Author: admin

Question description

This Assignment assesses the following course outcomes:

HN 377-6: Design ethical interventions to serve children and adolescents.

PC1.1: Work in teams to achieve collective goals.

Resource:

Team Peer Evaluation Worksheet located in doc sharing.

You have noticed several schools in your community have been reporting failing scores and are struggling to engage students. In this Assignment you will be working with a group of peers to design a new school to serve the children in your community. The design of the school will be based on what you have learned about the concept of multiple intelligences through your textbook and at least two additional sources.

Create a minimum 15 slide PowerPoint presentation incorporating the following elements:

• Compare and contrast traditional theories on intelligence with Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences.
• Based on what you have learned about the theory of multiple intelligences, describe how students in your new school would be grouped.
• List the subject areas that would be taught in your school and describe how learning would be assessed.
• Describe how Gardner’s theory would help shape the layout of the school.
• Explore the characteristics and strengths that the teaching staff should comprise.

Please keep the following expectations in mind:

• A minimum of 15 slides (not including title, team member page, and references slides).
• A title slide with a title that clearly indicates the topic of the presentation.
• A team member page with each team member’s name.
• Use one basic slide design and layout.
• Use charts and graphs as needed.
• Limit slides to between 6 and 8 lines of content.
• Use bullets for your main points.
• Use speaker notes to fully explain what is being discussed in the bullet points as though you are presenting to an audience.
• Use APA citations on appropriate slides.
• If images are used, they should be properly referenced.
• A minimum of three academic or scholarly sources (not including of the textbook) must be used.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Group Project

For this nation to be truly successful in the ongoing fight against crime, many argue that the exclusionary rule needs to be abolished. Others argue that the U.S. Supreme Court has already eroded the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule significantly, and nothing more needs to be done. The task for your group is to recommend, as a group, a policy position on the subject of the exclusionary rule. Should the exclusionary rule be expanded, contracted, or should it remain in its current state?

Your instructor will divide you into small groups of 4–5 people. You are to use the Small Group Discussion Board to discuss and debate the issues in this task. On the Small Group Discussion Board, using the Library, Internet, or any other available materials, complete the following:

• Make a post of 5–7 paragraphs discussing the exclusionary rule.
• What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Explain the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. Why is it considered important?
• Currently, do you feel the exclusionary rule limits law enforcement in their ability to fight crime? If so, do you believe the current limitations to be too much? Explain.
• With regard to the U.S. Constitution and civil liberties, what are the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Do you believe the exclusionary rule should be kept as it is, kept and modifies, or gotten rid of? Explain your position.

For this assignment, you need to do more than just comment on the other group members’ posts. Each group member needs to engage in a conversation with each of the other group members.

A conversation in this context means that you engage back and forth for at least 3 posts each. All posts must be substantive, meaning they must initiate or continue a dialogue.

Individual Portion

Find a recent case (2011 to the present) dealing with the exclusionary rule. Address the following in 300–500 words:

• The basic facts of the case including the state, city, and whether the original trial court was a state or federal court
• The legal issue(s) the court dealt with in the case
• The court’s ultimate legal ruling in the case
  • Do you agree with the court’s ruling? Why or why not?

All sources must be referenced using APA style. You should post your individual portion to the Small Group Area, not to the general submitted files area.

Group Deliverable

After the group has debated the issue in accordance with the minimum requirements and to the group’s satisfaction, the group must reach a consensus or compromise position. You are to deliver the group’s recommendation as to whether to keep as is, keep and modify, or get rid of the exclusionary rule. The recommendation of 600–800 words should consist of a report detailing the group discussion, including the following:

• Explanations of initial positions taken by group members and highlights of the ensuing debate
• Any pertinent information obtained by group members during the Individual Portion of the assignment
• The ultimate compromise reached by the group

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

For information on Group Projects, please read the Group Project Guidelines.

