Managing the Internet of Things: Is it a strategic tool?

Project/ Courseworkfor:

Business ProjectsInvolvingIS/IT

Coursework (Project)Title: Managingthe InternetofThings:Isit a strategic tool?

Wordlimit:1400–1600words.

 
Pleasedownload thearticles andstudythese articlescarefully;anddofurtherresearchpreferably usingrefereedjournalarticles.

Please providea Report(Essay) fromyour findings(understanding) basedontheresearch that you haveperformedtoanswertheresearch question: Is theInternetofThingscriticaltobusiness success andpossiblytobusiness Survival? Please ensurethatyourrecommendations are based
onsystematicinvestigationof thesubject area.

Structure of the essay
Question: Is theInternetofThings(IoT) criticaltobusinesssuccess andpossiblytobusiness Survival?

Introduction (250 words around)
• The aim of this essay
• Little definitions
• The trend of IoT nowadays
• Why IoT so important ?
• 3-4 arguments (state what are they) will be discussed in this essay

Main body (3-4 argument points)(1000 words around)
Question: Is theInternetofThingscriticaltobusinesssuccess andpossiblytobusiness Survival?
• Must read the 4 journals that given from the brief, use the arguments in the journal
• Arguments can also from further research
• Give examples, evidence on every points
• “Cars stream data” (new products) used asexample which is from (MichaelE.Porter,andJamesE.Heppelmann,‘How Smart,Connected ProductsAre TransformingCompanies’HarvardBusinessReview,October2015(Vol.93 Issue 10),p96-114.)
• Financial performance use system to set the standard to avoid the accidents, and could save the data clearly.
Limitation and recommendation (100 words around)
• Less communication with people, so team work might fail (reference)
• How to improve?

Conclusion (200 words around)
• Agree or not agree the question?

 16-17 references are needed (Harvard style), include 4 journals that mentioned above
 Show the understanding of the arguments
 Be critical
 Around 1450 words

Sampling and Survey Research in Quantitative Designs

 

Preparing an Annotated Outline

An outline is the scaffold upon which you build your paper. You probably already use a mental outline when you plan a paper, perhaps without even being aware of it. Writing the outline can give you a visualization of your plan. An outline provides both focus and direction for the paper, shows where relevant points and arguments should be made, and identifies areas where more supportive evidence is needed.

What is an annotated outline?

As you are writing a research paper, your paper is built around the research findings that you located in your search.

When you prepare an annotated outline, you will note the research that supports each section of the paper. This will help you see any areas that need further research to support them.

The following example may help support the transition of your paper from a collection of research notes to a fully developed paper.

Suppose the research topic you chose was the relation of childhood bullying to self-esteem. The title of your paper is: Self-esteem’s relationship to childhood bullying.

When researching the paper, you found conflicting research results. Some research showed that children with low self-esteem tended to bully others, while other research showed that children with extremely high self-esteem were bullies. Looking closer, you began to see that this research could be divided into studies investigating different variables, such as gender, age, and ethnic background. Now, you want to turn this into a research report.

An annotated outline might look like this (all citations are fictional):

Topic: The relationship between childhood bullying and self-esteem: Too much or too little?

A. Overview of childhood bullying

1. Definitions of bullying (Simpson, 2010; O’Connor, 2008)

2. Types of bullying (Yang, 2009; Sinisi, 2011)

B. Self-esteem in childhood

1. Definitions of self-esteem (Whitefield, 2009)

2. Impact of self-esteem on behavior in childhood (Liebermann, 2010)

C. Research on the relation of self-esteem to bullying in childhood

1. Gender, self-esteem, and childhood bullying

a.Self-esteem and same gender bullying

(1) Self-esteem in boys bullying boys (Pryzborski, 2012)

(2) Self-esteem in girls bullying girls

b. Self-esteem in opposite gender or non-gender specific bullying in childhood (no research found)

2. Age, self-esteem in childhood bullying

a. Self-esteem and bullying from 6-9 (Brennan, 2011)

b. Self-esteem and bullying from 9-12 (Mendez, 2010; Lee, 2011)

3. Family structure, self-esteem and childhood children

a. Self-esteem and bullying in children in single parent families (Shams, 2012)

b. Self-esteem and bulling in children in dual parent families (Mugaddam, 2011)

4. Ethnicity, self-esteem and childhood bullying

a. Inter-ethnic bullying and self-esteem (Jacinto, 2009; Akbarzadeh, 2010)

b. Intra-ethnic bullying and self-esteem (Lawrence, 2011)

D. Conclusions

E. Summary and suggestions for future studies

Preparing an annotated outline in this way will give you a way to organize and clarify your plans. Additionally, it gives your instructor a chance to provide feedback on the proposed structure of the paper before you begin to write. You can also see which subtopics you need to research further before proceeding with the final draft.

Assignment

For this task, you will prepare an annotated outline comparing the different types of sampling techniques that you read about in the Jackson and Trochim et al. readings for this week.

Headings for the outline should be divided between probability and nonprobability sampling. Each sampling technique should be described, including when it is best to use the particular method, identify the question type for the particular technique, identify the best method to apply to each technique, and list the type of quantitative design that best fits with the sampling technique.

Length: 5 pages

Your annotated outline should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to the topic.

