what can be done to remedy the injustice

(For your case) what can be done to remedy the injustice, who should do it, and why?
Complete an essay of 2,000 words which makes an argued suggestion for remedying the injustice.

Your introduction will state what the injustice is you will suggest a remedy for, and how it links micro, mess, and macro levels.
Your argumentation for the remedy should use Ruggie’s framework as well as ethical theories. You should also include a critical discussion of your suggested remedy: (for example) how would improve the situation, what could it not do, on what contingencies does success depend, what is the timeframe, who does what, on who does this impact (and how)?
Marking Criteria Essay
Marks allocated to criteria:

Application of Ruggie’s framework

The essay applies Ruggie’s framework to the case and the suggested remedy
20
Discussion of ethical theories

The essay discusses and applies relevant ethical theories to the case and the suggested
remedy
30
Discussion of remedy

The essay includes a critical discussion of the suggested remedy
30
Clarity of structure

The essay is well organised and logically constructed to achieve synthesis while being mindful of the needs of the reader 10
Writing

The essay is clearly written, spell checked and grammatically sound, and referenced appropriately using Harvard Style Referencing 10

Equity and Trust

 
Question:
‘The beneficiary principle has hampered the development of trusts law in England and Wales for over two centuries; it is too rigid and enforced far too strictly. Until the rules surrounding it are relaxed then there cannot be any flexibility with respect to private purpose trusts in this jurisdiction.’
Discuss this statement.

i am in my second year undergraduate degree, so therefore need an excellent answer to the above question. thoroughly discussed. (i need oscola referencing method).

private law and public law in the protection of enviroment . Their advantages and disadvatanges. The specific case/evidence to illustrate answer

 
Essay question: Explain how both private law and public law can help in the protection of the environment, critically analyse the degree either has advantages or disadvantages in achieving this objective. You are strongly recommended to illustrate your answer with reference just one specific area of application.
Personal requirement that you have to cover all these ideas below in essay and fulfil one real case to illustrate
Answer the question:
Definition of private and public environmental law.
What content of these law involving the environmental protection?
How can these law be implemented to achieve the objective?
Analysing private law and pubic law advantages and disadvantage can be happened during achieving the objective
Illustrate the mechanism of private and public law in the protection of the environment by an empirical example or specific case aiming to clarify their application in reality.

Review of 5 theories of justice

 
Instructions:
Write a one page review of each of the following theories of justice: John Rawls’s Justice as Fairness; Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach; Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach; Robert Nozick’s Libertarian theory; and Michael Walzer’s spheres of justice. (5 reviews total)

A review consists of a brief summary of the theory’s central thesis/argument and a critical evaluation of it. Each review consists of thoughtful responses to the following questions:
a. What are the main ideas?
b. What are the key concepts and how are they defined and
conceptualized?
c. What are the main supporting arguments for these ideas articulated by the authors?

Tort Law

Assignment 2015
“It was not until 1932 that the limited notion of the duty of care in negligence expressed in the earlier case law was expanded into the notions of closeness, proximity and neighbourhood that define the modern duty of care.” Discuss this statement. In your answer you should explain the approach of the courts in determining the existence of a duty of care prior to 1932 and how, on a doctrinal level,Donoghue v Stevenson changed that.

• word limit: 1500 words, excluding footnotes and bibliography
• font: Times New Roman point 12
• line spacing: 1.5
• marks will be awarded for clarity of expression, grammar, punctuation, syntax, structure and layout, evidence of wide reading, and proper use of the Oxford Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities

Below are the pre-1932 cases, they will form the basis of your assignment and you will need to understand the facts of the cases, the rules of law applied, and
the rationale for the rulings:

