Author: admin

These information below should be about iphone product in UAE market by focusing in consumer market:

1-SWOT Analysis: foundation of market stratagy.
SWOT
Write a few sentences detailing the most important issues (this should be about SWOT for apple brand and for iphone more specific.

2-Distribution strategy product in UAE market
What is the degree of market exposure required?
Explain the distribution channel (channel members, type/number of wholesalers and retailers, how are marketing functions shared,

coordination needed in channel…) (please give an example like Apple store in Mall Of the Emirates, SharafDG, only in UAE)

The control of body iron stores and laboratory investigation of anaemia associated with iron status: A critical review

II. Assessment Scenario/Problem

should include a critical discussion of the following aspects:
• Metabolism, regulation and cellular control of iron levels.
• Pathogenesis/causes of the disorders associated with abnormal iron status and anaemia.
• Investigation of anaemia associated with iron status e.g. tests used, advantages/disadvantages/limitations of tests, differential diagnosis

of different disorders, current/future trends and developments.

 

History

Write a report analyzing the Green PaRTY
Tell philosophy, formation year and why. Give names of people in the green party. What does the party say about the role of government? What does it say about man’s rights versus man’s responsibilities?

Required Readings Chapter 11: Managing Internal Operations Chapter 12: Corporate Culture and Leadership Thompson, A. A., Peteraf, M. A., Gamble, J., & Strickland, A. J. (2016). Crafting and Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases (20th Ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book
A firm’s strategies cannot be implemented without a number of support systems to carry on business operations. Discuss how your firm or a company that you are familiar with has used real-time Information Technology systems and control systems to aid the cause of good strategy execution. Include in your discussion how IT is or can be used strategically to help the firm meet its goals.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that either supports or refutes statistical data as a means of supporting criminal justice policy. Remember to back up your argument with factual, peer-reviewed references.

Include at least two peer reviewed references.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Select a prominent figure from 3500 BCE to 1650 CE.

How has that figure shaped, enhanced, and enriched the thinking of today’s world?

Requirements for the essay:
•Paper should be 2-3 pages in length.
•Use APA format for in-text citations and reference page. Header, page numbers, table of content, and abstract are not necessary for this

assignment. ◦All sources should be cited within the text of the paper as well as in a reference page. ◾Citations are needed for statistics,

direct quotes, and direct ideas.

◦Use one inch margins and 10-12 pt font.

•At least 75% of the paper should be in your own words. Do not copy and paste from any site.
•A minimum of two credible sources should be used for this assignment. One source may be your text.

Issues concerning shareholders and employees are of critical importance to the good functioning of any organization. In an academic essay

format, compare and contrast the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation (MCC) with a traditional capitalist corporation of your choice and

determine how the treatment of these stakeholders impacts on ethical outcomes.
Word length: 2,500 words
This essay requires you to investigate the ethical treatment of shareholders and workers in a traditional, capitalist corporation of your

choice and compare and contrast your findings with the treatment of these stakeholders in the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation. Please

choose an organization that you admire for its ethical behaviour rather than one, such as Enron, that behaved so reprehensively that its

only value these days is a “whipping boy” for ethicists.
As such, you need to investigate those issues that present as ethical dilemmas for these stakeholders and these are mentioned at

considerable depth throughout chapters 6 and 7 of the Crane and Matten (2010) text. The 1982 BBC documentary “The Mondragon Experiment” is

an excellent source of information about the origins and nature of the MCC and how the underlying principles upon which it based are made

practical. This film can be found on You Tube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zMvktpKDmo . Further information about how Mondragon has

progressed to the current day can be found on the corporation’s website at <http://www.mondragon-corporation.com/eng/ >.
Suggestion as to how to organise your essay
This suggestion about you could approach this essay is just that – a suggestion. In other words, you are encouraged to organise your essay

as you wish, presumably with a view to making the best case for your specific argument. Like all academic essays, you are required to make

an argument that is convincing and well-supported by references. Again, what follows is not meant to prescriptive, just a suggestion about

how you might proceed.
Firstly, review Module 2 to identify the issues that provide the fundamental points of difference between corporations and workers’

cooperatives such as Mondragon. It may be a good idea to read a little more widely to consider the political ideologies that underpin the

establishment of these organizations. Doing so provides your essay with a sound theoretical foundation as to how human beings are

conceptualized by those ideologies and how they relate to the major normative theories (See Fig. 3.2, p. 98, Crane & Matten, 2010). From

this, good students will be able to get an appreciation and better understanding of the ethical foundation of the MCC. This is important

because the major challenge in this essay is to determine how these points of difference (ideologies) manifest as ethical problems in both

