Author: admin

For this journal task. first use the text in Chapters 5 and 6 of your text to guide your reflection on

C or! Rogers’s principle of self-concept. Applying this phenomenological concept to yourself, address

the following in your journal: How much congruence do you think there is between your actual,

ideal. and ought selves? How does this affect how you think. feel, and act? Briefly summarize your
thoughts on Rogers’s major concepts of the self, seU-actualization. and unconditional positive

regard. What research design(s) did Rogers use in his studies? Do you think Rogers conducted his
research ethically? Why or why not? WRITER‘S PROMPT” Please bullet point answers. Please cite

from Personality: Theory and Research 13th Edition Daniel Cervone. Lawrence A. Pervin and

American Psychological Association section 2.06 and one additional resource writer‘s choice. I will
upload Chapters 5 and 6 to you.

 

Reading response
This reading response paper should address the questions “What should we know about the history of the real Africa that we don’t know (or aren’t

taught)? What does that say about the purposes (intended or unintended) of school curricula and about our alleged entrance into a postracial world?”

Your essay should cover the readings for Week 2 (Ehret, Van Sertima, Thornton).

 

Reconstruction and the Age of American Imperialism

Introduction:

Over the course of the nineteenth century, the United States matured into a country with interests and influences extending beyond North America. Following the upheaval of the Civil War, Americans tried to reassemble their country and bring the states of the former Confederacy back into the Union. The decade of Reconstruction was characterized by contentious legislation and attempts to integrate African Americans into the political, economic, and social frameworks of the United States. The Second Industrial Revolution reached its height during the second half of the century as well. New innovations in manufacturing, transportation, and communication accelerated the growth of consumer culture and changed the standard of living in the United States. As the nineteenth century drew to a close, the United States became an overseas empire, fighting wars with European powers over territorial influence and acquiring colonial possessions of its own.

In this assessment, you will examine the legal and social changes that took place during Reconstruction in the United States. You will also consider the ways that industrialization and imperialism contributed to the emergence of the United States as an international power during the late nineteenth century.

Requirements:
A. Discuss three major changes in race relations (i.e., laws, amendments, labor arrangements, working conditions, migration patterns, socioeconomic changes) that resulted from Reconstruction (suggested length of 1–2 pages).

B. Describe two consequences of industrialization on American politics and/or society (suggested length of 1–2 pages).

C. Explain the rise of the Progressive movement (suggested length of 1–2 pages) by doing the following:
1. Describe the role of religion and social morality in promoting Progressive reforms.
2. Describe two reform movements that helped to define the Progressive Era.
3. Discuss one impact of the Progressive movement on American politics (i.e., amendments, legislation, diplomatic decisions).

D. Explain (suggested length of 1–2 pages) the role of American imperialism in leading the United States into two of the following conflicts:
• Hawaiian Annexation
• War in the Philippines
• Spanish-American War
• World War I

E. Provide acknowledgement of source information, using in-text citations and references, for quoted, paraphrased, or summarized content.
1. Include the following information when providing source references:
• author
• date
• title
• location of information (e.g., publisher, journal, or website URL)

Textbook information:
https://www.cengagebrain.com/shop?catalogId=10057&langId=-1&storeId=10151&krypto=PGyZYsfcv1XxtxP5ZhiNhoxSuHw%252BbsScodmNJVrL5kZQJCCBVV0s3YXEaWJyOCqymDmotZXNa%252BCf%252BDPNXW3fnT6mhh1MM0fy0nAu9VKg%252FREdRL4OiqrTArYMSgQAkwtc

 

 

Select one of the due process hearing decisions from this week’s Areading.

In 750-1,000-words, summarize the following components related to the case:
•The argument from each side of the case specific to assessment, eligibility, and/or placement with a continuum of services.
•The supporting evidence each side presented.
•The ruling.
•The law that was used to support the ruling.

Conclude by stating whether you agree or disagree with the decision made and justify your position, citing specifics from the case. Support your findings with a minimum of two scholarly resources.
http://www.azed.gov/special-education/dispute/due-process/
http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/pdf/DueProcessParentGuideJAN14.pdf
http://www.azed.gov/disputeresolution/

”The Best Marketing Strategies are not Top Down, they are outside in, starting with the customers’ needs and wants”
Critically analyze this statement using Amazon as your case study organization.

Harvard In-text Citation and Referencing
Plagiarism-Free strict Policy
Kindly consider the resources listed in my attachment
At minimum, 8 resources to be used including the listed ones , and you can increase as you like.