Please add your file.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Group Project

For this nation to be truly successful in the ongoing fight against crime, many argue that the exclusionary rule needs to be abolished. Others argue that the U.S. Supreme Court has already eroded the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule significantly, and nothing more needs to be done. The task for your group is to recommend, as a group, a policy position on the subject of the exclusionary rule. Should the exclusionary rule be expanded, contracted, or should it remain in its current state?

Your instructor will divide you into small groups of 4–5 people. You are to use the Small Group Discussion Board to discuss and debate the issues in this task. On the Small Group Discussion Board, using the Library, Internet, or any other available materials, complete the following:

• Make a post of 5–7 paragraphs discussing the exclusionary rule.
• What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Explain the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. Why is it considered important?
• Currently, do you feel the exclusionary rule limits law enforcement in their ability to fight crime? If so, do you believe the current limitations to be too much? Explain.
• With regard to the U.S. Constitution and civil liberties, what are the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Do you believe the exclusionary rule should be kept as it is, kept and modifies, or gotten rid of? Explain your position.

For this assignment, you need to do more than just comment on the other group members’ posts. Each group member needs to engage in a conversation with each of the other group members.

A conversation in this context means that you engage back and forth for at least 3 posts each. All posts must be substantive, meaning they must initiate or continue a dialogue.

Individual Portion

Find a recent case (2011 to the present) dealing with the exclusionary rule. Address the following in 300–500 words:

• The basic facts of the case including the state, city, and whether the original trial court was a state or federal court
• The legal issue(s) the court dealt with in the case
• The court’s ultimate legal ruling in the case
  • Do you agree with the court’s ruling? Why or why not?

All sources must be referenced using APA style. You should post your individual portion to the Small Group Area, not to the general submitted files area.

Group Deliverable

After the group has debated the issue in accordance with the minimum requirements and to the group’s satisfaction, the group must reach a consensus or compromise position. You are to deliver the group’s recommendation as to whether to keep as is, keep and modify, or get rid of the exclusionary rule. The recommendation of 600–800 words should consist of a report detailing the group discussion, including the following:

• Explanations of initial positions taken by group members and highlights of the ensuing debate
• Any pertinent information obtained by group members during the Individual Portion of the assignment
• The ultimate compromise reached by the group

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

For information on Group Projects, please read the Group Project Guidelines.

Please add your file.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Group Project

For this nation to be truly successful in the ongoing fight against crime, many argue that the exclusionary rule needs to be abolished. Others argue that the U.S. Supreme Court has already eroded the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule significantly, and nothing more needs to be done. The task for your group is to recommend, as a group, a policy position on the subject of the exclusionary rule. Should the exclusionary rule be expanded, contracted, or should it remain in its current state?

Your instructor will divide you into small groups of 4–5 people. You are to use the Small Group Discussion Board to discuss and debate the issues in this task. On the Small Group Discussion Board, using the Library, Internet, or any other available materials, complete the following:

• Make a post of 5–7 paragraphs discussing the exclusionary rule.
• What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Explain the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. Why is it considered important?
• Currently, do you feel the exclusionary rule limits law enforcement in their ability to fight crime? If so, do you believe the current limitations to be too much? Explain.
• With regard to the U.S. Constitution and civil liberties, what are the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Do you believe the exclusionary rule should be kept as it is, kept and modifies, or gotten rid of? Explain your position.

For this assignment, you need to do more than just comment on the other group members’ posts. Each group member needs to engage in a conversation with each of the other group members.

A conversation in this context means that you engage back and forth for at least 3 posts each. All posts must be substantive, meaning they must initiate or continue a dialogue.

Individual Portion

Find a recent case (2011 to the present) dealing with the exclusionary rule. Address the following in 300–500 words:

• The basic facts of the case including the state, city, and whether the original trial court was a state or federal court
• The legal issue(s) the court dealt with in the case
• The court’s ultimate legal ruling in the case
  • Do you agree with the court’s ruling? Why or why not?

All sources must be referenced using APA style. You should post your individual portion to the Small Group Area, not to the general submitted files area.

Group Deliverable

After the group has debated the issue in accordance with the minimum requirements and to the group’s satisfaction, the group must reach a consensus or compromise position. You are to deliver the group’s recommendation as to whether to keep as is, keep and modify, or get rid of the exclusionary rule. The recommendation of 600–800 words should consist of a report detailing the group discussion, including the following:

• Explanations of initial positions taken by group members and highlights of the ensuing debate
• Any pertinent information obtained by group members during the Individual Portion of the assignment
• The ultimate compromise reached by the group

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

For information on Group Projects, please read the Group Project Guidelines.

Please add your file.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Group Project

For this nation to be truly successful in the ongoing fight against crime, many argue that the exclusionary rule needs to be abolished. Others argue that the U.S. Supreme Court has already eroded the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule significantly, and nothing more needs to be done. The task for your group is to recommend, as a group, a policy position on the subject of the exclusionary rule. Should the exclusionary rule be expanded, contracted, or should it remain in its current state?

Your instructor will divide you into small groups of 4–5 people. You are to use the Small Group Discussion Board to discuss and debate the issues in this task. On the Small Group Discussion Board, using the Library, Internet, or any other available materials, complete the following:

• Make a post of 5–7 paragraphs discussing the exclusionary rule.
• What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Explain the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. Why is it considered important?
• Currently, do you feel the exclusionary rule limits law enforcement in their ability to fight crime? If so, do you believe the current limitations to be too much? Explain.
• With regard to the U.S. Constitution and civil liberties, what are the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Do you believe the exclusionary rule should be kept as it is, kept and modifies, or gotten rid of? Explain your position.

For this assignment, you need to do more than just comment on the other group members’ posts. Each group member needs to engage in a conversation with each of the other group members.

A conversation in this context means that you engage back and forth for at least 3 posts each. All posts must be substantive, meaning they must initiate or continue a dialogue.

Individual Portion

Find a recent case (2011 to the present) dealing with the exclusionary rule. Address the following in 300–500 words:

• The basic facts of the case including the state, city, and whether the original trial court was a state or federal court
• The legal issue(s) the court dealt with in the case
• The court’s ultimate legal ruling in the case
  • Do you agree with the court’s ruling? Why or why not?

All sources must be referenced using APA style. You should post your individual portion to the Small Group Area, not to the general submitted files area.

Group Deliverable

After the group has debated the issue in accordance with the minimum requirements and to the group’s satisfaction, the group must reach a consensus or compromise position. You are to deliver the group’s recommendation as to whether to keep as is, keep and modify, or get rid of the exclusionary rule. The recommendation of 600–800 words should consist of a report detailing the group discussion, including the following:

• Explanations of initial positions taken by group members and highlights of the ensuing debate
• Any pertinent information obtained by group members during the Individual Portion of the assignment
• The ultimate compromise reached by the group

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

For information on Group Projects, please read the Group Project Guidelines.

Please add your file.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Explain fund flow analysis

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Group Project

For this nation to be truly successful in the ongoing fight against crime, many argue that the exclusionary rule needs to be abolished. Others argue that the U.S. Supreme Court has already eroded the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule significantly, and nothing more needs to be done. The task for your group is to recommend, as a group, a policy position on the subject of the exclusionary rule. Should the exclusionary rule be expanded, contracted, or should it remain in its current state?

Your instructor will divide you into small groups of 4–5 people. You are to use the Small Group Discussion Board to discuss and debate the issues in this task. On the Small Group Discussion Board, using the Library, Internet, or any other available materials, complete the following:

• Make a post of 5–7 paragraphs discussing the exclusionary rule.
• What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Explain the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. Why is it considered important?
• Currently, do you feel the exclusionary rule limits law enforcement in their ability to fight crime? If so, do you believe the current limitations to be too much? Explain.
• With regard to the U.S. Constitution and civil liberties, what are the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Do you believe the exclusionary rule should be kept as it is, kept and modifies, or gotten rid of? Explain your position.

For this assignment, you need to do more than just comment on the other group members’ posts. Each group member needs to engage in a conversation with each of the other group members.

