Edible coatings for horticultural crops and their impact on quality

 
You should do some research before choosing your topic to make sure that you can find adequate resources. Two good sources of information are the further reading and reference sections of the recommended text books and the electronic resources at the library for literature searching (I routinely use Web of Science). Remember that you are required to use
peer‐reviewed articles for generating your review and you need to cite these appropriately. A good place to begin is to select an appropriate review that is fairly recent or highly cited by authors that are respected in their research fields.
The review should be approximately 7‐8 pages in length, single spaced Times New Roman font size 12.

Implied Warranty of Merchantability on past restaurant cases)

 
You’re doing the analysis part of the paper.

Using past restaurant cases:

*Here are a few examples:

1) Fred Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.(1992)
2) Philip R. Hochberg v. O’Donnell’s Restaurant Inc.(1971)
3) Herbert Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Company(1939)
4) Chambley v. Apple Restaurants Inc.(1998)

*Argument: Was the rule of implied warranty of merchantability broken? Why and why not?

Support both sides of the issue and clearly communicate the “why” and “why not” rationale that supports both sides of the argument. Be sure to support both sides of the argument with factual case law by comparing and contracting the similarities and differences.

Limit the case descriptions to a minimum and maximize the analysis for earning the most point value.

Advertising Messages PowerPoint

 

Read Chapters 8 and 9 of the textbook by Duarte.

Duarte, N. (2008). slide:ology: The art and science of creating great presentations. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Select two companies in the same industry, for example Coke and Pepsi.

Then create a bullet point PowerPoint presentation comparing and contrasting the advertising messages of the two companies.

The presentation will be graded for critical analysis of the content.

The presentation will also be graded on the elements of a quality presentation included in Chapters 8 and 9, images and movement, as well as the elements learned in Week Three.

Use the Advertising Messages rubric provided in the course materials to ensure you have met all of the criteria.

• Do you agree with the Marxist view that economic concerns are the most important factor in shaping the course of international relations?

 
can you use this in the writing please:
-Baylis, J, Smith, S and Owens, P, The Globalization of World Politics 6th ed. Oxford University Press, 2014
-Blair, A & Curtis, S International Politics: An Introductory Guide, Edinburgh University Press, 2009
-Heywood, A, Global Politics, Palgrave, 2nd ed. Macmillan, 2014
-Nicholson, M International Relations: A Concise Introduction (2nd edition) Macmillan, 2002

books:
-Jackson, R & G Sorenson. Introduction to International Relations 2nd Edition Oxford University Press, 2003.
-Mansbach, RW The Global Puzzle 3rd edition. Houghton Mifflin 2000.
-Brown, C Understanding International Relations 3rd edition. Palgrave 2005.
-White, B. M, R Little & M Smith Issues in World Politics 2nd ed. Palgrave, 2001.

The following texts are useful for a more explicit attempt to grapple with the theoretical basis of the discipline. All students are encouraged to use these.

Little, R & M Smith (eds) Perspectives on World Politics (2nd ed) – Excellent collection of articles organised around a three perspective view of world politics.

Bull, H The Anarchical Society. A classic text which explores the nature of order within the anarchical condition of world politics

Brown, Lynn-Jones & Miller (eds) The Perils of Anarchy is a collection of articles originally published in the journal International Security. The essays apply a “realist” perspective to the post-Cold War world.

Kegley, CW (ed) Controversies in International Relations Theory (1995) can be seen as a useful contrast to the Brown et al volume insofar as it is a critique of contemporary realist thinking.

Halliday, F Rethinking International Relations is an attempt by a leading British academic to explore changes in theory in the context of radical changes within the international system itself.

Groom, AJR & M. Light Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory is a collection of short essays summarising all the key intellectual developments in the diverse discipline of International Relations. In addition to the short essays, it is very useful for the excellent bibliographies it contains
JOURNALS:”

You should get into the habit of consulting journals regularly. You should be aware that we will look favourably on assessed work that shows evidence that you have used a wider range of appropriate sources, including journals.

As a matter of course you should ensure you look at the journal The World Today (taken in the Kimberlin library) which is a very accessible short journal with articles that look at current issues in more depth than can be found in newspapers. You should also look to clip relevant stories from quality newspapers. Keep a regular eye on the Economist also. It is an invaluable source of data.

The following academic journals are also useful:

International Relations
Foreign Policy
International Security
Foreign Affairs
International Affairs
International Organisation
Review of International Studies
Diplomacy and Statecraft


7. Guide to the Presentation of Written Work

It is important that your work be properly presented (i.e. clearly written, supported by evidence, and well laid out). You can always ask your seminar tutor for advice and support on both the content and presentation of your written work.

In presenting work, please follow the guidelines below. They may seem a little pedantic, but we want to concentrate on what you have written rather than how essays are presented!

TYPING/WORD-PROCESSING: It is expected that you will submit your course work in word-processed form. Hand-written work can only be submitted where prior approval has been granted. You should use an easily-legible font (Times New Roman, Calibri or Verdana) in 12 point size. Double line spacing helps to make reading easier and provides space for comments.

MARGIN: Please leave a margin for your tutor to comment on what you have written. Tutors will use the margin to identify the strengths and weaknesses of particular parts of the essay. The assessment sheet addresses the whole essay. Having a margin allows you to get more feedback.

HEADINGS: Please indicate the title of your assignment or project, your own name and that of your seminar tutor at the beginning of your essay. Having to guess which question you are trying to answer can distract the reader from the arguments being put forward.

QUOTATIONS: The general rule about quoting from texts is that all quotations must be identified and properly referenced. Short quotations may be included in the main text, enclosing them in inverted commas. Longer quotations should begin a new line and be indented from the margin. Never use very long quotations of more than a short paragraph.
REFERENCING: All Politics and International Relations coursework should be include references to the sources that you have consulted in the work. We use the Harvard model of referencing. Referencing is a crucial way of making your sources of information transparent to your readers. A guide to how to reference using Harvard is available from the Hugh Aston Student Advice Centre and via Blackboard.

BIBLIOGRAPHY: You must list at the end of your project/assignment the books and articles that you used for it. A good piece of work will show that the bibliography has informed what you have written: there is little point in listing books that you do not use.

Note: The submission of an adequate bibliography is taken into account in the overall assessment. You will need to reference your sources adequately in order to pass.

Further bibliographical advice is given in the Politics and International Relations Student Handbooks.
NOTE:
Markers will be bearing the following questions in mind when they assess your work:
Has the candidate:

• Answered the question?
• Shown understanding of the issue?
• Shown awareness of the debates around it?
• Used appropriate, accurate and reliable evidence, illustration or argument to support his/her thesis?
• Shown evidence of sustained study and preparation?
• Demonstrated critical insight and originality in the answer?
• Expressed herself/himself clearly and concisely?
• Used a consistent and recognised system of citation and referencing?
• Met the required standards of presentation?

Principles of Research & Evidence Based Practice Module

 
Principles of Research & Evidence Based Practice Module (2000 words)
2 articles to critique (each article 1000 words)
Research approach:-(with reference)
Is it quantitative or qualitative or mixed?
Is this appropriate for the research purpose?
Sampling:- (with reference)
What type of sampling has been used?
E.g.:- purposive, convenience, random, etc. Is this appropriate for the study?
Methods of data collection:- (with reference)
What did they use to collect data?
Interview, focus groups, observation, questionnaires, measurement etc.
Was this appropriate for the research approach used?
Validity &reliability OR trustworthiness & credibility:- (with reference)
How did the researchers ensure these? What were the limitation (if any)?
Ethical consideration:- (with reference)
Was the study granted ethical approval? What about other issues such as informed consent, confidentiality, anonymity, fairness etc?
Analysis:- (with reference)
How were the data analysed? Was the technique appropriate for the research approach/data?
Results:- (with reference)
How were results presented?
Were they clear?
Did they answer the research question?
Discussion:- (with reference)
Did the authors discuss the results in the context of previous findings?
Limitation of the study:- (with reference)
Did the authors identify limitation? If not, did you pick up any significant limitation?
Strengths:- (with reference)
Overall, what was good about this article?
Implication of the study for practice:- (with reference)
What are the key implications for practice that arise from the study?
Articles:-
1). Original research: Empirical research- Quantitative
“The relationship between nurse staffing and inpatient complications
Journal of advanced Nursing 71(4),800-812. doi:10.1111/jan.12572
Louise Winton Schreuders, Alexandra P. Bremner, Elizabeth Geelhoed &Judith finn
Accepted for publication 6 October 2014
2). Family carers
Becoming a caregiver: new family carers’ experience during the transition from hospital to home
Angelika Plank, Valentina Mazzoni and Luisa Cavada
Accepted for publication 8 oct 2011
journal of clinical nursing,21,2072-2080,doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04025.x
Plagiarism 10%.
One reference compulsory for each 100 words.
For reference, Books & Article should be within last 5 years.

Eg:- of ref model (Harvard referencing)
As a professional discipline, this knowledge is important for guiding practice. (Liehr & Smith, 2008).

Ref list eg:-
Royse, D.D. (2008) Research methods in social work(5th ed.), Stamford : Cengage Learning

Preference link for Research Assignment
• Joanna Briggs InstituteURL
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)URL
• Scottish Inter-collegiate Guideline Network (SIGN)URL
• The Cochrane CollaborationURL
• Library LinksURL
• Evidence Based Practice, MOH, SingaporeURL

LEARNING TEACHING &ASSESSMENT IN PRACTICE

 
LEARNING,TEACHING &ASSESSMENT IN PRACTICE (MAX WORD 3250 WORDS)

Plagiarism 10%.

Section requirements
1. Introduction:
Outlines effectively and clearly what will be discussed in the assignment, including an outline of the content. You should identify your place of work and also consider the context of mentorship in nursing.
Suggested content (300 words)
You should outline what you are going to discuss in the assignment.
Briefly introduce your working environment and the importance of mentorship in clinical practice. It is expected that this would be supported by the literature.
2.Main Body:

Discuss the underachieving student and the role of the mentor, identifying key qualities of an effective mentor
Identify learning style/s and their application to learning, teaching and assessment of your student
Application of learning theories for example: andragogy/pedagogy, cognitive and behavioural
The importance of the clinical learning environment
Assessment to promote learning in practice.

Suggested Content (2850 words)
Explore the literature related to under achieving students and the consequences of failing to fail the student.
Identify the common behaviours of underachieving students
The role of self-awareness and emotional intelligence
Explore the literature related to the role of mentor in clinical practice and the unique relationship with their mentee.
Discuss the range of learning styles and the ways in which learning styles can be identified. Ascertain why learning styles are key to learning, teaching and assessment.
Specify your mentees learning style and apply to your discussion and analysis.

Determine how knowledge and application of learning theories in your role as mentor can enhance student learning. Demonstrate how you would apply theory to mentorship.

Explore the literature to consider how the clinical environment impacts on the student learning experience.
Consider the Importance of orientation/induction to the team and clinical area. Discuss the learning opportunities and resources in your own practice area to maximise student learning.
Development of relationships with both the mentor and the wider team should be evident and demonstrate how this can support or obstruct learning.
Provide evidence of SWOT analysis and how you make use of this in practice. This can relate to student/mentor/clinical learning environment.

This section should emphasise the value of accurate record keeping.

Consider objective setting during the initial interview using a SMART approach

The importance of two way feedback (student and mentor)

The process of providing timely assessment, focusing on the significance of the mid (formative) and final (summative) assessment
3. Conclusion & Recommendations
This section should summarise the main aspects of your essay. There should be no new points being made or references here.
Suggested Content (100 words)
The recommendations should be what you have learned as a mentor having completed this module and how this will impact on your future practice as a mentor.

4. One reference compulsory for each 100 words.

For reference, Books & Article should be with in last 5 years.

eg:- of ref model (Harvard referencing)
As a professional discipline, this knowledge is important for guiding practice. (Liehr & Smith, 2008).

ref list eg:-
Royse, D.D. (2008) Research methods in social work(5th ed.), Stamford : Cengage Learning

Preference link for Research Assignment
• Joanna Briggs InstituteURL
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)URL
• Scottish Inter-collegiate Guideline Network (SIGN)URL
• The Cochrane CollaborationURL
• Library LinksURL

Singapore nursing board (SNB) reference should have in the introduction and main body.

About mentor:-

The mentor works in restructured hospital in Singapore. Mentor working experience is 10 years in an acute stroke unit. Mentor specializes in neuroscience and certified clinical instructor. Mentor designation is senior staff nurse.

In this assignment must have 3 feedback session- 1) 48 hrs, 21/2 weeks (formative) and final (summative).

Scenario- must be in the appendix and not including the word count

scenario

‘A second year student will be coming to your work area for a 5 week placement with you as their mentor. You have been informed that the student had been underachieving in their previous placement. Discuss how you, as a mentor, would develop learning, teaching and assessment strategies to support the student to achieve a successful outcome. Utilise /refer to the module content, the learning opportunities and resources in your practice area and further reading to develop your discussion. Conclude your discussion with how the learning gained would apply to your future practice as a mentor’.

social

4day 1375 words
Serious attention:Hello, my order will use Turnitin anti-plagiarism software to check, so no copy no plagiarism.,otherwise I will apply refund. Thanks
please MUST finish it on time,no any reason for extend。Thanks
Please ensure the quality for the essay,it is important for me。Thanks
Subject:Foundations of Social Thought

Question:How does Durkheim attempt to reveal the effectiveness of the sociological approach to understanding social life?

