Author: admin

Book: Understanding Terrorism, third edition by James M. Poland

Read Chapter 1 and respond to requested work

You must select 2 end of chapter questions OR select any 2 topics from the chapter each week (from the require text).

1) Your response should be at least 200 words to fully develop your answer. Defend your position with concrete examples from the textbook and real-life cases, if applicable.

2) APA citation is required.

Please review the APA style (owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01)

-APA citing and referencing and formatting, see the librarian
-Go outside the book as well and use Journal Articles that have been peer reviewed/scholarly articles- see the librarian or use the schools research system
-APA formatting (12 pt font, Times new roman)
-Proper spelling and grammar
– do not use Wikipedia

P(5.u)

Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!

Why is epidemiologic surveillance important for public health? What role would it play if there were a bioterrorist attack?

1.Why is this topic important to Public Health?
2. Why did you select this topic? What is its importance?
3. How can we get involved?

Order instructions

Examine deal structuring by addressing all pertinent deal structuring considerations described in your required readings. In a paper, critique proper deal structuring within a business context and summarize how a firm may experience maximized earnings with successful deal structuring. Provide specific examples to support your claims.

Support your paper with a minimum of five (5) additional scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

Length: 5-7 pages not including title and reference pages

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards

• Affordable Rates – (15 – 25% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism 
• Masters & Ph.D. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee 
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content

Week Seven Discussion Activity

Today we will be going on a Field Trip. Remember when you were in grade school and usually in the spring your class filed onto a big yellow school bus? It was time for an adventure. It is now time for a similar adventure.

Philanthropy is the life-line or nonprofit organizations and I would like everyone to become familiar with these sources. Please spend a day researching sites and then I would like you to email me with your choice of one site. You will then post to the Discussion Board a 200 word presentation about this site and the organization….also make sure you add the website. This will mean that we will all be able to take many virtual field trips to these sites.

Please remember to email me so that we do not use the same organization twice. I will let you know if your choice has already been taken. This will be a great learning experience for all to become familiar with the sources that are available for funding. Remember email me by Sunday night with your choice and then present your organization on the Discussion Board!

Good luck and enjoy the Yellow School Bus Virtual Field Trip!

P(1.u)

Best university and college essays, written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!

Interview a Manager at a Healthcare Site who feels confident they can speak to the experience of rolling out healthcare technology at their worksite. Create a (with info in box to present to group) PowerPoint Presentation illustrating how IT is integrated into this healthcare site. Your PowerPoint Presentation should include the following:

Title Slide including the title of the presentation, your name, credentials, and the date the presentation was created.
At least five (5) content slides presenting the answer to the following interview questions:
The area of practice and its mission.
The type of technology integrated into the work site.
The goals/purpose of the technology.
The barriers that may have occurred when the system went live – if any.
The impact of the technology in regards to workflow or quality improvement.
APA formatted reference page (minimum of three (3) references). You must include a reference for the manager you interviewed formatted to align with APA 6th edition formatting.
Citations on content slides where appropriate.
Writing should be free from grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation error

P(5.m)            

Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!

 

Critically Thinking and Writing on a Topic, Due April 17

5-7 pages, 12-pt. font, double spaced, one-inch margins

 

Write a critical reflection paper.  This paper is not a research paper, nor is the paper an elaboration of your belief system. This paper contrasts the concepts of the first paper with those of Nietzsche that we have covered thus far in class.

Notice you are not defending your own position, but contrasting points between the two; then evaluating both for weaknesses and strengths: how each may result in unforeseen problems or how each may have strong possibilities.  Quite naturally, this final paper may tend toward a positive regard for your first paper and a negative one for its alternative.  A strong “A” paper, however, will be able to be critically fair with both positions and learn a new insight from the assessment; this will be the source of the paper’s thesis.

 

Plan:

1. Find two to three major points of divergence between the revised first paper and any one philosopher; don’t be obligated to address every point in first paper.

 

2. Offer direct evidence from both positions as each point is contrasted. Whenever borrowing a text’s ideas and words, cite with full in-text notes in the first citation, e.g. (“A meaningful Life” 2) [refer to your paper by its title, not “my paper,” “my position”], (Plato, Apology 35b2), (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics 1163a 25-30), (Nietzsche, On The Genealogy of Morals, Third Essay §16), or (Heidegger, “The Question Concerning Technology” 307).  Abbreviated citations are appropriated for successive citations, e.g., (“Technology” 309).

 

3. Having contrasted major points of divergence, evaluate the two philosophies: their viability, value, happiness quotient, possible misuse, etc. Be thoughtfully creative, but fair.

 

4. Finally, avoid “I believe,” “I feel,” or “you,” etc. in your exposition—maintain focus on the texts instead of shifting focus onto yourself or onto another.

 

Grading Criteria: Total points – 100

Paper Introduction: 15

• Have a clear thesis statement. What is the major point or claim of the paper?
• Engage the reader.
• Offer a brief overview of the paper.