Chapters 6 and 7 of the Crane and Matten text.
The first paragraph in the body of the essay should outline the contrasting political ideologies and concepts of human beings and the

points of difference and how they impact in terms of creating ethical dilemmas for both shareholders and workers. Subsequent paragraphs

should be focussed on the relevant ethical dilemmas outlined in the text and discussion should ensue as to how these issues can/may be

resolved by adopting an alternative ethical position in the way we organise.
You should be aware that you write the introductory paragraph and the concluding paragraph last. Good students will find a strong

definitive position about the nature of organizing and allude to essential criteria that will facilitate ethical behaviour for both

shareholders and workers. Critique of both, the chosen corporation and the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation, will be essential for a high

mark.
Graduate attributes tested and developed
G1 – Demonstrate applied knowledge of business ethics and practice.
G4 – Evaluate, synthesise & critically review theoretical frameworks with other evidence to provide solutions to real-world problems.
G7 – Comprehend and address complex ethical dilemmas.
G8 – Demonstrate an understanding of complex sustainable dilemmas and the need for responsible leadership.
G11 – Communicate professionally & effectively in both oral and written communication to various audiences to achieve targeted outcomes.
Submit your assignment
Your assignment must be submitted twice as a word processing file:
• To Turnitin, a service which checks student assignments for copying or plagiarism. The link to Turnitin for each assignment is on

StudyDesk.
• To EASE, for marking. EASE is the university’s system for electronically submitting assignments, and getting them back with

feedback after they’ve been marked. There is a link to EASE on StudyDesk, or you can go directly to <ease.usq.edu.au >.
Submit your assignment to Turnitin
Use the link on StudyDesk. When your assignment is correctly submitted, it will have a red X next to it. Clicking on the X lets you delete

the file.
How to understand your Turnitin report
Turnitin will give you a similarity percentage and a report on all the copied material in your assignment. To access the Turnitin report,

click on the link ‘Similarity’. The Turnitin report may take a few minutes, an hour, or even a day to appear.
The report will almost certainly identify some copying that isn’t a problem, such as references, material you have put in quote marks, and

common phrases. If your report shows 10% or 15% copying, it probably isn’t a problem. We don’t look at the number; we look at the

assignment itself.
Sometimes Turnitin identifies copying that seems strange. For instance, Turnitin may tell you that part of your assignment was the same as

part of another student’s assignment from an American university. Even though you’ve never seen that student’s assignment, this is still a

problem, because it usually means that both of you have copied some text from the same source, for example, a book. Turnitin might be wrong

about the place you copied words from, but it will be right to say you have copied. If you find Turnitin identifying any copying that isn’t

acceptable, you are able to delete the assignment you uploaded, change it, and submit the new version to Turnitin.
Criteria for assignment 3
Compare and Contrast Rubric
Category 1 2 3 4
Purpose & Supporting Details The paper compares or contrasts, but does not include both. There is no supporting information or support

is incomplete. The paper compares and contrasts items clearly, but the supporting information is incomplete. The paper may include

information that is not relevant to the comparison. The paper compares and contrasts items clearly, but the supporting information is

general. The paper includes only the information relevant to the comparison. The paper compares and contrasts items clearly. The paper

points to specific examples to illustrate the comparison. The paper includes only the information relevant to the comparison.
40 Marks
Organisation & Structure Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.

The paper breaks the information into whole-to-whole, similarities-to-differences, or point-by-point structure, but some information is in

the wrong section. Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader. The paper breaks the information

into whole-to-whole, similarities-to- differences, or point-by-point structure but does not follow a consistent order when discussing the

comparison. The paper breaks the information into whole-to-whole, similarities-to-differences, or point-by-point structure. It follows

a consistent order when discussing the comparison.
20 Marks
Transitions The transitions between ideas are unclear or non-existent. Some transitions work well; but connections between other

ideas are fuzzy. The paper moves from one idea to the next, but there is little variety. The paper uses comparison and contrast

transition words to show relationships between ideas. The paper moves smoothly from one idea to the next. The paper uses comparison and

contrast transition words to show relationships between ideas. The paper uses a variety of sentence structures and transitions.
20 Marks
Grammar & Spelling (Conventions) Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or

spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the

content.
20 Marks

 

Labeling theory
Needs to be about 12 sentences. Needs to reference the source that is attached. Listen to the NPR program linked

http://www.thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=385 (Act 1 Pyscho Dabble), How does it support and/or refute labeling theory? (It can support some

points of labeling theory while refuting others.) some background on topic is: In this section, you’ll probably observe that not all labels are created

equally. Individuals and groups have varying degrees of social power and resources to resist labeling; similarly, other groups have more power and

authority to label someone and have that label broadly accepted. In addition, interpersonal relationships and social distance affect the likelihood of a

person’s deviant behavior being defined as mental illness. I outline some principles below. (See also the assigned reading by Tausig.)

Family members are more likely to normalize the deviant behavior of another family member. This means that a brother, sister, mother, or father will try

to explain an unexpected or socially inappropriate behavior exhibited by another family member. For example, if a son were to start yelling and cursing

at his parents, the parents might forgive the behavior and remind themselves that their son has been under a lot of stress because of all the college

applications, testing, school work, and extracurricular activities he’s been involved with lately. The normalization of deviance within families is more

likely because

in general, family members are emotionally attached to one another and have a higher tolerance for untoward behaviors
these behaviors may occur over time, and thus may escape the notice of family members (for example, the parents come to think of their son as an angry

teenager)
most average family members do not have the skills and training to recognize diagnostic categories.
As David Mechanic (1989) has argued, family members are likely to continue normalizing deviant behavior until the deviant behavior:

is visible (so very clearly deviant that the behavior cannot be written off as normal any longer)
disrupts everyday functioning and life (causes the family to miss work, school, or family functions)
is frequent (begins to occur more often)
has crossed the tolerance threshold of family members (the family cannot endure the behavior any longer)
involves hallucinations or distorted perceptions of reality (for example, “autistic psychological processes” are so unusual that they cannot be

normalized).
It is at this point that the family members may turn to the medical community and psychiatric diagnostic categories to explain the behavior.

Nonfamily members (those with greater social distance from the person committing the deviant act) are less likely to normalize the behavior (and more

likely to identify the problem as mental illness). Similarly, when family members turn to outsiders for advice, these nonfamily members are more likely

to frame the behavior in psychiatric rubrics. Outsiders to a family are less likely to have emotional attachments to the person and have a lower

tolerance for that person’s deviant behavior. They are also more likely to measure a person’s behavior by general community standards of behavior.

Yelling at one’s parents is not socially acceptable, and if observers were to witness it, they might be able to dismiss the deviance once or twice

(thinking, for example, that the son is a bad kid). Ultimately, however, they are more likely to define the deviant behavior in terms of mental illness

(thinking that the kid has “anger issues” or has oppositional defiance disorder).

Social status affects the labeling process. People with higher education and women are more likely to self-label as having a psychological or

psychiatric problem.

 

 

Here are some of the designations within Dr. Stone’s “Most Evil” scale:

power hungry, humiliation, sadistic, torture, cannibal, callous, psychotic, predatory,

cold blooded, egocentric, mentally ill, severity, paranoid, narcissistic, violent, impulsive, non psychopathic, rape, mutilation, aggressive, enjoyment

and maybe a dozen more.

Construct your own scale based twenty two of these consideration and decide if you will use:

The number of victims
The apparent innocence of the victims
The amount of terror the crime caused
The mutilation involved
The sadistic enjoyment the criminal felt
Then apply either your own or Stone’s criteria

 

Bullying in Schools
1- Create a complete preparation outline template.
2-State the general purpose, specific purpose, and central idea clearly and in the appropriate form.
3-Limit your key points to three and main points with supporting resources to two per point.
4-State your key point and main points in complete sentences.
5-Summarize key points of introduction with a call for action in your conclusion.
6-Basead on the submitted outline, begin writing the first draft of your speech while studying the next lesson. in the lesson , you will study how to write the components of your speech. The outcome of this process is a final written speech to be submitted as the final assignment 7.