topic 4

 
What are the necessary attributes of a leader in today’s health care environment? How can you acquire these attributes? (Two different references required per response)
Your responses should be substantive, scholarly and reflect your analysis, critical thinking, thoughts and opinions related to the topic. Resources should be used to support your response, and your posting should not be an analysis or report of the resource. Citations should be used to identify information from sources.
. may only use peer reviewed sources and web sites from professional organizations in scholarly writings as reference sources. All sources must be recent, within a 5 year time frame or are classic sources. you must use at least two different scholarly peer-reviewed journals.

Chef Alain Ducasse

Write a 250 word essay on Chef Alain Ducasse Due to the expanse of the area covered, it may be preferable to discuss one idea in depth, such as unique ingredients, the chef’s style or training and/or why the chef’s work is successful.

Developing an Evaluation Plan

 
Using 800-1,000 words, discuss methods to evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed solution and variables to be assessed when evaluating project outcomes.

Example: If you are proposing a new staffing matrix that is intended to reduce nurse turnover, improve nursing staff satisfaction, and positively impact overall delivery of care, you may decide the following methods and variables are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed solution:

Methods:

Survey of staff attitudes and contributors to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction before and after initiating change.
Obtain turnover rates before and after initiating change.
Compare patient discharge surveys before change and after initiation of change.

Variables:

Staff attitudes and perceptions.
Patient attitudes and perceptions.
Rate of nursing staff turnover.

Develop the tools necessary to educate project participants and to evaluate project outcomes (surveys, questionnaires, teaching materials, PowerPoint slides, etc.).

Refer to the “Topic 4: Checklist.”

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,

Characterization of the Plowman in Canterbury Tales

 
After reading the characterizations of the plowman, friar, and franklin (landowner) compare and contrast their personalities. Are they pleasing or unpleasing according to their social status? Class status? Do you feel they are stereotypical according to what you read in the “Historical Overview”? Does your reading of the plowman add or take away from your perspectives of a farmer or farming?

Use specific examples from the texts you read and previous discussions as evidence. Quote, paraphrase, summarize, and cite appropriate. This link on OWL Purdue gives additional formatting information Link

Your first original post should be submitted before 10:00 p.m. on Wednesday. Your response to classmates’ posts should be completed before 10:00 p.m. on Sunday. NOTE: Canvas will give you notification that the due date is Wednesday as a reminder, but please continue discussing the topic with your classmates through Sunday evening.

Ways to participate:

Ask interesting, thoughtful questions pertaining to the topic
Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the teacher
Provide extensive additional information on the topic
Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
Share an applicable personal experience
Provide an outside source (for example, a website) that is pertinent to the topic
Make an argument concerning the topic
Grading:

Grading will be based on the same rubric as posts on your blog. You should develop original, complex ideas that go beyond surface reading (we’ve all read the same thing, so a simple review is not what I’m looking for).

Introduce fresh material, This may require additional research.
Properly cite your sources at the end of post Link
Each post should be written as a complete thought.
Identify your topic
Narrow the topic by telling your audience your point of view on a specific point
Show your audience what you mean by offering evidence
Conclude
A good test of whether or not it is a complete thought is if you can remove it from the discussion and have it still make sense
Responses to classmates’ posts should always have a “because” clause
Use appropriate netiquette. Nobody should feel attacked Link
Discussion Rubric
Participation – original post 3
Research – introduces fresh material 3
Discussion – responds to at least one classmate’s post 2
Writing Mechanics – free of errors 2
Submission:

Typing on the discussion board automatically shows up as your submission, so additional submission is not required.

HRM Human

 
“Illustrating your analysis with examples, including
those from the course syllabus, examples raised
in the seminar discussions, and examples from
your own organisation or one known to you…
discuss the role of human resource
management (HRM) in organisations…
and critically review the link between HRM and
wider organisational strategy.” We are studying BMW as well, I think we can use this as wider organization.