**Need a high professional and experienced writer, this assignment grade has a major impact on my graduation from this module, and it needs to be professionally written.

Amazon Assignment Requirements;

For reaching information about Amazon, you may either have a direct search to Amazon’s website or look for industry related information such as Amazon’s press releases.

** Minimum of (8)resources to be used and you can increase as much as you can, including the below mentioned ones.
** Assignments should be word-processed in Times New Roman 12-point type.
** Write clearly and professionally, avoid use of the first person such as ‘I’ or ‘we’ and take pride in the presentation and spelling.
***It may sound obvious, but make sure you answer the question. A good conclusion is crucial for good marks.
Consider;
Strategic Marketing Planning &Thinking &Decisions concepts.
Competitive Marketing strategy: various perspectives
• Customer oriented marketing strategy (in turbulent environments)
***You are allowed to use any content of the strategic marketing planning & implementation Concepts but that fits under the discussion of the required statement, please consider that tutor still needs to see relation to Amazon case as well as scholarly resources.
**Reflect inside the assignment your understanding about the market mix, target markets, segmentation, marketing plan, different marketing strategies, Customer retention value, SOSTAC, etc. but as appropriate only and whenever needed in relation to the assignment case study only as mentioned before.
** You can use at minimum one supporting Appendix that is related to the case study.
***Harvard In-text citation and Referencing
***Plagiarism-free strict policy
Recommended Resources to be used by the Tutor
Peter Donovan Timothy Samler, (1994),”Delighting Customers”, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 4 Iss 6 pp. 38 – 43 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000003940Emerald Insight

Kaushik Mukerjee, (2013),”Customer-oriented organizations: a framework for innovation”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 34 Iss 3 pp. 49 – 56 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JBS-Jun-2012-0013Emerald Insight

Nigel F. Piercy, (1995),”Customer satisfaction and the internal market”, Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science, Vol. 1 Iss 1 pp. 22 – 44 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000003878Emerald Insight

David W. Cravens Nigel F. Piercy Ashley Prentice, (2000),”Developing market-driven product strategies”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 9 Iss 6 pp. 369 – 388 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10610420010356975Emerald Insight

Stephanie Coyles Timothy C. Gokey, (2005),”Customer retention is not enough”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22 Iss 2 pp. 101 – 105 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363760510700041Emerald Insight

Competitive Marketing strategy: various perspectives
• Customer oriented marketing strategy (in turbulent environments)
• Technology-oriented competitive strategy: –
Competitor oriented marketing strategy (in placid environments).
Overview of Strategic Market Management (Source: Aaker and McLoughlin, 2010, Strategic Market Management, John Wiley and Sons). (External analysis – like customer, competition, industry & environment analysis- Opportunities and threats) & Self-analysis -Strategic strengths, weaknesses, problems, constraints and questions).
– Co. Deliberate & Emergent strategies.
– Company Marketing Strategy Components, Strategic Marketing Panningat strategical and tactical levels & Marketing Mix.
– Mapping the key elements of Marketing Strategy

Strategic Marketing thinking – to achieve breakthrough results.
Company marketing strategy thinking Adoption either Vertical or Lateral Marketing Thinking !

Sources to be used:
European Journal of Marketing:
Donald V. Shiner, (1988),”Marketing’s Role in Strategic and Tactical Planning”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 22 Iss 5 pp. 23 – 31
Journal of Business Strategy:
Dale Fodness, (2005),”Rethinking strategic marketing: achieving breakthrough results”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 26 Iss 3 pp. 20-34

 

Assignment Requirement :

• Length: 2000-2500 words (8-10 pages); answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner

• Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style

• References: Include the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions

• • • The writing should be master level and plagarisim free.

Books and chapters to be refered are:
1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge 5th Edition, – ISBN: 978-1935589679, please read chapter 6 for refrence.

2. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 11th Ed. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1118022276
Chapters: 6 and 21 for references

 

———————————————————–
module-7 Academic paper

 

1. Discuss methods you can use to improve the productivity of your meetings.

2. Think of a project that you are familiar with and describe how you would assess it based on the Project Management Maturity Model. What needs to be

done to push the project to the next level of the model?

3. Discuss the steps that need to be taken to write accurate and effective job or position descriptions.

4. How do you manage the following?
a. Failure to complete work within allocated deadlines
b. Constant interruptions
c. Excessive needs for overtime
d. Distracting personnel issues
e. Delegation of work
f. Conflicting priorities

5. How would you define “good” procedural documentation? As a project manager, what would your attitude be toward procedural documentation? Why?

 

 

The Old Testament story of Noah’s Ark is one of the best-known stories of the Judeo-Christian tradition. What are the origins of this famous story? The

first three known stories are from ancient Mesopotamia. The first to have appeared is the Sumerian King List in about 2000 B.C., but it is probably based

on an earlier version; the second flood story is the account from the Myth of Atrahasis III, which was written on a tablet in about 1600 B.C., and the

third is from the “Standard Version” of the famous Epic of Gilgamesh written about 1300 B.C. The Genesis story most certainly came last, but there is no

way of knowing exactly when this version was first composed and written down. The book of Genesis was a part of the Hebrew Torah, which was essentially

complete and recognized as authoritative at least as early as the fourth century B.C.

Answer these questions in a 300-500 word essay. Make sure you put these in context using the textbook (Jerry H. Bentley & Herb Zeigler. Traditions &

Encounters, Vol. 1 From the Beginnings to 1500, 6th Ed. 2015). Use the documents as your examples.

Why did this story appear and acquire significance in several of the Near Eastern cultures? Do these references to a great flood represent some commonly

believed myth, or do they reflect an actual event? When reading, consider the point of each story and its significance to the larger story being told.

What do all of these stories have in common? In what ways do the narratives differ? How do the stories add to or complement what we know about the ways

these societies functioned and in what they believed?

 

NETWORK DESIGN IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN AND DESIGNING GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS
Why do we need to create supply chain networks ?

– What do we need in a design of a supply chain network ?

– What are the disruptions in desigining of a chain networks ?

 

EDMG240 Quiz 4
1. ________is the loss of an electron by one reactant and ________is the gaining of electrons by another.
2. In making homemade explosives, aluminum oxide shavings are often mixed with ammonium nitrate – fuel oil (ANFO) explosive. What effect would this

have on this explosive?
3. Halogens are toxic and oxidizers. Why are halogens (F2, Cl2, Br2, I2, etc) called oxidizers?
4. Organic peroxides can self-react and combine to form unstable molecules. This type of self-reaction is called.
A.precipitation
B.sublimation
C.hybridization
D.polymerization
9. What does DOT 5.2 Type C mean?

10. Match the follow abbreviated term below with it’s definition from (A-G).

A. The airborne concentration of which 50% of the tested population died from an introduction of this chemical.
B. The maximum concentration limit averaged over a 15 min period to which healthy adults can be exposed safely. This limit should not occur more

than 4 times a day, and 60 min between exposures.
C. The maximum concentration averaged over 8 hrs to which 95% of health adults can be repeatedly explosed for 8h/day 40h/week.
D. The concentration that should not be exceeded during any part of the workday.
E. The maximum concentration of a chemical that healthy adult can be exposed for up to 15 min and escape without irreversible health effects.
F. The dose by ingestion or absorption (liquid/solid) in which 50% of the tested population died from an introduction of this chemical.
G. Time-weighted average concentration limit over a 8 hr day and 40 hr work week, to which all workers can be exposed without adverse effect and

without protection equipment.

——————————————————————————–

1. TLV-TWA
2. TLV-STEL
3. LC50
4. LD50
5. IDLH
6. TLV-C
7. PEL
12. The airborne concentration unit ppm is for
A.gases
B.liquids
C.solids
D.liquids and solids only
E.gases, liquids and solids
13. The airborne concentration unit mg/m3 is for