Textual Contrast: 30

• Have clear contrasting points of discussion in the chosen texts.
• Comment on the chosen texts; provide facts, rationale or other worthwhile supportive

information.  Don’t offer unsupported claims.

Textual Analysis: 25

• Raise objections to both of the chosen texts. How do objections weaken, strengthen, or

Falsify the chosen texts?

Paper Conclusion: 15

• Match conclusion of paper with thesis statement.
• Does the body of your paper support your thesis statement?

Paper Development and Composition: 15

• Develop one idea per paragraph with transitions between paragraphs.
• Are grammar and syntax correct?P(5.u)

  Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!

Find one company that fosters diversity of thought (open communication, employees feel free to express their opinion and even disagree with

management, encouraged free exchange of ideas) among its employees and discuss relationship between diversity of thought and the company’s

business performance based of lecture and popular business articles. The company can’t be Google and we should choose much less obvious company

for this exercise. We also have to prove based on our sources why we think this company encourages diversity of thought and explain what

diversity of thought is and explain why it should exist in all companies.

After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, select a patient whom you examined during the last 3 weeks. With this patient in mind,

address the following in a SOAP Note:
1.•Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding his or her personal and medical history?
2.•Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment?
3.•Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to

lowest priority. 4What was your primary diagnosis and 5 why?
6.•Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management including alternative

therapies?
•Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation
Case 48 yr black male with with primary complaint of Erectile Dysfunction . and worried about prostate. V/S 148/89, temp 98.4. res 22 pulse

92 sat 97.
history primary hypertension
on chlorthalidone beta blocker 50mg wt 290 ht 6.0
no other health issues in history

 

National Security

Complete a research essay on the government and national security. Remember this is being written for the president to read.

Here are the aspects and questions to address for this essay:

Identify a current issue being debated about American national security.
Explain two competing solutions to this problem.
Evaluate which one is preferable.
Address the responsibilities of each level of government, which are federal, state, and local. (Most of the essay will be about the federal government).
Make sure, per the rubric, to differentiate among the three branches of the federal government.
REQUIREMENTS:

500 word minimum and 600 word maximum length, not including references listed at the end or footnotes if used.
Incorporation of concepts and terms from the required readings.
Inclusion of facts from a recent news article about the topic/solution.
Correct spelling, grammar, and formatting, whether it’s APA, MLA, or Chicago/Turabian.
See the essay rubric for further details on grading.
Writing tips:

1) Write concisely! More is not necessarily better if the required points from the rubric are missed. A 500-word essay can earn an “A,” while a 700 word essay may lose points for going too long.

2) Essays should be written in the third person perspective. (Avoid using “I, me, my, mine, we, us, our, you, your”).

 

Add on four more pages to the thesis statement below (on the second page). Refer the prompt for what should be in the paper.

Prompt: One of the most beneficial exercises in a course exploring ethics is to develop a paper that allows you the opportunity to create connections between your personal view of ethics and the theory under discussion. The nature of ethical decision making encompasses recognition, analysis and resolution. We often don’t make a decision because it’s ethical, but rather, because it makes sense from our personal view of the situation. That is, ethical decisions happen “after the fact” as we begin to see the actual implications of the decision.

With this in mind, your paper should explore current ethical issues in the workplace that are relevant to your current career or the career that you are preparing to pursue.

• Evaluate and revise an ethics program to increase ethical behavior within an organizational environment.
• Create and systematically apply a defensible ethical moral framework to a contemporary ethics issue. To systematically apply the ethical moral framework, you must use the framework consistently as you describe the ethics issue. Explore the issue using the framework you create. HINT: This is done through the application of an ethical theory.

Add four pages after this:
Sexual Assault in the US Armed Forces
In a recent study by the Pentagon, there has been a 50% increase in the cases of sexual harassment and rape occurrences in the US Armed Forces. The report indicates that more than 26,000 military personnel were sexually assaulted in 2014 alone, with only 3,370 cases being reported (Cooper, 14).This paper will provide a critical and detailed analysis of the immediate ethical issue concerning the increased cases of rape and sexual assault in the US Armed Forces. Also, it will provide a detailed explanation of why the number of the sexual assault incidents are continuously increasing in the US Armed Forces. The subject of sexually related assault incidences in the US Armed Forces is a significant matter of concern that needs to be addressed keenly and exhaustively in terms of ethics and moral frameworks.
The discussion concerning the ethical issue in this matter will rely on the data from the recent research on branches of the US Armed Forces carried out by the Pentagon concerning sexual harassment in the military. These reports will provide factual data and statistics concerning the number of sexual assault incidents reported in the country’s military. Moreover, together with other materials, this paper will; first and foremost, define the contemporary circumstances relating to sexual harassment issues in the US Armed Forces. Secondly, it will discuss the ethical concerns surrounding this issue and its effects on the victims of these incidents in the US Armed Forces. Additionally, it will illustrate the key causes attributed to the constant annual increase in the rate of sexual assault incidents reported in the US Armed Forces. In conclusion, the discussion will point out several measures which can be implemented to counter the increasing rated of sexual harassment cases.