Identify your project and defend its representation of scholarship.
The electronic patient tracking board in emergency vs no patient tracking in emergency room
The importance of utilizing electronic patient tracking systems in emergency advantages and disadvantage defend it representation of scholarship.
scholarly articles up to date
P(5.m)
Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!
Although biometrics are commonly used in the public (law enforcement) sector, the use of biometrics in the private sector is becoming more common. As a result, the policies, procedures, and laws regulating their use are evolving.
Please submit your assignment.
P(5.u)
Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!
Order instructions
Grumheed Corporation (GC), a world leader in advanced tactical drones, plans to open a facility in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. While having not settled on an exact location, ideally the facility will be within two miles of the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport via major highway. While maintaining our original facility in Boston, the new campus will become the primary location for research and demonstration of equipment and sales. Since our company produces state-of-the-art military equipment, this new complex must have all possible security measures. Visitors, potential customers, current customers, support staff, design engineers and demonstration staff will all be housed in this 100,000 square foot facility. For BC/DR purposes the data warehouse will be duplicated to the Boston facility nightly.
This is a list of requirements facility:
Please present a detailed proposal of your recommendations for physical, technical and administrative security measures for our new facility. In your proposal please recommend categories of countermeasures and the associated risks that the countermeasures mitigate. You are not expected to recommend a specific brand/model of a countermeasure. Please include a section detailing additional risks that have not been mitigated by your proposal. Your proposal should be a minimum of 1500 words and properly site all references.
For a custom paper on the above or a related topic, place your order now!
What We Offer:
• Affordable Rates – (15 – 25% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism
• Masters & Ph.D. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content
500 word speech which follows this structure:
– identifying the problems and challenges of leadership within the case
– defining leadership and discussing theory and a model whilst making a link to the case
– providing recommendations (very important)
Files uploaded:
“Case” – is the physical case itself
“Case Facts” – are what I’ve drawn out of the case to be important facts
“Leadership theory” – is all the theory, definitions and models provided about leadership and are crucially important to be used in the second
point i made about structure above
Case Facts
Chip Brownlee – CEO and chairman of Galvatrens
Harry Mart – COO of Galvatrens
Arch Carter – lead director of Galvatrens
Terry Samples – Mike’s boss vice president of sales
Mike Fields – Plaintiff (accuser)
Arch calls chip and says he received his voice mail. Chip responds that former divisional sales manager has filed a lawsuit against the company,
claiming he was wrongfully terminated for trying to report an illegal scheme to increase sales.
After reading through the lawsuit copy Chip had gotten a perspective on the multiple departures in Sales during the past 4 weeks.
The plaintiff was Mike Fields, who left Galvatrens 3 weeks earlier. He claimed that he came across a plan developed by another divisional sales
manager Greg Wilson.
Mike states that Greg Wilson had proposed shipping goods to a few of his bigger customers, billing them and booking the sales but with a side
agreement that they wouldn’t have to take ownership. They could also return the shipments at any time, and would get a 2% discount on any goods
they accepted and paid for in the following quarter. The purpose of this scheme was to meet quarterly sales targets and trigger bonuses.
Chip further explains to Arch that Mike found out accidentally and since he didn’t know who else might be involved he confidentially contacted
Harry the COO of Galvatrens. He said Harry never followed up with him and instead referred the matter to Mike’s boss Terry Samples.
Until a week ago before Terry left abruptly to take another job he was vice president of sales. Mike alleges that Terry told him his performance
was not up to snuff and that he’d have to accept a demotion and a transfer to Indianapolis if he wanted to stay with the company.
Mike believes that the demotion was because of exposing the illegal scheme and Terry knew as a divorced father with joint custody of his kids
that Mike couldn’t leave time.
So, was Terry involved?
Chip states that at that point they didn’t know whether Terry was involved and whether Greg followed through with the scheme.
Greg resigned about a month ago. He took a job in California.
When Terry left last week, Chip was wondering whether the confusion in sales was a coincidence
Mike also says the company’s channels for confidential reporting of misconduct don’t work very well as the company made it easier for Terry to
retaliate.
A board meeting was to be planned.
The board was delighted when Chip agreed to be CEO of Galvatrens in Jan 1997. He previously led Paloreq a pharmaceutical and medical devices
company during a period of tremendous growth. He attracted a team of stellar managers through the same sorts of “people” initiatives he would
launch at Galvatrens.
The year before Galvatren hired Chip it reached a deadlock with CEO Walter Nickels. Nickels ran in an authoritarian hierarchical style. As the
company grew the board urged he delegate more and instil fresh blood into the executive team and he resisted.
With the company deteriorating Chip stepped in. he expanded on Galvatrens core businesses in home health and personal beauty to nutritional and
wellness products, products for infants and the home. Revenues, earnings and share price increased steadily.
Chip sought a COO who could focus on the company’s day to day operations. Harry Mart who Chip lured away from a competitor fit the role nicely.
Chip also worked hard to change the company culture. Early in his tenure, he announced an ambitious initiative to make Galvatrens an
organization that excelled in listening to and learning from its employees to achieve preferred employer status in the consumer products
industry.
Chip replaced the general counsel with Sydney Baydown. She was Chip’s general counsel atPaloreq. At her urging Chip upgraded procedures for
uncovering misconduct and solving conflicts in the workplace. Chip gave Sydney approval for a firm to review Galvatrens existing system.
Following the consultants’ advice Galvatrens instituted wan open-door policy for raising workplace concerns. While the policy encourages
employees to go to their immediate supervisors, it emphasises that they could approach any manager at any level for assistance. The police
included a specific ban on retaliation.
The company also included a toll-free 24-hour hotline for reporting violations of the code of conduct, added an ethics officer to its ranks and
launched an ethics awareness campaign.
After the Sarbanese Oxley Act, the company mandated that the ethics officer inform the board’s audit committee of any allegation of financial
wrongdoing or other possible code violations that involved company executives
Two of the consultant’s recommendations weren’t followed: one was that the company should hire an ombudsman and that the board should make a
director or committee of directors responsible for overseeing ethics. Focus groups and interview reveal that many employees don’t feel
comfortable raising concerns through formal management. Having a truly impartial ombudsman who reported to the CEO and board would make
employees more likely to come forward. The ombudsman allows people to report issues confidentially and offers informal means for helping resolve
issues.
These ideas were opposed by Dale Willis the senior vice president of HR at the time.
Chip also agreed to Dale’s request of delaying training needed for the new open-door policy until HR completes existing programs. Other
priorities arose and this initiative was forgotten.
Three days after Mikes lawsuit had been filed chip opened a conference call with the 8 directors he could round up. Harry and Dan Richardson
were away.
Syd was asked to brief the group. She said, “we’ve confirmed that Greg Wilson pitched a channel-stuffing scheme to two of his biggest customers.
However, at this point it isn’t know if it got further than that. We’ve also determined Mikes performance declined considerably in his last 10
months here. Records show that his team missed sales targets by a growing amount during that period. He had been unreachable during business
hours with increasing frequency and had missed important meetings. Prior to that though he was a solid producer. Mike’s lawyer hadn’t disputed
the change in performance claims but claimed it was due to a nasty custody battle between him and his ex-wife. Terrys reaction to the slide in
performance had been brutal contributing to Mikes emotional stress. ‘
Given the above info the company intend to deny the charges in the charges of Mikes lawsuit and have an independent investigation on the
channel-stuffing allegation. Syd was asked to be the liaison between the outside investigators and the board
Shelia the chair of the board’s audit committee asked what should the board’s role be in the investigation? To who should the investigators
report? Do we need a special committee for something like this?
Arch the lead director said that should be sorted out but first there need to be a focus on responding to the lawsuit on how does battling a guy
who attempted to raise some allegations square with our missions and values? There are giant reputational risks on every front in this
situation. If this isn’t handed well we could hurt ourselves, with employees, customers and stakeholders.
A board meeting was scheduled for six weeks where more facts would be available and they would be in a better position to weigh their options
The board met six weeks later and Harry the COO was absent again because of continuing problems at factories damaged by hurricanes.
The independent investigators had reported back stating that the customers had simply ignored Greg Wilson’s channel stuffing proposal. Terry had
forced Greg out when he learned about the plan, but he allowed Greg to resign and hadn’t told anyone else about the scheme. Greg has not
responded to the investigators and Terry’s reply was through his lawyer saying he’d review the questions and respond appropriately.
Investigators also confirmed that Mikes performance had declined and Terry role in it was Murky. Mike had done his best to raise alarm on the
scheme. The judge had allowed discovery to begin and the company had initiated settlement discussions with Mike.
Dan was furious that they didn’t hear about the scheme earlier from Terry or their customer and was wondering whether other people in Sales knew
about it. He stated that it doesn’t seem we have a handle on these kinds of problems.
Syd pointed that in many cases employees that see misconduct in their organisations don’t come forward and that the company has come a long way
since Chip took over.
Shelia said but clearly the good things already put in place like the open-door policy and the code of conduct aren’t working. Harry didn’t take
the original complaint seriously and just passed the buck. Nothing came in through the hotline. And no one contacted the ethics officer or HR.
Arch stated that is it realistic to expect Harry to deal with this after all he’s responsible for?
Shelia stated it is not expected of him to personally investigate issues that come to him but he should follow up and refer this issue to the
ethics officer.
Chip states that he’s kept Harry plate full and has asked Syd to think about how we can ensure that things like this don’t fall through the
cracks again.
Shelia and Arch met for breakfast the next morning.
Arch said he’s thinking they need a board retreat. I don’t think we’ve met our oversight responsibilities. We were not ready for something like
this.
Shelia agrees and said once we got into this thing it seemed clear we as a board didn’t know what our role was supposed to be. And I certainly
took it for granted that Chip and Syd had established the board for anonymous reporting that the audit committee and the full board for that
matter needs to provide oversight.
Arch said it’s got to show up in our self-evaluation this year. And several aspects must be considered when evaluating Chip and deciding what we
should ask of him in the future. he also says after putting all these procedures in place why did only one guy come forward – and he ends up
suing us? When the new surveys come out I’ll be curious to know if were really improving morale especially in Sales where there’s been so much
turnover.
Shelia said she agrees about Chip but the person who worries her is Harry. Harry may be technically strong but he has got to be able to take
care of people, and he’s just not good at it. I think there need to be consequences for Harry and new expectations for Chip
Leadership
Skills of a leader
Skill 1: Tuning in to the environment: Sensing needs and opportunities
Skill 2: Kaleidoscope thinking: Stimulating breakthrough ideas
Skill 3: Setting the theme: Communicating inspiring visions
Skill 4: Enlisting backers and supporters: Getting buy‐in and building coalitions
Skill 5: Developing the dream: Nurturing the working team
Skill 6: Mastering the difficult middles: Persisting and persevering
Skill 7: Celebrating accomplishments: Making everyone a hero
Key triggers of leadership development
1. Significant leadership challenge at an early age
2. Positive role models
3. Being ‘thrown in at the deep end’
4. Mentoring, coaching and consultant relationships
5. Experiential leadership development courses
6. Negative role models
7. MBA and professional qualifications
8. International or multicultural exposure
9. Voluntary and community work
10. Team sports
Change leadership
Different to ‘formal’ leadership
• involves specific interventions aimed at motivating behavioural change among employees
• Focuses on actions and behaviours rather than formal ‘positions’
• Judged by the impact those actions and behaviours exert on the change process
Core tasks of a change leader
1. Develop and articulate clear and consistent sense of purpose and direction for the organisation
2. Establish demanding performance expectations
3. Enable upward communication
4. Forge an emotional bond between employeesand the organisation
5. Develop future change leaders
Core roles of a change leader
1. Energising and instilling a readiness for change
2. Crafting a vision and setting direction
3. Leadership commitment & involvement
4. Reinforcing the message and institutionalising the new behaviours.
Change Leadership & Phases of Change Burke (2008)
Stace&Dunphy contingency model of change
Beyond the charismatic leader Nadler and Tushman (1990)
A change agent is …
1. a person who seeks “to reconfigure an organisation’s roles, responsibilities, structures, outputs, processes, systems, technology or
otherresources” (Buchanan, D. &Badham, R. (1999) Politics and organizational change: the lived experience. Human Relations, 52 (5): 609‐629)
2. the people responsible for directing, organising andfacilitating change in organisations (Burnes, B. (2004)Managing change: a strategic
approach to organisational dynamics. Financial Times Prentice Hall)
Change agents:
• Manager/ consultant/ project manager
• Understand they impact people as well astechnology, resources, structures
• Continually observe and search for new ways of making change happen‘change begins with me’
Roles of a change agent
Change strategist (change leader)
Change implementer
Change recipients
‘Consultant’ style Waddell et al (2011)
Purpose of the Assessment
The purpose of this assignment is to undertake a research report that consists of a critical literature review in relation to the topic
21st Century Leadership
A literature review is a critical analysis of published sources on a particular topic. It is an assessment of the literature and provides a summary, classification, comparison and evaluation. Undertaking a critical review of literature is a key component for postgraduate level. It allows you to demonstrate the depth of your research, and highlight your ability to question, compare and contrast and analyse a range of theories and texts in relation to your topic.
It is essential that you demonstrate your ability to read widely and in depth and that you are able to evaluate and critically analyse this research. As a post graduate business student it is essential that you demonstrate up-to-date knowledge regarding critical business issues and that you can reach evidence based conclusions in your writing.
Assessment Task
The task is to undertake a literature review on the core topic of 21st Century Leadership to evaluate and analyse key issues in relation to leadership
This could include a critical evaluation of some of the following core ideas (this is an example not a limit of core issues for evaluation)
You must write a 2,500 word critical literature review on this topic and present it as an evidence based research report. Compare, contrast, synthesise and critically analyse the academic research on this topic using quality academic sources to give an overview of 21st Century Leadership. Quality sources include academic journals and business reports.
A critical literature review requires you to look at quality research on your chosen topic to give an overview of the research in this area. This will require you to discuss academic definitions, identify key themes in the literature, and discuss the potential applications and implications of the literature and to show that you understand the quality of the sources that you are using. Citing your sources and referencing are a core part of this and your report should use the harvard reference system and include a reference list at the back of your work.
Learning outcomes
The learning outcomes being addressed through this assignment are:
| a) Critically explain the value and importance of an integrated perspective to organisational leadership.
b) Apply a range of analytical models and conceptual tools and techniques in the analysis of organisations. c) Demonstrate knowledge applied to practical situations of business management. d) Engage in critical, developmental reflection about professional knowledge. e) Produce evidence-based arguments and conclusions. f) Demonstrate an ability to work effectively as an individual and group member in order to carry out tasks linking theory to practice g) Make discriminating use of a range of learning resources in order to solve business related problems. h) Communicate the solutions arrived at, and the thinking underlying them, in written form. |
P(5.m)
Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!
Order instructions
Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:
Select two (2) editorials / essays / columns (by staff or freelance writers) on a current issue of public policy from two (2) different publications (large metropolitan or national newspaper such as Washington Post or the New York Times or national magazines such as Newsweek, Time, and The New Republic.)
1. Apply the procedures for argumentation analysis (located in Chapter 8) to display contending positions and underlying assumptions for the content of the above question.
2. Rate the assumptions and plot them according to their plausibility and importance. (Refer to Figure 3.16, “Distribution of warrant by plausibility and importance.”)
3. Determine which arguments are the most plausible. Provide a rationale for your views.
(Note: Refer to Demonstration Exercise 1 located at the end of Chapter 3 for criteria 4-6. Examine Box 3.0 – Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Choose one of the following policy issues in the U.S. gun control, illegal drugs, medical insurance fraud, and environmental protection of waterways, job creation, affordable health care, or Medicare.)
4. Apply the procedures for stakeholder analysis presented in Box 3.0 “Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis” to generate a list of at least five to ten (5-10) stakeholders who affect or are affected by problems in the issue area chosen for analysis. (Note: Refer to page 111 of the textbook for a step-by-step process on stakeholder analysis.)
5. After creating a cumulative frequency distribution from the list, discuss new ideas generated by each stakeholder. (Note:The ideas may be objectives, alternatives, outcomes causes, etc.; ideas should not be duplicates.)
6. Write an analysis of the results of the frequency distribution that answers the following questions: (a) Does the line graph flatten out? (b) If so, after how many stakeholders? (c) What conclusions can be drawn about the policy problems in the issue area? (Note: Compare your work with Case Study 3.1 at the end of the chapter.)
7. Include at least two (4) peer-reviewed references (no more than five [5] years old) from material outside the textbook to support your views. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental Websites. Do not use open source Websites such as Wikipedia, Sparknotes.com, Ask.com, and similar Websites are not acceptable resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
For a custom paper on the above or a related topic, place your order now!
What We Offer:
• Affordable Rates – (15 – 25% Discount on all orders above $50)
• 100% Free from Plagiarism
• Masters & Ph.D. Level Writers
• Money Back Guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• Unlimited Revisions at no Extra Charges
• Guaranteed High-Quality Content
Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations – Draft
Student Name
NRS 433V Introduction to Nursing Research
Grand Canyon University
Due Date
Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideration- Draft
This is the introductory paragraph of the paper. It should state the topic and the article that is being summarized. It is best that the main study which is being critiqued is mentioned here in the beginning of the paragraph with appropriate citation. The paper should be written in APA 6th edition format. This is an electronic template for papers written in APA style (American Psychological Association, 2010).The purpose of the template is to help the student set the margins and spacing.Margins are set at 1 inch for top, bottom, left, and right.The type is left-justified only—that means the left margin is straight, but the right margin is ragged.Each paragraph is indented five spaces.It is best to use the tab key to indent.The line spacing is double throughout the paper, even on the reference page. One space is used after punctuation at the end of sentences.The font style used in this template is Times New Roman and the font size is 12.
Background of Study
Each sentence should answer each one of the following questions: What was the clinical or research problem that led to the study? What was the significance of the study? What was the purpose of the study (what was the author hoping to find out by doing this study)? What was the main research question that was inferred inthis study? Were the purpose and the research questions related to the problem of the study? (Do NOT just list the question or questions. Explain the answers to the questions objectively in a paragraph.)
Methods of Study
What were the risks and benefits to the subjects that participated in the study? Were there risks and benefits that the authors did not discuss? If so what were they? Was informed consent from the subjects obtained by the authors? Did the subjects give their consent voluntarily? Was the institutional review board approval obtained from the same agency in which the study was performed?
What were the independent and dependent variables? Identify them separately and define them clearly. How was the data collected? Why did the author use this method? What was the time -period of the study (month and year of beginning and ending of study)? Briefly describe the sequence of data collection. How was the data managed? What was the method used to analyze the data? Was the rigor of the data management assured? If so, how? Was statistical software used? How was researcher bias minimized? What method was used to assure this bias was controlled in the data management of the study? Look at the grading rubric for additional criteria.
Results of Study
Briefly describe the results of the study in as few sentences as possible.Then answer the following questions objectively: What were the limitations of the study? How do the results of the study have implications to nursing practice? What is the opportunity for future nursing research of this topic?
Ethical Considerations
Briefly answer the following questions: Did the study receive IRB approval? Did the participants of the study receive protection of their privacy? Did the participants receive ethical treatment or was there lack of treatment of patients who participated in the study?
Conclusion
This paragraph is 4 or 5 sentences that make up the main points of the paper without minor statements or criteria. The rubric asks for the relation of the study to nursing practice and how the results apply to nursing practice. What is the summary of the knowledge that was learned from this study? This paragraph is the wrap-up for the reader.
References
Daresh, J. C. (2004). Beginning the assistant principalship: A practical guide fornew school administrators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Example (Book)
Herbst-Damm, K. L., &Kulik, J. A. (2005). Volunteer support, marital status, and the survival times of terminally ill patients. Health Psychology, 24(3), 225-229. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.2.225. Example (Journal)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Managing asthma: A guide for schools (NIH Publication No. 02-2650).National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/prof/asthma/asth_sch.pdfExample (Government webpage)
((The reference list should appear at the end of a paperon a separate page. There should be at least THREEstudiesto support the conclusion statements made in the paper above. The list provides the information necessary for a reader to locate and retrieve any source you cite in the body of the paper.Each source you cite in the paper must appear in your reference list; likewise, each entry in the reference list must be cited in your text. A sample reference page is included above; this page includes examples of how to format different reference types (e.g., books, journal articles, information from a website). The examples on the page above include examples taken directly from the APA manual.Remove the above examples and instructions before submitting this paper prior to submitting this assignment.))
P(5.u)
Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!
Assignment Overview
This Case Assignment starts with a general understanding of how measurement instruments and variable relationships are assessed. That knowledge is applied to the assessment of two papers.
Important: We will also see that every researcher not only doesn’t use the same tools but address less mechanisms for assessing the instruments and variable relationships.
Case Assignment
After reviewing the required readings found in the module background section, obtain the following document through the electronic library.
Shen, J. & Eder, L. B, (2009), Exploring Intentions to Use Virtual Worlds for Business, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, VOL 10, NO 2
Jyoti, J., and Dev, M. (2015). The impact of transformational leadership on employee creativity: the role of learning orientation, Journal of Asia Business Studies, 9(1).
Go to the case shell and address the questions identified within. The first part of the assignment uses the background reading. The second part uses the documents above.
Assignment Expectations
Students will be able to:
Assess a measurement instruments and associated measurement models.
Assess relationships between variables in a regression, path, or structural model.
Understand that different statistical analysis software (tools) present different statistics.
4 PAGES IS FOR THE CASE ASSIGNMENT
1 PAGE IS IS TO ANSWER THE DISCUSSION
P(5.u)
Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!
Visit a health food store or other store that carries a variety of nutritional supplements. Alternatively you can conduct research on the internet to acquire the product information necessary for this assignment.
Considering the information presented in this section, compare the vitamin supplements that are available.
Include multivitamins, single vitamins and vitamin combinations other than multivitamins.
Compare how these could be used to improve your health.
Analyze how these products could be used to improve performance, help you manage stress and help you prevent disease.
Write a 500-750 word essay detailing your findings.
Document your sources
P(5.u)
Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!
PolyPharmacy Problems
Formulate a policy to reduce the practice of multiple drug prescriptions.
What tools might be included in the design phase of the policy process to increase the probability of success?
What research from other countries could be helpful in addressing this issue?
Support your reasoning.
Awesome! We will spare no effort to give you a most pleasant experience.
But, that’s not all
You get a massive 35% on your first order
Get Discount NowOur record is the best in the industry but this is hardly a surprise; we handpick our writers after they are proven to be consistent, reliable and completely able in their areas of expertise.
Order your custom essay paper, research paper NOW and we’ll turn your frustrations into a sigh of relief
Order Now