A conversation in this context means that you engage back and forth for at least 3 posts each. All posts must be substantive, meaning they must initiate or continue a dialogue.

Individual Portion

Find a recent case (2011 to the present) dealing with the exclusionary rule. Address the following in 300–500 words:

• The basic facts of the case including the state, city, and whether the original trial court was a state or federal court
• The legal issue(s) the court dealt with in the case
• The court’s ultimate legal ruling in the case
  • Do you agree with the court’s ruling? Why or why not?

All sources must be referenced using APA style. You should post your individual portion to the Small Group Area, not to the general submitted files area.

Group Deliverable

After the group has debated the issue in accordance with the minimum requirements and to the group’s satisfaction, the group must reach a consensus or compromise position. You are to deliver the group’s recommendation as to whether to keep as is, keep and modify, or get rid of the exclusionary rule. The recommendation of 600–800 words should consist of a report detailing the group discussion, including the following:

• Explanations of initial positions taken by group members and highlights of the ensuing debate
• Any pertinent information obtained by group members during the Individual Portion of the assignment
• The ultimate compromise reached by the group

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

For information on Group Projects, please read the Group Project Guidelines.

Please add your file.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Group Project

For this nation to be truly successful in the ongoing fight against crime, many argue that the exclusionary rule needs to be abolished. Others argue that the U.S. Supreme Court has already eroded the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule significantly, and nothing more needs to be done. The task for your group is to recommend, as a group, a policy position on the subject of the exclusionary rule. Should the exclusionary rule be expanded, contracted, or should it remain in its current state?

Your instructor will divide you into small groups of 4–5 people. You are to use the Small Group Discussion Board to discuss and debate the issues in this task. On the Small Group Discussion Board, using the Library, Internet, or any other available materials, complete the following:

• Make a post of 5–7 paragraphs discussing the exclusionary rule.
• What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Explain the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. Why is it considered important?
• Currently, do you feel the exclusionary rule limits law enforcement in their ability to fight crime? If so, do you believe the current limitations to be too much? Explain.
• With regard to the U.S. Constitution and civil liberties, what are the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule? Explain.
• Do you believe the exclusionary rule should be kept as it is, kept and modifies, or gotten rid of? Explain your position.

For this assignment, you need to do more than just comment on the other group members’ posts. Each group member needs to engage in a conversation with each of the other group members.

A conversation in this context means that you engage back and forth for at least 3 posts each. All posts must be substantive, meaning they must initiate or continue a dialogue.

Individual Portion

Find a recent case (2011 to the present) dealing with the exclusionary rule. Address the following in 300–500 words:

• The basic facts of the case including the state, city, and whether the original trial court was a state or federal court
• The legal issue(s) the court dealt with in the case
• The court’s ultimate legal ruling in the case
  • Do you agree with the court’s ruling? Why or why not?

All sources must be referenced using APA style. You should post your individual portion to the Small Group Area, not to the general submitted files area.

Group Deliverable

After the group has debated the issue in accordance with the minimum requirements and to the group’s satisfaction, the group must reach a consensus or compromise position. You are to deliver the group’s recommendation as to whether to keep as is, keep and modify, or get rid of the exclusionary rule. The recommendation of 600–800 words should consist of a report detailing the group discussion, including the following:

• Explanations of initial positions taken by group members and highlights of the ensuing debate
• Any pertinent information obtained by group members during the Individual Portion of the assignment
• The ultimate compromise reached by the group

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

For information on Group Projects, please read the Group Project Guidelines.

Please add your file.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

1. There is currently a tendency among business professionals to endorse the use of incentive pay plans. Identify two jobs for which individual incentive pay is appropriate and two jobs for which individual incentive pay is inappropriate. Be sure to include your justification.

2. Opponents of incentive pay programs argue that these programs manipulate employees more than seniority and merit pay programs. Discuss your views of this statement.

3. Are employees more likely to favor defined contribution plans over defined benefit plans? How about employers? Explain your answer.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality