Solution Focus Therapy and Mindfulness- Can it be combined to assist client in having successsful outcomes?

Section III of paper. This is the Methodology section of the proposal. It includes the proposed research design: mixed methods, participants and sampling: counselors using these formats for clients and lookking at successful outcomes. Instrumentation and/or materials, Procedures, Data collection/Procedure, Processes to Ensure Dependable and Credible Results, Data Analysis and Interpretations and Expeccted Results, Limitations and Educational Implications/Inferences. These are all the sections that should be included albeit brief as it is just the proposal. Any questions, please contact me

Managing Communication

Select at least six primary sources from the tutorial reading and prescribed additional readings for this course. Supplement your argument with at least two references from other relevant quality journal articles. Illustrate as secondary sources. Provide a complete reference list at the end of your essay.

Literature Review

Task Description:
Write a literature review on the topic set by your lecturer

The literature review should be based on a minimum of 5 articles. At least 3 articles may be selected from the reference list in your research article for Task 2

Select and Read
1. Select and evaluate academic sources that are relevant to the topic.
2. Critically read the selected articles to understand and make notes on the main points

Organise your information
3. Identify a set of similar topics or themes that from the selected articles. You should expect to identify 3 – 5 main themes. These will form the paragraphs of your literature review
4. Order the themes or topics into a logical progression

Structure your writing
5. Introduce the topic of the literature review
(this section: approximately 150 words)

6. Synthesise: In the body of the review, the information should be organised according to the identified themes. For each theme, write a paragraph (or more) that synthesises the relevant information from across the various sources. Each paragraph should be logically linked to the previous and subsequent paragraphs. Ideas in each paragraphs should be linked with appropriate cohesive devices.
(this section: approximately 1100 words)

7. Conclude the review by summarising the main points from the review, and drawing out some overall conclusions
(this section: approximately 200 words)
Assessment criteria:
[Obj 2] reads critically, and articulates the processes by which this occurs
[Obj 1, 3] synthesises various authors’ views thematically
[Obj 3] is grammatically accurate
[Obj 3] summarises, paraphrases and cites effectively

ACADEMIC LITERACIES in TESOL and Applied Linguistics

Student name and number:
Assessment Task: Literature review ✔

Criteria Inadequate/ Fail Adequate/ Pass Good/ Credit Superior/ Distinction Outstanding/ High Distinction
Critical reading of selected sources

Effective summarising, paraphrasing and citing

Thematic synthesis of authors’ views

Grammatically accurate

Correct citation and referencing

(Note: not all criteria are equally weighted in determining a final grade )

Comparative Source Analysis

“On each page (from which you cited material), you must mark the material cited by underlining or highlighting the text.”
Purpose
In the Critical Reading Assignment (CRA) you just completed, you were introduced to one scholar’s
position on a given subject. In the second writing assignment, the Comparative Source Analysis
(CSA), you will examine how two pieces of scholarly work relate to a common topic and to each
other. This assignment provides you with another opportunity to practice critical reading,
summarization and paraphrasing skills and to introduce the process of formulating a research
question. This assignment will:
• expose you to two different scholarly approaches to a common topic.
• teach you to think about how scholarship overlaps and how it differs in the treatment of a
common topic.
• teach you how to identify conceptual problems, articulate the significance of those problems
and analyze how well an academic argument addresses them.
• give you some practice in designing a research question
Read assigned articles/essays
Your professor has assigned two scholarly works that you will read, compare and analyze. You will

Write a four-five page analytical essay
Write an essay that explains and analyzes how the assigned sources relate to a common topic and to
each other and that advances one research question that both sources answer. You may organize
your essay any way you feel is best, but in your essay you should:
1) Write an introduction.
a) Identify each source. Who are the authors, and what kind of sources are these?
b) Identify the common topic and provide any background information about the topic
that is necessary to situate the articles in their historical context and to help the reader
understand the content of the articles.
2) Summarize the argument contained in each of the two sources (maximum 200 words for
each source). What problem does each author address, what is the significance of that
problem, and how does each author address it with an argument?
3) Following the summaries, write an analysis demonstrating what these sources teach you
about the topic and how they speak to each other.
a) What are the areas of commonality (comparison) regarding the topic? Consider the
author’s: approach, problem, method, sources, thesis, claims, evidence and/or
conclusions. Provide specific examples from the source and include marked
printouts/photocopies for all citations.
b) What are the areas of difference (contrast) regarding this topic? Consider the author’s:
approach, problem, method, sources, thesis, claims, evidence and/or conclusions.
Provide specific examples from the source and include marked printouts/photocopies
for all citations.
4) Advance a research question. Restate the common problem that these two sources
address and formulate a Level-3 research question to which these two sources provide
different answers. What broader question do these sources address? How do these sources
address the question? What might you still need to know in order to answer this question?
(Note: A Level-3 research question is an open-ended question to which an answer can be
proposed based on scholarly research, but that cannot be answered definitively. See the
“Levels of Arguability Worksheet” that is posted to the MMW Website under Reference
Handouts).
Note about using quotations: You may use quotations in this assignment, but use them
judiciously and be sure to cite appropriately.
__________________________________________________________________
What to turn in:
___ Your four-to-five-page Comparative Source Analysis paper in MLA format
___ Labeled photocopies/printouts of title pages and all other pages from which you have cited
material. On each page, you must mark the material cited by underlining or highlighting the
text. You must also write the name of the author on the top of each page.
___ Works Cited Page in correct MLA format
___ Your graded Critical Reading Assignment
___ Print and submit the CSA grading rubric with your paper
___ Submit the same version of your Comparative Source Analysis paper (excluding Works Cited
page) to Turnitin.com by midnight of the day it is due in section

Research Paper

A picture sample of the resource that i also required to submit for this assignment, the references should be consisted of two from the reading list, and 3 from the academic resource, at last, kindly provide a document which could show where the references come from( 5.pic.jpg is the sample), and the reading list is mostly about topic 1, so just do the topic 1 would be easy.

Evidence Base Practice

Evidence base practice
Formulate an evidence based clinical question using PICO(population,Internavention, Comparison/NONE and outcome) and FACET analysis

Recruitment and Selection Report

Selection criteria Resume Telephone screening Application form Work sample test 1: _________ Work sample test 2: _________ Pen and paper test 1: _________ Pen and paper test 2: _________ Selection interview 1: _________ Selection interview 2: _________ Reference check Other: : _______ Other: : _______
Criteria 1:

 

 

                       
Criteria 2:

 

 

                       
Criteria 3:

 

 

                       
Criteria 4:

 

 

                       
Criteria 5:

 

 

                       
Criteria 6:

 

 

                       
Criteria 7:

 

 

                       
Criteria 8: