Bill

 
Paper it is on a bill proposed by Nancy Munoz an assembly woman in the the state of new jersey. This bill is under the NJ legislature website. please follow following directions for paper
Write a paper analyzing the topic/bill selected ,
paper is no longer than 10 pages;
contains a minimum of eight references;
is in APA format;
contains the following elements;
a short description of the policy and policy issue the bill addresses,
a background on the development of the bill including factual history, political issues and ramifications, the stage of the policy in terms of formulation and/or implementation,
the key stakeholders involved in this policy and their influence;
how the policy can or did become a priority on the political/legislative agenda;
a brief identification of the social, ethical, cultural, economic and environmental dimensions of the policy/policy issue;
a plan for policy implementation;
a plan for evaluation and ideas for modification of the policy issue;
the expected future of this policy/policy issue in terms of improving the health and well-being of US citizens;
the likelihood the bill will pass;
a description of the role nursing and other healthcare disciplines will play in ensuring that this policy/policy issue is properly implemented and evaluated to achieve its desired impact and added value to US health care.

Through critically analysing Charles Taylor’s “Atomism,” Virginia Held’s “Non-Contractual Society: A Feminist View,” and Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics,” develop an account of the relationship between the right and the good.

 
No Internet resources is required.
But use and quote from the book “Classics of Political & Moral Philosophy” 2nd edition by Steven M. Cahn.
You must support your points with direct references to the text
Avoid wasting space on irrelevant considerations or on vague introductory and concluding remarks.
Respond specifically, directly, and concisely to the question at hand.
Original illustrative/supportive examples are welcome and encouraged.

Statistics and data Analysis

 
Will upload the part two you wrote to you.

The one you will write now is part one.

Follow the sample giving in red for part one.

You might also want to touch on how the study will benefit a relevant area of health care.

I Googled “Significance of the Study” and found the following example from https://ivythesis.typepad.com/term_paper_topics/2008/06/a-sample-thes-2.html
Significance of the Study

This study will be a significant endeavor in promoting good work environment in the workplace and motivations (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)

Moreover, this study will be helpful to the retail industry

EBD portfolio

 

Assessment task: Reflective Learning Portfolio
Date/time/method of submission: Friday of week 14, by midday via Turnitin
Word count or equivalent: 800 words
You are required to submit an individual reflective portfolio which must demonstrate how you have developed during this course. Your portfolio must include the following: • A short reflection on the importance of this topic for you future career • What did you learn from the group work • Identify what weaknesses you need to address to achieve your set score
No references are required in the portfolio.

Was two test seminar we have to cover in the portfolio

Epidemiology Study Critique: Child Abuse & Neglect

 
Article Critique
Public health professionals are often required to evaluate a research study. This assignment is meant to build and evaluate participants’ ability to carry out this task. Students will submit a written critique of an article which will be worth 100 points. These 100 points will comprise 15% of a participant’s final grade in Principles of Epidemiology.
The critique will include the following:
• An unstructured abstract of 200 words
• A narrative with a word count between 2,000 (minimum) and 2,500 (maximum) words. Word count excludes references, tables, figures, and abstract.
Students will be assessed on their ability to …
(a) select the most important points to include in the critique;
(b) present these points fluently and in well-structured paragraphs;
(c) create a logical critique that is well articulated and supported;
(d) craft a critique that is succinct and adheres to the provided instructions.
Your critique must demonstrate critical thinking in the evaluation of an epidemiological study.
References should adhere to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
Your critique will need to address the following ten topics. Each topic is worth 10 points for a total of 100 points. Each of the 10 topics will be scored using the following guideline:
Not Answered 0 Points
Seriously Deficient: Student reflects very little learning in CHSC 7520. 1-2 Points
Poor / Unacceptable: Student only has a rudimentary understanding of the topic. Student is unable to discuss the full nuances for a study critique.
Text does not flow well and/or is not written in well-structured sentences and paragraphs. 3-4 Points
Acceptable: Student is able to describe the basic ideas of the point and how they relate to the study. Student offers little to no insight in their response. Answer adheres to specified guidelines.
Text is relatively easy to read with few errors. 5-7 Points
Good to Very Good: Student is able to discuss the nuances of the topic and how they relate to the study. Student goes beyond the article and offers insightful commentary. Answer adheres to specified guidelines. We would be pleased to say that the answer reflects an example of what students learn in CHSC 7520. 8-9 Points
Excellent: Answer adheres to specified guidelines. Student discusses the finer nuances of the topic and how they relate to the study. The student goes beyond the article and is able to discuss how the article relates to other similar articles in the field. The answer is an exceptional example, beyond what is expected of students in CHSC 7520 10 Points

