Posted on

Short Answer Questions

 
(1) What are Positive and Negative Rights?

(2) What are Intermediate vs. Final Goals (according to Aristotle)?

(3) According to Aristotle, how does striving for “The Good” bring you closer to “true happiness”/fulfillment/”Eudaimonia”?

(4) Why might this be considered both a Personal and a Public Goal?

Please answer in a short sentences for 1-2-3 questions. 2-3 sentences per question.

*For question 4, please answer 4 sentences.

I will mention the pages that contain the answers.
________________

For all answers, please use size number 11.

Posted on

please see description.

 
In South Africa, as elsewhere, people lives in which intimacy, work, community and spirituality are entwined. In the case of South Africa, they are entwined against a background of a society seeking a new sense of direction and purpose. Using materials from the book(Zoe Wicomb “You can’t get lost in Cape town”) we read and the film(“Tsotsi”) we saw, show how this background dialogues with individual choices in building a life. How would your own choices about work, family, spirituality, and community change if America were similarly seeking to rededicate itself to a new vision of the future? Using the example from your Palestine paper, what would you do if the overarching issue in your life suddenly got resolved and you had to move on? (PS: Please DON’T use any other sources besides the book and film I’ve mentioned above and MUST use the example from my Palestine paper, I will upload my Palestine paper later in my account. Please also be sure to watch the film and read the book before writing the paper

Posted on

Final Summary- Innovations

 
In Weeks 2 and 3, you examined three sources of innovation: open, lead user and disruptive. By Wednesday (Day 7), post a maximum 250-word Individual Summary, in which you consider innovation from a strategic perspective to discuss how changes in the external environment can impact on these innovation sources. In particular, consider briefly how political, economic and legal changes can influence how organisations access open and lead-user sources of innovation.

Posted on

Strategic Human Resource Management (Reporting writing by analyising case study)

 
Structure of report of MetalEx that should be written

1)Introduction

2) STEEPLED (External Environment)(Note: Very deep analysis STEEPLED/PESTEL is needed. Not in one or two sentences but in a paragraph or more with strong academic references)

3)Opportunity and threats of MetalEx

4)Business Strategy

5)Evaluation of the organisation’s strengths and weaknesses

6)Human resource strategy

7)Human resource policies and practices

8)Recommendation

9)Conclusion

NOTE:

Please avoid soft URLs including Wikipedia for sourcing information.

seventeen( 17) references are needed for this question. In order to answer this question academic journal articles and text book only which is year between 2010-2015 only not old articles.

Note:
I. Please avoid soft URLs including Wikipedia for sourcing information

II.Use Harvard referencing styles only; please include page number in text reference and URL of Source you have taken. Copy and paste sentences in assignment are totally forbidden and it will create big trouble in terms of academic integrity and plagiarism. So, please paraphrase every sentence you source from any academic journal articles or text books. Also, you could use your own creative ideas and opinion while answering questions.

III. Please do not cope and paste the sentences from Case study if needed to write the answer from Case study please paraphrase the sentences from case study very thoroughly.

NOTE: I have also uploaded all necessary hints that is needed for this assignment. Also, I have uploaded very low graded report for to analyse and write the excellent assignment than this uploaded report.

You would able to write the order up to 3300 words.

Posted on

Corruption In Nigeria

 
This is a research paper so it needs to be well written, you have to write in active voice and use plain English the analysis ( so 3 strong arguments with lots of evidence )should have lots of data and information tables, graphs figures would be fine , please this paper should flow, a hook statement would be fine , this paper should be interesting to read and the paper should have some room to breath , please this paper is worth a lot and following the instruction would be nice, make this paper capture the reader, and i would repeat once more follow instructions and make the paper flow and enjoyable and please lots of data and evidence would be needed also a cost and benefit analysis would be fine i believe this should be in the paper and also talk about the alternatives what are other people saying, the format of the paper is below, and also i have attach or rather uploaded the outline to be used in the paper, please follow the comments made by the professor on the thesis statement and also there are 5 bibliography you can add 2 more and it should be academic reference( journals, justice website , stat canada). AT the end of the paper you need 3 recommendation on what can be done to solve the issue and choose one of out the three that you think would be good Please i repeat once more follow the instructions giving , am looking forward to seeing the good work you going to put on this paper, AND also i would need a 4 pages draft to this paper to be ready in 5 days , so on the 10TH of November 2015, the draft should include the background, analysis and one page bibliography please the idea of the draft is important so i can see the flow and organization of the paper the draft does not really need to have the graph so just the introduction topic and thesis statement , background and analysis please i repeat lots of evidence .

and also the paper should not begin with this, or my , so go straight to the point and please once more follow the instructions on the outline uploaded

FORMAT: The research paper must conform to the following format:

Title Page

Abstract( between 150 to 250 words )

