Author: admin

Question description

“Social Networking” Please respond to the following:

• List three positive and three negative impacts of social networking. In your opinion, determine whether the positive impacts outweigh the negative impacts for a company determined to increase company awareness. Describe the role of the CIO in relationship to social networking and the organization. Describe the key activities that the CIO should be engaged in.
• Discuss ways that the IT organization can counter the negative impacts of social networking. Explain how the IT organization can maintain an ethical posture while managing organizational behavior related to social networking.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

https://fiu.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-5757966-… Explain why, 20 years after the 1992 riot in Los Angeles, Koreans have improved their situation but blacks have not.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Intro to Astronomy – Thinking Scientifically Assignment #1

The purpose of this assignment is to help you begin to learn to evaluate whether a claim or argument qualifies as good science or pseudoscience.Remember that there is really a continuum between these two opposites, so that any given topic may have some good points and some bad points.

In this assignment, you will be looking at a question that we will discuss in class – does the Earth orbit the Sun, or the other way around?

This is a question that for most people was settled a long time ago.However, there are still some who favor the geocentric model over the heliocentric model.A book has recently been published outlining their arguments – “Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right” by Robert A.

Sungenis and Robert J. Bennett (actually there are a set of books with different degrees of detail).

Please note that this topic has a strong connection to particular strands of Christian belief.This assignment is NOT intended as a criticism of anyone’s religious beliefs, but it is an example of a situation where some people’s beliefs conflict with the conclusions of science.

So, here’s your assignment:Submit a report detailing your responses to the items below.This report should be between 3 and 4 pages long (double spaced, no larger than 12 point font), not including references.You must include a “works cited” list including ALL sources you use.You must cite within the text of your report any information that you use.

A score will be given out of 100 points.I will be grading on how well your report is written, including grammar and spelling, as well as on content.If you need help with grammar, spelling or other general writing issues, please go to the Writing Center at Mabee Library.You may ask me for help on content.

I expect that the best way to research this topic will be on the web.However, if you find other resources (books, magazines, etc.) that are helpful, feel free to use them.Be sure to cite every source you use.I don’t care what citation style you use (APA, MLA, Turabian, etc.) but be sure to give sufficient information so that I can look up the source myself.

Please address the following items in your report.Your report should be in the form of an essay, but please follow this order.Points are assigned to each item below.

• First, search online for “Galileo Was Wrong”, “geocentrism”, or “geocentrist” to find at least one website supporting this claim.o (10 pts) What do you think is reasonable about the claims made or arguments given? o (20 pts) What do you think is unreasonable?What “red flags” do you see which indicate that this may be pseudoscience?
• (10 pts) Pick at least one argument made by the supporters of geocentrism.Briefly explain that argument. Thinking Scientifically Assignment #1 Page 1 of 2
• (50 pts) Critique the geocentrism position.
  • Find at least one critique of the geocentric argument (or, come up with your own) and explain.You may also include critiques of geocentrism in general, but please do try to find content that directly addresses the geocentric argument you explained above.
  • Your grade will be better if you look for arguments based in physical evidence.
• (10 pts) Wrap up with some discussion and conclusions.What do you think about this issue, the arguments and counter arguments?Tell me what YOU think, not what you think I want to hear.Your grade will depend on the quality of your work, not on your opinions.That said, I do expect you to think critically and carefully, and to back up any statements you make with solid reasoning and evidence. Your report is due at the beginning of class on the due date.You must bring your report to class with you.Also, we will spend some time in class discussing the topic, so please be prepared to share at least some of what you’ve written.Late reports will be accepted with a compelling reason, but will be subject to a late penalty of 10 points per day.If you do not bring your paper to class but email it to me on the day it is due I will accept it with a 5 point penalty.You are welcome to turn in your report before the due date.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Intro to Astronomy – Thinking Scientifically Assignment #1

The purpose of this assignment is to help you begin to learn to evaluate whether a claim or argument qualifies as good science or pseudoscience.Remember that there is really a continuum between these two opposites, so that any given topic may have some good points and some bad points.