1. Langridge v Levy 1837
2. Winterbottom v Wright 1842
3. Longmeid v Holliday 1851
4. George v Skivington 1869
5. 5- Heaven v Pender 1883
6. 6- Derry v Peek 1889
7. 7- Le Lievre v Gould 1893
8. 10- Blacker v Lake & Elliot Ltd 1912

human rights and global justice

 
‘The international human rights system does not adequately protect human rights because, as an international system, it simply cannot tailor its responses to specific situations. Local context is ignored in order to establish global principles.’
Critically analyse this statement with reference to material from two of the following three topics: Freedom of Religion (Week 3); Right to Health (Week 9) and Enforcing Human Rights – Part I (Week 10). You may refer to other relevant course material in your answer

Charter of Rights

 
In what ways do liberty and democracy come into conflict with each other in the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms? In what ways do liberty and democracy reinforce each other in the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Is the Charter fundamentally anti-democratic? Why or why
not?

Insolvency Law

 
1- Oscala referencing style.
2- The word count (3300) is excluded the footnotes and bibliography.
______________________________________________
The existing law allows a creditor, by private agreement with the debtor, to promote the priority of its claim over and above those of the debtor’s unsecured creditors. The economic efficiency of the recognition of secured credit has been intensely contested in academic writing both in the United States and elsewhere.
To what extent is the recognition of secured credit economically efficient.

Final form

 
It is a history class about the early American history.
Did this class change your perspective on History?

Do you now have a favorite early American History time period (i.e. French & Indian, American Revolution, War of 1812, Civil War, etc).
no sources are required
What did you enjoy about the class?

What would you like to see added?

Did you enjoy the choice of having traditional questions or picking a character? (for this question, please pick the traditional questions)

equity and trust law

 
UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON – SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND LAW

Coursework Assessment Details and Instructions

Module Code: LA6001

Module Title: Equity and Trusts
Percentage contribution to overall Module Mark: 50%

Word Length: max 3,000 words
DEADLINE DATE: To be submitted to TURNITIN any time beforehand but NO LATER than Wednesday 16th December 2015 by 3.00 pm AND Students should also submit a hard copy NO LATER than Wednesday 16th December 2015 by 3.00 p.m.

Students are required to undertake BOTH submissions.

PLEASE ENSURE YOU TYPE YOUR STUDENT ID NUMBER AT THE TOP OF THE FIRST PAGE OF YOUR COURSEWORK – NOT YOUR NAME
** Turnitin Information: Submit within website for the module on MOODLE
PLEASE NOTE:

• Students are required to submit an electronic copy of their coursework to the Turnitin assignment facility which is located within the website for the module on Moodle.
• Students are required to keep for their records a copy of the first page only of the Turnitin digital receipt. The digital receipt is automatically sent to your mail inbox in the corresponding section for the module on Moodle.
• Students should also submit a hard copy of their coursework.

WARNING – PLAGIARISM AND COLLUSION:
You are reminded that it is a breach of University Assessment regulations to copy or use another person’s work without proper acknowledgement. It is also a breach of regulations for two or more students to present the same or substantially similar piece of work. Any student who is found to be in breach of assessment regulations will be subject to an appropriate penalty (ranging from failure of the relevant unit to expulsion from the University).
A breach of assessment regulations cannot be excused by ignorance or external pressures.

No part of your work, except where clearly quoted and referenced (ie: correct use of quotation marks and footnotes etc.), may be copied from material belonging to any other person. You should employ a consistent referencing system throughout your work. eg:

Books: author, title, place of publication, publisher and date
Articles: author, title, journal, volume, year and first and last page numbers
Edited works: author, title of chapter followed by “in” editor(s), name of the work, place of publication, publisher, date and first and last page numbers of the chapter
Quotations: require the above detail plus appropriate page numbers

For further information about plagiarism and collusion, please consult your Programme Handbook or your Academic Guidance Tutor. For information on referencing, please consult the Study Skills Handbook.