Trust law

Can you please focus on 3 certainties, power of appointment, self appoint trustee, formalities of trust and constitution of trust. (especially on three certainties) I will upload the relevant lecture notes to you as well, please have a reference on it. Last, please also use cases to references the answer please.

course work

 

Part 1

For each of the variables listed below, you must 1) determine the level of measurement and 2) say whether it is categorical or continuous:

a) the amount of resistance a suspect displays toward the police, measured as not resistant, somewhat resistant, very resistant

b) the number of times someone has shoplifted in his/her life

c) the number of times someone has shoplifted, measured as 0-2, 3-5, 6 or more.

d) in a sample of juvenile delinquents, whether or not those juveniles have substance abuse disorders

e) the type of attorney a defendant has at trial, measured as privately retained or publicly funded

f) a prosecutor’s filing decisions, measured as filed charges and did not file charges

g) in a sample of offenders sentenced to prison, the number of days in their sentences.

Part 2

Below are two research scenarios. For each scenario, answer the three questions below

1. A researcher wishes to test the hypothesis that arrest deters recidivism. She gathers a sample of people who have been arrested.

a) what is the independent variable?

b) what is the dependent variable?

c) what is the unit of analysis?

2. A researcher wishes to test the hypothesis that prison architecture design affects the number of inmate-on-inmate assaults that take place inside a facility. He gathers a sample of prisons across the United States.

a) what is the independent variable?

b) what is the dependent variable?

c) what is the unit of analysis?

: Critiquing a Psychology Statistics Article

 
The statistics you critique in the article must have been covered in class before the end of the semester. These include, but are not limited to: correlations, binominal distribution/inference, regression, z-‐‐test, t-‐‐test, and ANOVA. You should NOT select an article that uses parameter estimation(e.g., 30% of women experience a depressive episode during their lifetime)or meta-‐‐analysis (a paper analyzing lots of previous experiments)! You want an article that uses any other design and/or statistic.

DO NOT QUOTE from your news article. You should be able to summarize what the article is saying using your own words and then CITING the article.

FINAL PAPER GUIDELINES

These are general guidelines and are meant to GUIDE you, not dictate you. You should follow these guidelines but also feel free to write additional sections as needed for clarity. Please be concise and do not ramble, but make sure to provide a detailed description of the methods and data analysis. A sample paper is on Canvas under Files/Final Paper Information.
1. Papers should be 4-‐‐7 pages long, double-‐‐spaced (with no additional spaces before/after paragraphs), in Times New Roman size 12 font with 1-‐‐inch margins. This page limit does not include the title or reference pages. The format should follow APA style. If you have questions about APA style please see the above links and, if you still have questions, post questions to the discussion board. A large proportion of your grade (~10%) will be based on
APA format.
2. You should be writing about the news article only, you should not find and summarize the research article on which the news article is reporting.
3. You should not quote from your news article – use your own words and be very careful to ensure you are using your own words so no plagiarism occurs. Do not take the news article report and change a couple of words, truly summarize in your own words.
4. Your paper must include the following sections and answers to the following questions (you may use appropriately formatted APA headings to separate these sections if you desire):
a. Title Page (see APA resources above for proper formatting)i. Title your paper: A Critique of “_________________________________” (name of the article you are critiquing goes in quotation marks)
b. Summary
i. Introduce the article topic ii. Identify what the articles goal appeared to be iii. Identify the research question or hypothesis iv. What was the design? (e.g. experimental, etc.) v. Were there independent/dependent or predictor/criterion variables? Why or why not? If yes, specify which variables are independent/dependent or predictor/criterion vi. Who was the population? vii. What was the sampling strategy? viii. What was the sample? ix. How were the abstract ideas of interest measured? x. In brief, what conclusion did the author of the article draw? xi. More things possible!
*If the article does not explicitly identify any of the things listed above, you are responsible to either 1) infer what you think it is given the limited information and state how you made that inference and/or 2) state what the appropriate item (sampling procedure, sample, etc.) should be given the question of interest.
c. Discuss the statistics used or implied in the article i. Provide the correct name for the statistic(s) employed ii. Define the statistic(s) employed. Generally, what information does this statistic(s) provide? What information does it not
provide? (e.g. correlation tells you a relationship, not causation)

d. Discuss what the article did well i. This can be theory-‐‐building, design, sampling, measurement, selection ofstatistics, interpretation, journalistic goals, etc.
e. Discuss what the article did not do well i. This can be theory-‐‐building, design, sampling, measurement, selection of statistics, possible biases, interpretation, journalist
goals, etc.

f. References (see APA resources above for proper formatting)
g. Copy of your news article (paste from print view to omit pictures