‘Norms’ as understood by traditional criminological theory are problematic in the understanding of the ‘problem of crime’ critically discuss.

3500 word essay.
‘Norms’ as understood by traditional criminological theory are problematic in the understanding of the ‘problem of crime’ critically discuss.

Concerns the work of Foucault. Power-knowledge , panopticism, constraint (must include some of Don Crewe’s ideas in , becoming criminal, his book) how do norms come about? And why do some people’s norms come to have more value than others?
How do these issues cause problems in understanding crime?