Write a 825-word minimum internal environmental analysis about Amazon

Write a 825-word minimum internal environmental analysis in which you include the following:

Assess the organization’s internal environment.
Identify the most important strengths and weaknesses of your organization including an assessment of the organization’s resources.
Identify the most important internal environmental factors in the general, industry, and external analysis in relation to the internal analysis.
Perform competitor analysis.
Assess the structure of the organization and the influence this has on its performance.
Determine the organization’s competitive position and the possibilities this provides.
Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Support your assessments with authoritative research using the UOPX Library. Include a minimum of two authoritative references. Remember all references should be included in the body of your paper as in-text citations.

Process and Quality Management

Refer to the Tri-State National Bank – Assessing Strategic Challenges and Advantages case on page 246 of the course textbook. After reading this case answer the following questions:

What steps might the bank take to leverage its strategic challenges and address its strategic advantages? (40 points)
How should the bank incorporate these issues into differentiation strategies and action plans? (40 points)
How does this issue of quality affect the bank? (20 points)
When answering the above questions, remember to elaborate, expand upon, and support your thoughts.

PERSONAL STATEMENT PHARMACY

Please change wording I used someone’s else essay as a template. PLEASE, no plagiarism this is important. Make it thought provoking and unique please.
I have attached the template I used, please change the wording from “my personal statement” that I used from the template
This essay mostly just needs paraphasing and re-writing, if additional information is needed please reach out
***Your Personal Essay should address why you selected pharmacy as a career and how the Doctor of Pharmacy degree relates to your immediate and long-term professional goals. Describe how your personal, educational, and professional background will help you achieve your goals.

Organizational Knowledge, Creativity and Innovation

1. Literature review (articles)
Ch2 exploring problems
Ch4 building up willpower
Ch5 self-awareness

2. Focus area of study (& challenges)
i. Marketing (Promotion)
ii. HR (請教練, 行銷人員)
iii. Technologies (如何用新科技結合做gym)
3. Knowledge Management:

4. Conclusions

There are the missing part, we just only do Ch5, self awareness of part one and the part 4 conclusion.

REALISM IN CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TEJU COLE’S EVERY DAY IS FOR THE THIEF AND CLAUDIA RANKINE’S CITIZEN: AN AMERICAN LYRIC

i want to do a comparative textual study of the realistic events going on in our contemporary world to do which is brought to bare in the two texts. however, i don’t have enough money for the two books or the complete paper so i would like the writer to help me with only Rankine’s poetry. the writer should do a thematic study of the Citizen book and point out the real life events that are portrayed in the text. i would like the writer to give me a good introduction of the whole essay though…by adding a scholarly definition to realism or literary realism

Developing a Health Advocacy Campaign

Application: Developing a Health Advocacy Campaign
To be an effective advocate and to develop a successful health advocacy campaign, you must have a clear idea of the goals of your campaign program and be able to communicate those goals to others. In addition, it is the nature of nurses to want to help, but it is important to make sure that the vision you develop is manageable in size and scope. By researching what others have done, you will better appreciate what can realistically be accomplished. It is also wise to determine if others have similar goals and to work with these people to form strategic partnerships. If you begin your planning with a strong idea of your resources, assets, and capabilities, you will be much more likely to succeed and truly make a difference with those you hope to help.
Over the next 3 weeks, you will develop a 9- to 12-page paper that outlines a health advocacy campaign designed to promote policies to improve the health of a population of your choice. This week, you will establish the framework for your campaign by identifying a population health concern of interest to you. You will then provide an overview of how you would approach advocating for this issue. In Week 9, you will consider legal and regulatory factors that have an impact on the issue and finally, in Week 10, you will identify ethical concerns that you could face as an advocate. Specific details for each aspect of this paper are provided each week. The Final Paper will be due in Week 10. This paper will serve as the Portfolio Application for the course.
Before you begin, review the complete Assignment.
This week, begin developing your health advocacy campaign by focusing on the following:
Week 10 Application
To prepare for this final portion of your paper:
• Review provisions 7, 8, and 9 of the ANA Code of Ethics in relation to advocacy for population health.
• Reflect on the ethical considerations you may need to take into account in your advocacy campaign.
• Research the ethical considerations and lobbying laws relevant to the location where your advocacy campaign will occur.
• Consider potential ethical dilemmas you might face in your campaign.
To complete: Revise and combine parts one and two of you previous papers (dissertations) and add the following:
• Explain any ethical dilemmas that could arise during your advocacy campaign, and how you would resolve them.
• Describe the ethics and lobbying laws that are applicable to your advocacy campaign.
• Evaluate the special ethical challenges that are unique to the population you are addressing.
• Provide a cohesive summary for your paper.
Reminder: You will submit one cogent paper that combines the previous applications (Parts One and Two) plus the new material.
Your paper should be about 10 pages of content, not including the title page and references. Be sure to paste the rubric at the end of your paper. (NOTE: PLEASE HAVE THE SAME WRITER WHO WROTE PART 1 AND PARY 2 OF MY DISSERTATION. I ATTACHED BOTH FILES AS REFERENCE)

