.

Anderson, Benedict R. O’G. Language and power : exploring political cultures in Indonesia.

Anwar, Khaidir. 1990. Indonesian: the development and use of a national language . Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.

Berman, Laine 1998. Speaking through the silence : narratives, social conventions, and power in Java. New York : Oxford University Press.

Errington, J. Joseph. 1998. Shifting languages : interaction and identity in Javanese Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heryanto, Ariel. 1995. Language of development and development of language : the case of Indonesia. Canberra : Australian National University, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Dept. of Linguistics.

Muliono, Anton M. Language development and cultivation : alternative approaches in language planning.

Maier, H. M. J. 1993. ?From heteroglossia to polyglossia: The creation of Malay and Dutch in the Indies?, Indonesia 56:37-65.

Sen, Krishna and David Hill. 2000. Media, culture and politics in Indonesia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press

Siegel, James T. 1986. Solo in the new order : language and hierarchy in an Indonesian city. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c1986.

Simpson, Andrew. 2007. Language and national identity in Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

Place an order today and get 13% Discount (Code GAC13)