The sub-points under each of the ten topics are provided for general purpose. Some may not be relevant to the study; as well, other points may be relevant which are not included in the sub-points, below. The topics that must be covered in your critique include:
1. Research Objectives and Study Rationale
a. What is the study’s primary research objective
b. What is the rationale for the objective (why is it important to do this study?)
c. Does the study have public/population health importance? Do the authors justify this?
d. Is the rationale grounded in the literature?
2. Study Design and Study Population
a. What study design do the authors use?
b. Do the authors measure risk, incident cases, etc.?
c. What are the disadvantages/advantages of the authors’ study design vis-à-vis their research objective?
d. What is the study population? Is the study population well-suited to the research?
e. What are the eligibility criteria and how do these relate to the study objective/and interpretation of the findings?
3. Data Collection and Key Variables/Measures
a. What data collection methods did the authors use? What are the strengths/weaknesses of their data collection approach?
b. What are the key variables in the study? Is the data collection method suited to their variables of interest?
c. Are the variables suited to their research objective? Are some important variables missing?
d. How are the variables measured/defined?
e. Could you replicate their study based on the description of data collection and variables?
f. Do the authors address confounding? What confounders are included?
g. Would other data collection/variables be better suited to the study at hand? If so which methods and why?
4. Implementation of Study and Quality Control
a. How was the study population recruited?
b. What steps were taken to minimize selective factors in recruitment, retention, non-participation?
c. What safeguards were put in place re: data quality?
5. Findings
a. How many participants are included in analyses?
b. Were any subjects dropped? If so how many?
c. Do the authors discuss missing data?
d. What are the main findings with respect to the study objectives and “importance” ? Do you agree with the authors’ assessment of which findings are important? Why or why not?
6. Interpretation of Findings
a. How well do the authors account for non-response and other exclusions in their interpretations?
b. Does the study population reflect the target population?
c. What threats to validity are discussed? Which ones are not?
d. Have the authors discussed all relevant sources of bias?
e. Do the authors draw conclusions which are not substantiated by their results?
7. Linking with Previous Knowledge
a. Do the authors discuss how their findings compare with those from other relevant studies?
b. Do the authors discuss reasons for differences between their results and those from other studies? How well do they do this?
c. Do the authors offer possible biological or other mechanisms which could explain their findings?
d. Do the authors account for other concepts related to causal inference?
e. Is the discussion responsive to the study rationale?
f. Does the study advance knowledge?
8. Implications and Recommendations
a. What are the primary conclusions?
b. Are their conclusions supported by their findings?
c. Do authors address implications of their study and/or provide insightful recommendations for future research?
9. Overview of Strengths and Limitations
a. What are the strengths of the study?
b. What are the limitations? Are the limitations reasonable with respect to other studies in the field?
c. Could the authors have overcome some of these limitations with difficult

Holden Case Study

 
Assessment Description:
The purpose of this case study analysis is to develop students’ skills in both theory and application as it
applies to the learning outcomes of GB500, Business Perspectives. This will enable students to apply business perspective theories and concepts relating to a ‘real world’ business scenario. Through this
case study, students will be researching and deliberating on a macro-environmental factor that has impacted severely on an Australian company, Holden.
Scenario:
“Australians love their cars. And for much of the past six decades the cars they’ve loved most have been home-grown. In that time, Australia has been one of a select group of countries with the capacity to
design, engineer and build its own cars. For 60 years that capacity has been a cornerstone of the
country’s industrial capacity. Now all that is about to change.
When the new Coalition Government made it clear it wasn’t prepared to spend more money assisting the
car industry, the big manufacturers Holden and Toyota said goodbye”

As an individual assignment, students are required to apply a case study to prepare a 2000 word report addressing the following:

A. Explain how external environmental scanning could have alerted Holden to change its business
strategies and avoid business closure in Australia?

