impact of electronic procurement practices on supply chain performance

Evaluating the impact of electronic procurement practices on supply chain performance:incorporating cost and risk associated with the system implementation
I want a UK writer to be assigned to this paper I want to work with the writer on chapter by chapter basis. References must be in Harvard style. For the methodology can request the writer to use mixed method (quantitative and qualitative) as my chosen methodology.

A digital alternative to traditional money

Cryptocurrency: A digital alternative to traditional money
1) Argue the author’s perspective on the business related topic utilizing recent scholarly resources to prove the thesis statement.
2) Prepare a professional quality written document describing key aspects of selected topics.
3) Effectively utilize research facilities, including physical and electronic library resources to identify valid
4) Properly cite information synthesized into the paper.

construction

Topic: construction
2 courseworks that are based on easy architectural stuff like revit and following the lecturers instructions. Also included would be an essay and some easy exercises.
Note: Not sure how many pages.
Uni website is here
https://blackboard.lsbu.ac.uk/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp
Username: maslahs
Password: smalsah1
once logged in go to My Courses/Modules
* EBB_5_140_1314: 13/14, Production Management & * EBB_5_150_1314: 13/14, Construction Planning are the once you need to click on.
Once there you can click assignment tab on the left. The relevant videos, site layouts, samples etc are all there.

Topic: Conceptual framework

Topic: 2nd Conceptual frameworkdiagramReview exercise 3.2 on page 70 of the PDF about conceptual frameworks. Create a second conceptual framework diagram for your study and think about the following questions:
Review exercise 3.2 on page 70 of the PDF about conceptual frameworks. Create a second conceptual framework diagram for your study and think about the following questions:
• Do both diagrams produce insight into what you think is going on with the variables in the study?
• Which diagram would be easier or more practical to test?
• Which diagram would fare better during testing? Why?
• What are the implications of both diagrams?
• Which diagram has implications more fitting of your study?
• Is it easy to distinguish between the diagrams?
• How could your study distinguish between the diagrams?

Familial defective Apolipoprotein B-100

Topic: Familial defective Apolipoprotein B-100
This order is specifically for writer ID 139234 PLEASE
I was informed by support department to put my order under the essay category.
Sources MUST be peer reviewed OR from original papers, NO WEBSITES AND NO BOOK.
I really preferred 2010,2011,2012,2013,2014 where possible.

Attached Files:
1-Sample from a student (contains several pages (scanned (jpg) (not word document), numbered with number and letter ex 1E, 2E … etc).
P stands for page No. for example p 2E means page number 2E.
2- A file called A Robust Strategy for Screning and Confirmation of Familal Defective… TTHIS file MUST be used as one SOURCE and TO be added with other sources (mainly use this source in addition to other sources.
I need my report structure to be in the same way as the sample structure (but not copying the same text, i.e. paraphrase every things, add new info (if required), new structure if you like but be close to this structure.

Steps: PLEASE KEEP THE SAMPLE INFRONT OF YOU AND FOLLOW THESE STEPS:
1- Introduction (see sample page 2E and do the same introduction (I mean same info but DIFFERENT SOURCES EXCEPT THE MAMOTTE SOURCE (A Robust Strategy for Screning and Confirmation of Familal Defective). And please be within the context of the sample introduction. Also you may need to extend some info ( Maximum of 3-4 lines) If you required.
2- Aim (p 2E) do it the same but with CAREFULL Paraphrasing.
1- Materials and methods (p 2E) do it in the same way as the sample BUT with CAREFULL Paraphrasing. And for the table in the same page, just draw the table (include only text, No numbers) (NO PARAPHRASE).
3- Week 2 (p 3E) (the FIRST 5 lines ) Just Paraphrase it carefully From the sample with taking care of the scientific words ex (B1/ARG … etc) not to be changed.
4- Week 2 (p 3E) (the next lines 6,7,8 and 9 (i.e starting with the word INITIALIAZATION ) Just copy it the same (NO PARAPHRASE).
5- Week 2 (p 3E) (the next lines 10,11,12 and 13 (i.e starting with The word AFTER) do it in the same way as the sample BUT with CAREFULL Paraphrasing

6- Figure 1 (p 3E) (the flow chart) Just copy it the same with changing the structure (I mean use circles instead of the squares or any things you suggest).

7- Week 3 (p 3E) do it in the same way as the sample BUT with CAREFULL Paraphrasing.

8- Results (p 3E) Just copy it the same (NO PARAPHRASE).
9- On page 4E , LEAVE blank space for figure 2, and just copy figure 2 key the same.
10- On page 4E ( the 4 line before the Discussion i.e from the line that starts with the words OUR OBTAINED) do it in the same way as the sample BUT with CAREFULL Paraphrasing.
11- DISCUSSION (THE MOST IMPORTANT PART (EQUAL 60%) (p 4E and p 5E) (NEED IT MORE STRONGER THAN THE SAMPLE ONE) here just see the sample and do it in the SAME way (WITH careful paraphrasing + paying attention to in text references (2 references ARE ENOUGH along with THE MAMOTTE SOURCE (A Robust Strategy for Screning and Confirmation of Familal Defective) which is the main source that must be used. And please the new reference/s should say the same info. i.e. LINKING FINDINGS TO INFO. Also please take care of the scientific words ex (pcr primer, bands, digestion … etc) not to be changed.
11- DISCUSSION (THE MOST IMPORTANT PART (EQUAL 60%) (p 4E and p 5E) (NEED IT MORE STRONGER THAN THE SAMPLE ONE) here just see the sample and do it in the SAME way (WITH careful paraphrasing + paying attention to in text references (2 references ARE ENOUGH along with THE MAMOTTE SOURCE (A Robust Strategy for Screning and Confirmation of Familal Defective) which is the main source that must be used. And please the new reference/s should say the same info. i.e. LINKING FINDINGS TO INFO. Also please take care of the scientific words ex (pcr primer, bands, digestion … etc) not to be changed.
12- References List (p 5E) Simply put your references (Please I need at least 6) Vancouver Style . i.e. You may use one from sample reference list. And please not to forget to use THE MAMOTTE SOURCE (A Robust Strategy for Screning and Confirmation of Familal Defective) along with other sources.

Familial defective Apolipoprotein B-100

Topic: Familial defective Apolipoprotein B-100
This order is specifically for writer ID 139234 PLEASE
I was informed by support department to put my order under the essay category.
Sources MUST be peer reviewed OR from original papers, NO WEBSITES AND NO BOOK.
I really preferred 2010,2011,2012,2013,2014 where possible.

PROBLEMATISING WRITE-UP

Topic: week7 assignment (PROBLEMATISING WRITE-UP)
please read the instructions and tell me what you have understand before starting , because this will save us time and avoid deviation from the main instructions .

A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE SUSTAINABILITY AND ETHICAL PERFORMANCE OF BRITISH PETROLEUM

A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE SUSTAINABILITY AND ETHICAL PERFORMANCE OF BRITISH PETROLEUM
MBA final assessment: Individual assignment
In order to determine your understanding of the theories and practices around sustainable and responsible business, you are tasked with analyzing the sustainability performance of a large multinational in the extractive industries, British Petroleum (BP). You will have to gather and study all available resources that could provide you with insight into their performance in the areas of sustainability and ethics, including their sustainability report, website resources, case material, and secondary academic analyses of their practices.for example have a look at these journals too(1.BRITISH PETROLEUM(A);DEFINING A STRATEGIC VISION,2, BP’S DEEP WATER DISASTER(A); OIL INDUSTRY’S VALUE CHAIN RISKS,3. BRITISH PETROLEUM (C) ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY?4. BRITISH PETROLEUM(B); THE DEEP WATER HORIZON EXPLOSION. BRITISH PETROLEUM(C); ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY? and BRITISH PETROLEUM’S CSR PRACTICES; A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OR GREEN WASHING?)RISKS,
In your assignment, please assess the sustainability and ethics performance of BP by critically evaluating the following:
1) BP’s approach and commitment to values
2) BP’s stakeholder engagement practices
3) BP’s commitment to ethical communication with stakeholders regarding their sustainability performance
4) Their leadership approach towards responsible and sustainable business
5) Their implementation strategies towards sustainable and responsible business across the value-chain
6) Those risk management and compliance strategies that pertain to ethics and sustainability
Structure of the assignment
1) Introduction: framing the paper’s main argument and providing conceptual clarification
– Theoretical framework: assess the main theories that you chose to apply and critically evaluate their contribution to assessing the case at hand
– Critical evaluation of each of the content areas mentioned above
3) Conclusion: a summary of BP’s strengths and weaknesses in the area of sustainability and ethics, and suggestions on how they might improve their performance in this area.
The main criteria upon which our assessment is based include:
• Critical analyses of and insight into the material we discussed
• Theoretical knowledge and understanding
• Application of theory to practical problem-solving
• Translating insights into new management systems and practices
• Further important stylistic factors include overall structure, argumentation flow, and editing.

Research table

Topic: Research table
To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the “Section B: Problem Description” assignment in Module 2. Appraise each resource using the “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists,” available in the textbook appendix or electronically on the textbook student resource CD-ROM. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.
Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the “Evaluation Table Template,” available in the textbook appendix. Use the “Evaluation Table Template” as an adaptable template.
Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:
1) Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2) Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3) Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Module 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Refer to “NUR 699 Literature Support Holistic Assessment.”
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section C: Literature Support for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
please use my last two orders if needed for details
NUR699.v10R.LiteratureSupportHolisticAssessment_Student.docx