In this assignment, you will be looking at a question that we will discuss in class – does the Earth orbit the Sun, or the other way around?

This is a question that for most people was settled a long time ago.However, there are still some who favor the geocentric model over the heliocentric model.A book has recently been published outlining their arguments – “Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right” by Robert A.

Sungenis and Robert J. Bennett (actually there are a set of books with different degrees of detail).

Please note that this topic has a strong connection to particular strands of Christian belief.This assignment is NOT intended as a criticism of anyone’s religious beliefs, but it is an example of a situation where some people’s beliefs conflict with the conclusions of science.

So, here’s your assignment:Submit a report detailing your responses to the items below.This report should be between 3 and 4 pages long (double spaced, no larger than 12 point font), not including references.You must include a “works cited” list including ALL sources you use.You must cite within the text of your report any information that you use.

A score will be given out of 100 points.I will be grading on how well your report is written, including grammar and spelling, as well as on content.If you need help with grammar, spelling or other general writing issues, please go to the Writing Center at Mabee Library.You may ask me for help on content.

I expect that the best way to research this topic will be on the web.However, if you find other resources (books, magazines, etc.) that are helpful, feel free to use them.Be sure to cite every source you use.I don’t care what citation style you use (APA, MLA, Turabian, etc.) but be sure to give sufficient information so that I can look up the source myself.

Please address the following items in your report.Your report should be in the form of an essay, but please follow this order.Points are assigned to each item below.

• First, search online for “Galileo Was Wrong”, “geocentrism”, or “geocentrist” to find at least one website supporting this claim.o (10 pts) What do you think is reasonable about the claims made or arguments given? o (20 pts) What do you think is unreasonable?What “red flags” do you see which indicate that this may be pseudoscience?
• (10 pts) Pick at least one argument made by the supporters of geocentrism.Briefly explain that argument. Thinking Scientifically Assignment #1 Page 1 of 2
• (50 pts) Critique the geocentrism position.
  • Find at least one critique of the geocentric argument (or, come up with your own) and explain.You may also include critiques of geocentrism in general, but please do try to find content that directly addresses the geocentric argument you explained above.
  • Your grade will be better if you look for arguments based in physical evidence.
• (10 pts) Wrap up with some discussion and conclusions.What do you think about this issue, the arguments and counter arguments?Tell me what YOU think, not what you think I want to hear.Your grade will depend on the quality of your work, not on your opinions.That said, I do expect you to think critically and carefully, and to back up any statements you make with solid reasoning and evidence. Your report is due at the beginning of class on the due date.You must bring your report to class with you.Also, we will spend some time in class discussing the topic, so please be prepared to share at least some of what you’ve written.Late reports will be accepted with a compelling reason, but will be subject to a late penalty of 10 points per day.If you do not bring your paper to class but email it to me on the day it is due I will accept it with a 5 point penalty.You are welcome to turn in your report before the due date.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Intro to Astronomy – Thinking Scientifically Assignment #1

The purpose of this assignment is to help you begin to learn to evaluate whether a claim or argument qualifies as good science or pseudoscience.Remember that there is really a continuum between these two opposites, so that any given topic may have some good points and some bad points.

In this assignment, you will be looking at a question that we will discuss in class – does the Earth orbit the Sun, or the other way around?

This is a question that for most people was settled a long time ago.However, there are still some who favor the geocentric model over the heliocentric model.A book has recently been published outlining their arguments – “Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right” by Robert A.

Sungenis and Robert J. Bennett (actually there are a set of books with different degrees of detail).

Please note that this topic has a strong connection to particular strands of Christian belief.This assignment is NOT intended as a criticism of anyone’s religious beliefs, but it is an example of a situation where some people’s beliefs conflict with the conclusions of science.

So, here’s your assignment:Submit a report detailing your responses to the items below.This report should be between 3 and 4 pages long (double spaced, no larger than 12 point font), not including references.You must include a “works cited” list including ALL sources you use.You must cite within the text of your report any information that you use.