A.gases
B.liquids
C.solids
D.liquids and solids only
E.gases, liquids and solids

Instructions for completing your Space Mission Reviews
Please read all of the information below carefully before beginning your assignment.
PURPOSE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT: To expose you to future space missions and to improve your
scientific literacy and critical thinking by providing an opportunity to formulate an informed opinion
about the value of space exploration.
INTRODUCTION: You are a member of the advisory committee of an international funding
organization for space missions. The funding objective of your organization is:
Assisting the world’s government-funded space agencies in the exploration of space for the
tangible benefit of humanity by contributing to our knowledge in at least one of the following
areas:
• The potential for habitability on another planet or moon
• The potential for the discovery of natural resources on another planet, moon, comet or
asteroid
• Climate change on another planet or moon
Each year, your organization chooses 1 space mission to contribute funding for. Your job is to identify
two future space missions that are still in the planning stage and to submit a summary of each mission as
well as an argument for why each mission is consistent with your organization’s funding objectives.
NOTE: One of your reviews will be due in the middle of the term and the other review will be due
near the end of the term. This will give you the opportunity to use the feedback from your 1st review
to improve on your 2nd review. The due dates for each review can be found at the Course Schedule
link in the General Information section of our Moodle site as well as at
www.yorku.ca/rfinger/ns1530/w18/ns1530-w18-sched.pdf.
INSTRUCTIONS: For each review, follow the steps below.
1. Download the Mission Review Template (a link to this template can also be found in the Space
Mission Review section of our Moodle site).
2. Choose a future space mission: At present, there are 4 government-funded space agencies with
interplanetary launch capabilities and for which mission information is publically available. These
are:
Space Agency Agency mission website
European Space Agency ESA
Indian Space Research Organization ISRO
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency JAXA
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA
Choose a future space mission from one of the agency websites in the list above. The target of the
mission must be a planet (other than Earth) or a moon, asteroid or comet. The mission can be in any
stage of the planning/development process as long as it is not currently in operation (ie, post-launch).
3. Complete the Mission Review Template: Complete the mission review template by filling in the
following sections:Mission Review: Instructions • NATS1530M • W2018
• Mission Information: provide the space agency, mission name, target(s) and proposed launch
date. (Year only is sufficient if the date and month have not been specified by the space agency).
• Mission Summary (350-400 words): Provide a summary of the mission and its science
objective(s). Include any other information that you deem relevant for the summary (eg, the
length of the mission, the cost of the mission, any targets that the craft will visit on the way to its
final destination, features that make the mission unique, etc.) Your summary must be in your
own words, with no quoting from other sources, and the language must be comprehensible to
someone with no scientific background. Acronyms must be defined and technical lingo must be
explained in layperson’s terms, which means that you may need to look up unfamiliar words
using an encyclopaedic source such as Wikipedia.
VERY IMPORTANT: All information in your summary must include an in-text citation so that
the reader can fact-check your statements. Each statement (or block of related statements) should
be followed by a number in superscript (eg, “Here is a fact.”1). The superscript must correspond
to one of the references in the Sources section (see below).
• Mission Justification (300-350 words): Provide an argument in support of funding for your
chosen mission by explaining how the science objectives meet your funding organization’s
vision to contribute to the “…exploration of space for the tangible benefit of humanity…” in
at least one of the 3 areas listed in the Introduction section above. Your arguments do not need to
be infallible, but they do need to be reasonable and thoughtful.
NOTE: If you include any additional facts or figures in this section, be sure to include in-text
citations after each fact.
TIP: Making a strong argument is much easier when you are arguing about something that you
are passionate about. When choosing your mission, try to choose something that you feel a
strong reaction to when you read about it.
• Sources: Provide the primary website that you obtained your mission information from. The
website should be referenced using the MLA citation format. Also, if you include any facts or
figures from other sources, be sure to reference these sources in this section as well.
TIP: A handy online generator for MLA references can be found at http://www.easybib.com/.
Citations to Wikipedia pages can be generated by clicking on the “Cite this page” link on the
relevant page, then scrolling down to the citation listed under “MLA style”.
4. Edit your work: When you’ve completed your mission review, make sure to have it spell-checked
and edited so that you don’t lose marks for poor writing. Here are some ways to get your work
edited:
• Ask a friend or family member with excellent English writing skills, preferably someone with no
science background so they can confirm that your writing is understandable for a layperson.
• Use an editing tool, either built into your word-processor or online (eg, Grammarly at
https://www.grammarly.com/).
• Take (or send) your work to York’s Writing Center (http://writing-centre.writ.laps.yorku.ca/).
Page 2 of 4Mission Review: Instructions • NATS1530M • W2018
• Meet with a writing instructor at York’s Learning Commons Hub, located on the 2nd floor of the
Scott Library. Visit the Hub in person to find out their hours.
• If you are an ESL student, make an appointment at York’s ESL Open Learning Centre
(http://eslolc.laps.yorku.ca/).
5. Submit your work: Go to the Space Mission Review section of our Moodle site and click on the
appropriate ‘Mission Review <#>: Upload’ link, then click on the ‘Submit to TurnItIn’ icon ( )
to upload your completed file.
NOTE: When uploading your file, please enter the name of your chosen mission as the Submission
Title.
6. Check that your file was submitted successfully: After uploading your file, click on the link in the
‘Similarity’ column (even if it says ‘Pending’). This should open your report in the TurnItIn
document viewer. Confirm that your file appears as it should.
NOTE: Within 24 hours of submitting your file, your work will be assigned a ‘Similarity’ score.
This is the percentage of your content that matches existing sources, such as web sites or other
students’ papers. A similarity score of 0%-30% is normal for this type of assignment. If your
similarity score is greater than 30%, you should click on the link to your file in the ‘Similarity’
column to open your file in the TurnItIn document viewer. Text that has been matched with existing
sources will be highlighted. If the highlighted sections are primarily lists of names or places, then no
revisions are necessary. However, if the highlighted sections contain complete sentences from an
existing source, you should rewrite the sentence in your own words to avoid losing marks. Revised
files can be resubmitted up to the deadline.
ALSO NOTE: If you submit your file within 24 hours of the due date, the similarity report might
not be completed by the submission deadline. This does not mean that your file is late, but it does
mean that you will not be able to revise your file if the similarity score is high. So, try to submit your
file at least 48 hours in advance of the deadline.
ASSIGNMENT CHECKLIST
 Your file must be submitted using the Mission Review Template. If you submit a different
document, a 1-mark penalty will be applied.
 You must choose a target beyond Earth, and the target must be different for each mission review.
If the target is not beyond Earth or if you use the same target twice, your mission review will
receive a failing mark.
 You must provide in-text citations for each statement (or block of related statements) containing
facts or figures from published sources. If in-text citations are not provided, marks will be
deducted based on the extent to which you included unreferenced information.
 You must provide, in the Sources section, the links to all websites from which you obtained
information for your review. If this requirement isn’t met, a 1-mark penalty will be applied.
Page 3 of 4Mission Review: Instructions • NATS1530M • W2018
 Your reviews must be written using full sentences (ie, point-form answers are not acceptable)
and each section must be within the specified word count.
 Your reviews must be in YOUR OWN WORDS, with no quoting from other sources.
 Your writing must be comprehensible to readers with no science background. Acronyms must be
defined and technical lingo must be explained in layperson’s terms.
 The Mission Summary and Mission Justification sections each have a specific purpose, so be
careful not to repeat information in both sections. When you read over your work, make sure that
every statement brings in a new piece of information or a new thought/idea.
 Your writing is expected to be free of spelling and grammatical errors. Refer to step 4 above for
suggestions for getting your work edited. If your work contains spelling and/or grammatical
errors, a 1-mark penalty will be applied.
 When uploading your file, enter the name of your chosen mission as the Submission Title.
 Late submissions will incur a 10% penalty per day. Technical difficulties are not an acceptable
excuse for missing deadlines. Be sure to attempt your submission at least one weekday before the
deadline so you have time to resolve any technical problems that may arise. If you are not able to
upload your file, email your file to ns1530m@yorku.ca before the deadline so that it can be timestamped. Please do not email your file unless

