Category: discussion

Submit the answers to the self assessment discussion questions (500-word count) that are located page 59. Support the concepts (in-text citations) of the assessment with one scholarly journal article and textbook material. Provide references in APA format for your sources.
To what extent . . .
1. Are you encouraged to voice any concerns to your superiors?
2. Are evaluations of your performance generally based on accurate information?
3. Do you have opportunities to correct mistakes in the way your job performance is assessed?
4. Do the rewards you receive (e.g., pay raises, recognition) reflect your relative contributions to the
company?
5. When people in your company are reprimanded, does the punishment received fit the crime?
6. Do the best people in the company receive the most recognition for their accomplishments?
7. Does your supervisor treat you in a polite manner?
8. Does your superior demonstrate respect and dignity in the way he or she regularly treats you?
9. Is your superior unlikely to make rude and demeaning statements?
10. Does your superior communicate news to you in an open and unbiased fashion?
11. Does your superior share important information in a timely manner?
12. Is your superior likely to explain his or her decisions to you in a clear and thorough fashion?
Scoring
1. Add your responses to questions 1, 2, and 3. This is your procedural justice score.
2. Add your responses to questions 4, 5, and 6. This is your distributive justice score.
3. Add your responses to questions 7, 8, and 9. This is your interpersonal justice score.
4. Add your responses to questions 10, 11, and 12. This is your informational justice score.
5. For each score, higher numbers (e.g., 12–15) reflect higher perceived amounts of the type of fairness in
question, whereas lower scores (e.g., 3–6) reflect lower perceived amounts of that type of fairness.
Discussion Questions
1. With respect to what particular type of fairness did you score highest? What specific experiences con-
tributed to this assessment?
2. With respect to what particular type of fairness did you score lowest? What specific experiences contrib-
uted to this assessment?
3. What kinds of problems resulted from any violations of any type of organizational justice you may have
Experienced? What could have been done to avoid these violations?
Group Exercise
ANALYZING AN ETHICAL DILEMMA
More often than you might imagine, managers confront situations in which they have to decide the right
Thing to do. Such “ethical dilemmas,” as they are known, are usually quite challenging. Discussing ethical
Dilemmas with others is often a useful way of shedding light on the ethical path by identifying ethical con-
Side rations that you may have overlooked on your own. This exercise will give you an opportunity to analyze
an ethical dilemma.
Directions
1. Divide the class into multiple groups of three or four students.
2. Read the following ethical dilemma.
3. working together with the others in your group, analyze the dilemma by answering the following questions:
a. As the president in this situation, what do you think you would do? What factors enter into your decision?
b. What do you think would be the right thing to do? Explain the basis for your answer.

Your Discussion Paper is to be divided into four sections.These actions areas follows:

1. LiteratureReview:
In  this section,you are expected to write abrief overview of each of the readings for the  week, identifying the main arguments, key points, and perspective in each article. You are NOT being asked to provide a comprehensive summary of the readings. Rather: can you show agood understanding of the main argument and key points in each reading?Can you effectively frame the readings, in terms of their perspectives and debates that are being engaged with?

2. Critical Reflection:
In this section,you are expected to discuss and reflect upon the week’s topic and material.This is the most important section in your Report,and should be the most substantial.Some of the questions you can ask are:What did you find thought provoking? Why?How has this week’s material enabled you to think about and engage with the themes of the course? What do you think? Why? So what?

3. Research Scope:
In this section, provide a brief indication of any further questions or research areas that you may be interested in pursuing, as a result of this week’s topic.This section does NOT need to be lengthy.

4. Reference List:
Provide a full listing of any resources that you have directly used in your work.Do NOT cite resources that are not directly used.You are expected to conform to proper referencing conventions.

As part of this assessment, all students submitting a Discussion Paper during a particular week will be seated at the front of their class,where they will act as a panel for their tutorial for the duration of 1  hour. )Your tutor will moderate,and the panel will be expected to help the tutor drive and direct tutorial discussion.Panel lists are encouraged to ask each other questions, as  well as ask questions of the class–  ,and ask panelists to provide reflections or responses to particular questions or issues.Classes are encouraged to engage actively with each panel ,and challenge panelists for their reflections and responses.

If you are late to class when you are on the panel, a late penalty will apply. If you do not attend class during your allocated week , a 20% penalty will be applied to your Discussion Paper–unless you can demonstrate mitigating circumstances.