1500 words
French society, after experiencing the social crisis of the Revolution of 1789, saw the rise of a variety of social ideas and philosophies which sought to explain the past development of humanity and its future course. We will look the work of Auguste Comte and the impact of his vision of a science of society in the form of sociology as a discipline in France, especially the work of Emile Durkheim.

Impact of Transformational and Servant Leadership on organisational Innovation;the role of Staff Satisfaction

 
All research is conducted within a particular ontological and epistemological paradigm. The production of a PhD, or any other form of social science research, thus necessitates a clear ontological and epistemological framework. Research must also conform to ethical philosophy and standards. This essay requires students to select and apply ontological, epistemological and ethical paradigms to their proposed research and to critically assess the philosophical foundations and ethical implications of their work.

Describe, discuss and critically evaluate your chosen paradigm and demonstrate how you will apply this paradigm to the design of your research. Consider and critically evaluate the ethical dimensions of your research. Equal weight will be given in the marking to the justification of your chosen paradigm and to the ethical dimensions of your research.

Marking Criteria
The essay should demonstrate:
1. A clear and critical understanding of research philosophy.
2. An appreciation of the fundamental differences between various paradigms.
3. Understanding of the link between research paradigms and methodology, and ability to contextualise own research within an appropriate paradigm.
4. Ability to critically evaluate research paradigms.
5. Critical understanding and analysis of the ethical paradigms covered in this module.
6. Ability to consider and critically evaluate the ethical implications of own research.
NB. Failure to engage with the philosophical and ethical paradigms covered in this module will automatically result in a fail.

Learning Outcomes
1. Distinguish and evaluate the philosophical underpinnings and methodological ramifications of different approaches to business and management.
2. Discuss and evaluate the roles that researchers can play and the ethical ramifications of adopting such roles.
3. Specify the philosophical underpinning and methodological ramifications of a research programme and the testing of its findings.
My research title is( Impact of Transformational and Servant Leadership on organisational Innovation: the role of Staff Satisfaction in Banks in Saudi Arabia)
I am going to use Quantitative method.
Could you please use the attached references as can as possible.

What is the relationship between international law and international politics?

 
Essay topic is : “What is the relationship between international law and international politics?”
The word limit for the coursework is 3,000 words, excluding footnotes and bibliography. The Law School’s policy stipulates that a student may exceed the word limit by up to 10% without incurring a penalty.
The coursework must be word processed, in font 12, Times New Roman, double-spaced and double-sided. It should also state an accurate word count on the front page and include page numbers. The coursework should be stapled together once in the left hand top corner. There is no need for plastic or other covers. Please adopt OSCOLA (the Oxford Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities) for citation of authorities, legislation, and other legal materials. A copy of OSCOLA can be found on Moodle. You may also use Harvard style, if your coursework does not involve too many primary legal materials.

reasons why divorce rates have significantly risen in western countries

 
please include the following and structure the essay by introduction, body and conclusion.
*a reminder the research conducted is only based on western countries.* like the UK, etc..

Introduction – the introduction must include “my aim is to…”
please show an un biased point of view by arguing against and for, and do not speak in first person, rather state “its believed or reference a name” in the introduction provide an over view of what will be discussed.

Please use references in Harvard style by including author name and date of publishment and highlight it in blue so it can be obvious for me to find the references. avoid plagirising by quoting or paraphrasing.
throughout the body paragraphs explain what are common reasons leading to divorce, mention statistics for evidence, discuss the effects divorce has on all factors within, social, economic, legal and cultural etc….
also mention the pressures on divorce, and mention ways social policy is used to help.

within the conclusion, you can conclude whether you are for or against divorce. I preferably would like if you argued for divorce, on a serious matter. include a strong thesis statement which is arguable. i would like a thesis statement around the lines of independence women are gaining now a days, by higher education which is leading to higher divorce rates because they are more likely to provide for themselves rather than relaying on their husbands ( for example ) please make sure it is arguable though.

i will attach a power point presentation with some helpful information that you can use for the essay. please provide a list of sources and resources used following after the conclusion paragraph.