A score will be given out of 100 points.I will be grading on how well your report is written, including grammar and spelling, as well as on content.If you need help with grammar, spelling or other general writing issues, please go to the Writing Center at Mabee Library.You may ask me for help on content.

I expect that the best way to research this topic will be on the web.However, if you find other resources (books, magazines, etc.) that are helpful, feel free to use them.Be sure to cite every source you use.I don’t care what citation style you use (APA, MLA, Turabian, etc.) but be sure to give sufficient information so that I can look up the source myself.

Please address the following items in your report.Your report should be in the form of an essay, but please follow this order.Points are assigned to each item below.

• First, search online for “Galileo Was Wrong”, “geocentrism”, or “geocentrist” to find at least one website supporting this claim.o (10 pts) What do you think is reasonable about the claims made or arguments given? o (20 pts) What do you think is unreasonable?What “red flags” do you see which indicate that this may be pseudoscience?
• (10 pts) Pick at least one argument made by the supporters of geocentrism.Briefly explain that argument. Thinking Scientifically Assignment #1 Page 1 of 2
• (50 pts) Critique the geocentrism position.
  • Find at least one critique of the geocentric argument (or, come up with your own) and explain.You may also include critiques of geocentrism in general, but please do try to find content that directly addresses the geocentric argument you explained above.
  • Your grade will be better if you look for arguments based in physical evidence.
• (10 pts) Wrap up with some discussion and conclusions.What do you think about this issue, the arguments and counter arguments?Tell me what YOU think, not what you think I want to hear.Your grade will depend on the quality of your work, not on your opinions.That said, I do expect you to think critically and carefully, and to back up any statements you make with solid reasoning and evidence. Your report is due at the beginning of class on the due date.You must bring your report to class with you.Also, we will spend some time in class discussing the topic, so please be prepared to share at least some of what you’ve written.Late reports will be accepted with a compelling reason, but will be subject to a late penalty of 10 points per day.If you do not bring your paper to class but email it to me on the day it is due I will accept it with a 5 point penalty.You are welcome to turn in your report before the due date.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Intro to Astronomy – Thinking Scientifically Assignment #1

The purpose of this assignment is to help you begin to learn to evaluate whether a claim or argument qualifies as good science or pseudoscience.Remember that there is really a continuum between these two opposites, so that any given topic may have some good points and some bad points.

In this assignment, you will be looking at a question that we will discuss in class – does the Earth orbit the Sun, or the other way around?

This is a question that for most people was settled a long time ago.However, there are still some who favor the geocentric model over the heliocentric model.A book has recently been published outlining their arguments – “Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right” by Robert A.

Sungenis and Robert J. Bennett (actually there are a set of books with different degrees of detail).

Please note that this topic has a strong connection to particular strands of Christian belief.This assignment is NOT intended as a criticism of anyone’s religious beliefs, but it is an example of a situation where some people’s beliefs conflict with the conclusions of science.

So, here’s your assignment:Submit a report detailing your responses to the items below.This report should be between 3 and 4 pages long (double spaced, no larger than 12 point font), not including references.You must include a “works cited” list including ALL sources you use.You must cite within the text of your report any information that you use.

A score will be given out of 100 points.I will be grading on how well your report is written, including grammar and spelling, as well as on content.If you need help with grammar, spelling or other general writing issues, please go to the Writing Center at Mabee Library.You may ask me for help on content.

I expect that the best way to research this topic will be on the web.However, if you find other resources (books, magazines, etc.) that are helpful, feel free to use them.Be sure to cite every source you use.I don’t care what citation style you use (APA, MLA, Turabian, etc.) but be sure to give sufficient information so that I can look up the source myself.

Please address the following items in your report.Your report should be in the form of an essay, but please follow this order.Points are assigned to each item below.