you are sure that your submission has failed.
PLAGIARSM: Plagiarism is a major academic offence and carries serious penalties, ranging from a
failing grade on the work in question to a failing grade in the course. Students who have not conducted
University-level writing assignments are encouraged to refer to York ’s Academic Integrity Tutorial at
www.yorku.ca/tutorial/academic_integrity/?g11n.enc=UTF-8. This is a very useful tutorial for learning
the important distinction between presenting someone else’s work and plagiarizing their work.
EVALUATION: The evaluation of your work will be available approximately 3-4 weeks after each due
date. Your total mark for each review is computed from a detailed rubric. A preview of the rubric can be
found here. After each of your reviews has been marked, the completed rubric can be viewed as follows:
1. From the ‘Mission Review <#>: Upload’ link, click on the link to your submitted file. This will
open your file in the TurnItIn document viewer.
2. On the right side of the viewer, you’ll see a column of buttons. Click on the Rubric/Form button
( ).This will open up the evaluation rubric, where you can see a detailed breakdown of your
mark as well as a justification for the marks awarded in each category.
PLEASE NOTE: While we appreciate that students are anxious to receive their marks, please be aware
that high-quality and thorough marking of written assignments is a time-consuming process. Students
are therefore asked to refrain from requesting their marks. A course announcement will be posted when
the marking has been completed for each set of reviews.
ALSO NOTE: If you feel that a review(s) has been marked incorrectly, you will have an opportunity at
the end of the course to request a reassessment in cases where the marking error is preventing you from
achieving the next highest letter grade. Details about this process will be provided in the Course
Announcements forum at the end of the term.
ENJOY!
Page 4 of 4