B. Using readings from week 2 (“critical reflection”), demonstrate how critical reflection can bring forth
managerial foresight for Holden to remain competitive in their business in Australia.

C. Critically analyse how innovative thinking and intrapreneurial orientation could have saved the Holden
Manufacturing Group.

Your Case Study Analysis should follow professional report structure:
Title Page
Executive Summary
Table of Content
Table of Figures
Introduction:
Industry Overview
Organisation’s background
Body:
The three questions for report discussion
Conclusion
Appendices
Reference List

NB: Title page, Table of Content, Table of Figures, Executive Summary, Reference List &
Appendices does not count towards word limit of your report

You must use a minimum of 10 references. These must comprise:
• At least 6 academic articles
• Up to 2 text books (including the prescribed text: BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT: A market-oriented perspective written by Hans Eibe Sørensen)
• Up to 2 other authoritative sources of your choice. E.g. quality newspaper or professional journal, government or NGO website. Please avoid the use of corporate websites as these tend to be promotional and not authoritative.
•Wikipedia and other ‘popular’ or non-academic sources are not to be used.

Firstly read the articles and watch the DVD provided below, however this will not be sufficient to complete this assessment task and students are required to research independently to justify their analyses.

Response

 
Respond on or before Day 6 to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected a different scenario than you did, in one or more of the following ways:

•Suggest additional ethical and legal implications for all stakeholders in your colleagues’ scenarios.
•Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
•Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.

Below is the discussion that I would like for you to respond to: See above what you need to address:

SCENARIO 3

Nurse practitioners are regulated by state boards of nursing or other state designated agencies in which they practices, therefore, it is their responsibilities to know the laws and regulations in their state of practice to avoid litigation (Arcangelo & Peterson, 2013).

In Maryland, a nurse practitioner is authorized to prescribe under the terms of a written agreement with a physician. The Maryland Board of Nursing supplies a form on its Website for this written agreement. The form asks for the practice’s address and a description of the practice and patient population (Maryland Board of Nursing, 2010). If a nurse practitioner prescribes for an individual who is not a patient of the practice described, then the prescribing is outside of the written agreement, and therefore is not authorized by law. In addition the Maryland State Board of Nursing Rules and Regulations, Annotated Code of Maryland (COMAR 10.27.07.10) outlines the following documentation requirements for prescribing: 1) there shall be a medical record on the patient/client to document the prescription of the medication. 2) The prescription must be within the prescriber’s scope of practice and 3) the prescription shall be documented on the medical record in accordance with COMAR 10.27.07.10. (Maryland Board of Nursing).

In the above scenario, since the husband is not the patient of the nurse practitioner, how is she going to have access to the patient medical record to do a proper documentation of the narcotic prescription? This will result in a breach of the Maryland nursing Acts of 2010, therefore the incident need to be reported. Moreover, the Federal law requires that controlled substances be prescribed only in the context of a bona-fide physician-patient relationship, including a written record.

Legal and ethical implications

With all the challenges facing nursing profession, I think it is important to practice in an ethically sound professional manner. It is also necessary to balance ethical considerations, with professional values and relevant laws that is governing nursing. Prescribing for oneself or a family member may have legal or ethical implications. According to Walter, Lang & Ross (2010) the Health and Ethics Policies of the American Medical Association (AMA) discouraged health practitioners from treating themselves or their immediate family for several reasons. These include loss of objectivity; embarrassment caused by a thorough exam and medical history; tendency to treat conditions outside their specialty when treating self or family. Walter, Lang & Ross (2010) mentioned that it is risky to prescribe for someone who is not registered as a patient at the practice or facility where a nurse practitioner is employed