Introduction

Background (3 quarter of a page)

Analysis/Alternatives

Conclusion

References

Posted on

Hi Hitler! How the Nazi Past is Bei ng Normalized in Contemporary Culture by Gavriel D. Rosenfeld

 
A book review assignment expects you to offer a critical evaluation of a piece of writing with
respect to both structure and content. A review should contain three main elements. It should provide a
brief summary of the book and the author’s main argument(s). So, the review should answer the basic
question: what is this book about? You do not want to linger here, as the point is not to provide so much
detail that the reader of your review does not need to read the book. You want enough detail to provide
the gist of the book. Like in the perhaps more familiar movie review, you want to tell the reader what the
movie is about without spoiling the experience of seeing it. A book review should also comment on how
well the author made their argument. Was their argument organized in a clear, logical way? Was the
author’s argument easy to follow and reinforced throughout the piece? Was it well written and easy to
understand? You should provide evidence from the book for your answers to these questions; examples of
good or bad writing – depending on your conclusions. Again, a comparison to a movie review is helpful
here (“good plot, but the filming and editing were so poor it made the plot harder to understand. For
example, in the scene where…”). The third element in a book review is your evaluation of the book’s
content and argument. You’ve discussed what the author argued, you discussed how well they made that
argument; now you must engage with the argument itself. In an academic book review, this element is
probably the most important. For our specific purposes, consider what the author’s arguments say about
ideas of the past and how those ideas alter over time. What does the author say about how our relationship
with the past is informed by our present? Finally, this is your review. Say whether you were or were not
convinced by the author’s argument and why. Ultimately: did you like the book? Why or why not?
Although a book review is different from an “essay” in which you do your own research, it should
follow roughly the same pattern. You are making an argument, insofar as you are going to make assertions
about this book one way or the other. Those should be stated, briefly, near the beginning of your review
and elaborated with evidence in the body of the work – just like in an essay. In this way, a book review is
similar to an essay even though you are asked to perform a slightly different task.

Posted on

eng 2

 
Using your thesis statement and research, present the problem that needs to be addressed with your proposed solution. Note: Your solution, advantages, and challenges, will be in Parts 2 and 3.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

1.Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion).
2.Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. (Revised from Assignment 2)
3.Describe the history and status of the issue and provide an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
4.Explain the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
5.Explain the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.). and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
6.Explain the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
7.Provide a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution.
8.Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
9.Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences throughout the paper.
10.Support claims with at least three (3) quality, relevant references. Use credible, academic sources available through Strayer University’s Resource Center. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:

•Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
•Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
Note: Submit your assignment to the designated plagiarism program so that you can make revisions before submitting your paper to your professor.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

•Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis statement.
•Recognize the use of summary, paraphrasing, and quotation to communicate the main points of a text.
•Analyze the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, logos in writing samples and for incorporation into essays or presentations.
•Prepare a research project that supports an argument with structure and format appropriate to the genre.
•Recognize how to organize ideas with transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
•Incorporate relevant, properly documented sources to substantiate ideas.
•Write clearly and concisely about selected topics using proper writing mechanics.
•Use technology and information resources to research selected issues for this course.

Posted on

Annotated Bibliography Assignment…

 
You will complete this assignment using the attached template and grading rubric provided. This assignment will be used as a spring board in the research for a final Research Project.

Topic:
Biblical Qualifications for Local Church Leadership: “husband of one wife.”
The paper will biblically prove what a particular qualification means and how it should be implemented in our current culture.

***Please make your final product reflect the template and grading rubric.***

Posted on

book

 
This assignment is for my International Political Economy
Class, I want from you to write 8-10 pages paper following the professor instructions below:

Students are to complete a typed as well double spaced book appraisal pick one book to write about in your book appraisal and also pick two other books from the list to compare and contrast with the first book you chose to write about in your book appraisal.

***DO NOT SUMMARISE THE BOOK. RATHER, ILLUSTRATE AND ANALYSE FIVE MAIN ARGUMENTS OR POINTS OF SIGNIFIGANCE THE AUTHOR MAKES AND WHY YOU THE READER AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THEM***

*** You have to compare and contrast at lest 5 significant points the author of you main book made with the other two books authors ***

***Don’t forget to compare and contrast two other books with the first book you chose to write about in your book appraisal from the suggestions books list***

***NOTE THAT ALL DATA SHOULD BE FOOTENOTED ***

Posted on

design of an automated flexible manufacturing system

 
I need a case study for the manufacturing of car rims. the project is formed of two parts, a project scope and the main report. I will attach a file that shows exactly what is needed. I also need the report to have detailed information on each step in the system. the project scope must be like a summary of the things in the main report, it is explained more in the attached file. please follow the attached file thoroughly and completely. in the end of the report, the writer must divide the work to 3 parts, one for each student because this is a group project. the word count should not exceed 4500.