• First, search online for “Galileo Was Wrong”, “geocentrism”, or “geocentrist” to find at least one website supporting this claim.o (10 pts) What do you think is reasonable about the claims made or arguments given? o (20 pts) What do you think is unreasonable?What “red flags” do you see which indicate that this may be pseudoscience?
• (10 pts) Pick at least one argument made by the supporters of geocentrism.Briefly explain that argument. Thinking Scientifically Assignment #1 Page 1 of 2
• (50 pts) Critique the geocentrism position.
  • Find at least one critique of the geocentric argument (or, come up with your own) and explain.You may also include critiques of geocentrism in general, but please do try to find content that directly addresses the geocentric argument you explained above.
  • Your grade will be better if you look for arguments based in physical evidence.
• (10 pts) Wrap up with some discussion and conclusions.What do you think about this issue, the arguments and counter arguments?Tell me what YOU think, not what you think I want to hear.Your grade will depend on the quality of your work, not on your opinions.That said, I do expect you to think critically and carefully, and to back up any statements you make with solid reasoning and evidence. Your report is due at the beginning of class on the due date.You must bring your report to class with you.Also, we will spend some time in class discussing the topic, so please be prepared to share at least some of what you’ve written.Late reports will be accepted with a compelling reason, but will be subject to a late penalty of 10 points per day.If you do not bring your paper to class but email it to me on the day it is due I will accept it with a 5 point penalty.You are welcome to turn in your report before the due date.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Assume you are an investigator in a fraud unit. You have been assigned a case where one individual has been writing forged checks, mostly from checks stolen and altered. You have six of the forged checks from three different banks. You know the suspect and are now writing an affidavit (a written request to the court to justify your search) for a search warrant for his apartment.

• What will you need from his apartment and why do you need it?
• Describe the types of materials you may need to find to prove he was altering or modifying the checks, as well as any other material you may need for a handwriting analysis.

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Please answer TWO the following five questions.

1. Who would you include on a steering committee that is responsible for ongoing HIPAA privacy compliance? Who should lead this committee?

2. What type of ongoing educational activities would you provide for the workforce of your organization to facilitate compliance with the HIPAA privacy rule? Who would be included in these educational activities?

3. How would you ensure that you have identified all of your organization’s current business associates and developed business associate agreements with them?

4. As the privacy officer for a covered entity, you are aware that protected health information has been accessed by an unauthorized individual. What type of analysis will you conduct to determine whether it constitutes a “breach” under HIPAA?

5. Do you believe that the twelve “public interest and benefit” exceptions to the authorization requirement are warranted? Do you believe that any of these exceptions should require the patient’s authorization under the HIPAA Privacy Rule?

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Please answer TWO the following five questions.

1. Who would you include on a steering committee that is responsible for ongoing HIPAA privacy compliance? Who should lead this committee?

2. What type of ongoing educational activities would you provide for the workforce of your organization to facilitate compliance with the HIPAA privacy rule? Who would be included in these educational activities?

3. How would you ensure that you have identified all of your organization’s current business associates and developed business associate agreements with them?

4. As the privacy officer for a covered entity, you are aware that protected health information has been accessed by an unauthorized individual. What type of analysis will you conduct to determine whether it constitutes a “breach” under HIPAA?

5. Do you believe that the twelve “public interest and benefit” exceptions to the authorization requirement are warranted? Do you believe that any of these exceptions should require the patient’s authorization under the HIPAA Privacy Rule?

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

Question description

Please answer TWO the following five questions.

1. Who would you include on a steering committee that is responsible for ongoing HIPAA privacy compliance? Who should lead this committee?

2. What type of ongoing educational activities would you provide for the workforce of your organization to facilitate compliance with the HIPAA privacy rule? Who would be included in these educational activities?

3. How would you ensure that you have identified all of your organization’s current business associates and developed business associate agreements with them?

4. As the privacy officer for a covered entity, you are aware that protected health information has been accessed by an unauthorized individual. What type of analysis will you conduct to determine whether it constitutes a “breach” under HIPAA?

5. Do you believe that the twelve “public interest and benefit” exceptions to the authorization requirement are warranted? Do you believe that any of these exceptions should require the patient’s authorization under the HIPAA Privacy Rule?

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality