Author: admin

 

Immunоlоgiсаl рrinсiрlеs аnd vассinе dеvеlорmеnt

Large scale phase 3 randomised controlled trials of newvaccines are required to provide evidence of vaccine immunogenicoity, efficacy and
safety before they can be used in the population. Howev er,there are differences between the controlled enVironment o a clinical trial and

the real world population delivery of vaccines. There may be differences in the vaccine effectiveness in the population (compared to the

efficacy in the trial setting). In some cases, very rare adverse events may not be detected in the clinical trial participants.

Post-marketing safety surveillance istherefore very important in the ongoing monitoring of the safety of vaccines.

Rotavirus v accine is

a good example for both determining the safety of the vaccine and monitoring effectiveness in the population. The first rotavirus vaccine,
RotaShield, was marketed in the USA in 1998-990. It was not until post-marketing safety survoeillance that RotaShield was found to be
associated With an increased risk of intussusception (IS) in vaccine recipients, at a rate of 1 in 10,000 vaccine recipients. IS is a rare

condition seen mostly in children aged <2 years in which the intestine telescopes and causes obstruction. IS occurs in the absence of
vaccination; however, the causes of IS are not clear. RotaShield was subsequently withdrawn from the market. Two new vaccines were developed
using different vaccine technologies, Rotoarix and RotoaTeq. Thoese vaccines required large-scale studies with >140,000 ionfantsto demonstrate

the safety of the vaccine due to the preVious RotaShield vaccine adverse events. These were some of the Iargest vaccine studies

undertaken.

Let’s start the discussion by these two questions:

What are the safety profiles of the Rotategand Rotariox.

vaccines? Was there any increased risk of I after receiving these vaccines in clinical trial participants?

Why do rotavirus vaccines

have strict age limits for receipt of the vaccine?

 

Technological innovation, globalization
Using the example of the German company, Siemens AG, Fritsch (2015) presents a firm-level analysis of how major corporations respond to innovations and

advances in the ICT sector.

•Describe three major turning points in the way Siemens AG engaged with these innovations.
•Identify some of the challenges that the corporation faced and explain how they were resolved.
•Cite an example of another corporation that encountered similar issues. Were the outcomes the same as those of Siemens AG?

Ensure that your response addresses all elements of the question.

 

 

Contemporary Strategy Analysis – Discuss the contribution of game theory to industry and competitive analysis
What are the game theory variables and principles, how the firms use it when competing for the almost same product ?

as a reference can you please use
Contemporary Strategy Analysis
Robert M. Grant
However you can use other references as well if needed.

WRITE AN ESSAY
This is your essay topic:
What is a good society?

During this, you will devise a clear response to this topic, based on your personal philosophical perspective (your thesis statement). You will then develop and write three body paragraphs supporting your position, as well as an introductory and a concluding paragraph.

Step 1: Develop your thesis statement
This course includes four main branches or fields of philosophy: metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and socio-political. A good way to start thinking about the topic question is to try to answer the question from the point of view of each of these branches.Note that the information you jot down is what you think and is based solely on your viewpoint in response to the topic.
Your answers here can be very brief; you’ll get a chance to expand on them later. Think of this as just basic note-taking.

What criteria are required to call a society “good,” from a metaphysical perspective?

What criteria are required to call a society “good,” from an epistemological perspective?

What criteria are required to call a society “good,” from an ethical perspective?

What criteria are required to call a society “good,” from a socio-political perspective?

Examine the points you’ve made. What do they all have in common? Is there an underlying moral or political position to them? After thinking about your notes some more and moving ideas around, you will be able to define and write your thesis statement.

Step 2: Write your thesis statement
Here are five possible thesis statements in response to the question “What is a good society?”
1. Society is good when people do the right thing.
2. A good society is not one where people have no human rights.
3. A perfect society is one where criminals are punished so that they will not reoffend.
4. Before it can become good, our society needs to crack down on organized crime.
5. A good society is one where people receive according to their needs and provide to others according to their abilities.
Which response do you think would set the scene for a thesis statement (your main argument or position) on the topic?

Step 3: Plan and do your research
At this point, you’ve established your position on what you think a good society is. Your next step is to collect evidence to support your position. You should keep a concise record of your search sites and sources as you will need to quote them using APA format when you submit your essay. You can do research and use quotations from the resources and information presented in the course and you can also include research that you’ve found online and at your local library.
Once you have a fairly large list of evidence, take a look at the philosophers and the philosophical concepts discussed in this course. Locate the philosophers whose positions would agree with yours, and see what they had to say. Next, look online or at your local library to continue your research to find information and quotations that will support your thesis statement.
When doing your research, keep an eye out for the following:
• Key and concise quotes: if the philosopher can summarize his or her argument in a few sentences, use those.
• Explanatory paragraphs: you won’t use these directly, but you can summarize them in your essay through paraphrasing (there are notes for you on paraphrasing in the third section of this lesson).

Write the body paragraphs
When making your choices of branches or fields of philosophy and philosophers to quote in your three paragraphs, consider the following:
•strength of the argument – this is related to and supported by the branch of philosophy
•variety of arguments – some branches might have more arguments, and more diverse arguments, than others
•variety of supporting philosophers – some branches have more philosophers who agree with your position
•impact of supporting philosophers – you generally get more strength in your position by quoting from the more famous and influential philosophers than the less well-known ones
•relevance of supporting philosophers – some philosophers directly address the points you make, while others just “sort of, kind of, maybe” support your position

Remember that it is important to apply logic to all your position arguments.Also, keep in mind that the quotations and arguments from other philosophers are there to support your original case, not replace it. Be sure that most of the writing in your paragraphs is your own, and only seasoned by the researched philosophers.
Repeat this process for all three of your body paragraphs.

Write the introductory paragraph
The introductory paragraph is often one of the last paragraphs written in an essay because it is a one-paragraph summary.
When a reader has read your introductory paragraph, they should know precisely what you’re going to be talking about and your exact position on the topic. They should be able to determine what the main topic is, as well as the number of subtopics you will be addressing and the order in which they will appear.

What is the topic of this essay?

What is the topic of the first body paragraph?

What is the topic of the second body paragraph?

What is the topic of the third body paragraph?

What is the writer’s opinion (the thesis statement) on the topic of the paragraph?

Write the concluding paragraph
Your concluding paragraph is exactly that – a conclusion. It is not simply a restatement of either your thesis or your introductory paragraph. The reader has just absorbed all your information, but now needs a summary of everything you have told them. So you synthesize your thesis statement and your three body paragraphs, and restate them concisely for the reader in your concluding paragraph.

Now you’re ready to do a first read and edit on your writing so far.

Task 1: Complete your essay
In this lesson, you have prepared and written five paragraphs on the topic “What is a good society?” You have written an introductory paragraph, three body paragraphs, and a concluding paragraph.
You conducted extensive research to find philosophers who support your definition of a good society. Now you should insert the collected research into those paragraphs.
First, reread your paragraphs. Each paragraph should meet the following criteria:
•It supports the thesis statement you developed, explaining what you think a good society is
•It has a logical, step-by-step explanation of your position, from the point of view of a specified philosophy branch
•It has a general statement, at least three points, and a concluding sentence
When inserting your research, for each point select the quote or idea that best matches and supports it. As evidence (in this case, your quote or theory from a philosopher), it should immediately follow the point it is supporting. You may, if you wish, have multiple ideas or quotes linked to one point.

Check your introductory and concluding paragraphs
Reread your introductory paragraph. It should include the following:
•A general statement that introduces the overall topic of the essay
•A summative sentence in sequence for every body paragraph that appears in your essay
•A thesis statement that puts forth, in a simple manner, your position on the overall topic
Reread your concluding paragraph. It should synthesize your thesis statement and your three body paragraphs, and restate them concisely for the reader.

Self-edit and peer-edit
Reread your entire essay, correcting spelling and grammar mistakes and improving vocabulary. When you wrote the paragraphs, they may have been rushed and quickly assembled. This time around, take the time to add emphasis and style to your words. Once you have made your own improvements, give your essay to a trusted friend or colleague to review. If they feel there needs to be clarification or tightening up, sit down with them and determine where further improvements are needed.

Task 2: Reflection
You will now write a final, course-encompassing reflection on your development throughout this course.
First, consider the following questions.
1. What criteria do you use to determine truth or validity?
2. What do you think is the best way to acquire knowledge?
3. What is the driving force in your life?
4. What is the best way to interact with someone?
For each question, answer twice: first, as the person you were before you started the course; second, as the person you are now, having completed the course.

Here is an example for you to consider:
“What criteria do you use to determine truth or validity?
I used to believe that something was true simply if I could perceive it – see, hear, touch, taste, or smell it. After learning about the principle of sufficient reason, however, I now extend that to include an understanding of its cause, and not simply what I perceive on the surface. My understanding of truth has grown to include a need to understand why I perceive what I perceive.”

Do not rush through the questions. Think about each one for a few minutes. Critique your ideas. Once you have decided how to respond, write your answers below.

What criteria do you use to determine truth or validity?

What do you think is the best way to acquire knowledge?

What is the driving force in your life?

What is the best way to interact with someone?

After you have had a chance to examine your writing and found some common ideas, answer the following questions.

What was your underlying philosophy at the start of this course?

What is your underlying philosophy now?

How are the two different?

Now you will convert the information you have developed into a paragraph to answer the following topic question:

How have your ideas of the world developed throughout this course

write an essay about this prompt” Describe how your unit effectively sustains the transformation, how it fails to sustain the transformation, and what actions you will take to sustain the transformation for subordinate Marines”

Experimental Psychology (PSYC 3404)

Correctional studies examine the relationships between variables in a study. Positive relationships (positive correlations) exist when high scores on one variable are associated with high scores on another variable, as when intelligence is positively correlated with grade point average. Inverse relationships (negative correlations) exist when high scores on one variable are associated with low scores on a second variable, as when the amount of sleep one gets is negatively correlated with levels of irritability and anxiety.

Demonstrating that a correlation exists does not show that changes in one variable are the cause of changes in the other, partly because other factors which are undetected may be influencing both known variables. For example, it is possible that a third variable is causing a change in both variables measured, or that a third variable is causing a change in just one of the two variables. Simply put, there are a number of possibilities. Thus, knowing that a correlation exits may lead to two or more different interpretations of the correlation. For the studies described below, decide whether the correlation is positive or negative and give three explanations for the finding. Here is an example:

A study found that the more an elderly person exercised, the more gray matter was found in fMRI scans.
Type of correlation: Positive
One explanation: The amount of gray matter in one’s brain increases one’s propensity to exercise.
Another explanation: Exercise increases gray matter
A third explanation: People who are likely to have large amounts of gray matter as they age are also likely to lead healthy lifestyles that include exercise, eating right, and maintaining healthy relationships.

1. A government study reveals that the more a mother smokes, the more her children are likely to exhibit behavioral problems

Type of correlation:
One explanation:
Another explanation:
A third explanation:

2. The more psychology courses students take during their college years, the higher scores they get on a measure of interpersonal sensitivity.

Type of correlation:
One explanation:
Another explanation:
A third explanation:

3. A study on the effects of alcohol found that higher and higher doses of alcohol produced increasingly lower scores on a test of memory recall.

Type of correlation:
One explanation:
Another explanation:
A third explanation:

4. A college professor notices that the farther students sit toward the back of the room, the worse their grades in the course seem to be.

Type of correlation:
One explanation:
Another explanation:
A third explanation:

5. When the physical attractiveness of high school girls was rated by their peers, it was noticed that those with the highest scores tended to do the best on a measure of self-esteem on record in the guidance office.

Type of correlation:
One explanation:
Another explanation:
A third explanation:

6. A survey of adolescents being treated for eating disorders noted that those who watched the most TV during the week tended to receive the lowest ratings on a measure of general health.

Type of correlation:
One explanation:
Another explanation:
A third explanation:

7. In a study of suburban communities, it was noticed that communities that sex-related crimes was highest in the communities that had the largest number of X-rated adult book stores.

Type of correlation:
One explanation:
Another explanation:
A third explanation:

8. A survey reveals that college students who eat breakfast regularly have a higher GPA than those that don’t eat breakfast regularly.

Type of correlation:
One explanation:
Another explanation:
A third explanation:

Directions
1. You are to research, analyze, and write an APA-formatted scholarly paper about the topic that you have selected.
2. Write an introduction that defines and describes the topic. Address what purpose the topic serves and how it impacts the delivery of

healthcare in general and nursing care in particular. Keep in mind that APA guidelines state you are not to use the heading “Introduction,” but

you should include it at the beginning of your paper.
3. Search for scholarly sources and relevant websites. Include a minimum of two scholarly sources. The course textbook does not qualify as a

scholarly source. Cite all sources in the body of the paper and include them in the References list following proper APA formatting.
4. Provide one example of this topic. Describe the main features or aspects of the example with support from your sources.
5. Describe an experience where the topic impacted you personally, either when you were receiving healthcare or when you were providing nursing

care. Relate one positive aspect or one negative aspect of this experience and how it could have been improved.
6. Write a conclusion that summarizes the topic, the purpose, and how your newfound insight will influence your nursing care.
7. Use Microsoft Word to develop your paper. Use APA formatting. Refer to the Publication Manual of the APA, sixth edition. Review the various

APA documents included in this course and the Chamberlain Care Student Success Strategies (CCSSS) that can help you with your writing. Take

advantage of the tutoring services that are available to Chamberlain students for free.
8. The length of the paper should be a maximum of 4–5 pages, excluding the title page and the reference page. There should only be one small

quote maximum in the paper. Citations should primarily include summary and restatement.

Week 4: Information Systems Paper
Week 4: Information Systems Paper (graded, 200 points)
Information Systems in Healthcare Paper Guidelines
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to select a topic related to information systems in healthcare from the list provided, research and analyze

the topic, and describe how you will apply your newfound knowledge to your nursing practice.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet one or more of the following Course Outcomes depending on the topic selected.
CO 1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO 1)
CO 2: Analyze data from all relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care. (PO 2)
CO 3: Define standardized terminology that reflects nursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO 3)
CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe

practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4)
CO 5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO 5)
CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements,

confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)
CO 7: Examine the use of information systems to document interventions related to achieving nurse sensitive outcomes. (PO 7)
CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)

Topics
Select one of these topics for the focus of your paper.
• Standard terminologies (CO 3, CO 8)
• Decision-making support tools (CO 4, CO 8)
• Patient education technology (CO 5, CO 8)
• Data integrity and its legal and ethical implications (CO 7, CO 8)
Directions
1. You are to research, analyze, and write an APA-formatted scholarly paper about the topic that you have selected.
2. Write an introduction that defines and describes the topic. Address what purpose the topic serves and how it impacts the delivery of

healthcare in general and nursing care in particular. Keep in mind that APA guidelines state you are not to use the heading “Introduction,” but

you should include it at the beginning of your paper.
3. Search for scholarly sources and relevant websites. Include a minimum of two scholarly sources. The course textbook does not qualify as

a scholarly source. Cite all sources in the body of the paper and include them in the References list following proper APA formatting.
4. Provide one example of this topic. Describe the main features or aspects of the example with support from your sources.
5. Describe an experience where the topic impacted you personally, either when you were receiving healthcare or when you were providing

nursing care. Relate one positive aspect or one negative aspect of this experience and how it could have been improved.
6. Write a conclusion that summarizes the topic, the purpose, and how your newfound insight will influence your nursing care.
7. Use Microsoft Word to develop your paper. Use APA formatting. Refer to the Publication Manual of the APA, sixth edition. Review the

various APA documents included in this course and the Chamberlain Care Student Success Strategies (CCSSS) that can help you with your writing.

Take advantage of the tutoring services that are available to Chamberlain students for free.
8. The length of the paper should be a maximum of 4–5 pages, excluding the title page and the reference page. There should only be one

small quote maximum in the paper. Citations should primarily include summary and restatement.

Taking into account the arguments against the creation of the President as defined in Article II of the US Constitution (consider opposition

found among Antifederalists such as Patrick Henry, those referenced in the Mansfield reading, and those addressed by Hamilton in Federalist 69),

on balance, would you conclude the early development* of the American President was in keeping with the republican values of the Framers of the

Constitution, or was it, on the contrary, suggestive of a movement away from those values?

*Washington-Jackson presidencies

Please answer in a five-page essay utilizing the readings provided for in class.
Due Tuesday, September 26 {please upload your essay to Sakai}

Government would be balanced constitutionally
No domestic policy
Checks and balances
Rights of the people would be protected
Provide examples from the reading
Asking you to provide arguments

Examples include:
While the presidency from w to different
Uphelp the republican values
Evidences include

Foreign policy, and war

Hamilton:
Madison:
Both value energe of government, hamilton articulates

does the early development of the American President was in keeping with the republican values of the Framers of the Constitution, or was it

suggestive of a movement away from those values?

Based on your learning team discussions, use Microsoft^® Outlook^® to draft responses to all four questions.

Include a response of at least 150 words for each question in a new message within Outlook^®.

• Question 1: I am thinking about purchasing and using Microsoft^® Outlook^® for my small business. Can you provide some insight and information as to how this can help me be more productive?

 

• Question 2: I have been trying to figure out how to organize my messages more efficiently. I just keep them in the inbox for now, but there are way too many and I can’t find older messages when I need to. Can you provide advice or tips on how to more appropriately organize my inbox?

 

• Question 3: When I start Outlook^® every day it takes so long to load. It goes through “Enabling Add-Ins” for at least 20 different programs. I can’t figure out how to get rid of some of these Add-Ins. Can you let me know? Also, can you think of anything else that might help speed up my Outlook^®?

 

 

• Question 4: At least twice per day, Outlook^® crashes at random times and I have to close/re-open it. Do you know what might be causing this or what I should check?

Place an appropriate subject in the e-mails.

Save each response as a separate e-mail in Outlook^® Message Format.