Research Essay

 
Length and format: 4

5 pages. The title page and reference page are also required, but they should
not be factored into the 4

5 page length of the essay. It should also be double spaced, written in
Times New Roman, and 12 font. Essay should conform to APA
formatting and citation style.
Please
note that the

Annotative Bibliography

 
Write an annotative bibliography that includes a cover page and 20 references (not older than 7 years) that covers the topic of the “The Impact of staff turnover on organizational effectiveness and employee performance”. This assignment must have 15 peer reviewed articles and 5 books related to the topic. The format for this assignment is APA Times New Roman 12 font double spaced. All references should not be older than seven (7) years old.

Culturally Relevant Pedagogy

Please note that I am requesting revisions to Chapter 3. I need two additional pages on qualitative research, because one of the writers I had in the past, did not give me the correct information. Please note that I only want the preferred writer that I have indicated. I will upload directions and documents for this assignment.

narrative bibliography

 
AMA referencing style
I wrote a annotated bibliography for my research topic and it will be uploaded now I just need a narrative bibliography via AMA style and to follow the provided rules in the ex
ABSTRACT
Objective: To describe and discuss the process used to write a narrative review of the literature for publication in
a peer-reviewed journal. Publication of narrative overviews of the literature should be standardized to increase
their objectivity.
Background: In the past decade numerous changes in research methodology pertaining to reviews of the literature
have occurred. These changes necessitate authors of review articles to be familiar with current standards in the
publication process.
Methods: Narrative overview of the literature synthesizing the findings of literature retrieved from searches of
computerized databases, hand searches, and authoritative texts.
Discussion: An overview of the use of three types of reviews of the literature is presented. Step by step instructions
for how to conduct and write a narrative overview utilizing a ‘best-evidence synthesis’ approach are discussed,
starting with appropriate preparatory work and ending with how to create proper illustrations. Several resources
for creating reviews of the literature are presented and a narrative overview critical appraisal worksheet is
included. A bibliography of other useful reading is presented in an appendix.
Conclusion: Narrative overviews can be a valuable contribution to the literature if prepared properly. New and
experienced authors wishing to write a narrative overview should find this article useful in constructing such a
paper and carrying out the research process. It is hoped that this article will stimulate scholarly dialog amongst
colleagues about this research design and other complex literature review methods. (J Chiropr Med 2006;5:101–
117)
Key Indexing Terms: Review Literature; Authorship; Peer Review, research; Manuscripts; Metaanalysis
Clinical Update
101 0899-3467/Clinical Update/1002-049$3.00/0
JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by National University of Health Sciences
INTRODUCTION
Background
The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss
the research design known as a review of the literature
and to delineate how to write a particular variety
of this research design, the narrative overview of
the literature. Another intention of this article is to
provide educational information and assistance for
those who have not yet published a literature review
and to decrease potential author frustration
that can arise during the peer review process. It is
important to note that the general classification of
’literature review’ has three varieties: narrative review,
qualitative systematic review and quantitative
systematic review. Each will be addressed in this
article. However, the primary focus of this article
will be on the writing of a narrative review.
A literature review is a type of research article published
in a professional peer-reviewed journal. The
purpose of a literature review is to objectively report
the current knowledge on a topic and base this
summary on previously published research.1 A literature
review provides the reader with a comprehensive
overview and helps place that information
into perspective.2
The literature review research design is different
from other research designs because rather than
patients, data to write the report are collected from
the published literature.3,4 These full length articles
provide a new conclusion to the literature, not the
brief summary of literature that is given typically in
the introduction or discussion sections of other research
designs.2,5 In creating a literature review, the
author searches through the literature, retrieves numerous
sources of information and synthesizes the
findings of all relevant sources into one article.2,3,6
Thus, a vast amount of information is brought together
and written in a manner in which the reader
can clearly understand the topic.
There are several reasons to read reviews of the
literature. For the clinician, they can save valuable
time when reviewing or searching for information
about patient care by condensing a great amount of
information into a few pages.1,6,7 The clinician can
read one paper instead of sifting through the whole
of the literature to find the answer to a clinical
question; the author of the literature review has
already done most of this work for him.

health pomotion

 
Select and read a research based article from 2014 or 2015 among those published in any of the following periodicals:
American Journal of Health promotion
American Journal of Public Health
Health Education and Behavior
Health Education Research
Health Education Practice
Journal of Health Education
Journal of School Health
Write a summary of no longer than two double spaced page in length about this research.
Each review should summarize the purpose of the study,what was done,the principal findings, and conclusions.You should comment on why the article is important
for health education and what you have learned from reading the article.Attach a copy of the article.

Research in Motion specifically with an eye toward technology product development

 
Research the history of RIM, specifically with an eye toward technology product development.

Your research should lead to answers to the following questions.

1. What were some of the challenges that RIM faced to protect its intellectual property, and how did RIM handle those challenges?
2. What were some of the industry factors that influenced RIM?
3. Apply as many TCOs as you can to the RIM (below).

TCOs are terminal course objectives and they are as follows:

TCO A Given a company situation be able to describe the industry dynamics of technological innovation

TCO B Given a company situation be able to determine whether and how to protect its technological innovations.

TCO C Given an organizational and industry context, identify the core technological competencies of the organization.

TCO D Given an organizational context, develop a plan to increase the innovative capabilities of the organization both through collaboration strategies and internal innovation.

TCO E Given information about a company’s industry and organization, formulate a technological innovation strategy through its

new product development strategy.
TCO F Given an organizational and industry context, identify and suggest a deployment strategy that will facilitate the success
of a technologically driven organization.