ENV333 Assignment #3

 
Students must choose three different questions in total for the third assignment, selecting one
question from three of the four following groups of questions. The response to each question
should be between 1000 and 1200 words. Length penalties will be deducted for responses
longer than 1200 words. The total length of the assignment – excluding the reference list,
questions, and titles – should be no more than 3600 words.
Before responding to each of your chosen questions, reproduce the question as it appears here
with the number corresponding to the numbering scheme used here. Make sure that, in
answering each question, you draw on a minimum of three different course readings or
lectures (although the best papers will normally exceed this requirement). Over the course of
the entire assignment, endeavour to use the greatest diversity of course sources possible
from different weeks of the course, drawing on a wide selection of readings, authors, and
course ideas. Non-course academic sources (including those in the document posted on
Blackboard with additional resources) may also be used. Create a single bibliography or
reference list in APA format for the entire assignment.
Group #1 Critical Reflection Topics: Indigenous and Religious Worldviews
You may choose to write on one of the following critical reflection topics. Always indicate
clearly in your paper which worldviews you are writing about, being as specific as possible1.
1a Consider the way Loy characterises the market as a religion with the way Assadourian
speaks of the culture of consumerism as well as the way that Hathaway & Boff (pp. 104-5)
speak of consumerism as a cosmology. Drawing on these and related course readings,
describe how consumerism and the “religion of the market” inform a worldview that is
ecologically destructive. Compare this worldview to one drawn from a specific religion or
Indigenous culture (indicate clearly which one you have chosen – if choosing an Indigenous
worldview, choose a specific Indigenous culture), particularly the way this
religious/Indigenous worldview might challenge consumerism and other aspects of a
modern worldview that tend to drive quantitative growth, consumption, and ecological
destruction. What resources from this religious or Indigenous worldview might be helpful
in moving toward a more ecological worldview?
1b Consider one particular religious or Indigenous worldview (indicate clearly which one you
have chosen – if choosing an Indigenous worldview, choose a specific Indigenous culture).
What are some of the key ecological insights or ideas found in this worldview? How do
these ideas compare with insights from deep ecology, ecofeminism, social ecology, or an
ecological justice perspective (choose one and indicate it clearly)? In what ways are they
similar or different? Are there particular insights or ideas from this religious or Indigenous
worldview that could be problematic from an ecological perspective? Are there other ideas
or resources found within this religious or Indigenous tradition that could help to counter
these or to shift it towards a more ecological worldview?
1c Consider any two different religious or Indigenous worldviews drawn from two different
weeks of the course (indicate clearly which ones – if choosing an Indigenous worldview,
choose a specific Indigenous culture). Write an imaginary dialogue between
representatives of each of these two worldviews. Each person first describes two key
insights found in their particular religious or Indigenous tradition that they believe make
1 Particularly in writing about Indigenous worldviews, try to be as specific as possible since different
Indigenous cultures can be very different from each other. While you may use course sources that,
perhaps, adopt certain generalisations about Indigenous cultures in a particular geographic region, be
clear when you are doing so and take care to not make sweeping statements. Similarly, with religions, it
is often helpful to be as specific as possible.
Assignment #3 Details and Guidelines: Page 2
a positive contribution towards an ecological worldview. Then, include a dialogue between
the two persons that points out similarities and differences between these insights.
Conclude by describing what each person learns from the other person’s perspective that
can enrich their own worldview.
1d Choose one religious tradition. Imagine you have been invited to give a short presentation
in a community of this religious tradition (clearly note the religion you are considering).
One group in this temple, church, synagogue, or religious centre wants to carry out an
extensive energy retrofit of their building, install solar panels, incorporate natural
elements into their worship/ritual space, and convert their lawn into an organic food
garden. Others in the community want to donate their money to support a local food bank
and homeless shelter. Based on your understanding of this religion’s worldview, write a
speech arguing in favour of one of these proposals (over the other) or put forth a new
proposal (supported by this religion’s beliefs) that addresses both the ecological concerns
and concerns around social justice and poverty.
1e Lynn White wrote that (western) Christianity is the most anthropocentric of all religions.
Drawing on course readings, argue why this is so or demonstrate how other factors may
have been more important in terms of the emergence of anthropocentrism (and
domination, exploitation, and colonisation) in Europe. Based on the readings, what
insights within Christianity could be used to move it towards a more ecological worldview?
Group #2 Critical Reflection Topics: Science and Worldviews
You may choose to write on one of the following critical reflection topics. Always indicate
clearly in your paper which worldviews you are writing about, being as specific as possible.