“Project to support the fight against the major problems preventing refugees from restarting their lives and become self-reliant in San Diego, California.”

This research paper should be a Grant Application with a specific budget, timeframe, and everything a project can have. I will submit more information as the work continues.
Suggested project title:
“Project to support the fight against the major problems preventing refugees from restarting their lives and become self-reliant in San Diego, California.”
Office space:
At least 12,000sqft @$1.35/sqft
Material needs would be:
– Van for transportation
– Office equipment
– Office supplies
– Hangers for ware house
– Racks for ware house
– Educational materials
Project team:
1. Project Director FT Employed @$45/hr
2. Project Coordinator FTE @$30/hr
3. Case Managers FT employed @$15/hr
4. ESL teacher helpers PT employed @$13/hr
5. Warehouse attendant & office cleaner FT employed @12/hr
Activities:
– English as a Second Language (ESL). The approach is to use a native speaker with a teacher helper who speaks the same language as the clients (refugees).
– Mental Health (senior refugee support, Young girls’ sports and exhibition events, Young boys sports, etc.- to fight trauma, anxiety, stress, PTSD…)
– Interpreters training (with a focus on languages with 2 different dialects)
– Job search
– Job readiness
– Resume building
– Certified Nurse Assistance (CAN) class scholarships (to help men and women work at high rate)
– Computer literacy
– Driver’s permit and driver’s license guidance
Project duration:
1 year (renewable after final & project closure evaluation report evaluation).
Other items to budget:
Gift cards for incentives for seniors and youth
Utilities
Telecommunication costs
Office insurance
Mileage reimbursement
Travel
Promotional materials

case study

Please read the case and focusing on everything our text has said, as well as any other applicable source material give a well reasoned answer as to what should be done.

Please write at least one page, no more than two. Are there any laws that are applicable? Who will benefit and who will be hurt by the decision? If a practice is accepted in another culture, should it be acceptable to us when we do business, or work, or live in that culture?

The following case is for your ethical enjoyment…

The room was already packed when Liu Peijin walked in. His flight from Shanghai to Chongqing had been delayed, and he had fretted about missing the training. But fortunately he’d gotten there in time. Liu knew his presence was important. As the president of Almond China, he wanted to show his Chongqing colleagues how much he cared about the topic under discussion: ethical business practices.

Taking his seat, Liu nodded at the head of HR, who was running the training. The two went way back: Both had been with their German parent company, Almond Chemical, since 1999, when it first established operations in China. Since then Almond China had set up two joint ventures with local partners—the only way foreigners could do business in chemicals in the country. Almond controlled 70% of the stock in one of them. The other was a venture with Chongqing No. 2 Chemical Company, in which Almond had a 51% stake and the Chinese directors were very active.

Liu sat next to Wang Zhibao, the vice president in charge of sales for the Chongqing joint venture. Wang looked skeptical. He was good at his job, having closed several key deals that had kept the business afloat during its early years. But he was also at the center of a conflict between the venture partners: The Chongqing executives were increasingly vocal about how difficult it was to operate according to European standards, particularly the rules against gifts and commissions. Such incentives were commonly accepted in China and routinely employed by Almond’s competitors. Trying to do business without them, Wang argued, was foolhardy. “This is China, not Europe,” was his refrain.

But the line between these practices and breaking the law was a fine one. Almond was headquartered in Munich and listed on the New York Stock Exchange as well as the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, meaning it was required to adhere to the U.S. government’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which specifically forbade the bribing of foreign government officials by U.S.-listed companies.

Liu kept an eye on Wang as the HR director explained Almond’s ethics regulations and the legal consequences of business bribery. Liu knew the rules made sales more difficult, but Almond’s policy was clear, and he wanted to make sure that every member of the sales team understood it.

He had taken the same hard line on safety and environmental practices. The production facilities in Chongqing had been built according to German national standards, and all the safety equipment—helmets, shoes, and protective clothing—had come from Europe. The Chinese partners had called these investments “wasteful” and “frivolous”—“luxurious expenditures” that the young venture couldn’t, and shouldn’t, afford. But, with backing from the head office, Liu had stood firm. Similarly, he’d insisted that the factory’s MDI (methylene diphenyl diisocyanate) waste be treated as a dangerous substance and processed with a special cleaning agent, in accordance with European standards, even though Chinese law didn’t mandate it. His partners had been dismayed at the millions of yuan this would cost. But Liu refused to compromise, because he had witnessed the consequences of lesser standards firsthand. Years before, when he was working for another Chinese chemical company, an affiliate’s chlor-alkali plant had suffered an explosion, injuring 200 staff members and residents of the surrounding area and halting production for more than a month.

The training was reaching its end, and the HR director signaled to Liu that it was his turn to speak. Liu hesitated slightly as he looked at his Chongqing colleagues. “At Almond, ethics are nonnegotiable,” he said. “We need to remember these laws as we go about our business. We are not just a Chinese company; we’re a global one.” Solemn, blank faces stared back at him.

As he left the room, he couldn’t help feeling that his remarks had fallen on deaf ears.

“We Cannot Concede”
Two weeks later, Liu was back in Chongqing for the second-quarter board meeting. As he walked into the lobby of the Hilton, he ran into George Ho, the finance director for the joint venture. Ho looked flustered.

“Are you all right?” Liu asked in English. Ho was from Hong Kong and didn’t speak fluent Chinese. He held a unique position: He reported to the general manager of the joint venture but also to the finance director at Shanghai headquarters.

“I’m worried about this meeting, Liu,” Ho said. “I had a disturbing conversation with Wang last week.”

Liu nodded, not surprised.

Ho continued. “Wang is close to making a huge sale—30 million yuan—but the customer’s purchasing manager is insisting on a 1% commission. He says that’s what he’s being offered by other companies.”

“We can’t do that,” Liu said.

“That’s what I said. But Wang was insistent. He said that if we can’t do that, we should at least be able to offer the manager a trip to Europe, a visit to Almond headquarters.”

“What did you say to that?” Liu asked.

“No—of course,” Ho replied. “But he accused me of jeopardizing the venture. He said that we ‘foreigners’ have so much money, we don’t care about the performance of the business.”

“You did the only thing you could do,” Liu said.

“I can’t believe Wang thought that suggestion would fly, especially after the training,” Ho said. He walked down the hall toward the boardroom. Liu followed.

The meeting had barely begun when Chen Dong, the chairman of the joint venture and a Chongqing No. 2 Chemical executive, raised the commission issue. (His leadership position was one of the many concessions Almond had made to lure his company into the joint venture.)

That was fast, Liu thought. He sat quietly while Dolf Schulman, the vice chairman of the venture and Almond Chemical’s senior vice president of business development, fielded the question.

“Chen, we cannot concede on these issues,” Schulman said. “There are no exceptions to be made. Almond must be a law-abiding corporate citizen—as should every Almond employee.”

Ho looked up and nodded at Liu. But Chen was not ready to end the discussion. “To the best of my knowledge,” he said, “many foreign-owned companies reward Chinese customers for their business. Some companies organize overseas visits, some provide management training, some arrange golf outings. This is good business practice in China. We need to be flexible in order to compete. If we can’t provide the commission, let’s at least consider a visit to Munich headquarters.”

