Place an order for a custom essay, research paper on this or related subject.
The atrocities committed by some of the Iraq warlords are worth thorough punishment both from the Iraqi government and the international community. Nonetheless, these punishments should be meted on convicted prisoners and not all the suspects. The alleged torture of the Iraqi suspects by the United States soldiers is far from believable. Whereas the United States is believed to be one of the countries that uphold in high esteem the rule of law, it is ironically and scenically perpetuating this impunity.
The humiliation of the prisoners so as to give the required information is far from the legal. The argument that the United States troops humiliated the prisoners to get intelligence information from the prisoners elicits many queries than answers on the role of the United States in upholding the rule of law and the protection of human rights. Natural justice does dictate that suspects are innocent until prove guilty; torturing persons that innocent is adamant violation of human rights and should refuted forthwith.
Discussion: US Torture Techniques in Iraq
The United Nations convention does not allow the torture of suspects. Neither does the convention allow the torture of prisoners outside the stipulated punishment. However, it is absurd that the United States which is a signatory of this convention’s ratification allows under its watch he torture of suspects or alleged victims. Green (Green 2005) argues that suspects are expected to enjoy the human rights without any violation. The dispatch by some of the media that the Iraqi suspects were not allowed sufficient time for sleep leaves much to be desired.
The alleged secret jail abuse is a gross violation of he rights of the suspects (Coleman 2009). The torture in Al Muthanna airbase where the Muslim suspects were forced to using the Koran as their toilet paper denied the suspects their right to services and subsequently their right to practice their religious doctrines. The detainee’s allegation that they were tortured hours on end by the united states troops calls for the review of the UN policy on terror suspects (ACLU 2005).
The existence of alleged secret jails created by the United States in itself was utter disregard of the expectation of the United Nations convention. Whereas the idea of fighting terrorism was such a noble idea, the war was expected to be fought openly and in consultation of the United Nations Security Council. The allegation that the United States created these jails without the knowledge of this noble international institution shows gross egotism.
Linday (Linday 2009) states that the inflection of cigarettes on suspects was not only inhuman but against the rights on the suspects as provided in the United Nations convention. The rounding of the suspects by very many American troops shows the shear violation of the rights of the suspects. The victims were rounded to the level of death. Similarly, according to Green (Green 2005) prisoners are entitled to the human rights like any other human being. The fact that prisoners in Iraq were provided with hoods made from sandbag sacking is in utter disregard of human rights.
If the secret documents accessed provide any basis for any discourse, it is evident that the conditions that the suspects went through were beyond the entitlement of any suspect, and in accordance with the UN Convention. Taking the example of female American soldiers who were allegedly allowed to have their menstrual blood streamed into the water used Muslim suspects, denied the suspects their rights to practice their religious doctrines. This is against the provisions of the United Nations convention; suspects are expected to enjoy their rights and practice their doctrines without denial.
The sodomizing and raping of the suspects as have been shown in the international media shows the denial of the human rights of the suspects (Ross B., & Esposito 2005). In some cases the media shows that some of the suspects had their fingernails removed and sometimes electrocuted. Ideally, these tortures showed the indignity of the American troops to the human rights of the suspects. Some of the torture cases were extremely serious to the extent of causing death.
The fact that some of the torture allegations were rubbished without any investigation by the United States troops shows that the torture cases reported were not a mistake but were understood in the high offices. As a nation according to ACLU (ACLU, 2005) that upholds human rights with immense seriousness, the adamant disregard of the allegations showed that the Bush government was ideally behind this torture cases. The reference to the torture by the bush government to the torture as interrogation technique simply meant Bush’s government had prescribed and perhaps approved these human indignities.
The uproar (Sigmund 2006) on the existence of suspect torture within the American camps should have raised sufficient concern for the American government. This international concern should have sufficiently proved to the US government that this much smoke was evidencing the existence of fire. Subsequent, if the American government’s concern was not belated, then it should have gone ahead to investigate this claims.
The criticism from both the Chinese and the British government equally raised sufficient concern for attention by the Bush government (Ross B., & Esposito, 2005). Given that these were key players in the declaration of the war in Iraq, their concerns should have been given some attention, albeit not much, by the Bush government. Similarly the international relations and the legal implication of these allegations should have been given due consideration in rubbishing the torture claims.
The foregoing discussion shows that the Bush government was in favor of the torture activities that had become a rampant thing in camps of the American soldiers. As the custodian of the human rights, the Bush government ought not to have shown its inclinations towards the support for the torture activities in Iraq. This support can be ardently seen in the defense he openly shows for the water boarding as a way of torture, ironically asserting that it did assist in saving lives. Bush shows that this technique had ideally been approved by his office.
The revelation that the CIA had destroyed the allegation tapes equally raised sufficient eyebrows. In a government that is held in high esteem of human rights protection, this was not expected. The subsequently stopping of the investigation that were going on concerning the torture was equal proof that the bush government had the least interest, if any, on upholding the rule of law in the Iraq.