2a Describe three insights arising from post-19th century science (quantum physics, systems
theory, or cosmological insights) that support the movement towards a more ecological
worldview. In what ways are these insights similar to those of deep ecology or ecofeminism
(choose one and identify which you are focusing on)? In what ways are they different? To
what extent do they challenge earlier scientific understandings that may have supported
the emergence of exploitative, growth-oriented industrial capitalism?
2b Brian Swimme suggests that “the opportunity of our time is to integrate science’s
understanding of the universe with more ancient intuitions concerning the meaning and
destiny of the human” (Swimme as quoted in Hathaway & Boff, 2009, pg. 139-140).
Consider two key ecological insights from a particular Indigenous or religious worldview
(identify which you are focusing on – be as specific as possible; if you have written about an
Indigenous or religious worldview in question #1, choose a different religion or Indigenous
culture) and compare these to two similar or complementary insights from modern science
(systems theory, quantum theory, new cosmology, etc.). Based on your analysis, what
might a synthesis of the insights from these two worldviews look like, particularly in terms
of ecological insights or perspectives? Or is such a synthesis not possible (or not desirable)?
Why?
2c Consider the Gaia theory and the idea that the Earth functions, at least in some respects,
in a way similar to a single living organism (note some key ideas or insights you want to
focus on). Compare the insights from the Gaia theory to similar insights from specific
Indigenous or religious traditions (name which ones, focusing on one different than the
one(s) used in the questions in group 1). In what way do they differ and in what way are
they similar? In what ways are they distinct? In what ways? Might a synthesis be possible
(or desirable)? If so, what might it look like?
Group #3 Critical Reflection Topics: Eco-philosophies
You may choose to write on one of the following critical reflection topics. Always indicate
clearly in your paper which worldviews you are writing about, being as specific as possible.
Assignment #3 Details and Guidelines: Page 3
3a. Compare and contrast the key characteristics and ideas of two of the following: social
ecology/ecojustice, deep ecology, and ecofeminism (identify which two you are focusing on).
In what ways are they similar? In what ways are they different? Is it possible to imagine a
synthesis that incorporates the best ideas of each? If so, what might this look like and how
might such a perspective understand the meaning of “liberation”? If not, why is a synthesis
not possible?
3b. Is it possible to work for both ecological sustainability and social justice at the same time?
What potential conflicts can arise between these two goals? How can they be overcome? To
answer this question, please consider a specific case study or example (not directly
considered in the course) that you are familiar with – for example, a development proposal
in a specific community (clearly identify the case you are considering). If this proposal does
not further ecological sustainability or if it undermines social justice (or both), what kind of
alternative could be imagined that would take both into consideration? What are some key
elements that should be present in a model of development or sustainable community that
benefits both the poor and the wider ecological community? What kind of worldview might
underpin such a model?
Group #4 Critical Reflection Topics: Ecopsychology and Worldview Transformation
You may choose to write on one of the following critical reflection topics. Always indicate
clearly in your paper which worldviews you are writing about, being as specific as possible.
4a. Describe at least three key insights from ecopsychology that are helpful in understanding
how the worldview of modernity/industrial growth capitalism took hold and why
consumerism influences such a powerful influence. Based on these insights, how might the
worldview of consumerism (and market capitalism) be challenged – both at an individual
and societal level?
4b. Consider some of the key permaculture design principles as well as permaculture ethics.
What main assumptions and beliefs seem to underpin permaculture? How are these
similar or different from ideas found in some Indigenous worldviews (provide specific
examples)? Could permaculture design principles promote the process of re-indigenisation?
Why do you (or do you not) believe so?
4c. Consider either the Earth Charter Initiative, the Work that Reconnects (Joanna Macy),
one of the initiatives of the Pachamama Alliance (Awakening the Dreamer or Generating
Waking Up), or the Transition Towns movement. What are some of the key elements of the
worldview being promoted by (or apparent in) this initiative? What assumptions about
worldview change is this initiative based on? How does its educational methodology draw
on ecopsychology or other ecological insights? Does it draw on or is it related to specific
religious, Indigenous, scientific, or philosophical perspectives? If so, which ones and how?

"Zero-Sum Game" "Non-Zero-Sum Game"

 

Compare and contrast “zero-sum game” and “non-zero-sum game,” and provide an example of each. With Carol Gilligan’s work on moral development in mind, which gender do you think would prefer which situation? Explain your opinion.

I need a heading for the introduction and a conclusion. Please refrain from using websites for collegiate research. Please address the subject matter in detail. Need critical thinking and more supporting facts. Need transition for the assignment. Need a academic paper and the sentences need to be developed.

The paper needs to be in APA format.

Total possible points of 100 include ten (10) points for organization and use of language, including grammar and punctuation.