Assessment Criteria:
Discussion Paper
Writing and presentation: clarity and coherence of expression,grammar,punctuation,sentence construction,layout
Conceptual understanding: ability to identify,explain,discuss,and analyse key ideas,theories,arguments,issues
Capacity for critical reflection: ability to develop and articulate your own opinions and critical reflections, supported by relevant research and scholarly resources
Referencing: adherence to proper referencing conventions Panel
Contributiontodiscussion:abilitytoactivelycontributetoaninsightfuldiscussionofkeypointsandissues

 

Following the discussion online use the examples from the class resources, write observable objectives for your course/program. You should have two levels of objectives. Include 3-5 (or more) Goals for the entire course/program. Include 5-10 more Objectives for a unit/lesson/session of the course.

Requirements:
Learners

Scoring: 50 pts
3-5 well-composed Goals – 20 points
5-10 well-composed Objectives using the three component model – 30 points

For this discussion question, you are asked to review the student learning outcomes for this course and discuss how you met these outcomes. The intention here is to provide you an opportunity to “reflect” on the learning achieved during this term and how you successfully met these learning outcomes. If you do not feel you successfully met the objective, discuss your plans to successfully complete the objective in the future.
By the end of the course, the student should be able to:
Demonstrate synthesis of the knowledge and skills acquired in preceding graduate nursing core and specialty curriculum content.
Evaluate current health policy and legal and ethical considerations in addressing the health promotion and disease prevention of a target population.
Integrate this synthesis in the creation of a scholarly project of either an evidenced-based practice proposal or a research proposal that generates new nursing knowledge.
Disseminate significant components of the project through a written paper and oral presentation.

Create a growth plan:
Topic 1: 500 words
Discuss eight points that you believe will lead to you to become a more improved and valuable educator. Have one reference per point- eight total.
Topic 2: 500 words with 2 references
Create a time line for your growth plan including:
i. Goals achievable in 1 week
ii. Goals achievable in 1 month
iii. Goals achievable in 1 year

This week’s second discussion forum will focus on two selected groups:
Vulnerable mothers and children
People affected by alcohol and substance abuse
For each segment, select three specific factors from Chapter 2 (e.g., age, gender, culture, ethnicity, education, and income) that are present.
Reflecting on your experiences and knowledge gained in previous courses, discuss how these factors relate to the group’s vulnerability.
Based on the selected factors, assess the health care needs that can be inferred for each group. Discuss which approach(es) to care from Chapter 4, Section 4.1 (i.e., preventive, treatment, or long term), might help address them.
Your initial contribution should be 250 to 300 words in length. Your research and claims must be supported by a minimum of two scholarly sources beyond your course text. Use proper APA formatting for in-text citations

Atleast 4 full pages (the paper must end on page 5). Must be typed using the Times New Roman 12-points,double-spaced with one-inch margins. avioli” (153-162. Quotes cannot be too long (they have to be within ~2 lines).
– Every body paragraph must have at least 1 quote from each source. In a “sandwich” format. 3 body paragraphs are preferred

meteorology and air quality modelling

PLEASE make sure that you use all models that you should use.
no need to references
and please write the answer in different colour..

c
You are required to write a report based on theAir Products and Chemicals Inc(Air Products)case study.
Reference:Air Products and Chemicals Inc 2006, Business Process Management II: Air Products Case Study, pp. 69-89, Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA, EBSCOhost.

For this report, you are to critically evaluate and write about Air Productsbusiness processes, which are driven by well-formulated strategies that drive business value. In doing so, you will emphasise on its process management and technology by specificallyfocussing on processes, people, leadership, strategy, information technology, business value, and measurementas depicted in the case study and other relevant sources.

For the main body of the report, you are advised to incorporate the four part structure outlined below:

Part 1: Organisational Strategy
Some points to consider are:
 Organisational background and vision
 Strategy
 Problems faced (need for change)
 Process improvement road map

Part 2: Process Management
Some points to consider are:
 Process blueprint
 Improvement process
 Benefits from global processes
 Enablers of successful process changes

Part 3: Role of Tec

please elaborate a little more on the empirical studies section in chapter two which will be helpful during the discussion chapter. Also try to point out arguments in this empirical studies wrt OHF’s.