This was typical behavior for Chen. He had a tendency to develop very strong opinions but keep them to himself until the board met. Schulman waited for the translator to finish; then he hesitated, trying to come up with a suitable response. Liu knew he needed help.

“Commission or trips, it’s all the same thing: business bribery,” Liu said. “We can get orders without these tactics.”

Chen picked up the Q2 financial statement that had been distributed at the beginning of the meeting and said, “Orders? What orders? We made only 60% of our target for this quarter. When we set up this joint venture, we assigned our very best people to it—our best technicians, best salespeople, best managers. Why? Because we believed we could manufacture some of the best chemical products in the world and, in turn, get more orders. But look at this.” He threw the statement down on the table. “Our performance is sinking fast. This joint venture has done nothing but hurt us. We have yet to see any return at all.”

Chen paused to let the translator catch up but then thought better of it. “All you do is make us spend, spend, spend—on German goggles, unnecessary waste processing, and ridiculously high salaries.” He turned to Ho, who looked bewildered. “And now I hear rumors that you are planning to launch SAP’s ERP software to synchronize with headquarters. When will the spending stop?”

Chen continued, his voice rising. “We need a tighter control on costs. We can’t possibly meet our profitability target when our expenses are so high. We want to choose the finance director going forward, so we can give this venture a real chance at succeeding. We see no other option.”

He sat back in his chair and crossed his arms. Schulman was squirming in his seat. Ho was pale with shock. Liu wasn’t sure what to say. He was astonished that Chen had brought up the safety standards—he’d thought that issue was settled long ago—and astounded by the slap at Ho. But he needed backup if he was going to oppose the joint venture’s chairman.

Finally Schulman spoke. “Chen, thank you for being honest about your concerns,” he said. “At this point I think all these issues are still open for discussion.”

Liu almost choked. What was Schulman thinking? Seeing Liu’s expression, Schulman looked at his watch and said, “Should we take a 15-minute break?” With that, he stood up.

“This Venture Is Critical”
As Liu walked out of the room, Schulman grabbed his elbow and steered him toward a smaller meeting room down the hall. Once the door was closed, Schulman’s shoulders slumped.

“Liu, what should we do?” he asked. “Do you think we should concede to these demands? This venture is critical for us—you know that.”

Liu did understand how high the stakes were. China accounted for only 3% of Almond’s current business, but the company was depending on the country for future growth. The Chongqing operation was supposed to prove that Almond could expand further in China, and the company was already planning additional acquisitions. But Liu was shocked that Schulman would even consider bending the company’s standards regarding ethics and safety.

“We need to stand strong,” Liu said, “not give in.” He was thinking about Almond’s reputation as well as the future in China. He had joined the century-old German company not only because it boasted the world’s leading chemical-production technology, but also because of its values, management approach, and safety ethic, which he’d hoped would serve as a model for Chinese industry.

“But we shouldn’t annoy them,” Schulman said. “We need Chen. And he’s right about the numbers. We could be in trouble without Wang’s sale. Besides, where do we draw the line? Is a golf game bribery? We do that in Germany all the time.”

Liu realized that Schulman wasn’t asking for his opinion. He was asking for permission to give in. Suddenly Liu felt like a kid stuck between two warring parents. The break time was almost up. They needed to get back to the meeting and respond to Chen’s demands.

Comparative Analysis of human rights protection based on Diodorus’s texts and the Kurukan Faga Charter

Using up to 1,500 words, make a critical comparative analysis of human rights protection based on Diodorus’s texts and the Kurukan Faga Charter. Highlight in particular the elements of convergence and divergence of the two texts as regards the protection of human rights in ancient Africa.
Must incorporate these to sources:
Diodorus Silicus, Book I (61-85), available online at: ,

SIRIMAN KOUYATE, THE CHARTER OF KURUKAN FUGA, available online at: ,

Smoking cessation education among the adult and geriatriic population in a primary care clinic

Discussion Question:

Answer both of the following questions honestly and professionally:

1. Discuss the factors and approach you will use to develop a professional partnership with your selected site ” in primary care clinic”.

2. What is the importance of collaborating with other healthcare professionals in order to establish trusting relationships to gain commitment for mobilizing health initiatives?

Need two scholarly source.