For guidance on plagiarism and collusion from online sources, check the originality report of your Turnitin submission.
This piece of coursework will be assessed by reference to the following criteria:
1. Describe, apply and analyse principles of Equity and trusts;
2. Draw with confidence on case law and statutory provisions;
3. Demonstrate the ability to identify and address key legal issues through the application of appropriate problem solving skills;
4. Demonstrate an understanding of the specific nature of legal reasoning within the field of Equity and deploy this in providing advice;
5. Explain and apply the principles governing the courts’ approach to equitable remedies;
6. Demonstrate and apply an understanding of how the courts ascertain when an express private trust has come into existence;
7. Explain and apply the principles determining the complete and incomplete constitution of gifts and trusts, using appropriate equitable maxims.

This coursework assessment is designed to allow students to show how the following learning outcomes have been achieved:

Knowledge:

1. Describe and Analyse the principles and remedies of Equity and trusts

Thinking skills:

2. Examine in detail and explain judicial decisions in the field of Equity and trusts, set as specific case studies

Subject-based practical skills:

3. Apply equitable rules, principles and remedies in a creative manner to solve problems
4. Formulate well-reasoned and practice advice to ‘client problems’.

Instructions to Students:
PLEASE NOTE: Assessments MUST be properly referenced and MUST include a bibliography. Adequacy of referencing will form part of the marking criteria.

Candidates should answer ALL three questions. Each question carries equal marks.

• In June 2015, Butlers, a large Liverpool based business, hired a cargo ship – The Rodney – to Conways, a London based firm of oil shippers, for a period of twelve months. Payment for The Rodney was to be on a monthly basis. Payment for the hire of the ship for the first five months is now considerably overdue and Butlers have commenced legal proceedings against Conways for their non-payment of the debt. However, Butlers has recently heard that Conways is facing serious financial difficulties, due to fluctuations in the price of oil. Conways had a serious drop in its profits for the last financial year. Butlers fear that Conways may dissipate all the assets remaining in its bank accounts in London and Manchester before satisfying Butlers’ future court judgment. Butlers have been informed that A.PB Oil Ltd has paid a large sum of money directly into Conways’ bank account in London as an advance payment for its latest shipment of oil.

Advise Butlers on any action it may take to prevent Conways from frustrating execution of the court judgment which Butlers is likely to obtain.

• Haroon, a wealthy businessman, used to be a very keen backgammon player. He retired last year and handed over his business interests to his children. Upon retirement he purported to make the following ‘trust’:

‘I hereby transfer to Ravi and Satchin, the senior members of the Wanstead Backgammon Club, £250,000, to be held on trust for the purpose of making such grants as they shall in their absolute discretion see fit to deserving members and ex-members of the Club’.

Haroon has recently lost all interest in Backgammon. He regrets his attempt to create a ‘trust’ and seeks your advice as to whether the disposition is valid. If possible Haroon wishes to reclaim the £250,000 from which Ravi and Satchin have not yet made any grants.

Haroon also wishes to loan £200,000 to his daughter Nila. She wants the loan in order to buy manufacturing equipment to expand her business, which produces a range of pickles. Haroon is concerned that Nila is expanding the business too quickly and could risk becoming insolvent. He wishes to ensure that the loan is only used for the purchase of manufacturing equipment and that any money not used for this purpose is returned to him in the event that Nila’s pickle business goes into liquidation.

Advise Haroon.

• Bruno, aged 80, was informed recently by his doctors that he has serious heart disease and at considerable risk of a fatal heart attack.
Shortly after, his adopted daughter, Maria, visited him from her home in France at his house by the sea near Brighton. Bruno said to Maria, “I am unlikely to see you again. Upon my death, I want you to have my house and car”. He gave Maria the key to what he described as “my box of deeds” saying that “you will find everything you need in the box when I die”.

Last week, Bruno went swimming in the sea by himself early one morning. He disappeared and his dead body was washed up later on a beach. Maria has opened the “box of deeds”, where she discovered the deeds to her father’s house, title to which was not yet registered, as well as the keys to his valuable Mercedes car, together with a vehicle registration document.

Advise Maria. It seems that her father left no will, but he has another daughter, Amber, who has told Maria that she does not believe that Bruno wanted Maria to enjoy sole rights in the house and the car.